丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较

李宗艳; 肖娟; 蒙进芳; 王锦

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较

李宗艳 , 肖娟 , 蒙进芳 , 王锦

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2011 > 28(1): 115-120

李宗艳, 肖娟, 蒙进芳, 王锦. 丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(1): 115-120. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

引用本文:

李宗艳, 肖娟, 蒙进芳, 王锦. 丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(1): 115-120. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

LI Zong-yan, XIAO Juan, MENG Jin-fang, WAN Jin. Comparative leaf anatomy for six cultivars of Paeonia suffruticosa from Lijiang and Zhongyuan，China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(1): 115-120. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

Citation:

LI Zong-yan, XIAO Juan, MENG Jin-fang, WAN Jin. Comparative leaf anatomy for six cultivars of Paeonia suffruticosa from Lijiang and Zhongyuan，China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(1): 115-120. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

1.
西南林业大学园林学院，云南昆明 650224;
2.
云南森林自然中心，云南昆明 650011;
3.
西南林业大学资源学院，云南昆明 650224

详细信息

通信作者: 李宗艳

Comparative leaf anatomy for six cultivars of Paeonia suffruticosa from Lijiang and Zhongyuan，China

1.
Faculty of Landscape Architecture，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming 650224，Yunnan，China;
2.
Yunnan Forest Nature Center，Kunming 650011，Yunnan，China;
3.
Faculty of Resources，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming 650224，Yunnan，China

More Information

Corresponding author: LI Zong-yan

摘要: 对云南丽江3个牡丹Paeonia suffruticosa品种与代表中原的3个牡丹品种的叶微形态结构进行了比较观察。结果表明：中原牡丹品种与丽江牡丹品种在解剖特征上最大的差异表现为栅栏组织形态、海栅比及气孔密度的差异。中原牡丹品种具有旱生植物的解剖特点，栅栏组织发达，排列紧密，气孔较小，而丽江牡丹品种则表现为栅栏组织的退化，细胞间隙大，海栅比大。丽江3个牡丹品种中，香玉板Paeonia suffruticosa Xiangyuban和丽江粉Paeonia suffruticosa Lijiangfen在气孔密度、气孔大小上的差异不大；而丽江紫Paeonia suffruticosa Lijiangzi气孔密度最大；丽江粉具有稍发达的栅栏组织，细胞多呈长柱状，海绵组织稀疏松，细胞小，海栅比最小，且海栅比和气孔指数与中原牡丹3个品种相差不大；叶比较解剖特征反映出两品种群间的耐湿能力存在差异，气孔密度和海栅比与品种的耐湿能力呈正相关。图1参15
- 园艺学 /
- 牡丹 /
- 气孔密度 /
- 栅栏组织 /
- 海绵组织 /
- 适应性
Abstract: To determine their adaptability，the micro-morphological structures of six Paeonia suffruticosa （peony） tree cultivars：Xiangyuban Lijiangfen Lijiangzi from Lijiang of China and WulongpenshengQinlongwomochiShouanhongfrom central plains of China（Zhongyuan） were compared. Results for Zhongyuan cultivars and Lijiang cultivars showed large differences in the cellsmorphology for palisade tissue，in the ratio of spongy tissue to palisade tissue，and in stomatal density. Also，Zhongyuan cultivars had typical anatomical characteristics for drought resistance with highly developed and closely arranged palisade tissue；whereas Lijiang cultivars had degenerated palisade tissue，large intercellular spaces，and a high ratio of spongy tissue to palisade tissue. ForXiangyuban and Lijiangfen，cell morphology and stomatal characteristics，such as stomatal density and size，were similar. However，Lijiangzi was more capable of adjusting its transpiration due to stomatal density. Meanwhile，Lijiangfen had relatively developed palisade cells，most of which were columnar and closely arranged with sparse，small spongy cells. Smaller ratio of spongy tissue to palisade tissue，which has no significant difference in ratio of spongy tissue and palisade tissue and stomatal density with three Zhongyuan cultivars. Zhongyuan cultivars have different resistance of waterlogging with Lijiang cultivars by comparing their leaf anatomical structures. It showed that stomata density and ratio of spongy tissue to palisade tissue were positively correlated with resistance of waterlogging.［Ch，1 fig. 15 ref.］
- horticulture /
- Paeonia suffruticosa /
- tomatal density /
- palisade tissue /
- spongy tissue /
- adaptability

[1]	郝力慧, 董彬, 朱绍华, 马进. 牡丹响应高温胁迫的转录组分析及PsHSP基因表达 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(4): 802-811. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200529
[2]	罗卿清, 郑钢, 顾翠花, 顾帆, 陈凯, 郑绍宇. 黄薇花粉活力及柱头可授性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(1): 182-187. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.024
[3]	火艳, 招雪晴, 黄厚毅, 黄贤斌, 许云方, 祝遵凌, 苑兆和. 观赏石榴表型遗传多样性分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(5): 939-949. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190619
[4]	陈文妃, 杜长霞, 金佩颖, 何亚妮, 樊怀福. 模拟干旱胁迫对黄瓜幼苗组织结构的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(6): 1149-1154. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.024
[5]	朱咪咪, 张迟, 常爱玲, 党婉誉, 周彩红, 俞狄虎, 吴莹莹, 张敏. ‘无籽’瓯柑小孢子母细胞减数分裂特性基因RAD51和MS1的表达差异分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(6): 921-927. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.06.001
[6]	王文鹏, 周莉花, 赵宏波, 包志毅. 蜡梅与光叶红蜡梅和夏蜡梅属间杂交亲和性初步研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5): 756-762. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.015
[7]	雷燕, 李庆卫, 李文广, 景珊, 陈俊愉. 2个地被菊品种对不同遮光处理的生理适应性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5): 708-715. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.008
[8]	褚怡, 范义荣, 张韶伊, 孙玉芬, 宁惠娟. 大花蕙兰与国兰花粉活力及柱头可授性分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(6): 950-954. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.06.022
[9]	陈家龙, 朱建军, 吴秀水, 余宏傲. 金雀花组织培养与快繁 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(4): 611-614. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.04.022
[10]	秦巧平, 林飞凡, 张岚岚. 枇杷果实糖酸积累的分子生理机制 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 453-457. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.021
[11]	黄可, 王小德, 柳翼飞, 刘猛. 红枫春季叶色变化与色素含量的相关性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(5): 734-738. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.05.016
[12]	翟丽丽, 房伟民, 陈发棣, 王晓帅, 吴洪米, 张琳. 国庆小菊品种抗旱性综合评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(2): 166-172. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.02.003
[13]	徐小博, 贾文庆, 刘会超. 牡丹品种间花瓣营养成分差异 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(5): 729-733. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.05.015
[14]	庄倩, 赵利群, 朱松岩. 3个牡丹组内亚组间远缘杂交品种在东北地区的适应性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(6): 918-921. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.013
[15]	郑艳伟, 范义荣, 郭晨瑛, 范庆君, 张庆宝. 浙皖两地牡丹的栽培及应用现状 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(6): 835-841.
[16]	孟赐福, 曹志洪, 姜培坤, 徐秋芳, 周国模. 叶面施硼矫正杨梅缺硼的研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(5): 543-547.
[17]	张晓宁, 欧晓红, 陈杰, 司徒英贤. 云南不同地点及海拔异色瓢虫鞘翅色斑变异比较 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(5): 565-568.
[18]	王齐瑞, 谭晓风, 张琳. 覆草栽培对甜樱桃生长及光合速率的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(1): 24-28.
[19]	阮秀春, 斯金平, 吴健, 黄文华, 郭宝林, 许元科. 雷公藤属植物生物学特性与生态适应性的初步研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(5): 595-598.
[20]	马进, 张万荣, 王小德, 孟瑾. 杭州地区冷季型草坪草引种适应性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2003, 20(1): 54-57.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2011/1/115

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 4889
HTML全文浏览量: 220
PDF下载量: 1236
被引次数: 0

丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

1. 西南林业大学园林学院，云南昆明 650224;

2. 云南森林自然中心，云南昆明 650011;

3. 西南林业大学资源学院，云南昆明 650224

通信作者: 李宗艳

刊出日期: 2011-02-20

关键词:

摘要: 对云南丽江3个牡丹Paeonia suffruticosa品种与代表中原的3个牡丹品种的叶微形态结构进行了比较观察。结果表明：中原牡丹品种与丽江牡丹品种在解剖特征上最大的差异表现为栅栏组织形态、海栅比及气孔密度的差异。中原牡丹品种具有旱生植物的解剖特点，栅栏组织发达，排列紧密，气孔较小，而丽江牡丹品种则表现为栅栏组织的退化，细胞间隙大，海栅比大。丽江3个牡丹品种中，香玉板Paeonia suffruticosa Xiangyuban和丽江粉Paeonia suffruticosa Lijiangfen在气孔密度、气孔大小上的差异不大；而丽江紫Paeonia suffruticosa Lijiangzi气孔密度最大；丽江粉具有稍发达的栅栏组织，细胞多呈长柱状，海绵组织稀疏松，细胞小，海栅比最小，且海栅比和气孔指数与中原牡丹3个品种相差不大；叶比较解剖特征反映出两品种群间的耐湿能力存在差异，气孔密度和海栅比与品种的耐湿能力呈正相关。图1参15

English Abstract

Comparative leaf anatomy for six cultivars of Paeonia suffruticosa from Lijiang and Zhongyuan，China

1. Faculty of Landscape Architecture，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming 650224，Yunnan，China;

2. Yunnan Forest Nature Center，Kunming 650011，Yunnan，China;

3. Faculty of Resources，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming 650224，Yunnan，China

Corresponding author: LI Zong-yan

Publish Date: 2011-02-20

Keywords:

Abstract: To determine their adaptability，the micro-morphological structures of six Paeonia suffruticosa （peony） tree cultivars：Xiangyuban Lijiangfen Lijiangzi from Lijiang of China and WulongpenshengQinlongwomochiShouanhongfrom central plains of China（Zhongyuan） were compared. Results for Zhongyuan cultivars and Lijiang cultivars showed large differences in the cellsmorphology for palisade tissue，in the ratio of spongy tissue to palisade tissue，and in stomatal density. Also，Zhongyuan cultivars had typical anatomical characteristics for drought resistance with highly developed and closely arranged palisade tissue；whereas Lijiang cultivars had degenerated palisade tissue，large intercellular spaces，and a high ratio of spongy tissue to palisade tissue. ForXiangyuban and Lijiangfen，cell morphology and stomatal characteristics，such as stomatal density and size，were similar. However，Lijiangzi was more capable of adjusting its transpiration due to stomatal density. Meanwhile，Lijiangfen had relatively developed palisade cells，most of which were columnar and closely arranged with sparse，small spongy cells. Smaller ratio of spongy tissue to palisade tissue，which has no significant difference in ratio of spongy tissue and palisade tissue and stomatal density with three Zhongyuan cultivars. Zhongyuan cultivars have different resistance of waterlogging with Lijiang cultivars by comparing their leaf anatomical structures. It showed that stomata density and ratio of spongy tissue to palisade tissue were positively correlated with resistance of waterlogging.［Ch，1 fig. 15 ref.］

李宗艳, 肖娟, 蒙进芳, 王锦. 丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(1): 115-120. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

引用本文:

李宗艳, 肖娟, 蒙进芳, 王锦. 丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(1): 115-120. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

Citation:

全文HTML

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

留言板

丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

通信作者: 李宗艳

Comparative leaf anatomy for six cultivars of Paeonia suffruticosa from Lijiang and Zhongyuan，China

Corresponding author: LI Zong-yan

计量

出版历程

丽江牡丹和中原牡丹叶片结构微形态比较

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.018

1. 西南林业大学 园林学院，云南 昆明 650224; 2. 云南森林自然中心，云南 昆明 650011; 3. 西南林业大学 资源学院，云南 昆明 650224

通信作者: 李宗艳

English Abstract

Comparative leaf anatomy for six cultivars of Paeonia suffruticosa from Lijiang and Zhongyuan，China

1. Faculty of Landscape Architecture，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming 650224，Yunnan，China; 2. Yunnan Forest Nature Center，Kunming 650011，Yunnan，China; 3. Faculty of Resources，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming 650224，Yunnan，China

Corresponding author: LI Zong-yan

全文HTML

目录

1. 西南林业大学园林学院，云南昆明 650224;

2. 云南森林自然中心，云南昆明 650011;

3. 西南林业大学资源学院，云南昆明 650224

1. Faculty of Landscape Architecture，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming 650224，Yunnan，China;

2. Yunnan Forest Nature Center，Kunming 650011，Yunnan，China;

3. Faculty of Resources，Southwest Forestry University，Kunming 650224，Yunnan，China