3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应

张文婷; 谢福春; 王华田; 于文胜; 迟炳庆; 杜军; 宋黎; 姜成平

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应

张文婷 , 谢福春 , 王华田 , 于文胜 , 迟炳庆 , 杜军 , 宋黎 , 姜成平

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2009 > 26(2): 182-187

张文婷, 谢福春, 王华田, 于文胜, 迟炳庆, 杜军, 宋黎, 姜成平. 3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 182-187.

引用本文:

张文婷, 谢福春, 王华田, 于文胜, 迟炳庆, 杜军, 宋黎, 姜成平. 3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 182-187.

ZHANG Wen-ting, XIE Fu-chun, WANG Hua-tian, YU Wen-sheng, CHI Bing-qing, DU Jun, SONG Li, JIANG Cheng-ping. Physiological response of three garden plants to drought stress[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(2): 182-187.

Citation:

ZHANG Wen-ting, XIE Fu-chun, WANG Hua-tian, YU Wen-sheng, CHI Bing-qing, DU Jun, SONG Li, JIANG Cheng-ping. Physiological response of three garden plants to drought stress[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(2): 182-187.

3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应

1.
山东农业大学农业生态与环境重点实验室，山东泰安 271018;
2.
山东省烟台市园林管理处，山东烟台 264000;
3.
山东省烟台市林业种苗站，山东烟台 264000

详细信息

通信作者: 王华田

Physiological response of three garden plants to drought stress

1.
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Ecology and Environment，Shandong Agricultural University，Taian 271018，Shandong，China;
2.
Garden Management Department of Yantai City，Yantai 264000，Shandong，China;
3.
Forest Seed and Seedling Station of Yantai City，Yantai 264000，Shandong，China

More Information

Corresponding author: WANG Hua-tian

摘要: 针对中国北方城市干旱缺水、园林绿地植物难以保证及时灌溉的现象，选择2年生灌木金叶女贞Ligustrum vicaryi，连翘Forsythia suspensa，紫薇Lagerstroemia indica，采用盆栽方法测定了土壤自然干旱胁迫过程中影响各树种抗旱性的主要生理生化指标，利用隶属函数法对3种园林植物幼苗进行综合评定。结果表明：随土壤水分胁迫的加重，金叶女贞的叶绿素质量分数先升高后降低再升高，连翘先降低后升高，紫薇呈先升高后降低的趋势，金叶女贞和连翘在不同胁迫时期的叶绿素质量分数达到显著差异水平；金叶女贞在遭受干旱胁迫后叶肉组织相对电导率呈升高—降低—升高，连翘先降低后升高，紫薇则是逐渐升高的趋势，紫薇和连翘在不同胁迫时期，相对电导率均达显著差异水平；金叶女贞的超氧化物歧化酶活性先升高后降低，紫薇则呈先降低后升高，连翘呈升高—降低—升高趋势，3个树种均达到显著差异；可溶性蛋白质量分数均呈先下降后上升的趋势，连翘达差异显著水平；脯氨酸质量分数金叶女贞呈降低—升高—降低，连翘和紫薇则是一直升高的趋势，紫薇在不同时期达到显著差异水平。综合评价结果表明，3种灌木的抗旱性强弱为：金叶女贞＞连翘＞紫薇。图5表1参17
- 植物学 /
- 金叶女贞 /
- 连翘 /
- 紫薇 /
- 抗旱性 /
- 生理指标
Abstract: Because of difficulty with timely irrigation of garden plants，this research was conducted to determine the best water-stress tolerant shrub of three types to plant in the drought prone north of China. Two-year-old potted shrubs of Ligustrum vicaryi，Forsythia suspense，and Lagerstroemia indica were chosen and treated with natural drought stress with three replications in a 3 × 3 randomized block design. Physiological characteristics were measured during the course of drought stress，and the membership function was used to assess the plants’ complex anti-drought stress capability. Results showed that as drought stress increased，the leaf chlorophyll curve for Li. vicaryi was increase-decrease-increase（P＜0.05），for F. suspensa was decrease-increase（P＜0.05），and for La. indica was increase-decrease. The curve of the relative electrolyte conductivity of the leaf tissue solution for Li. vicaryi was increase-decrease-increase，for F. suspensa was decrease-increase（P＜0.05），and for La. indica was a constant increase（P＜0.05）. The curve of superoxide dismutase （SOD） activity for Li. vicaryi was increase-decrease，for La. indica was decrease-increase，and for F. suspensa was increase-decrease-increase，and SOD activity of different periods of the three species respectively had significant difference（P＜0.05）. Soluble protein contents of the three shrubs decreased at first and then increased，and soluble protein contents of different periods for F. suspense respectively had significant difference（P＜0.05）. The proline content of Li. vicaryi was decrease-increase-decrease（P＜0.05）while F. suspensa and La. indica constantly in creased. Complex appraisal of drought resistance by using membership functions for the three shrubs showed： Li. vicaryi ＞ F. suspensa ＞ La. indica.［Ch，5 fig. 1 tab. 17 ref.］
- botany /
- Ligustrum vicaryi /
- Forsythia suspense /
- Lagerstroemia indica /
- drought resistance /
- physiological index

[1]	贺丹, 李海涛, 原江琴, 汪安印, 王翼飞, 李永华, 刘艺平. 郑州市7种园林植物滞尘能力与叶片生理及光合响应 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40(6): 1205-1214. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230160
[2]	颜越, 金荷仙, 王瑛, 陈超怡, 范颖佳, 柳丹. 间作模式对社区花园可食植物生理特性及铅吸收的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40(2): 338-347. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220365
[3]	李呈呈, 吴其超, 马燕, 栗雨昊, 臧德奎. 6个彩叶桂品种对低温胁迫的生理响应及抗寒性评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(4): 828-836. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200606
[4]	王东丽, 张日升, 方祥, 王凯, 吴叶礼, 秦崧悦, 龙丹丹, 沈海鸥. 固沙樟子松种子萌发与幼苗生长对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(1): 60-68. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.008
[5]	王树和, 周彩勤, 张奎望, 刘慧迪. 金叶女贞棒孢叶斑病菌的生物学特性、致病性及系统发育 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(6): 1174-1181. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.06.015
[6]	高晓宁, 赵冰, 刘旭梅, 黄文梅. 4个杜鹃花品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(4): 597-607. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.04.005
[7]	洪震, 练发良, 刘术新, 胡有金. 3种乡土园林地被植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(4): 636-642. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.04.012
[8]	王颖, 陆国权, 王晨静, 赵习武. 彩叶芋2个品种抗寒性的比较 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(2): 285-290. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.02.018
[9]	曾德静, 王铖, 刘军, 尹丽娟. 水涝胁迫下海州常山形态和生理指标的变化 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(2): 172-178. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.02.003
[10]	陈闻, 赵颖, 叶正钱, 王美琴, 王晶, 王国明. 干旱胁迫对5个海岛树种生长及生理特性的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(4): 490-498. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.04.005
[11]	阮志平, 黄全能, 王芬芬, 姚碧艳, 刘与明, 李振基. 硝酸镧对董棕幼苗耐寒性的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(1): 23-28. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.01.005
[12]	顾翠花, 王守先, 田苗. 紫薇品种数量分类研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(6): 903-907. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.06.016
[13]	王改萍, 岑显超, 彭方仁, 杨红宁. 不同楸树品种的抗旱性鉴定 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(6): 815-821.
[14]	王磊, 汤庚国, 刘彤. 长筒石蒜切花衰败生理及超微结构的变化 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(4): 498-502.
[15]	韩艳, 林夏珍. 5种常绿阔叶树幼苗的抗旱性比较 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(6): 822-828.
[16]	顾翠花, 王守先, 张启翔. 我国紫薇属植物AFLP分子标记体系的优化 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(3): 298-303.
[17]	陈柯, 王小德. 常春油麻藤等3种藤本植物抗旱性生理指标研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(3): 314-318.
[18]	王慰, 黄胜利, 丁国剑, 黄有军, 黄坚钦, 郑炳松. 盐胁迫下舟山新木姜子1年生苗形态变化及生理反应 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(2): 168-172.
[19]	阮志平, 廖启炓, 丁印龙. 4种棕榈科植物在厦门越冬的生理指标比较 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(1): 115-118.
[20]	孙晓萍. 金叶女贞的引种栽培和园林价值 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1995, 12(2): 156-160.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/id/421

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2009/2/182

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 4468
HTML全文浏览量: 213
PDF下载量: 218
被引次数: 0

3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应

1. 山东农业大学农业生态与环境重点实验室，山东泰安 271018;

2. 山东省烟台市园林管理处，山东烟台 264000;

3. 山东省烟台市林业种苗站，山东烟台 264000

通信作者: 王华田

刊出日期: 2009-04-20

关键词:

摘要: 针对中国北方城市干旱缺水、园林绿地植物难以保证及时灌溉的现象，选择2年生灌木金叶女贞Ligustrum vicaryi，连翘Forsythia suspensa，紫薇Lagerstroemia indica，采用盆栽方法测定了土壤自然干旱胁迫过程中影响各树种抗旱性的主要生理生化指标，利用隶属函数法对3种园林植物幼苗进行综合评定。结果表明：随土壤水分胁迫的加重，金叶女贞的叶绿素质量分数先升高后降低再升高，连翘先降低后升高，紫薇呈先升高后降低的趋势，金叶女贞和连翘在不同胁迫时期的叶绿素质量分数达到显著差异水平；金叶女贞在遭受干旱胁迫后叶肉组织相对电导率呈升高—降低—升高，连翘先降低后升高，紫薇则是逐渐升高的趋势，紫薇和连翘在不同胁迫时期，相对电导率均达显著差异水平；金叶女贞的超氧化物歧化酶活性先升高后降低，紫薇则呈先降低后升高，连翘呈升高—降低—升高趋势，3个树种均达到显著差异；可溶性蛋白质量分数均呈先下降后上升的趋势，连翘达差异显著水平；脯氨酸质量分数金叶女贞呈降低—升高—降低，连翘和紫薇则是一直升高的趋势，紫薇在不同时期达到显著差异水平。综合评价结果表明，3种灌木的抗旱性强弱为：金叶女贞＞连翘＞紫薇。图5表1参17

English Abstract

Physiological response of three garden plants to drought stress

1. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Ecology and Environment，Shandong Agricultural University，Taian 271018，Shandong，China;

2. Garden Management Department of Yantai City，Yantai 264000，Shandong，China;

3. Forest Seed and Seedling Station of Yantai City，Yantai 264000，Shandong，China

Corresponding author: WANG Hua-tian

Publish Date: 2009-04-20

Keywords:

Abstract: Because of difficulty with timely irrigation of garden plants，this research was conducted to determine the best water-stress tolerant shrub of three types to plant in the drought prone north of China. Two-year-old potted shrubs of Ligustrum vicaryi，Forsythia suspense，and Lagerstroemia indica were chosen and treated with natural drought stress with three replications in a 3 × 3 randomized block design. Physiological characteristics were measured during the course of drought stress，and the membership function was used to assess the plants’ complex anti-drought stress capability. Results showed that as drought stress increased，the leaf chlorophyll curve for Li. vicaryi was increase-decrease-increase（P＜0.05），for F. suspensa was decrease-increase（P＜0.05），and for La. indica was increase-decrease. The curve of the relative electrolyte conductivity of the leaf tissue solution for Li. vicaryi was increase-decrease-increase，for F. suspensa was decrease-increase（P＜0.05），and for La. indica was a constant increase（P＜0.05）. The curve of superoxide dismutase （SOD） activity for Li. vicaryi was increase-decrease，for La. indica was decrease-increase，and for F. suspensa was increase-decrease-increase，and SOD activity of different periods of the three species respectively had significant difference（P＜0.05）. Soluble protein contents of the three shrubs decreased at first and then increased，and soluble protein contents of different periods for F. suspense respectively had significant difference（P＜0.05）. The proline content of Li. vicaryi was decrease-increase-decrease（P＜0.05）while F. suspensa and La. indica constantly in creased. Complex appraisal of drought resistance by using membership functions for the three shrubs showed： Li. vicaryi ＞ F. suspensa ＞ La. indica.［Ch，5 fig. 1 tab. 17 ref.］

张文婷, 谢福春, 王华田, 于文胜, 迟炳庆, 杜军, 宋黎, 姜成平. 3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 182-187.

引用本文:

张文婷, 谢福春, 王华田, 于文胜, 迟炳庆, 杜军, 宋黎, 姜成平. 3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 182-187.

Citation:

ZHANG Wen-ting, XIE Fu-chun, WANG Hua-tian, YU Wen-sheng, CHI Bing-qing, DU Jun, SONG Li, JIANG Cheng-ping. Physiological response of three garden plants to drought stress[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(2): 182-187.

全文HTML

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

留言板

3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应

通信作者: 王华田

Physiological response of three garden plants to drought stress

Corresponding author: WANG Hua-tian

计量

出版历程

3种园林灌木幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应

1. 山东农业大学 农业生态与环境重点实验室，山东 泰安 271018; 2. 山东省烟台市园林管理处，山东 烟台 264000; 3. 山东省烟台市林业种苗站，山东 烟台 264000

通信作者: 王华田

English Abstract

Physiological response of three garden plants to drought stress

1. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Ecology and Environment，Shandong Agricultural University，Taian 271018，Shandong，China; 2. Garden Management Department of Yantai City，Yantai 264000，Shandong，China; 3. Forest Seed and Seedling Station of Yantai City，Yantai 264000，Shandong，China

Corresponding author: WANG Hua-tian

全文HTML

目录

1. 山东农业大学农业生态与环境重点实验室，山东泰安 271018;

2. 山东省烟台市园林管理处，山东烟台 264000;

3. 山东省烟台市林业种苗站，山东烟台 264000

1. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Ecology and Environment，Shandong Agricultural University，Taian 271018，Shandong，China;

2. Garden Management Department of Yantai City，Yantai 264000，Shandong，China;

3. Forest Seed and Seedling Station of Yantai City，Yantai 264000，Shandong，China