城市公园植物景观量化评价研究

邵锋; 宁惠娟; 包志毅; 侯维微

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

城市公园植物景观量化评价研究

邵锋 , 宁惠娟 , 包志毅 , 侯维微

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2012 > 29(3): 359-365

邵锋, 宁惠娟, 包志毅, 侯维微. 城市公园植物景观量化评价研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 359-365.

引用本文:

邵锋, 宁惠娟, 包志毅, 侯维微. 城市公园植物景观量化评价研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 359-365.

SHAO Feng, NING Hui-juan, BAO Zhi-yi, HOU Wei-wei. Quantified estimates of plant landscapes in urban parks[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 359-365.

Citation:

SHAO Feng, NING Hui-juan, BAO Zhi-yi, HOU Wei-wei. Quantified estimates of plant landscapes in urban parks[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 359-365.

城市公园植物景观量化评价研究

1.
浙江农林大学风景园林与建筑学院，浙江临安 311300

详细信息

通信作者: 包志毅

Quantified estimates of plant landscapes in urban parks

1.
School of Landscape Architecture，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China

More Information

Corresponding author: BAO Zhi-yi

摘要: 为对杭州太子湾公园植物景观进行量化评价研究，在调查杭州太子湾公园植物景观现状基础上，选取其中具有代表性的5类植物景观（滨水、复层混交、园路、建筑及小品旁和色叶）作为评价样本，摄取样本照片作为评价媒介，选择49位评判人员参与评价，运用风景质量评价法中的心理物理学派的美景度评判法（scenic beauty estimation，SBE）进行评价，并通过SPSS 17.0软件进行数据分析。结果表明：受过园林专业教育的学生组对植物景观的评价结果与专家组、非专业学生组之间有较好的相关性（R = 0.538 ～0.752，P= 0.000～0.047 ＜0.050），园林专业学生可初步选为预测植物景观评价的评判人员。在评判复层混交植物景观时，应根据生态学原则和美学原则分别进行评判，其余4类植物景观可将2个原则合并（P = 0.237 ～ 0.920 ＞ 0.050），城市公园植物景观营建要兼顾生态学和美学要求。基于评价结果，对美景度分值较高的植物景观进行分析。表5参18
- 园林学 /
- 杭州太子湾公园 /
- 植物景观 /
- 美景度评判法（SBE法） /
- 量化评价
Abstract: Plant landscapes in Hangzhous Prince Bay Park were quantitatively estimated and researched，which could be used as a scientific reference for developing plant landscapes in urban parks. On the basis of investigating current plant landscapes in Hangzhous Prince Bay Park，five representative types of plant landscapes （waterfronts，compound-layers，garden roads，garden architectures，and colorful leaves） were selected as samples，and photographs of samples were taken as the media for estimates. Forty-nine participators were selected as estimators. Samples were estimated using the scenic beauty estimation （SBE） method from the psychological paradigm，and the data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0 software. Using the estimate results，plant landscapes with a higher scenic beauty score were analyzed. Results showed that for an estimator group，students who had received landscape architecture education were favorably correlated to an expert group and a non-professional student group （R = 0.538 - 0.752，P = 0.000 - 0.047 ＜ 0.050）. When estimating the compound-layers plant landscape，ecological principles and aesthetic principles were estimated respectively，whereas the other four types of plant landscapes were contrary （P = 0.237 - 0.920 ＞ 0.050）. Thus，professional students could be selected as estimators to predict estimates of plant landscapes，and requirement of ecology and aesthetics must be taken into account on developing plant landscapes in urban parks.［Ch，5 tab. 18 ref.］
- landscape architecture /
- Hangzhou’s Prince Bay Park /
- plant landscape /
- scenic beauty estimation （SBE） method /
- quantified estimate

[1]	丁绍刚, 朱嫣然. 基于层次分析法与模糊综合评价法的医院户外环境综合评价体系构建 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(6): 1104-1112. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.019
[2]	王美婷, 孙冰, 陈雷, 罗水兴, 陈勇, 黄应锋, 张静, 张珂. 广州市典型性城市公园植物景观美景度研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(3): 501-510. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.03.016
[3]	张建国, 王震. 德清县下渚湖国家湿地公园景观美景度评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(1): 145-151. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.01.020
[4]	于波涛, 杨天琪, 李臣. 寒地城市生态园林树种组合的植物群落关联性分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(2): 247-256. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.02.009
[5]	赵庆, 唐洪辉, 魏丹, 钱万惠. 基于绿视率的城市绿道空间绿量可视性特征 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(2): 288-294. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.02.014
[6]	陈旦妮, 顾翠花, 季梦成, 张松, 陆瑾翊. 基于植物分布统计的大观园主要院落植物造景 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(1): 147-155. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.01.020
[7]	严军, 查玚晟, 梁慧琳. 基于山形特征的山地公园景观空间选址研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(6): 927-932. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.06.016
[8]	李华威, 穆博, 雷雅凯, 田国行. 道路带状绿地景观评价及功能分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(4): 611-618. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.04.018
[9]	方舒丽, 张明如, 孟勐, 章琳, 王欣. 浙江传统书院园林植物景观特色 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(4): 619-624. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.04.019
[10]	丁彦芬, 张佳平. 云台山野生乔灌木资源园林开发利用综合评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(4): 558-565. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.04.012
[11]	任斌斌, 冯久莹, 李树华. 模拟邯郸地区自然群落的植物景观设计 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(6): 870-877. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.006
[12]	蒋雪丽, 王小德, 崔青云, 盛彩金. 杭州城市公园绿地植物多样性研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(3): 416-421. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.03.011
[13]	张哲, 潘会堂. 园林植物景观评价研究进展 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(6): 962-967. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.021
[14]	卢山, 胡绍庆, 陈波. 木犀属植物及其园艺品种在园林绿地中的配置 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(5): 734-738. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.05.015
[15]	杨絮飞, 李国新. 论中国古典园林中植物语素的多维审美意蕴 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 262-265.
[16]	应君, 沈肖. 中国园林设计中引入使用后评价的意义和方法 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 417-420.
[17]	丁一飞. 诸暨市城市公园绿地布局现状分析评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(3): 392-396.
[18]	舒美英, 夏自谦, 范义荣. 城市园林绿化工程招投标规范化的可拓评判 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(2): 214-220.
[19]	陈招英, 张建和. 五泄风景名胜区植物景观营建途径 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2002, 19(2): 211-213.
[20]	陈昕. 室内植物景观设计探讨 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2002, 19(4): 412-415.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/id/612

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2012/3/359

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3440
HTML全文浏览量: 365
PDF下载量: 1109
被引次数: 0

城市公园植物景观量化评价研究

1. 浙江农林大学风景园林与建筑学院，浙江临安 311300

通信作者: 包志毅

收稿日期: 2011-08-31
修回日期: 2011-11-23
刊出日期: 2012-06-20

关键词:

摘要: 为对杭州太子湾公园植物景观进行量化评价研究，在调查杭州太子湾公园植物景观现状基础上，选取其中具有代表性的5类植物景观（滨水、复层混交、园路、建筑及小品旁和色叶）作为评价样本，摄取样本照片作为评价媒介，选择49位评判人员参与评价，运用风景质量评价法中的心理物理学派的美景度评判法（scenic beauty estimation，SBE）进行评价，并通过SPSS 17.0软件进行数据分析。结果表明：受过园林专业教育的学生组对植物景观的评价结果与专家组、非专业学生组之间有较好的相关性（R = 0.538 ～0.752，P= 0.000～0.047 ＜0.050），园林专业学生可初步选为预测植物景观评价的评判人员。在评判复层混交植物景观时，应根据生态学原则和美学原则分别进行评判，其余4类植物景观可将2个原则合并（P = 0.237 ～ 0.920 ＞ 0.050），城市公园植物景观营建要兼顾生态学和美学要求。基于评价结果，对美景度分值较高的植物景观进行分析。表5参18

English Abstract

Quantified estimates of plant landscapes in urban parks

1. School of Landscape Architecture，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China

Corresponding author: BAO Zhi-yi

Received Date: 2011-08-31
Rev Recd Date: 2011-11-23
Publish Date: 2012-06-20

Keywords:

Abstract: Plant landscapes in Hangzhous Prince Bay Park were quantitatively estimated and researched，which could be used as a scientific reference for developing plant landscapes in urban parks. On the basis of investigating current plant landscapes in Hangzhous Prince Bay Park，five representative types of plant landscapes （waterfronts，compound-layers，garden roads，garden architectures，and colorful leaves） were selected as samples，and photographs of samples were taken as the media for estimates. Forty-nine participators were selected as estimators. Samples were estimated using the scenic beauty estimation （SBE） method from the psychological paradigm，and the data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0 software. Using the estimate results，plant landscapes with a higher scenic beauty score were analyzed. Results showed that for an estimator group，students who had received landscape architecture education were favorably correlated to an expert group and a non-professional student group （R = 0.538 - 0.752，P = 0.000 - 0.047 ＜ 0.050）. When estimating the compound-layers plant landscape，ecological principles and aesthetic principles were estimated respectively，whereas the other four types of plant landscapes were contrary （P = 0.237 - 0.920 ＞ 0.050）. Thus，professional students could be selected as estimators to predict estimates of plant landscapes，and requirement of ecology and aesthetics must be taken into account on developing plant landscapes in urban parks.［Ch，5 tab. 18 ref.］

邵锋, 宁惠娟, 包志毅, 侯维微. 城市公园植物景观量化评价研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 359-365.

引用本文:

邵锋, 宁惠娟, 包志毅, 侯维微. 城市公园植物景观量化评价研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 359-365.

SHAO Feng, NING Hui-juan, BAO Zhi-yi, HOU Wei-wei. Quantified estimates of plant landscapes in urban parks[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 359-365.

Citation:

SHAO Feng, NING Hui-juan, BAO Zhi-yi, HOU Wei-wei. Quantified estimates of plant landscapes in urban parks[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 359-365.