[1] 吴敏娟, 尤誉杰, 张晓红, 等. 不同干扰模式对受害马尾松人工纯林林分结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 58 − 66.

WU Minjuan, YOU Yujie, ZHANG Xiaohong, et al. Effects of different interference modes on the stand structure of artificial pure forest of Pinus massoniana [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(1): 58 − 66.
[2] 吕文艳, 王柏泉, 曾德山, 等. 松材线虫病疫木不同伐除方式对森林植物群落演替的影响[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2008, 37(3): 4 − 8.

LÜ Wenyan, WANG Baiquan, ZENG Deshan, et al. Effects of different cutting methods of pine wood nematode disease on forest plant community succession [J]. Hubei For Sci Technol, 2008, 37(3): 4 − 8.
[3] 王国明, 赵颖, 陈斌, 等. 松材线虫病除治迹地自然恢复过程中物种多样性的动态变化[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(2): 170 − 177.

WANG Guoming, ZHAO Ying, CHEN Bin, et al. Dynamic changes of species diversity during the natural restoration process of pine wood nematode disease [J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2010, 27(2): 170 − 177.
[4] 石娟, 骆有庆, 宋冀莹, 等. 松材线虫入侵后不同伐倒干扰强度对马尾松林植物多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(7): 1157 − 1163.

SHI Juan, LUO Youqing, SONG Jiying, et al. Effects of different cutting intensity on the plant diversity of Pinus massoniana forest after invasion of pine wood nematode [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 17(7): 1157 − 1163.
[5] 孟宪宇. 测树学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006.
[6] 吴建强, 王懿祥, 杨一, 等. 干扰树间伐对杉木人工林林分生长和林分结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(2): 340 − 348.

WU Jianqiang, WANG Yixiang, YANG Yi, et al. Effects of interfering tree thinning on the growth and stand structure of Chinese fir plantation [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26(2): 340 − 348.
[7] 朱婷婷, 王懿祥, 朱旭丹, 等. 遮光对木荷和枫香光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(1): 28 − 35.

ZHU Tingting, WANG Yixiang, ZHU Xudan, et al. Effect of shading on photosynthetic characteristics of Schima superba and Liquidambar formosana [J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2017, 34(1): 28 − 35.
[8] 王懿祥, 张守攻, 陆元昌, 等. 林木个体大小不一致性指标对人工林间伐方式的即时性响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(6): 1645 − 1651.

WANG Yixiang, ZHANG Shougong, LU Yuanchang, et al. The immediate response of individual size inconsistency indexes to the mode of artificial forest thinning [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014, 25(6): 1645 − 1651.
[9] 王懿祥, 张守攻, 陆元昌, 等. 干扰树间伐对马尾松人工林目标树生长的初期效应[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 67 − 73.

WANG Yixiang, ZHANG Shougong, LU Yuanchang, et al. The initial effect of interfering tree thinning on the growth of target trees in Pinus massoniana plantation [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2014, 50(10): 67 − 73.
[10] 周红敏, 惠刚盈, 赵中华, 等. 林分空间结构分析中样地边界木的处理方法[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(2): 1 − 5.

ZHOU Hongmin, HUI Gangying, ZHAO Zhonghua, et al. The treatment method of boundary wood in the spatial structure analysis of stands [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2009, 45(2): 1 − 5.
[11] 仇建习, 汤孟平, 沈利芬, 等. 近自然毛竹林空间结构动态变化[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(6): 1444 − 1450.

QIU Jianxi, TANG Mengping, SHEN Lifen, et al. Dynamic changes of spatial structure of near-natural bamboo forests [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34(6): 1444 − 1450.
[12] CLARK P J, EVANS F C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations [J]. Ecology, 1954, 35(4): 445 − 453.
[13] 安慧君, 张韬. 聚集指数边界效应的校正方法与应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29(3): 57 − 60.

AN Huijun, ZHANG Tao. Correction method and application of boundary effect of clustering index [J]. J Nanjing For Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2005, 29(3): 57 − 60.
[14] HEGYI F. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands [J]. Growth Models Tree Stand Simu, 1974, 30: 74 − 90.
[15] 王懿祥. 人工马尾松和杉木林目标树经营理论与实践[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2012.

WANG Yixiang. Theory and Practice of Target Tree Management in Pinus massoniana and Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantation[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2012.
[16] 姜俊, 谢阳生, 陆元昌, 等. 不同林龄阶段马尾松人工林群落结构特征及经营策略[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(6): 1 − 7.

JIANG Jun, XIE Yangsheng, LU Yuanchang, et al. Community structure and management strategy of Pinus massoniana plantation in different ages [J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2015, 30(6): 1 − 7.
[17] 柴希民, 蒋平. 松材线虫的发生和防治[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
[18] 张慧, 周国模, 白尚斌, 等. 目标树抚育对亚热带天然次生灌丛群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5): 1414 − 1420.

ZHANG Hui, ZHOU Guomo, BAI Shangbin, et al. Effects of target tree rearing on the structure and diversity of subtropical natural secondary shrub communities [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017, 28(5): 1414 − 1420.