Volume 28 Issue 6
Dec.  2011
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

DONG Sheng-zhong, WANG Mei-yan, SUN Gang-qiang, YANG Fei, ZHANG Yi-liang, XU Shao-chun, WU Hang-dong, ZHOU Qu-long. Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite (WPC) walls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 931-936. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016
Citation: DONG Sheng-zhong, WANG Mei-yan, SUN Gang-qiang, YANG Fei, ZHANG Yi-liang, XU Shao-chun, WU Hang-dong, ZHOU Qu-long. Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite (WPC) walls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 931-936. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite (WPC) walls

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016
  • Publish Date: 2011-12-20
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3659) PDF downloads(1110) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite (WPC) walls

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

Abstract: Wood-plastic composites (WPCs),in regards to ornamentation,processing,installation,and physical and mechanical performance,have favorable energy efficiency qualities for residential buildings. To analyze newly developed residential building materials,a heat flow meter method was used to measure the heat transmission coefficient of five walls:[W1. common brick wall (CBW)(10 mm cement mortar+240 mm common brick + 10 mm cement mortar);W2.(CBW+40 mm WPC keel+20 mm WPC board);W3.(CBW+40 mm WPC keel+25 mm polyurethane foam sprayed on the WPC board+20 mm WPC board);W4.(CBW+40 mm WPC keel+30 mm WPC board filled with polyurethane foam);and W5.(CBW+20 mm WPC keel+60 mm WPC board filled with polyurethane foam)] and two kinds of single-material walls:[60 and 120 mm single-material boards (SMBs)]. These walls were compared with reference to design standard (JGJ 134-2010) for energy efficiency of residential buildings in hot summer and cold winter zones. Results showed that:(1)W1 did not meet the new thermal specification requirements. (2)When the building shape coefficient was0.4,all four composite walls (W2-W5) met requirements. However,when the building shape coefficient was>0.4,W2 did not meet requirements,whereas W3-W5 did. (3)W3 had the minimum heat transmission coefficient and best thermal performance with the most inexpensive and most rational structure. (4)Compared with composite walls,single-material walls were thin and light weight with high thermal insulation performance. The 60 mm SMBs met the lowest thermal technology requirement for the inner partition wall, and the 120 mm SMBs met the thermal technology requirement for the outer wall. Thus,single-material walls were more suitable for use as partition walls. [Ch, 3 fig. 3 tab. 10 ref.]

DONG Sheng-zhong, WANG Mei-yan, SUN Gang-qiang, YANG Fei, ZHANG Yi-liang, XU Shao-chun, WU Hang-dong, ZHOU Qu-long. Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite (WPC) walls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 931-936. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016
Citation: DONG Sheng-zhong, WANG Mei-yan, SUN Gang-qiang, YANG Fei, ZHANG Yi-liang, XU Shao-chun, WU Hang-dong, ZHOU Qu-long. Thermal performance of several wood-plastic composite (WPC) walls[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 931-936. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.016

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return