Combustibility of fresh leaves of 17 species of garden bamboo in Kunming

WANG Kunlun; JIANG Ting; HOU Xiaofei; MA Ruijie; WANG Qiuhua; LI Shiyou

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190612

Volume 37 Issue 5

Oct. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Zhejiang A&F University > 2020 > 37(5): 963-970

WANG Kunlun, JIANG Ting, HOU Xiaofei, MA Ruijie, WANG Qiuhua, LI Shiyou. Combustibility of fresh leaves of 17 species of garden bamboo in Kunming[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(5): 963-970. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190612

Citation:

WANG Kunlun, JIANG Ting, HOU Xiaofei, MA Ruijie, WANG Qiuhua, LI Shiyou. Combustibility of fresh leaves of 17 species of garden bamboo in Kunming[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(5): 963-970. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190612

Combustibility of fresh leaves of 17 species of garden bamboo in Kunming

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190612

WANG Kunlun^{1, 2
,},
JIANG Ting^{1, 2},
HOU Xiaofei³,
MA Ruijie⁴,
WANG Qiuhua^{1, 2},
LI Shiyou^{1, 2
,
,}

1.
Fire Research Institute, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
2.
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China
3.
Longcaoping Forestry Bureau of Shaanxi Province, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
4.
Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Jiangchuan County, Jiangchuan 652600, Yunnan, China

Received Date: 2019-10-21
Rev Recd Date: 2020-05-22

Available Online: 2020-10-10

Publish Date: 2020-08-20

Abstract

Objective Comparing the combustibility of fresh bamboo leaves in gardens, in order to protect bamboo forest. Method Taking 5 common flammable woody plants as control, the moisture content, mass per unit area, absolute line rate, absolute area loss rate, absolute mass loss rate, relative line rate, relative area loss rate and relative mass loss rate of 17 species’ fresh bamboo leaves in Kunming were measured and calculated. The combustibility of bamboo leaves was evaluated by factor analysis and systematic clustering. Result All the fresh bamboo leaves of 17 species were inflammable, and the order of combustibility from large to small was as follows: Neosinocalamus affinis, Bambusa ventricosa, Fargesia yuanjiangensis, Schizostachyum funghomii, B. sinospinosa, B. textilis, B. multiplex, Dendrocalamus semiscandens, Chimonocalamus pallens, Phyllostachys nigra var. henonis, B. distegia, Ph. nigra, D. bambusoides, D. hamiltonii, D. giganteus, B. intermedia, B. surrecta. Conclusion 10 of them were highly flammable and 7 were relatively flammable. [Ch, 1 fig. 6 tab. 25 ref.]
- forest protection,
- bamboo,
- fresh leaves,
- combustibility,
- Kunming area

Relative Article

[1]	JIN Jing, XIE Rong, LI Xia, ZHOU Liujiang, DU Yongbin, GU Yutong, FAN Jianting. Effects of three different host plants on the feeding preference and developmental status of Ceracris kiangsu . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(6): 1143-1148. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190723
[2]	LIU Yilai, WANG Jianghong, ZHANG Jing, ZHU Danni, MAO Jiajun, ZHOU Xiang. Influence of aphid-specific pathogen Conidiobolus obscurus on population dynamics of bamboo aphids and the aphid-control effect . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(5): 907-914. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.05.018
[3]	ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Shouke, SHU Jinping, MENG Hailin, WU Hong, WANG Haojie. Ambient temperature and humidity along with urine-puddling for Ceracris kiangsu, the yellow-spined bamboo locust . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(4): 704-710. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.04.017
[4]	LI Hongbin, ZHU Chengqi, ZHOU Xiang, MA Liangjin, SU Xiu. Morphological and molecular identification of Heteroepichloë sasae isolated from Phyllostachys iridescens . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016, 33(6): 1040-1044. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.06.016
[5]	WANG Xueqin. Bibliometric analysis and visualization map analysis of bamboo cultivation literature . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016, 33(2): 330-339. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.02.020
[6]	FANG Rong, WU Hong, WANG Haojie, ZHANG Wei, GENG Xiansheng, SHU Jinping. Behavioral responses of the yellow-spined bamboo locust, Ceracris kiangsu, towards solutions of ammonium bicarbonate and sodium chloride . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(3): 434-439. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.03.016
[7]	YE Shenyi, RUAN Xiayun, FAN Ying, ZHANG Huanshuai, JING Changyi, MAO Shengfeng, ZHANG Ailian. Antimicrobial activity of Carya illinoensis leaves . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(4): 658-662. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.04.025
[8]	ZHENG Yongbo, ZHANG Yuyao, LIAO Zhouyu, LI Luliang, ZHOU Jinfeng, WANG Qiuhua, LI Shiyou. Combustion characteristics of stems and leaves of Eupatorium adenophorum . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(3): 450-456. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.03.019
[9]	ZENG Fei-li, BEN Ai-ling3, ZHENG Jing-rong, HAN Zheng-min. Identification and pathogenicity of bacterial strains carried by American pine wood nematodes . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(5): 696-702. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.05.010
[10]	YAN Zheng-liang, LIU Yun-cai, HU Guang-hui, LIU Yong-gang, MENG Meng. Primary insect pest occurrence and tree diversity in stands of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(2): 226-231. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.02.012
[11]	YUE Chao-yang, LIU Ai-hua, ZHANG Xin-ping, MA Pei-pei, JIAO Shu-ping. Poplar resistance to Melampsora rostrupii rust in Xinjiang . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(2): 262-268. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.02.015
[12]	XU Hua-chao, HAO Xiao-dong, HUANG Jun-hao, YE Tan-xian, YE Li-xin. Insects diversity of Fengyangshan Mountain in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.001
[13]	YANG Yong-gang, WU Xiao-qin. Research progress on pathogens of witches’ broom of bamboo . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(1): 144-148. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.023
[14]	LI Shi-you, LUO Wen-biao, SHU Qing-tai, MA Chang-le, MA Ai-li, ZHANG Qiao-rong. Combustibility of 25 woody plants for selection of fire-resistant tree species in Kunming area . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(3): 351-357.
[15]	LIU Bo, YU Shu-quan, ZHOU Guo-mo, ZHENG Wen-da, LIU Xue-song, LU Feng-zhu, HUANG Zhi-wei, ZHANG Zi-yan. Combustibility of Schima superba leaves using a cone calorimeter . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(1): 69-71.
[16]	LI Shi-you, LI Xiao-ning, LI Sheng-hong, JINGui-jun, ZHOUQuan, HUXiao-long, WANG Qiu-hua. Flame retardancy of wood bark from Keteleeria evelyniana, Pinus yunnanensis and Pinus armandii in Yunnan Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(2): 192-197.
[17]	BAI Hong-xia, YUAN Xiu-ying. Survey on the diversity of endophytes in Populus for Inner Mongolia . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(6): 629-635.
[18]	XU Hua-chao, SHI Zu-hua, WU Hong. Virulence of Beauveria bassiana on reproduction of the aphid Takecallis taiwanus . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(6): 599-603.
[19]	LI Ke-en. Effects of Sendebao and Bacillus thuringiensis on controlling Algedonia coclesalis . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(4): 445-448.
[20]	YANG Yan-hong, CHEN Yu-hui, ZHU Yun-feng. Isolation and identification of Cronartium ribicola mycoparasites in southwest China . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2005, 22(4): 414-419.

References

[1]	CUI Lu. Extraction of Remote Sensing Information and Spatiotemporal Simulation of NPP of Bamboo Forest in China[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2018.
[2]	TANG Changyi, ZHU Wenqiang, LUO Binggui, et al. Fire prevention and recovery capability of artificial management of Phyllostachys pubescens [J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol, 2013, 40(4): 22 − 25.
[3]	LI Feifeng. Study on Optional Solutions for Fuelbreak Construction from Economic Perspectives[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2012.
[4]	SHAN Yanlong, TAO Hongwei, ZHAO Li, et al. Ordination of fire resistances of bark of main species in Korean pine broad-leaved forests in Changbai Mountains [J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2011, 39(12): 49 − 50, 89.
[5]	LI Shiyou, LUO Wenbiao, SHU Qingtai, et al. Combustibility of 25 woody plants for selection of fire-resistant tree species in Kunming area [J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2009, 26(3): 351 − 357.
[6]	LI Shiyou, ZHAO Jiagang, ZHANG Yuyao, et al. Fire resistance of live leaves of 11 woody species in Central Yunnan Province [J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2015, 34(5): 25 − 30.
[7]	DIBBLE A C, WHITE R H, LEBOW P K. Combustion characteristics of north-eastern USA vegetation tested in the cone calorimeter: invasive versus non-invasive plants [J]. Int J Wildland Fire, 2007, 16(4): 426 − 443.
[8]	ENGSTROM J D, BUTLER J K, SMITH S G, et al. Ignition behavior of live California Chaparral leaves [J]. Combustion Sci Technol, 2004, 176(9): 1577 − 1591.
[9]	CLARKE P J, PRIOR L D, FRENCH B J, et al. Using a rainforest-flame forest mosaic to test the hypothesis that leaf and litter fuel flammability is under natural selection [J]. Oecologia, 2014, 176(4): 1123 − 1133.
[10]	LI Shuhua, LI Yanming, REN Binbin, et al. Fire-resistant function of landscape plants and plant arrangement of fireproof green space [J]. Landscape Archit, 2008(6): 92 − 97.
[11]	ZHONG Anjian, ZOU Lu, YE Qing, et al. Study on fire resistance of 15 landscape species in the urban area of Nanchang [J]. J Fujian For Sci Technol, 2010, 37(4): 63 − 63, 83.
[12]	JIN Qianrong, WU Zhihui, WU Xinghui. A study of greening design of Yunnan Wildlife Garden [J]. For Invent Plann, 2004, 29(1): 88 − 90.
[13]	LI Shiyou, LI Xiaoning, LUO Wenbiao, et al. Combustility of living branches and leaves for 20 gardens tree species [J]. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2008, 35(4): 490 − 493.
[14]	HE Zhonghua, YE Qing, ZHONG Anjian, et al. Research on the anti-fire of the tree species in the garden of Nanchang suburb [J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2010, 38(33): 18976 − 18978.
[15]	ZHANG Yuyao, ZHOU Jinfeng, LI Luliang, et al. Initial study on combustibility of new leaves of 11 garden woody species in Kunming [J]. For Resour Manage, 2013(6): 144 − 147.
[16]	JIN Meiju, HONG Wuyong. Study on technical regulations and standards of flammability for textiles [J]. Shanghai Textile Sci Technol, 2009, 37(9): 42 − 44.
[17]	CUI Yong, CHANG Jianmin, WANG Wenliang. Synthesis process of bio-oil phenolic resin used for glass-fiber reinforced plastic [J]. J For Eng, 2017, 2(6): 67 − 73.
[18]	CUI Fei, LUO Jing, CAI Xilai, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of determination of oxygen index on fire retardant PVC electrician casing [J]. J Saf Sci Tech, 2009, 5(2): 56 − 60.
[19]	ZHAO Guangxian. Flame retardant and flame retarder of rubber [J]. World Rubber Ind, 2005, 32(5): 3 − 8, 11.
[20]	ZHENG Yongbo, ZHANG Yuyao, LIAO Zhouyu, et al. Combustion characteristics of stems and leaves of Eupatorium adenophorum [J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2014, 31(3): 450 − 456.
[21]	SU Wenjing, ZHANG Siyu, HE Cheng, et al. Combustion characteristics of live leaves of 9 lianas species in Kunming, Yunnan Province [J]. For Resour Manage, 2017(6): 120 − 123.
[22]	ZHAO Xiaoming, SONG Xiuji, WANG Xueyi, et al. Regression model of effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on oil content in soybean variety Dongnong 46 [J]. Chin Agri Sci Bull, 2007, 23(7): 332 − 336.
[23]	NING Hailong, SONG Xiuji, WANG Xueyi, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on oil content in soybean [J]. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007, 29(3): 302 − 307.
[24]	DAI Kaijie, HE Fang, SHEN Youxin, et al. Effects of different phosphorus on growth and P absorption of Pinus yunnanensis Franch. seedlings [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29(8): 4078 − 4083.
[25]	DAI Kaijie, HE Fang, SHEN Youxin, et al. Biomass and its allocation of Pinus yunnanensis seedlings under phosphorus deficiency [J]. Guihaia, 2006, 26(2): 183 − 186.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(1) / Tables(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(1138) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()

Proportional views

HTML

除黑龙江、吉林、内蒙古和新疆4省(区)外，中国其余省(区、市)都有竹类生长和分布。据第8次(2009−2013年)森林资源清查，中国竹林面积达601 万hm²，占中国森林面积的3%，占世界竹林面积约20%^[1]。在廊道旁、公园、古寺庙、风景区等地方种植竹子以增加景观优质性，是园林配置的一部分。竹林分布广，面积大，因此需要考虑竹林保护与防火等问题。有些竹种具有一定的防火能力，被作为防火植物使用，如毛竹Phyllostachys edulis、雷竹Ph. praecox等^[2-3]。对于竹子的燃烧性能方面国内外研究较少，但是在森林可燃物的燃烧性和抗火性方面，国内外都进行了大量研究^[4-9]。李树华等^[10]认为：在火灾危险带种植刚竹Ph. sulphurea等植物可以减缓火势蔓延。钟安建等^[11]对南昌城区15种园林树种的抗火性进行研究，认为珊瑚树Viburnum odoratissimum抗火性能最强，桂花Osmanthus fragrans抗火性能最差。金钱荣等^[12]将木荷Schima superba选为防火功能较强的行道绿化树种。李世友等^[13]对20种园林绿化植物的鲜枝叶进行燃烧试验及燃烧性排序。何忠华等^[14]对12种园林树种的抗火性进行了综合评价，认为乐昌含笑Michelia chapensis抗火性最强。森林植物叶燃烧性研究方法可以为竹叶研究提供借鉴。张雨瑶等^[15]对11种园林木本植物的新叶片和2种对比植物老活叶片进行了垂直燃烧实验，认为鹅掌楸Liriodendron chinense等燃烧性较强。氧指数试验法主要用于测定聚合材料的阻燃性能，如对于各种纺织品^[16]、玻璃纤维增强塑料^[17]、聚氯乙烯(PVC)管^[18]、橡胶^[19]等阻燃性能的测定，在森林可燃物研究方面的应用较少。本研究对17种园林竹鲜叶进行燃烧性比较，旨在分析园林竹鲜叶的易燃性差异，为竹林保护与防火提供依据。

1. 材料与方法

1.1. 样品采集

以17种园林竹为研究对象(括号中数字为样品代号)，车筒竹Bambusa sinospinosa (1)、慈竹Neosinocalamus affinis (2)、灰金竹Phyllostachys nigra var. henonis (3)、灰香竹Chimonocalamus pallens (4)、料慈竹B. distegia (5)、龙竹Dendrocalamus giganteus (6)、绵竹B. intermedia (7)、青皮竹B. textilis (8)、沙罗单竹Schizostachyum funghomii (9)、秀叶箭竹Fargesia yuanjiangensis (10)、小佛肚竹B. ventricosa (11)、孝顺竹B. multiplex (12)、野龙竹D. semiscandens (13)、椅子竹D. bambusoides (14)、油竹B. surrecta (15)、云南甜龙竹D. hamiltonii (16)、紫竹Ph. nigra (17)。以5种常见易燃园林绿化用木本植物的老叶作对比，即阴香Cinnamomum burmanni (18)、桂花Osmanthus fragrans (19)、滇润楠Machilus yunnanensis (20)、蓝桉Eucalyptus globulus (21)、云南樟C. glanduliferum (22)。所有植物均栽植于西南林业大学校园内。由于新叶含水率呈动态变化，而老叶含水率相对稳定且易燃，故选老叶为实验样品。取叶时，选多株、不同枝条上外形和大小相似、质量相近的多片竹叶，于防火期采集健康的完整分枝，立刻带回实验室。

1.2. 实验方法

采集同枝条上的老叶，分为2组，分别进行燃烧实验和含水率测定。燃烧实验前测定鲜叶质量、叶脉长度并在白纸上勾绘出鲜叶外形，实验在高浓度医用氧条件下进行，点火气体为丙烷气。将竹叶叶尖朝上、叶柄朝下放入试件夹中，点火器火焰长度为10~15 mm，从上朝下点火，用秒表记录竹叶燃烧时间。每种鲜叶重复6次实验。含水率(H)测定采用105 ℃烘干恒量法，取相对含水率。实验采用JF-3型氧指数测定仪进行。

1.3. 数据获取及计算方法

叶片单位面积质量(W)、绝对线速率(V₁)、绝对面积损失速率(V₂)、绝对质量损失速率(V₃)、相对线速率(V₄)、相对面积损失速率(V₅)和相对质量损失速率(V₆)参照李世友等^[6]、张雨瑶等^[15]、郑永波等^[20]和苏文静等^[21]方法进行。

1.4. 数据处理

运用SPSS 18.0软件，以平均V₁、V₂、V₃、V₄、V₅、V₆等6个指标进行因子分析，得到22种植物鲜叶的燃烧性能得分并排序。根据燃烧性能得分，应用聚类分析法划分等级。采用因子分析法对数据进行标准化处理，通过KMO值和Bartlett球体检验提取公因子，利用旋转法使因子变量更具有可解释性，计算因子变量得分。

3. 结论与讨论

对17种园林竹和5种易燃木本植物鲜叶燃烧性6个指标的因子分析可知：各植物得分差距较大，最高分与最低分之间相差2.417，说明22种植物鲜叶的燃烧性差距较大。与5种园林木本植物相比，竹叶均为易燃叶。料慈竹、椅子竹、云南甜龙竹、龙竹、紫竹、绵竹和油竹的鲜叶燃烧性能相对较低，尤其是油竹，比桂花、阴香和滇润楠还难燃。绝对线速率(V₁)、相对线速率(V₄)、相对面积损失速率(V₅)和相对质量损失速率(V₆)对其燃烧性影响较大。基于17种竹的燃烧性能得分，SPSS聚类分析将其划为易燃和较易燃2个等级，其中易燃竹种10种，较易燃竹种7种。

鲜叶的燃烧性受自身理化性质和生态学、生物学特性等多因素的综合影响。昆明地区旱季降雨稀少，园林竹浇水较为频繁，浇水周期、浇水量和浇水次数对竹叶的含水率造成一定影响。施肥也会影响竹子生理性能。研究表明施氮肥会提高大豆Glycine max的脂肪含量^[22-23]；不同磷含量培养液处理下植株幼苗的株高、茎叶生物量和总生物量差异极其显著^[24]；不同磷源处理下云南松Pinus yunnanensis幼苗体内磷含量明显不同^[25]。施肥对植物化学成份的影响一定程度上也影响其燃烧性。本研究中的竹叶样品采自竹下较低部位；竹子受自身生长因素及光照等外部因素影响，不同空间部位的竹叶生长发育不均衡，也会导致竹叶不同的理化性质和生态学特性。以后的研究中，要尽量减少人工经营措施对实验取样的干扰，并且考虑不同空间部位对竹叶的作用，使样品更具有代表性。本研究根据竹叶的燃烧速率来分析燃烧性，而没有分析理化性质、生态学特性等对燃烧性的影响。因此，以上鲜叶的燃烧性排序及分类是在特定条件下得出的，能否适用于其他条件还需要进一步验证。

Reference (25)

[1]	崔璐. 中国竹林遥感信息提取及NPP时空模拟研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2018.	CUI Lu. Extraction of Remote Sensing Information and Spatiotemporal Simulation of NPP of Bamboo Forest in China[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2018.
[2]	唐昌贻, 朱文强, 罗炳贵, 等. 人工经营毛竹林防火能力及恢复分析初探[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2013, 40(4): 22 − 25.	TANG Changyi, ZHU Wenqiang, LUO Binggui, et al. Fire prevention and recovery capability of artificial management of Phyllostachys pubescens [J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol, 2013, 40(4): 22 − 25.
[3]	李飞峰. 基于经济学视角的生物防火林带营建技术方案选择研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2012.	LI Feifeng. Study on Optional Solutions for Fuelbreak Construction from Economic Perspectives[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2012.
[4]	单延龙, 陶洪伟, 赵丽, 等. 长白山红松阔叶林主要树种树皮抗火性的分析与排序[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(12): 49 − 50, 89.	SHAN Yanlong, TAO Hongwei, ZHAO Li, et al. Ordination of fire resistances of bark of main species in Korean pine broad-leaved forests in Changbai Mountains [J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2011, 39(12): 49 − 50, 89.
[5]	李世友, 罗文彪, 舒清态, 等. 昆明地区25种木本植物的燃烧性及防火树种筛选[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2009, 26(3): 351 − 357.	LI Shiyou, LUO Wenbiao, SHU Qingtai, et al. Combustibility of 25 woody plants for selection of fire-resistant tree species in Kunming area [J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2009, 26(3): 351 − 357.
[6]	李世友, 赵家刚, 张雨瑶, 等. 滇中地区11种森林木本植物活叶片抗火性能[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2015, 34(5): 25 − 30.	LI Shiyou, ZHAO Jiagang, ZHANG Yuyao, et al. Fire resistance of live leaves of 11 woody species in Central Yunnan Province [J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2015, 34(5): 25 − 30.
[7]	DIBBLE A C, WHITE R H, LEBOW P K. Combustion characteristics of north-eastern USA vegetation tested in the cone calorimeter: invasive versus non-invasive plants [J]. Int J Wildland Fire, 2007, 16(4): 426 − 443.
[8]	ENGSTROM J D, BUTLER J K, SMITH S G, et al. Ignition behavior of live California Chaparral leaves [J]. Combustion Sci Technol, 2004, 176(9): 1577 − 1591.
[9]	CLARKE P J, PRIOR L D, FRENCH B J, et al. Using a rainforest-flame forest mosaic to test the hypothesis that leaf and litter fuel flammability is under natural selection [J]. Oecologia, 2014, 176(4): 1123 − 1133.
[10]	李树华, 李延明, 任斌斌, 等. 园林植物的防火功能以及防火型园林绿地的植物配置手法[J]. 风景园林, 2008(6): 92 − 97.	LI Shuhua, LI Yanming, REN Binbin, et al. Fire-resistant function of landscape plants and plant arrangement of fireproof green space [J]. Landscape Archit, 2008(6): 92 − 97.
[11]	钟安建, 邹璐, 叶清, 等. 南昌城区15种园林树种的抗火性研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2010, 37(4): 63 − 63, 83.	ZHONG Anjian, ZOU Lu, YE Qing, et al. Study on fire resistance of 15 landscape species in the urban area of Nanchang [J]. J Fujian For Sci Technol, 2010, 37(4): 63 − 63, 83.
[12]	金钱荣, 吴志晖, 吴兴辉. 云南野生动物园环境绿化设计研究[J]. 林业调查规划, 2004, 29(1): 88 − 90.	JIN Qianrong, WU Zhihui, WU Xinghui. A study of greening design of Yunnan Wildlife Garden [J]. For Invent Plann, 2004, 29(1): 88 − 90.
[13]	李世友, 李小宁, 罗文彪, 等. 20种园林绿化树种活枝叶的燃烧性研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2008, 35(4): 490 − 493.	LI Shiyou, LI Xiaoning, LUO Wenbiao, et al. Combustility of living branches and leaves for 20 gardens tree species [J]. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2008, 35(4): 490 − 493.
[14]	何忠华, 叶清, 钟安建, 等. 南昌郊区园林树种抗火性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(33): 18976 − 18978.	HE Zhonghua, YE Qing, ZHONG Anjian, et al. Research on the anti-fire of the tree species in the garden of Nanchang suburb [J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2010, 38(33): 18976 − 18978.
[15]	张雨瑶, 周劲峰, 李路良, 等. 昆明地区11种园林木本植物新叶片燃烧性分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(6): 144 − 147.	ZHANG Yuyao, ZHOU Jinfeng, LI Luliang, et al. Initial study on combustibility of new leaves of 11 garden woody species in Kunming [J]. For Resour Manage, 2013(6): 144 − 147.
[16]	金美菊, 洪武勇. 纺织品燃烧性能技术法规与标准研究[J]. 上海纺织科技, 2009, 37(9): 42 − 44.	JIN Meiju, HONG Wuyong. Study on technical regulations and standards of flammability for textiles [J]. Shanghai Textile Sci Technol, 2009, 37(9): 42 − 44.
[17]	崔勇, 常建民, 王文亮. 玻璃纤维增强塑料用热解油-酚醛树脂的合成工艺[J]. 林业工程学报, 2017, 2(6): 67 − 73.	CUI Yong, CHANG Jianmin, WANG Wenliang. Synthesis process of bio-oil phenolic resin used for glass-fiber reinforced plastic [J]. J For Eng, 2017, 2(6): 67 − 73.
[18]	崔飞, 罗静, 蔡喜来, 等. 阻燃PVC电工套管氧指数测定中的影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2009, 5(2): 56 − 60.	CUI Fei, LUO Jing, CAI Xilai, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of determination of oxygen index on fire retardant PVC electrician casing [J]. J Saf Sci Tech, 2009, 5(2): 56 − 60.
[19]	赵光贤. 橡胶的阻燃与阻燃剂[J]. 世界橡胶工业, 2005, 32(5): 3 − 8, 11.	ZHAO Guangxian. Flame retardant and flame retarder of rubber [J]. World Rubber Ind, 2005, 32(5): 3 − 8, 11.
[20]	郑永波, 张雨瑶, 廖周瑜, 等. 紫茎泽兰茎叶的燃烧性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(3): 450 − 456.	ZHENG Yongbo, ZHANG Yuyao, LIAO Zhouyu, et al. Combustion characteristics of stems and leaves of Eupatorium adenophorum [J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2014, 31(3): 450 − 456.
[21]	苏文静, 张思玉, 何诚, 等. 昆明地区9种藤本植物活叶片的燃烧性[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(6): 120 − 123.	SU Wenjing, ZHANG Siyu, HE Cheng, et al. Combustion characteristics of live leaves of 9 lianas species in Kunming, Yunnan Province [J]. For Resour Manage, 2017(6): 120 − 123.
[22]	赵小铭, 宋秀吉, 王雪依, 等. 高油大豆东农46号脂肪含量的氮磷钾肥效应回归模型[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(7): 332 − 336.	ZHAO Xiaoming, SONG Xiuji, WANG Xueyi, et al. Regression model of effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on oil content in soybean variety Dongnong 46 [J]. Chin Agri Sci Bull, 2007, 23(7): 332 − 336.
[23]	宁海龙, 宋秀吉, 王雪依, 等. 氮磷钾肥对大豆脂肪含量的效应[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29(3): 302 − 307.	NING Hailong, SONG Xiuji, WANG Xueyi, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on oil content in soybean [J]. Chin J Oil Crop Sci, 2007, 29(3): 302 − 307.
[24]	戴开结, 何方, 沈有信, 等. 不同磷源对云南松幼苗生长和磷吸收量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(8): 4078 − 4083.	DAI Kaijie, HE Fang, SHEN Youxin, et al. Effects of different phosphorus on growth and P absorption of Pinus yunnanensis Franch. seedlings [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29(8): 4078 − 4083.
[25]	戴开结, 何方, 沈有信, 等. 低磷胁迫下云南松幼苗的生物量及其分配[J]. 广西植物, 2006, 26(2): 183 − 186.	DAI Kaijie, HE Fang, SHEN Youxin, et al. Biomass and its allocation of Pinus yunnanensis seedlings under phosphorus deficiency [J]. Guihaia, 2006, 26(2): 183 − 186.

代号	H/%	W/(g·m⁻²)	绝对燃烧速率			相对燃烧速率
代号	H/%	W/(g·m⁻²)	V₁/(cm·s⁻¹)	V₂/(cm²·s⁻¹)	V₃/(g·s⁻¹)	V₄/(%·s⁻¹)	V₅/(%·s⁻¹)	V₆/(%·s⁻¹)
1	40.51	146	1.079	0.863	0.012	8.667	8.667	8.667
2	56.99	56	1.349	2.087	0.012	8.566	8.566	8.566
3	51.86	104	0.552	0.541	0.005	6.882	6.882	6.882
4	55.12	104	0.697	0.402	0.004	6.954	6.954	6.954
5	43.84	116	0.642	1.283	0.014	3.140	3.140	3.140
6	58.91	96	0.421	1.320	0.012	2.140	2.140	2.140
7	53.07	92	0.425	0.644	0.006	3.450	3.450	3.450
8	56.73	58	0.981	1.316	0.008	6.820	6.820	6.820
9	42.93	66	1.245	1.486	0.010	7.600	7.600	7.600
10	44.08	53	1.194	1.058	0.006	9.450	9.450	9.450
11	44.27	87	1.171	1.885	0.016	7.583	7.583	7.583
12	46.07	70	0.849	1.040	0.007	7.040	7.040	7.040
13	56.83	70	0.858	2.177	0.016	4.200	4.200	4.200
14	58.97	72	0.520	0.737	0.005	4.700	4.700	4.700
15	55.34	102	0.216	0.345	0.004	1.500	1.500	1.500
16	58.79	84	0.546	1.579	0.013	2.660	2.660	2.660
17	43.15	94	0.521	0.604	0.006	5.140	5.140	5.140
18	52.36	190	0.330	0.977	0.018	2.967	2.967	2.967
19	47.55	322	0.316	0.747	0.037	4.200	3.020	4.400
20	49.12	230	0.173	0.486	0.011	1.767	1.767	1.767
21	46.93	483	0.146	0.228	0.011	0.883	0.883	0.883
22	52.21	185	0.118	0.544	0.010	0.983	1.000	0.983

代号	V₁	V₂	V₃	V₄	V₅	V₆
1	1.108 53	−0.270 53	0.134 17	1.396 29	1.403 15	1.393 99
2	1.809 85	1.895 67	0.134 17	1.359 08	1.366 27	1.356 76
3	−0.260 34	−0.840 40	−0.849 73	0.738 69	0.751 40	0.735 89
4	0.116 30	−1.086 40	−0.990 29	0.765 21	0.777 69	0.762 44
5	−0.026 57	0.472 77	0.415 28	−0.639 89	−0.614 88	−0.643 72
6	−0.600 61	0.538 25	0.134 17	−1.008 29	−0.980 00	−1.012 41
7	−0.590 22	−0.658 11	−0.709 17	−0.525 68	−0.501 69	−0.529 43
8	0.853 98	0.531 17	−0.428 06	0.715 85	0.728 77	0.713 03
9	1.539 71	0.832 03	−0.146 95	1.003 20	1.013 56	1.000 61
10	1.407 24	0.074 57	−0.709 17	1.684 76	1.689 04	1.682 67
11	1.347 50	1.538 17	0.696 40	0.996 94	1.007 35	0.994 34
12	0.511 11	0.042 72	−0.568 62	0.796 90	0.809 09	0.794 14
13	0.534 49	2.054 95	0.696 40	−0.249 38	−0.227 85	−0.252 92
14	−0.343 46	−0.493 52	−0.849 73	−0.065 17	−0.045 29	−0.068 58
15	−1.133 09	−1.187 28	−0.990 29	−1.244 07	−1.213 68	−1.248 36
16	−0.275 92	0.996 62	0.274 72	−0.816 72	−0.790 14	−0.820 69
17	−0.340 86	−0.728 90	−0.709 17	0.096 92	0.115 36	0.093 65
18	−0.836 98	−0.068 78	0.977 51	−0.703 62	−0.678 05	−0.707 50
19	−0.873 34	−0.475 83	3.648 09	−0.249 38	−0.658 70	−0.179 18
20	−1.244 78	−0.937 74	−0.006 39	−1.145 71	−1.116 19	−1.149 92
21	−1.314 91	−1.394 34	−0.006 39	−1.471 38	−1.438 96	−1.475 84
22	−1.387 64	−0.835 09	−0.146 95	−1.434 54	−1.396 24	−1.438 97

成分	初始特征值			提取载荷平方和			旋转载荷平方和
成分	总计	方差百分比/%	累积/%	总计	方差百分比/%	累积/%	总计	方差百分比/%	累积/%
1	4.114	68.567	68.567	4.114	68.567	68.567	4.084	68.070	68.070
2	1.263	21.056	89.623	1.263	21.056	89.623	1.293	21.553	89.623
3	0.591	9.843	99.466
4	0.031	0.515	99.981
5	0.001	0.019	100.000
6	1.887×10⁻⁸	3.145×10⁻⁷	100.000

评价指标	主成分		评价指标	主成分
评价指标	1	2	评价指标	1	2
V₁	0.949	0.227	V₄	0.981	−0.014
V₂	0.480	0.718	V₅	0.990	−0.600
V₃	−0.224	0.850	V₆	0.979	−0.007

评价指标	主成分		评价指标	主成分
评价指标	1	2	评价指标	1	2
V₁	0.224	0.125	V₄	0.245	−0.066
V₂	0.079	0.538	V₅	0.250	−0.102
V₃	−0.103	0.680	V₆	0.244	−0.060