7种木塑材料墙体的热工性能分析

董升忠; 王美燕; 孙钢强; 杨飞; 章益梁; 许少春; 吴杭冬; 周瞿龙

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

7种木塑材料墙体的热工性能分析

董升忠 , 王美燕 , 孙钢强 , 杨飞 , 章益梁 , 许少春 , 吴杭冬 , 周瞿龙

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2011 > 28(6): 931-936

董升忠, 王美燕, 孙钢强, 杨飞, 章益梁, 许少春, 吴杭冬, 周瞿龙. 7种木塑材料墙体的热工性能分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(6): 931-936. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

引用本文:

DONG Sheng-zhong, WANG Mei-yan, SUN Gang-qiang, YANG Fei, ZHANG Yi-liang, XU Shao-chun, WU Hang-dong, ZHOU Qu-long. Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite （WPC） walls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 931-936. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

Citation:

DONG Sheng-zhong, WANG Mei-yan, SUN Gang-qiang, YANG Fei, ZHANG Yi-liang, XU Shao-chun, WU Hang-dong, ZHOU Qu-long. Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite （WPC） walls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 931-936. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

7种木塑材料墙体的热工性能分析

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

1.
浙江农林大学基建处，浙江临安 311300;
2.
浙江农林大学园林与建筑学院，浙江临安 311300

详细信息

通信作者: 王美燕

Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite （WPC） walls

1.
Infrastructure Maintenance Department，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;
2.
School of Landscape Architecture，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China

摘要: 木塑材料具有良好的装饰性、加工安装性能和物理力学性能，经济环保，是近年来新兴的一种新型材料。运用热流计法，测量了5种木塑复合墙体和2种木塑单一板材墙体的传热系数，参照JGJ134－2010《夏热冬冷地区居住建筑节能设计标准》的要求，得出以下结论：①普通砖墙（10 mm厚水泥砂浆＋240 mm厚实心黏土砖＋10 mm厚水泥砂浆）已不能满足新规范的热工要求。②当建筑的体型系数0.4时，4种复合墙体都能满足规范要求。当体型系数＞0.4时，试件2（普通砖墙＋40 mm厚木塑龙骨＋20 mm厚木塑板）不能满足规范要求；试件3（普通砖墙＋40 mm厚木塑龙骨＋外喷25 mm厚发泡聚氨酯＋20 mm厚木塑板）、试件4（普通砖墙＋40 mm厚木塑龙骨＋30 mm厚木塑板，内填发泡聚氨酯）、试件5（普通砖墙＋20 mm厚木塑龙骨＋60 mm厚木塑板，内填发泡聚氨酯）均能满足规范要求。③试件3的传热系数最小，热工性能最好，构造最经济合理。④单一板墙比复合墙体厚度薄、自重轻，保温性能较高，更适合用作隔墙。60 mm厚单一板墙即可满足内隔墙的最低热工要求。120 mm厚单一板墙可满足外墙的热工要求。图3表3参10
- 木塑复合材料 /
- 传热系数 /
- 热流计法 /
- 复合墙体 /
- 单一板墙
Abstract: Wood-plastic composites （WPCs），in regards to ornamentation，processing，installation，and physical and mechanical performance，have favorable energy efficiency qualities for residential buildings. To analyze newly developed residential building materials，a heat flow meter method was used to measure the heat transmission coefficient of five walls：［W1. common brick wall （CBW）（10 mm cement mortar+240 mm common brick + 10 mm cement mortar）；W2.（CBW+40 mm WPC keel+20 mm WPC board）；W3.（CBW+40 mm WPC keel+25 mm polyurethane foam sprayed on the WPC board+20 mm WPC board）；W4.（CBW+40 mm WPC keel+30 mm WPC board filled with polyurethane foam）；and W5.（CBW+20 mm WPC keel+60 mm WPC board filled with polyurethane foam）］ and two kinds of single-material walls：［60 and 120 mm single-material boards （SMBs）］. These walls were compared with reference to design standard （JGJ 134－2010） for energy efficiency of residential buildings in hot summer and cold winter zones. Results showed that：（1）W1 did not meet the new thermal specification requirements. （2）When the building shape coefficient was0.4，all four composite walls （W2-W5） met requirements. However，when the building shape coefficient was＞0.4，W2 did not meet requirements，whereas W3-W5 did. （3）W3 had the minimum heat transmission coefficient and best thermal performance with the most inexpensive and most rational structure. （4）Compared with composite walls，single-material walls were thin and light weight with high thermal insulation performance. The 60 mm SMBs met the lowest thermal technology requirement for the inner partition wall, and the 120 mm SMBs met the thermal technology requirement for the outer wall. Thus，single-material walls were more suitable for use as partition walls. ［Ch, 3 fig. 3 tab. 10 ref.］
- wood-plastic composites /
- heat transmission coefficient /
- heat flow meter method /
- composite wall /
- single-material wall

[1]	胡渊渊, 鲍俊俊, 蔡晓郡, 周小妹, 杨大鹏, 宋丽丽. 纳米复合膜对香榧坚果储藏过程中油脂品质的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240177
[2]	刘子昕, 王琦, 闫承琳, 王鑫旭, 李晓旭. 木塑复合材料3DP设备微滴喷射过程仿真及关键参数 . 浙江农林大学学报, doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230511
[3]	张斌, 马星霞, 张景朋, 蒋明亮. 含石蜡水基型有机木材保护复合制剂的性能研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(2): 423-429. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210264
[4]	史航, 李兵, 郭建忠. 功能化枝状复合吸附材料的制备及吸附Cr(Ⅵ)的性能 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(2): 396-404. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200119
[5]	杜珂珂, 雍宬, 孙恩惠, 黄红英, 曲萍, 徐跃定, 陈玲, 孙倩, 关明杰. 生物预处理秸秆纤维特性及复合材料的性能研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(4): 869-875. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210647
[6]	徐斌, 王恒旭, 陆杰, 傅深渊, 戴进峰. 重组竹/玻纤/PET泡沫复合多层结构保温板制备及性能评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(2): 396-402. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200330
[7]	王珏, 郭明, 孙立苹. 磁性海藻酸钠复合凝胶球的制备及对铅离子的吸附性能 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(6): 1112-1119. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190751
[8]	查瑶, 饶俊, 关莹, 张利萍, 高慧. 竹叶/HDPE复合材料的制备及性能 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(2): 343-349. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.02.020
[9]	俞友明, 王聪, 蔡智勇, 卢克阳. 铝-木复合材料抗弯性能预测与分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.01.001
[10]	方露, 王正, 熊先青. 热压温度对硅烷化木单板/聚乙烯薄膜复合材料性能的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(3): 483-488. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.03.016
[11]	李慧媛, 周定国, 吴清林. 硼酸锌/紫外光稳定剂复配对高密度聚乙烯基木塑 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(6): 914-918. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.06.014
[12]	胡晗, 吴章康, 王云, 关成, 黄伟. 3种木塑复合材料的耐老化性能比较 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(1): 117-121. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.01.018
[13]	顾晓艳, 孟明浩, 俞益武. 休闲观光农业与户外运动的复合开发策略及实证研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(1): 104-110. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.01.018
[14]	王志强, 季雪平, 卢晓宁, 朱林. 强化复合地板刚度预测 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(5): 646-650. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.05.002
[15]	程大莉, 蒋身学, 张齐生. 二氧化钛/竹炭复合材料的吸附-光催化降解苯酚的动力学研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(2): 205-209. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.02.007
[16]	王泉中, 张晓冬, 周雪华. 湿效应对竹木复合材料刚度性能的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(4): 591-594. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.04.019
[17]	路则光, 申利明, 黄河浪, 杨启勇, 薛丽丹, 李毅. 单板划刀痕对多层实木复合地板漆膜质量的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(4): 468-471.
[18]	金永明, 钱俊, 楼坚强, 俞友明, 叶良明. 用PSL 法生产细木工芯板 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2003, 20(1): 5-7.
[19]	傅深渊, 于红卫, 槐敏, 吕健全. 复合淀粉胶的制备及在胶合板上的应用 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2002, 19(3): 269-272.
[20]	马灵飞, 杨云芳, 许英超. 木塑复合材性能的研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1996, 13(1): 104-108.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2011/6/931

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3658
HTML全文浏览量: 274
PDF下载量: 1110
被引次数: 0

7种木塑材料墙体的热工性能分析

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

1. 浙江农林大学基建处，浙江临安 311300;

2. 浙江农林大学园林与建筑学院，浙江临安 311300

通信作者: 王美燕

刊出日期: 2011-12-20

关键词:

摘要: 木塑材料具有良好的装饰性、加工安装性能和物理力学性能，经济环保，是近年来新兴的一种新型材料。运用热流计法，测量了5种木塑复合墙体和2种木塑单一板材墙体的传热系数，参照JGJ134－2010《夏热冬冷地区居住建筑节能设计标准》的要求，得出以下结论：①普通砖墙（10 mm厚水泥砂浆＋240 mm厚实心黏土砖＋10 mm厚水泥砂浆）已不能满足新规范的热工要求。②当建筑的体型系数0.4时，4种复合墙体都能满足规范要求。当体型系数＞0.4时，试件2（普通砖墙＋40 mm厚木塑龙骨＋20 mm厚木塑板）不能满足规范要求；试件3（普通砖墙＋40 mm厚木塑龙骨＋外喷25 mm厚发泡聚氨酯＋20 mm厚木塑板）、试件4（普通砖墙＋40 mm厚木塑龙骨＋30 mm厚木塑板，内填发泡聚氨酯）、试件5（普通砖墙＋20 mm厚木塑龙骨＋60 mm厚木塑板，内填发泡聚氨酯）均能满足规范要求。③试件3的传热系数最小，热工性能最好，构造最经济合理。④单一板墙比复合墙体厚度薄、自重轻，保温性能较高，更适合用作隔墙。60 mm厚单一板墙即可满足内隔墙的最低热工要求。120 mm厚单一板墙可满足外墙的热工要求。图3表3参10

English Abstract

Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite （WPC） walls

1. Infrastructure Maintenance Department，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;

2. School of Landscape Architecture，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China

Publish Date: 2011-12-20

Keywords:

Abstract: Wood-plastic composites （WPCs），in regards to ornamentation，processing，installation，and physical and mechanical performance，have favorable energy efficiency qualities for residential buildings. To analyze newly developed residential building materials，a heat flow meter method was used to measure the heat transmission coefficient of five walls：［W1. common brick wall （CBW）（10 mm cement mortar+240 mm common brick + 10 mm cement mortar）；W2.（CBW+40 mm WPC keel+20 mm WPC board）；W3.（CBW+40 mm WPC keel+25 mm polyurethane foam sprayed on the WPC board+20 mm WPC board）；W4.（CBW+40 mm WPC keel+30 mm WPC board filled with polyurethane foam）；and W5.（CBW+20 mm WPC keel+60 mm WPC board filled with polyurethane foam）］ and two kinds of single-material walls：［60 and 120 mm single-material boards （SMBs）］. These walls were compared with reference to design standard （JGJ 134－2010） for energy efficiency of residential buildings in hot summer and cold winter zones. Results showed that：（1）W1 did not meet the new thermal specification requirements. （2）When the building shape coefficient was0.4，all four composite walls （W2-W5） met requirements. However，when the building shape coefficient was＞0.4，W2 did not meet requirements，whereas W3-W5 did. （3）W3 had the minimum heat transmission coefficient and best thermal performance with the most inexpensive and most rational structure. （4）Compared with composite walls，single-material walls were thin and light weight with high thermal insulation performance. The 60 mm SMBs met the lowest thermal technology requirement for the inner partition wall, and the 120 mm SMBs met the thermal technology requirement for the outer wall. Thus，single-material walls were more suitable for use as partition walls. ［Ch, 3 fig. 3 tab. 10 ref.］

引用本文:

Citation:

DONG Sheng-zhong, WANG Mei-yan, SUN Gang-qiang, YANG Fei, ZHANG Yi-liang, XU Shao-chun, WU Hang-dong, ZHOU Qu-long. Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite （WPC） walls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 931-936. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016