千岛湖姥山林场不同森林群落空气负离子浓度的比较

刘欣欣; 华超; 张明如; 张建国; 柳丹

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.007

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

千岛湖姥山林场不同森林群落空气负离子浓度的比较

刘欣欣 , 华超 , 张明如 , 张建国 , 柳丹

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2012 > 29(3): 366-373

刘欣欣, 华超, 张明如, 张建国, 柳丹. 千岛湖姥山林场不同森林群落空气负离子浓度的比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 366-373. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.007

引用本文:

LIU Xin-xin, HUA Chao, ZHANG Ming-ru, ZHANG Jian-guo, LIU Dan. Aero-anion concentration in different forest communities of Laoshan Forest Farm，Chun’an County[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 366-373. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.007

Citation:

LIU Xin-xin, HUA Chao, ZHANG Ming-ru, ZHANG Jian-guo, LIU Dan. Aero-anion concentration in different forest communities of Laoshan Forest Farm，Chun’an County[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 366-373. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.007

千岛湖姥山林场不同森林群落空气负离子浓度的比较

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.007

刘欣欣¹,
华超¹,
张明如^2,3, ,,
张建国^2,3,
柳丹³

1.
浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院，浙江临安 311300;
2.
浙江农林大学风景园林与建筑学院，浙江临安 311300;
3.
浙江农林大学旅游与健康学院，浙江临安 311300

详细信息

通信作者: 张明如

Aero-anion concentration in different forest communities of Laoshan Forest Farm，Chun’an County

1.
School of Forestry and Biotechnology，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;
2.
School of Landscape Architecture，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;
3.
School of Tourism and Health，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHANG Ming-ru

摘要: 为探讨不同类型森林群落空气负离子浓度的时间变化特征，选择2010年春、夏、秋和冬4个季节的晴天，对浙江淳安千岛湖姥山林场6种类型的森林群落的空气负离子、可吸入颗粒物（PM10）和小气候因子进行同步监测。结果表明：①千岛湖姥山林场空气负离子浓度夏季最高，秋季次之，春季和冬季较低；②6种类型森林群落空气负离子年平均浓度均在1 000个cm－3以上，天然森林群落空气负离子浓度高于人工森林群落，常绿阔叶树群落空气负离子浓度高于针叶树群落；③不同季节空气质量评价系数变化顺序为夏季＞秋季＞春季＞冬季；④天然森林群落冬季空气清洁度为B级，其他季节均为A级，人工森林群落夏季和秋季空气清洁度为A级，春季为B级，而冬季仅为C级。综合比较不同季节单级系数和空气质量评价系数的变化差异，认为天然森林群落空气质量高于人工森林群落。图1表4参20
- 森林生态学 /
- 千岛湖 /
- 森林群落 /
- 空气负离子 /
- 空气质量 /
- 单优群落
Abstract: The seasonal variation of aero-anions for six forest community types （i.e. evergreen broad-leaved forest communities dominated with Cyclobalanopsis glauca，Schima superba，Cyclobalanopsis glauca，C. sclerophylla，Lithocarpus glaber and coniferous forest communities dominated with Pinus massoniana，Cupressus funebris，or natural forest communities dominated with Cyclobalanopsis glauca，Schima superba，Cyclobalanopsis glauca，C. sclerophylla，Lithocarpus glaber，Pinus massoniana，and artificial forest communities dominated with Cupressus funebris，Myrica rubra） was studied using synchronous monitoring of negative air ions，PM10 （particulate matter ＜ 10 m），and micro-climate factors at Laoshan Forest Farm，Qiandao Lake，Chunan County，China，during the four seasons of 2010. Analysis included a comparison of the polarity ratio and an air quality assessment index. Results showed that：（1） the concentration of aero-anions was highest in summer and second in autumn. （2） The annual average aero-anion concentration for the six forest community types was above 1 000 indcm－3. Aero-anions by communities showed natural forest ＞ artificial forest and evergreen broadleaved forest ＞ coniferous forest. （3） The air quality assessment index by season was summer ＞ autumn ＞ spring ＞ winter. （4） Natural forest air quality was at the B-level in winter，and A-level in other seasons，whereas artificial forest air quality was A-level in summer and autumn，B-level in spring，and C-level in winter. Comparing the polarity ratio and the air quality assessment index for different seasons in these forest communities，the air quality of natural forest communities was better than artificial forest communities. These results provided the theory basis for the seasonal variation characteristics of aero-anions for six forest community types.［Ch，1 fig. 4 tab. 20 ref.］
- forest ecology /
- Qiandao Lake /
- forest community /
- aero-anion /
- air quality /
- monodominant community

[1]	宋文璐, 张华, 伏捷, 张俊, 杜维新, 苑知言, 赵海涵. 辽宁仙人洞国家级自然保护区森林群落稳定性评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(3): 505-515. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210330
[2]	谢立红, 曹宏杰, 黄庆阳, 杨帆, 王继丰, 王建波, 倪红伟. 五大连池火山森林群落多样性与稳定性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(2): 235-245. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200255
[3]	赵亚红, 徐翠霞, 马玲, 王彬, 韦赛君, 吕嘉欣, 高岩, 张汝民. 3种常绿树挥发物成分对空气负离子及微生物的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(4): 654-663. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190521
[4]	伏捷, 张华, 何红, 吕蕊, 王颖, 祝业平. 辽东山区古石河森林群落物种组成特征 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(3): 533-540. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.03.014
[5]	毛佳园, 黄成林, 史久西, 徐珍珍, 秦一心. 浙中城市森林主要群落分析及优化 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(6): 1000-1008. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.06.011
[6]	张建国, 徐文俊, 崔会平, 梅阳阳, 蔡碧凡. 衢州大橘海森林公园空气负离子浓度变化 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(1): 26-32. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.01.004
[7]	张洋, 慎佳泓, 张方钢. 西湖风景名胜区森林群落结构特征与动态 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(4): 589-596. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.04.015
[8]	周斌, 余树全, 张超, 伊力塔. 不同树种林分对空气负离子浓度的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(2): 200-206. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.02.005
[9]	高铭聪, 蒋文伟, 金竹秀, 郭慧慧, 梅艳霞. 西径山森林公园夏季空气负离子日变化 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(4): 667-673. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.023
[10]	艾训儒, 易咏梅, 姚兰, 王柏泉, 熊彪. 旅游区人为干扰对森林群落物种多样性的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(2): 178-184. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.02.003
[11]	石彦军, 余树全, 郑庆林. 6种植物群落夏季空气负离子动态及其与气象因子的关系 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(2): 185-189. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.02.004
[12]	高菊, 何云核, 吉兴磊. 安徽鹞落坪森林群落优先保护评价体系 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 326-332.
[13]	张明如, 俞益武, 赵明水, 章志攀, 杜晴洲, 陈建新. 天目山国家级自然保护区柳杉群落空气负离子浓度日变化特征 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(5): 701-707.
[14]	章志攀, 俞益武, 张明如, 杜晴洲, 陈建新, 毛凤成. 天目山空气负离子浓度变化及其与环境因子的关系 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(4): 481-485.
[15]	章志攀, 俞益武, 孟明浩, 孔邦杰. 旅游环境中空气负离子的研究进展 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(1): 103-108.
[16]	王贵霞, 李传荣, 许景伟, 夏江宝. 温带森林群落多样性的测度方法比较评述 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2004, 21(4): 486-491.
[17]	余树全, 李翠环, 姜礼元, 谢吉全. 千岛湖天然次生林群落生态学研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2002, 19(2): 138-142.
[18]	王胜奎. 森林可持续发展的动态优化模型 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2001, 18(3): 233-237.
[19]	蔡良良, 余国信, 余启国, 黄超钢. 千岛湖景观防护林林相改造探讨 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1997, 14(3): 303-307.
[20]	蔡良良. 千岛湖生态林现状及几个问题 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1996, 13(4): 481-484.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.007

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2012/3/366

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3624
HTML全文浏览量: 334
PDF下载量: 1293
被引次数: 0

千岛湖姥山林场不同森林群落空气负离子浓度的比较

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.007

1. 浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院，浙江临安 311300;

2. 浙江农林大学风景园林与建筑学院，浙江临安 311300;

3. 浙江农林大学旅游与健康学院，浙江临安 311300

通信作者: 张明如

收稿日期: 2011-05-23
修回日期: 2011-11-11
刊出日期: 2012-06-20

关键词:

摘要: 为探讨不同类型森林群落空气负离子浓度的时间变化特征，选择2010年春、夏、秋和冬4个季节的晴天，对浙江淳安千岛湖姥山林场6种类型的森林群落的空气负离子、可吸入颗粒物（PM10）和小气候因子进行同步监测。结果表明：①千岛湖姥山林场空气负离子浓度夏季最高，秋季次之，春季和冬季较低；②6种类型森林群落空气负离子年平均浓度均在1 000个cm－3以上，天然森林群落空气负离子浓度高于人工森林群落，常绿阔叶树群落空气负离子浓度高于针叶树群落；③不同季节空气质量评价系数变化顺序为夏季＞秋季＞春季＞冬季；④天然森林群落冬季空气清洁度为B级，其他季节均为A级，人工森林群落夏季和秋季空气清洁度为A级，春季为B级，而冬季仅为C级。综合比较不同季节单级系数和空气质量评价系数的变化差异，认为天然森林群落空气质量高于人工森林群落。图1表4参20

English Abstract

Aero-anion concentration in different forest communities of Laoshan Forest Farm，Chun’an County

1. School of Forestry and Biotechnology，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;

2. School of Landscape Architecture，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;

3. School of Tourism and Health，Zhejiang A & F University，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China

Corresponding author: ZHANG Ming-ru

Received Date: 2011-05-23
Rev Recd Date: 2011-11-11
Publish Date: 2012-06-20

Keywords:

Abstract: The seasonal variation of aero-anions for six forest community types （i.e. evergreen broad-leaved forest communities dominated with Cyclobalanopsis glauca，Schima superba，Cyclobalanopsis glauca，C. sclerophylla，Lithocarpus glaber and coniferous forest communities dominated with Pinus massoniana，Cupressus funebris，or natural forest communities dominated with Cyclobalanopsis glauca，Schima superba，Cyclobalanopsis glauca，C. sclerophylla，Lithocarpus glaber，Pinus massoniana，and artificial forest communities dominated with Cupressus funebris，Myrica rubra） was studied using synchronous monitoring of negative air ions，PM10 （particulate matter ＜ 10 m），and micro-climate factors at Laoshan Forest Farm，Qiandao Lake，Chunan County，China，during the four seasons of 2010. Analysis included a comparison of the polarity ratio and an air quality assessment index. Results showed that：（1） the concentration of aero-anions was highest in summer and second in autumn. （2） The annual average aero-anion concentration for the six forest community types was above 1 000 indcm－3. Aero-anions by communities showed natural forest ＞ artificial forest and evergreen broadleaved forest ＞ coniferous forest. （3） The air quality assessment index by season was summer ＞ autumn ＞ spring ＞ winter. （4） Natural forest air quality was at the B-level in winter，and A-level in other seasons，whereas artificial forest air quality was A-level in summer and autumn，B-level in spring，and C-level in winter. Comparing the polarity ratio and the air quality assessment index for different seasons in these forest communities，the air quality of natural forest communities was better than artificial forest communities. These results provided the theory basis for the seasonal variation characteristics of aero-anions for six forest community types.［Ch，1 fig. 4 tab. 20 ref.］

引用本文: