不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能

孙芳利; 毛胜凤; 文桂峰; 段新芳; 陈其乐

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能

孙芳利 , 毛胜凤 , 文桂峰 , 段新芳 , 陈其乐

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2006 > 23(2): 135-139

孙芳利, 毛胜凤, 文桂峰, 段新芳, 陈其乐. 不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(2): 135-139.

引用本文:

孙芳利, 毛胜凤, 文桂峰, 段新芳, 陈其乐. 不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(2): 135-139.

SUN Fang-li, MAO Sheng-feng, WEN Gui-feng, DUAN Xin-fang, CHEN Qi-le. Anti-mold effects of bamboo timber treated with different solutions[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(2): 135-139.

Citation:

SUN Fang-li, MAO Sheng-feng, WEN Gui-feng, DUAN Xin-fang, CHEN Qi-le. Anti-mold effects of bamboo timber treated with different solutions[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(2): 135-139.

不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能

1.
浙江林学院工程学院, 浙江临安 311300;
2.
中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所, 北京 100091;
3.
杭州百孚竹制品有限公司, 浙江临安 311300

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(30170750)

详细信息

作者简介: 孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。E-mail:Sun-fangli @163.com

通信作者: 孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。

中图分类号: S782.33

Anti-mold effects of bamboo timber treated with different solutions

1.
.School of Engineering , Zhejiang Forestry College, Lin'an 311300 , Zhejiang , China;
2.
Research Institute of Wood Industry , The Chinese Academy of Forestry , Beijing 100091, China;
3.
Hangzhou Baifu Bamboo Products Co ., Ltd., Lin'an 311300, Zhejiang , China

Funds:

This research was supported by the International Foundation for Science , Stockholm, Sweden, and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, The Hague , The Netherlands, Through a Grant to Fangli Sun.No .D/3284

摘要: 研究了冷水、热水、苯+醇、苯+乙醚、10 gkg-1盐酸(HCl )和10 gkg-1氢氧化钠溶液(NaOH )浸提处理后毛竹Phyllostachys pubescens 的霉变性能。结果表明:①经10 gkg-1HCl浸提的竹片防木霉Trichoderma viride , 橘青霉Penicillium citrinum 和黑曲霉Aspergillus niger 效果最佳, 接种1 个月后试样平均被害值均为0 。②经10 gkg-1NaOH 浸提的竹片对木霉、橘青霉有较好的防霉效果。经10 gkg-1NaOH 浸提的竹片如不经过水洗, 接种1 个月后试样平均被害值均为0 ;而经过水洗后防霉效果有不同程度下降, 对木霉和橘青霉而言, 处理后试样平均被害值分别为1.58 和0.35 。经10 gkg-1NaOH 浸提的竹片对于黑曲霉的防治效果不佳,10 gkg-1NaOH 浸提后的竹片水洗前后对黑曲霉的试样平均被害值分别为1.82 和2.79 。③经冷水、热水、苯+醇、苯+乙醚浸提竹片的防霉效果均不佳, 7 d 以后试样平均被害值均已达到3.00 以上, 主要原因在于不同溶液浸提出的竹材内含物成分和数量不同。图3 表2 参12
- 林业工程 /
- 毛竹 /
- 竹材 /
- 浸渍试验 /
- 霉菌 /
- 防霉性能
Abstract: The anti-mold effects of Phyllostachys pubescens extracted with solutions such as cold water , hot water , benzene +alcohol , benzene +ether , 10 g kg-1 HCl and 10 g kg-1 NaOH were studied .The results were as follows :(1)Bamboo specimens extracted with 10 gkg-1 HCl could successfully resist the testing molds including Trichoderma viride , Penicillium citrinum and Aspergillus niger .The average infection values of the treated specimens after a month were all zero .(2)Bamboo specimens extracted with 10 gkg-1 NaOH resisted Trichoderma viride and Penicillium citrinum better than Aispergillus niger .When the specimens were extracted only with 10 gkg-1 NaOH , the infection values were all zero .But when they were extracted with 10 gkg-1 NaOH and washed with water , the resistances to Trichoderma viride and Penicillium citrinum decreased dramatically , and the infection values being 1.58 and 0.35 respectively .Bamboo timbers treated with 10 g kg-1 NaOH had poor resistance to Aspergillus niger , and the infection values of the treated specimens before and after being washed with water were 1.82 and 2.79 respectively .(3)Bamboo timbers extracted with cold water , hot water , benzene +alcohol , benzene +ether were hardly effective to the testing mold .The infection values of the treated specimens were all over 3.00 . The different anti-mold effects were caused by different types and amounts of extractives .[ Ch , 3 fig .2 tab .12 ref .]
- forest engineering /
- Phyllostachys pubescens /
- bamboo timber /
- immersion tests /
- mold /
- anti-mold properties

[1]	李荣荣, 贺楚君, 彭博, 王传贵. 毛竹材不同部位纤维形态及部分物理性能差异 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(4): 854-860. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200649
[2]	吴文娟, 闫雪晴, 邹春阳, 王博伟, 何贤. 基于全溶体系的毛竹竹材木质素分离方法 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(2): 335-342. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.02.019
[3]	刘庭菘, 王慧, 王同属, 姜俊, 王婕, 孙芳利, 杨先金. 竹材气相氟化处理的尺寸稳定性和防霉性能 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(2): 350-356. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.02.021
[4]	李媛媛, 张双燕, 王传贵, 方徐勤. 毛竹采伐剩余物的化学成分、纤维形态及纸浆性能 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(2): 219-226. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.002
[5]	黄梦雪, 张文标, 张晓春, 余文军, 李文珠, 刘贤淼, 戴春平, 汪孙国. 毛竹材玻璃化转变温度的影响因素 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(6): 897-902. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.06.011
[6]	刘彬彬, 孙芳利, 张绍勇, 周月英, 顾媛媛. 高温对毛竹防霉剂丙环唑防霉性能的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5): 783-788. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.019
[7]	周紫球, 陆媛媛, 范伟青, 叶慧群, 吴礼栋. 肥料对5年生毛竹竹材物理力学性质的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(5): 729-733. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.05.015
[8]	尚娜娜, 叶晓, 黄丽霜, 金贞福. 热压过程中毛竹材加工剩余物蒸爆纤维木质素结构变化规律 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 420-425. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.015
[9]	杨优优, 卢凤珠, 鲍滨福, 沈哲红. 载银二氧化钛纳米抗菌剂处理竹材和马尾松的防霉和燃烧性能 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(6): 910-916. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.06.016
[10]	欧阳赣, 单胜道, 罗锡平, 杨亮, 宋成芳. 毛竹催化热解动力学研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(5): 680-685. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.05.007
[11]	陈利芳, 何雪香, 马红霞, 谢桂军, 张燕君, 王剑菁. 环保型防霉剂处理竹材的防霉效果 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(1): 78-82. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.01.014
[12]	杨乐, 鲍滨福, 孙芳利, 陈安良, 王品维, 杜春贵, 于红卫. 2种新型防霉剂对刨花板的防霉性能 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(1): 7-12. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.002
[13]	杨淑敏, 江泽慧, 任海青, 费本华. 2种造林方式的毛竹材质生成中微纤丝角的变化 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(2): 217-222. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.02.009
[14]	周国英, 李河. 竹材木质素选择性降解菌株的分子鉴定 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(4): 497-501.
[15]	嵇伟兵, 姚文斌, 马灵飞. 龙竹和绿竹竹材壁厚度方向的梯度力学性能 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(2): 125-129.
[16]	卢凤珠, 徐跃标, 钱俊, 徐群芳, 严建敏. 不同竹龄毛竹材燃烧性能的研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2005, 22(2): 198-202.
[17]	吴礼栋, 华文礼, 林陈涛, 胡金根, 廖立洪. 竹腔注射治虫对竹材物理力学性质的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2000, 17(1): 56-58.
[18]	陈龙安, 余学军, 韩春, 宣涛涛, 李中居. ABT 生长剂在毛竹笋材两用林上的应用 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1999, 16(2): 131-134.
[19]	马灵飞, 韩红, 徐真旺, 张静文, 马乃训. 部分竹材灰分和木素含量的分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1996, 13(3): 276-279.
[20]	杨云芳, 刘志坤. 毛竹材抗拉弹性模量及抗拉强度 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1996, 13(1): 21-27.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/id/1516

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2006/2/135

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1258
HTML全文浏览量: 201
PDF下载量: 212
被引次数: 0

不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能

1. 浙江林学院工程学院, 浙江临安 311300;

2. 中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所, 北京 100091;

3. 杭州百孚竹制品有限公司, 浙江临安 311300

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(30170750)

作者简介:
孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。E-mail:Sun-fangli @163.com

通信作者: 孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。

刊出日期: 2006-04-20

中图分类号: S782.33

关键词:

摘要: 研究了冷水、热水、苯+醇、苯+乙醚、10 gkg-1盐酸(HCl )和10 gkg-1氢氧化钠溶液(NaOH )浸提处理后毛竹Phyllostachys pubescens 的霉变性能。结果表明:①经10 gkg-1HCl浸提的竹片防木霉Trichoderma viride , 橘青霉Penicillium citrinum 和黑曲霉Aspergillus niger 效果最佳, 接种1 个月后试样平均被害值均为0 。②经10 gkg-1NaOH 浸提的竹片对木霉、橘青霉有较好的防霉效果。经10 gkg-1NaOH 浸提的竹片如不经过水洗, 接种1 个月后试样平均被害值均为0 ;而经过水洗后防霉效果有不同程度下降, 对木霉和橘青霉而言, 处理后试样平均被害值分别为1.58 和0.35 。经10 gkg-1NaOH 浸提的竹片对于黑曲霉的防治效果不佳,10 gkg-1NaOH 浸提后的竹片水洗前后对黑曲霉的试样平均被害值分别为1.82 和2.79 。③经冷水、热水、苯+醇、苯+乙醚浸提竹片的防霉效果均不佳, 7 d 以后试样平均被害值均已达到3.00 以上, 主要原因在于不同溶液浸提出的竹材内含物成分和数量不同。图3 表2 参12

English Abstract

Anti-mold effects of bamboo timber treated with different solutions

1. .School of Engineering , Zhejiang Forestry College, Lin'an 311300 , Zhejiang , China;

2. Research Institute of Wood Industry , The Chinese Academy of Forestry , Beijing 100091, China;

3. Hangzhou Baifu Bamboo Products Co ., Ltd., Lin'an 311300, Zhejiang , China

Funds:

Publish Date: 2006-04-20

Keywords:

Abstract: The anti-mold effects of Phyllostachys pubescens extracted with solutions such as cold water , hot water , benzene +alcohol , benzene +ether , 10 g kg-1 HCl and 10 g kg-1 NaOH were studied .The results were as follows :(1)Bamboo specimens extracted with 10 gkg-1 HCl could successfully resist the testing molds including Trichoderma viride , Penicillium citrinum and Aspergillus niger .The average infection values of the treated specimens after a month were all zero .(2)Bamboo specimens extracted with 10 gkg-1 NaOH resisted Trichoderma viride and Penicillium citrinum better than Aispergillus niger .When the specimens were extracted only with 10 gkg-1 NaOH , the infection values were all zero .But when they were extracted with 10 gkg-1 NaOH and washed with water , the resistances to Trichoderma viride and Penicillium citrinum decreased dramatically , and the infection values being 1.58 and 0.35 respectively .Bamboo timbers treated with 10 g kg-1 NaOH had poor resistance to Aspergillus niger , and the infection values of the treated specimens before and after being washed with water were 1.82 and 2.79 respectively .(3)Bamboo timbers extracted with cold water , hot water , benzene +alcohol , benzene +ether were hardly effective to the testing mold .The infection values of the treated specimens were all over 3.00 . The different anti-mold effects were caused by different types and amounts of extractives .[ Ch , 3 fig .2 tab .12 ref .]

孙芳利, 毛胜凤, 文桂峰, 段新芳, 陈其乐. 不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(2): 135-139.

引用本文:

孙芳利, 毛胜凤, 文桂峰, 段新芳, 陈其乐. 不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(2): 135-139.

SUN Fang-li, MAO Sheng-feng, WEN Gui-feng, DUAN Xin-fang, CHEN Qi-le. Anti-mold effects of bamboo timber treated with different solutions[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(2): 135-139.

Citation:

全文HTML

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

留言板

不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能

作者简介: 孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。E-mail:Sun-fangli @163.com

通信作者: 孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。

Anti-mold effects of bamboo timber treated with different solutions

计量

出版历程

不同浸提处理后竹材的防霉性能

1. 浙江林学院 工程学院, 浙江 临安 311300; 2. 中国林业科学研究院 木材工业研究所, 北京 100091; 3. 杭州百孚竹制品有限公司, 浙江 临安 311300

作者简介: 孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。E-mail:Sun-fangli @163.com

通信作者: 孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。

English Abstract

Anti-mold effects of bamboo timber treated with different solutions

1. .School of Engineering , Zhejiang Forestry College, Lin'an 311300 , Zhejiang , China; 2. Research Institute of Wood Industry , The Chinese Academy of Forestry , Beijing 100091, China; 3. Hangzhou Baifu Bamboo Products Co ., Ltd., Lin'an 311300, Zhejiang , China

全文HTML

目录

1. 浙江林学院工程学院, 浙江临安 311300;

2. 中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所, 北京 100091;

3. 杭州百孚竹制品有限公司, 浙江临安 311300

作者简介:
孙芳利, 讲师, 从事木竹材保护与改性研究。E-mail:Sun-fangli @163.com

1. .School of Engineering , Zhejiang Forestry College, Lin'an 311300 , Zhejiang , China;

2. Research Institute of Wood Industry , The Chinese Academy of Forestry , Beijing 100091, China;

3. Hangzhou Baifu Bamboo Products Co ., Ltd., Lin'an 311300, Zhejiang , China