秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价

李冬林; 金雅琴; 张纪林; 阮宏华

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价

李冬林 , 金雅琴 , 张纪林 , 阮宏华

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2008 > 25(2): 228-234

李冬林, 金雅琴, 张纪林, 阮宏华. 秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(2): 228-234.

引用本文:

李冬林, 金雅琴, 张纪林, 阮宏华. 秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(2): 228-234.

LI Dong-lin, JIN Ya-qin, ZHANG Ji-lin, RUAN Hong-hua. Heavy metal soil pollution in the Qinhuai River riparian zone[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(2): 228-234.

Citation:

LI Dong-lin, JIN Ya-qin, ZHANG Ji-lin, RUAN Hong-hua. Heavy metal soil pollution in the Qinhuai River riparian zone[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(2): 228-234.

秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价

1.
南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210037;
2.
江苏省林业科学研究院, 江苏南京 211153;
3.
金陵科技学院园艺学院, 江苏南京 210038

基金项目:

江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BK2006087);江苏省社会发展基金资助项目(BS2007067)

详细信息

作者简介: 李冬林,副研究员,博士研究生。从事森林生态学研究。E-mail:lidonglin126@126.com

中图分类号: S714;X825

Heavy metal soil pollution in the Qinhuai River riparian zone

1.
College of Forest Resource and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China;
2.
Forestry Academy of Jiangsu, Nanjing 211153, Jiangsu, China;
3.
Department of Horticulture, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, Jiangsu, China

摘要: 对南京秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属质量分数进行了分析。镉、铬、铅、铜、锌等5种土壤重金属分布在水平和垂直层次上均表现出一定异质性。近水区土壤重金属质量分数普遍高于远水区;表层土壤重金属质量分数高于下层。不同区域土壤重金属富集程度有较大差异。上游河岸几乎未受人为干扰,5种重金属离子质量分数均明显小于中下游。中游的殷巷土壤中镉和铬质量分数明显超标,多因子综合污染指数>3.0,为重度污染。下游的岔路口表层土壤综合污染指数>2.0,为中度污染。大校场表层土壤综合污染指数>1.0,为轻度污染。5种重金属元素污染指数排序为镉>锌>铜>铬>铅。重金属元素铜与镉呈显著的正相关(PPP<0.01)。土壤pH值与重金属元素有一定的相关性。
- 土壤生态学 /
- 秦淮河 /
- 河岸带 /
- 重金属 /
- 污染分析与评价
Abstract: Qinhuai River is the main river in Nanjing City,the overall length is more than 100 km,having 16 prongs and 2 630 km2 river valley. This objective is to rebuild and protect ecological system of the Qinhuai River riparian zone,pollution levels of five heavy metals(Cd,Zn,Cu,Cr,and Pb) in a riparian zone along the Qinhuai River of Nanjing were analyzed with sample plot method. Five plots were set,including Dongping of Lishui City,Yinxiang and Chalukou of Jiangning District,Dajiaochang of Qinhuai District and Zhongheqiao of Nanjing City,and each plot fell into near-riparian zone(0-30 m near river) and far-riparian zone(5-10 m near river). Results indicated that soil heavy metals in the riparian zone manifested spatial heterogeneity. Soil heavy metal content of the near-riparian zone was much than the far-riparian zone,and for topsoil(0-10 cm in depth) it was much than the subsoil(10-20 cm in depth). In different plots soil heavy metal content was distinctive. Also,in the upper reaches,due to less human interaction,soil heavy metal content was less than the middle and lower reaches.Both Cd and Cr content of the soil in Yinxiang were much than the standard level(Pn > 3.0); so soil pollution was heavy. Soil from Chalukou had an intermediate degree of pollution(Pn > 2.0),and soil came from Daojiaochang was lightly polluted(Pn > 1.0). The pollution index ranking for these five heavy metals in the riparian zone was Cd > Zn > Cu > Cr > Pb. There were positive correlations between soil Cu with Cd(PPPPPPP<0.05).
- soil ecology /
- Qinhuai River /
- riparian zone /
- soil heavy metals /
- pollution analysis and assessment

[1]	孙经宇, 孙向阳, 李素艳, 王晨晨, 岳宗伟. 北京市通州区绿地土壤重金属源解析及风险评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2024, 41(3): 517-525. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230435
[2]	张岩, 张瑞香, 刘占欣, 冯雪琦, 郭二辉. 黄河河岸带不同人为干扰的土壤物理性质比较 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40(5): 1035-1044. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220727
[3]	周杨, 周文斌, 马嘉伟, 阮忠强, 叶正钱, 柳丹. 缙云县某复垦地块土壤环境质量调查及生态风险评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(2): 388-395. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210289
[4]	邵晗, 王虎, 王妍, 徐红枫, 苏倩, 刘云根. 岩溶石漠化地区不同利用方式对土壤肥力和重金属质量分数的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(3): 635-643. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210437
[5]	杨俊, 王祖辉, 李昂, 胡泊. 武汉乌金港底泥重金属和磷污染特征及清淤深度的确定 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(3): 653-661. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210467
[6]	张天然, 郑文革, 章银柯, 黄芳, 李晓璐, 袁楚阳, 于慧, 晏海, 邵锋. 杭州市临安区4种绿地内细颗粒物中重金属污染特征 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(4): 737-745. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200558
[7]	彭博, 刘鹏, 王妍, 张叶飞, 杨波. 普者黑流域表层水和沉积物中重金属污染特征及风险评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(4): 746-755. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200547
[8]	叶朝军, 吴家胜, 钟斌, 陈俊任, 郭佳, 徐美贞, 柳丹. EDTA和有机酸对毛竹修复重金属污染土壤的强化作用 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(3): 431-439. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.03.006
[9]	张建云, 高才慧, 朱晖, 钟水根, 杨纹砚, 郑均泷, 吴胜春, 单胜道, 王志荣, 张进, 曹志洪, Peter CHRISTIE. 生物质炭对土壤中重金属形态和迁移性的影响及作用机制 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(3): 543-551. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.03.021
[10]	许佳霖, 武帅, 梁鹏, 张进, 吴胜春. 高虹镇稻米中重金属污染状况及健康风险评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(6): 983-990. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.003
[11]	梁立成, 余树全, 张超, 钱力, 齐鹏. 浙江省永康市城区土壤重金属空间分布及潜在生态风险评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(6): 972-982. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.002
[12]	张素, 梁鹏, 吴胜春, 张进, 曹志洪. 节能灯产地竹林土壤重金属污染的时空分布特征 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(3): 484-490. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.03.014
[13]	金文奖, 侯平, 张伟, 梁立成, 俞飞. 温州鳌江流域表层底泥及河岸土壤重金属空间分布与生态风险评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(6): 963-971. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.001
[14]	刘伸伸, 张震, 何金铃, 马友华, 胡宏祥, 张春格. 水生植物对氮磷及重金属污染水体的净化作用 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(5): 910-919. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.05.025
[15]	钟斌, 陈俊任, 彭丹莉, 刘晨, 郭华, 吴家森, 叶正钱, 柳丹. 速生林木对重金属污染土壤植物修复技术研究进展 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(5): 899-909. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.05.024
[16]	晏闻博, 柳丹, 彭丹莉, 李松, 陈俊任, 叶正钱, 吴家森, 王海龙. 重金属矿山生态治理与环境修复技术进展 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(3): 467-477. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.03.021
[17]	胡杨勇, 马嘉伟, 叶正钱, 柳丹, 赵科理. 东南景天Sedum alfredii修复重金属污染土壤的研究进展 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(1): 136-144. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.01.021
[18]	郭明, 武晓鹏, 孙东海, 周建钟, 张华. 新型基质固相萃取重金属离子分析及残留关联性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(4): 551-557. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.04.011
[19]	姜培坤, 徐秋芳, 罗煦钦, 王俊奇. 雷竹笋重金属含量及其与施肥的关系 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2004, 21(4): 424-427.
[20]	姜培坤, 徐秋芳, 杨芳. 雷竹土壤水溶性有机碳及其与重金属的关系 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2003, 20(1): 8-11.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/id/2882

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2008/2/228

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1374
HTML全文浏览量: 153
PDF下载量: 105
被引次数: 0

秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价

1. 南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210037;

2. 江苏省林业科学研究院, 江苏南京 211153;

3. 金陵科技学院园艺学院, 江苏南京 210038

基金项目:

江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BK2006087);江苏省社会发展基金资助项目(BS2007067)

作者简介:
李冬林,副研究员,博士研究生。从事森林生态学研究。E-mail:lidonglin126@126.com

收稿日期: 2007-06-28
修回日期: 2007-09-30
刊出日期: 2008-04-10

中图分类号: S714;X825

关键词:

摘要: 对南京秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属质量分数进行了分析。镉、铬、铅、铜、锌等5种土壤重金属分布在水平和垂直层次上均表现出一定异质性。近水区土壤重金属质量分数普遍高于远水区;表层土壤重金属质量分数高于下层。不同区域土壤重金属富集程度有较大差异。上游河岸几乎未受人为干扰,5种重金属离子质量分数均明显小于中下游。中游的殷巷土壤中镉和铬质量分数明显超标,多因子综合污染指数>3.0,为重度污染。下游的岔路口表层土壤综合污染指数>2.0,为中度污染。大校场表层土壤综合污染指数>1.0,为轻度污染。5种重金属元素污染指数排序为镉>锌>铜>铬>铅。重金属元素铜与镉呈显著的正相关(PPP<0.01)。土壤pH值与重金属元素有一定的相关性。

English Abstract

Heavy metal soil pollution in the Qinhuai River riparian zone

1. College of Forest Resource and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China;

2. Forestry Academy of Jiangsu, Nanjing 211153, Jiangsu, China;

3. Department of Horticulture, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2007-06-28
Rev Recd Date: 2007-09-30
Publish Date: 2008-04-10

Keywords:

Abstract: Qinhuai River is the main river in Nanjing City,the overall length is more than 100 km,having 16 prongs and 2 630 km2 river valley. This objective is to rebuild and protect ecological system of the Qinhuai River riparian zone,pollution levels of five heavy metals(Cd,Zn,Cu,Cr,and Pb) in a riparian zone along the Qinhuai River of Nanjing were analyzed with sample plot method. Five plots were set,including Dongping of Lishui City,Yinxiang and Chalukou of Jiangning District,Dajiaochang of Qinhuai District and Zhongheqiao of Nanjing City,and each plot fell into near-riparian zone(0-30 m near river) and far-riparian zone(5-10 m near river). Results indicated that soil heavy metals in the riparian zone manifested spatial heterogeneity. Soil heavy metal content of the near-riparian zone was much than the far-riparian zone,and for topsoil(0-10 cm in depth) it was much than the subsoil(10-20 cm in depth). In different plots soil heavy metal content was distinctive. Also,in the upper reaches,due to less human interaction,soil heavy metal content was less than the middle and lower reaches.Both Cd and Cr content of the soil in Yinxiang were much than the standard level(Pn > 3.0); so soil pollution was heavy. Soil from Chalukou had an intermediate degree of pollution(Pn > 2.0),and soil came from Daojiaochang was lightly polluted(Pn > 1.0). The pollution index ranking for these five heavy metals in the riparian zone was Cd > Zn > Cu > Cr > Pb. There were positive correlations between soil Cu with Cd(PPPPPPP<0.05).

李冬林, 金雅琴, 张纪林, 阮宏华. 秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(2): 228-234.

引用本文:

李冬林, 金雅琴, 张纪林, 阮宏华. 秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(2): 228-234.

LI Dong-lin, JIN Ya-qin, ZHANG Ji-lin, RUAN Hong-hua. Heavy metal soil pollution in the Qinhuai River riparian zone[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(2): 228-234.

Citation:

LI Dong-lin, JIN Ya-qin, ZHANG Ji-lin, RUAN Hong-hua. Heavy metal soil pollution in the Qinhuai River riparian zone[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(2): 228-234.

全文HTML

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

留言板

秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价

作者简介: 李冬林,副研究员,博士研究生。从事森林生态学研究。E-mail:lidonglin126@126.com

Heavy metal soil pollution in the Qinhuai River riparian zone

计量

出版历程

秦淮河河岸带典型区域土壤重金属污染分析与评价

1. 南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210037; 2. 江苏省林业科学研究院, 江苏南京 211153; 3. 金陵科技学院园艺学院, 江苏南京 210038

作者简介: 李冬林,副研究员,博士研究生。从事森林生态学研究。E-mail:lidonglin126@126.com

English Abstract

Heavy metal soil pollution in the Qinhuai River riparian zone

1. College of Forest Resource and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China; 2. Forestry Academy of Jiangsu, Nanjing 211153, Jiangsu, China; 3. Department of Horticulture, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, Jiangsu, China

全文HTML

目录

1. 南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210037;

2. 江苏省林业科学研究院, 江苏南京 211153;

3. 金陵科技学院园艺学院, 江苏南京 210038

作者简介:
李冬林,副研究员,博士研究生。从事森林生态学研究。E-mail:lidonglin126@126.com

1. College of Forest Resource and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China;

2. Forestry Academy of Jiangsu, Nanjing 211153, Jiangsu, China;

3. Department of Horticulture, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, Jiangsu, China