Zhou Guomo, Wei Xinliang, Li Rongxun, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation to Tourist Resources Quality in the West Lake Scenic Resorts of Hangzhou[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1997, 14(4): 375-381.
Citation: FUBin-ling, NIE Xiang-yong, YAO Shun-bin. Anti-deviation experiments on systematic sampling for continuous forest inventory of Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(1): 44-49.

Anti-deviation experiments on systematic sampling for continuous forest inventory of Zhejiang Province

  • Received Date: 2006-02-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2006-05-29
  • Publish Date: 2007-02-20
  • Data accuracy and reliability are key factors forinventory results to objectively and factually reflectforest resource situations.Sampling scheme design, inventory technology and methodology, operational process and many other factors influences the continuous forest inventory(CFI)data accuracy and reliability.Among them, sampling scheme design is the key factorof effecting CFI data quality. In order to optimize CFI system, and prevent the side effects to CFI data quality by periodical alterations of systematic sampling and special artificial treatment issues, Zhejiang Province started experiments and researches on anti-deviation technology adopting sampling scheme of permanentplots plus substitute(temporary) plots in 1994. This paper calculates and analyzes three periods of Zhejiang Province CFI data since 1989 by groups, using methods of the Difference Test for Population Average and the Variance Analysis. Every combination of the three periods of data passes the Difference Test for Population Average and the Single Factor Variance Analysis, and there are no noticeable differences. Tentative experimental results demonstrate that the CFI sample plots are well representative of Zhejiang forest resources, and obvious systematic deviation does not exist.[Ch, 3 fig. 9 tab. 13 ref.]
  • [1] ZHANG Yanfei, ZHOU Xiaoguang, WU Yaqi.  Spatiotemporal differences and influencing factors of urban development quality in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(4): 892-900. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220623
    [2] REN Dianting, ZHANG Jun, JIN Xin, LI Ping, WANG Yixiang, GE Hongli, TAO Jixing.  Simulation and prediction of tree species composition change of forests in Taizhou City . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(3): 608-616. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220341
    [3] KUANG Yuanyuan, FAN Tao.  Differences and influencing factors of soil moisture in karst microhabitats in southeast Yunnan . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(3): 531-539. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190383
    [4] HUANG Ting, XUN Weibing, ZHANG Ruifu.  Soil organic matter and crop yield with long-term fertilization schemes for an upland crop rotation in northern China . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(2): 253-260. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.02.008
    [5] SHI Quan, CHEN Xiaopei, LIN Xinchun, XU Yonghan, XU Yingwu.  Oligomeric status of the SOC1 gene from Phyllostachys violascens and Arabidopsis thaliana . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016, 33(2): 183-190. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.02.001
    [6] YANG Jingyi, XIA Yufang, XIE Zhaojun, TAO Xingyue, DING Xiaoxia.  Difference analysis using an FTIR spectrum for individual walnuts . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(3): 420-425. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.03.014
    [7] LAI Chao, FANG Luming, LI Ji, ZHOU Changhe.  Design and implementation of an integrated forest resources information system . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(6): 890-896. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.06.010
    [8] LUO Xian-Xian.  Straight-line intersect sampling with comprehensive forest resource monitoring . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(4): 566-573. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.04.013
    [9] ZOU Yi-qiao, DU Qun, GE Hong-li.  An age-based growth model applied to no-age conditions . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(6): 889-896. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.06.013
    [10] JI Bi-yong, TAO Ji-xing, ZHANG Guo-jiang, DU Qun, YAO Hong-wen, XU Jun.  Zhejiang Province’s forest vegetation biomass assessment for guaranteed accuracy . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 328-334. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.002
    [11] ZENG -wei, LI Guang-hui, HU Hai-gen, TANG Jian-feng.  Design and implementation of personal digital assistant (PDA) based information collection system for forest resources . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(1): 111-115.
    [12] LUO Xian-xian, KANG Xin-gang.  Progress in research on the comprehensive monitoring of forest resources . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(6): 803-809.
    [13] GE Wen-ning.  Alteration of property right of state-owned forest in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(3): 338-341.
    [14] HUANG Bi-heng, GUAN Yu, WU Zhi-song.  Computation of repeat number of tests comparing mean difference . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2005, 22(1): 119-122.
    [15] LIU An-xing.  Design of dynamic forest resources monitoring system of Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2005, 22(4): 449-453.
    [16] CAI Liang-liang, CAI Xia, ZHU Hong-wei.  Problems and solutions in the implementation of forest resources dynamic information system at the county level . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2004, 21(2): 228-230.
    [17] ZHANG Guo-jiang, LIU An-xing.  Calculating method of unmeasured cut in continuous forest inventory . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2002, 19(3): 251-254.
    [18] GUAN Yu.  On sequential sample test . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2002, 19(1): 90-94.
    [19] WEI Xin-liang, HU Yong-xu, YU Long-fei, CAI Xia, ZHANG Sheng-chao, ZHOU Bao-feng.  Technology system of forest management survey in collective forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2001, 18(3): 223-227.
    [20] Yuan Ronglan, Tang Cai, Yu Qilong.  Spatial Distribution Pattern and Sampling Methods of Petrova cristata Larvae. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1996, 13(4): 489-496.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 26.4 %FULLTEXT: 26.4 %META: 71.7 %META: 71.7 %PDF: 1.8 %PDF: 1.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.5 %其他: 11.5 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %China: 1.3 %China: 1.3 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %三亚: 0.0 %三亚: 0.0 %上海: 3.8 %上海: 3.8 %上饶: 0.1 %上饶: 0.1 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临夏回族自治州: 0.0 %临夏回族自治州: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临沂: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %丽水: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %乌兰察布: 0.0 %乌兰察布: 0.0 %乌鲁木齐: 0.5 %乌鲁木齐: 0.5 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %伊犁: 0.0 %伊犁: 0.0 %佳木斯: 0.0 %佳木斯: 0.0 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %信阳: 0.4 %信阳: 0.4 %克孜勒苏: 0.0 %克孜勒苏: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰辛: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %北京: 18.2 %北京: 18.2 %北屯: 0.1 %北屯: 0.1 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南充: 0.1 %南充: 0.1 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南平: 0.0 %南平: 0.0 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南阳: 0.2 %南阳: 0.2 %厦门: 0.0 %厦门: 0.0 %台州: 4.5 %台州: 4.5 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %吉安: 0.1 %吉安: 0.1 %吉林: 0.0 %吉林: 0.0 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸宁: 0.0 %咸宁: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %商丘: 0.0 %商丘: 0.0 %商洛: 0.0 %商洛: 0.0 %喀什: 0.1 %喀什: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %孝感: 0.0 %孝感: 0.0 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %宿州: 0.1 %宿州: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.0 %宿迁: 0.0 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %广西玉林: 0.0 %广西玉林: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %延边: 0.0 %延边: 0.0 %延边朝鲜族自治州: 0.0 %延边朝鲜族自治州: 0.0 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %德州: 0.0 %德州: 0.0 %德阳: 0.0 %德阳: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %承德: 0.0 %承德: 0.0 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %抚顺: 0.0 %抚顺: 0.0 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %曲靖: 0.1 %曲靖: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 6.7 %杭州: 6.7 %枣庄: 0.0 %枣庄: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %株洲: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.0 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %梅州: 0.0 %梅州: 0.0 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %汕头: 0.0 %汕头: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %河池: 0.0 %河池: 0.0 %泉州: 0.0 %泉州: 0.0 %泰安: 0.1 %泰安: 0.1 %泰州: 0.0 %泰州: 0.0 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 2.6 %湖州: 2.6 %湘西: 0.1 %湘西: 0.1 %滨州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %漳州: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %焦作: 0.0 %焦作: 0.0 %珠海: 0.0 %珠海: 0.0 %白山: 0.0 %白山: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %盘锦: 0.1 %盘锦: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.0 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %舟山: 0.1 %舟山: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 2.0 %芒廷维尤: 2.0 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %茂名: 0.1 %茂名: 0.1 %荆门: 0.0 %荆门: 0.0 %莆田: 0.0 %莆田: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 2.1 %衢州: 2.1 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 27.0 %西宁: 27.0 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %西隆: 0.0 %西隆: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %资阳: 0.0 %资阳: 0.0 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %辽阳: 0.1 %辽阳: 0.1 %连云港: 0.0 %连云港: 0.0 %通化: 0.1 %通化: 0.1 %遂宁: 0.0 %遂宁: 0.0 %遵义: 0.0 %遵义: 0.0 %邢台: 0.1 %邢台: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %郑州: 2.4 %郑州: 2.4 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %金华: 0.5 %金华: 0.5 %铁岭: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %铜仁: 0.0 %铜仁: 0.0 %铜川: 0.0 %铜川: 0.0 %锦州: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %阜阳: 0.0 %阜阳: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %龙岩: 0.1 %龙岩: 0.1 %其他其他China[]三亚上海上饶东莞临夏回族自治州临汾临沂丽水乌兰察布乌鲁木齐九江伊犁佳木斯保定信阳克孜勒苏六安兰州兰辛包头北京北屯南京南充南宁南平南昌南通南阳厦门台州合肥吉安吉林周口呼和浩特咸宁咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布商丘商洛喀什嘉兴大庆大连天津太原孝感宁波安庆安康安阳宜昌宜春宣城宿州宿迁常州常德广州广西玉林廊坊延边延边朝鲜族自治州张家口徐州德州德阳惠州成都扬州承德抚州抚顺无锡昆明晋中晋城曲靖朝阳杭州枣庄柳州株洲格兰特县桂林梅州武汉汕头沈阳沧州河池泉州泰安泰州济南济源海口淮南深圳温州湖州湘西滨州漯河漳州潍坊潮州濮阳烟台焦作珠海白山盐城盘锦石家庄福州科珀斯克里斯蒂秦皇岛绍兴舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州茂名荆门莆田菏泽蚌埠衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安西隆诺沃克贵阳资阳赣州辽阳连云港通化遂宁遵义邢台邯郸郑州重庆金华铁岭铜仁铜川锦州镇江长春长沙阜阳阳泉青岛驻马店黄石齐齐哈尔龙岩Highcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(1679) PDF downloads(154) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Anti-deviation experiments on systematic sampling for continuous forest inventory of Zhejiang Province

Abstract: Data accuracy and reliability are key factors forinventory results to objectively and factually reflectforest resource situations.Sampling scheme design, inventory technology and methodology, operational process and many other factors influences the continuous forest inventory(CFI)data accuracy and reliability.Among them, sampling scheme design is the key factorof effecting CFI data quality. In order to optimize CFI system, and prevent the side effects to CFI data quality by periodical alterations of systematic sampling and special artificial treatment issues, Zhejiang Province started experiments and researches on anti-deviation technology adopting sampling scheme of permanentplots plus substitute(temporary) plots in 1994. This paper calculates and analyzes three periods of Zhejiang Province CFI data since 1989 by groups, using methods of the Difference Test for Population Average and the Variance Analysis. Every combination of the three periods of data passes the Difference Test for Population Average and the Single Factor Variance Analysis, and there are no noticeable differences. Tentative experimental results demonstrate that the CFI sample plots are well representative of Zhejiang forest resources, and obvious systematic deviation does not exist.[Ch, 3 fig. 9 tab. 13 ref.]

Zhou Guomo, Wei Xinliang, Li Rongxun, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation to Tourist Resources Quality in the West Lake Scenic Resorts of Hangzhou[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1997, 14(4): 375-381.
Citation: FUBin-ling, NIE Xiang-yong, YAO Shun-bin. Anti-deviation experiments on systematic sampling for continuous forest inventory of Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(1): 44-49.

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return