薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性、功能多样性及其相互关系分析

顾建强; 陈东辉; 徐奎源; 陈友吾; 吴佳伟; 周靖; 徐志宏

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性、功能多样性及其相互关系分析

顾建强 , 陈东辉 , 徐奎源 , 陈友吾 , 吴佳伟 , 周靖 , 徐志宏

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2015 > 32(1): 116-122

顾建强, 陈东辉, 徐奎源, 陈友吾, 吴佳伟, 周靖, 徐志宏. 薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性、功能多样性及其相互关系分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(1): 116-122. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

引用本文:

GU Jianqiang, CHEN Donghui, XU Kuiyuan, CHEN Youwu, WU Jiawei, ZHOU Jin, XU Zhihong. Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 116-122. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

Citation:

GU Jianqiang, CHEN Donghui, XU Kuiyuan, CHEN Youwu, WU Jiawei, ZHOU Jin, XU Zhihong. Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 116-122. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性、功能多样性及其相互关系分析

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

1.
浙江农林大学农业与食品科学学院浙江临安 311300;
2.
浙江省建德市森林病虫防治检疫站浙江建德 311600;
3.
浙江省林业科学研究院，浙江杭州 310023

基金项目:

浙江省公益技术研究农业项目（2012C32019）;浙江省林业厅林业科技推广项目（2012B10）;杭州市科技发展计划项目（20130432B99）

详细信息

作者简介: 顾建强，从事生态学研究。

通信作者: 徐志宏，教授，博士，从事农业昆虫与害虫防治等研究。

中图分类号: S763.3；X176

Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand

1.
School of Agricultural and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, Zhejiang China;
2.
Forest Pest Management and Quarantine Station of Jiande City, Jiande 311600, Zhejiang China;
3.
Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China

摘要: 通过扫网法和踏查法，调查了浙江省建德市薄壳山核桃Carya illinoensis林地昆虫多样性情况，共采集昆虫589头，鉴定至11目160种。基于9个生物学性状、4个物种多样性指数和7个功能多样性指数，研究了建德薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性和功能多样性2个维度的生物多样性，探究了两者的相互关系。结果表明：①同翅目Homoptera，半翅目Hemiptera，鞘翅目Coleoptera，鳞翅目Lepidoptera为优势目，整个昆虫亚群落的物种多样性和功能多样性均为最大。②选取的功能指数能较好地反映各群落的功能多样性情况。③功能性状距离（FAD），功能性状平均距离（MFAD），功能树状图指数（FD）随物种丰富度的增加而增大，属于物种丰富度单调递增指数（MSR）；功能性状距离与功能性状平均距离是同一类指数。④功能多样性对害虫防治有指导意义。表6参30
- 昆虫生态学 /
- 薄壳山核桃林 /
- 物种多样性 /
- 功能多样性
Abstract: To determine relation of functional diversity with species richness, we investigated insect diversity of a pecan stand in Jiande, the sweep sampling and the route survey method were applied. Then, based on nine biological traits including ecological characters, four indexes of species diversity （Richness，Shannon，Simpson and Evenness） and six indexes of functional diversity （Functional richness, Functional attribute diversity，Modified FAD，Functional dendrogram，Convex hull hyper-volume，Functional specialization）were obtained. Also, two dimensions of insect diversity （species diversity and functional diversity） and the relationship between both dimensions were studied using the MSR index. 589 insect specimens collected in the survey, which were identified 160 species belonging to 11 orders. Results of the analysis by DPS 14.10，FDiversity and Excel 2003 revealed that: 1） advantage of orders were Homoptera, Coleoptera, and Lepidoptera; and the greatest species diversity and functional diversity were in an insect sub-community. 2） Also, the selected functional traits easily distinguished the functional diversity among the community. 3） FAD, MFAD, and FD indexes increased with increasing species diversity. belonging to MSR index （Monotonically increasing with Species Richness）, in this case community will be more stable and the pests in the pecan stand will easily be suppressed in low density. Also, FAD and MFAD were similar. Thus, functional diversity in the pecan stand could be used as guidance for pest control.［Ch, 6 tab. 30 ref.］
- insect ecology /
- pecan （Carya illinoensis） /
- species diversity /
- functional diversity

[1]	南国卫, 王静慧, 秦淑莹, 韩磊, 何馨雨. 不同恢复年限刺槐林林下草本层的物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2024, 41(5): 978-985. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240128
[2]	张川英, 李婷婷, 龚笑飞, 潘江炎, 龚征宇, 潘军, 焦洁洁, 吴初平. 遂昌乌溪江流域山蜡梅生境群落特征与物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40(4): 848-858. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220570
[3]	曾洪, 陈聪琳, 喻静, 向琳, 孙一淼, 胡明玥, 郝建锋. 人为干扰对雅安苍坪山公园桉树人工林物种多样性和生物量的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(2): 253-261. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.20950756.20200312
[4]	张荣, 李婷婷, 金锁, 鱼舜尧, 王宇, 李禹江, 齐锦秋, 郝建锋. 人为干扰对蒙顶山木荷次生林物种多样性及土壤理化性质的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(5): 867-875. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190554
[5]	靳孟理, 胡俊, 齐实, 逯进生, 李月, 蒋九华. 北京市侧柏低效林物种多样性改造策略 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(1): 27-35. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.004
[6]	夏雯, 芦建国, 景蕾. 镇江市低影响开发示范区植物群落特征与物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(4): 793-800. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.04.020
[7]	陈飞龙, 黄凤生, 夏俊勇, 王义平. 不同经营模式下山核桃林昆虫群落结构 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(3): 429-436. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.03.001
[8]	何荣晓, 杨帆, 崔明. 海口市城市森林结构及植物多样性指标相关性分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(6): 1142-1150. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.06.011
[9]	邓宏兼, 李卫忠, 曹铸, 王庆, 王广儒. 基于不同取样尺度的油松针阔混交林物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(1): 67-75. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.010
[10]	魏琦, 楼炉焕, 冷建红, 包其敏, 钟潮亮, 沈年华. 毛枝连蕊茶群落结构与物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(4): 634-639. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.018
[11]	闫东锋, 朱滢, 杨喜田. 宝天曼栎类天然林物种多样性与稳定性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(4): 628-633. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.017
[12]	徐华潮, 郝晓东, 黄俊浩, 叶石玄仙, 叶立新. 浙江凤阳山昆虫物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.001
[13]	艾训儒, 易咏梅, 姚兰, 王柏泉, 熊彪. 旅游区人为干扰对森林群落物种多样性的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(2): 178-184. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.02.003
[14]	沈年华, 万志洲, 汤庚国, 王春, 程红梅. 紫金山栓皮栎群落结构及物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(5): 696-700.
[15]	李贵祥, 施海静, 孟广涛, 方向京, 柴勇, 和丽萍, 张正海, 杨永祥. 云南松原始林群落结构特征及物种多样性分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(4): 396-400.
[16]	哀建国, 梅盛龙, 刘胜龙, 丁炳扬. 浙江凤阳山自然保护区福建柏群落物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(1): 41-45.
[17]	汤孟平, 周国模, 施拥军, 陈永刚, 吴亚琪, 赵明水. 天目山常绿阔叶林群落最小取样面积与物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(4): 357-361.
[18]	范海兰, 洪伟, 洪滔, 吴承祯, 宋萍, 朱慧, 张琼, 林勇明. 炼山对南酸枣人工林林下物种多样性的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2005, 22(5): 495-500.
[19]	陈世品. 福建青冈林恢复过程中植物物种多样性的变化 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2004, 21(3): 258-262.
[20]	金则新. 浙江天台山常绿阔叶林次生演替序列群落物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2002, 19(2): 133-137.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2015/1/116

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3029
HTML全文浏览量: 465
PDF下载量: 716
被引次数: 0

薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性、功能多样性及其相互关系分析

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

1. 浙江农林大学农业与食品科学学院浙江临安 311300;

2. 浙江省建德市森林病虫防治检疫站浙江建德 311600;

3. 浙江省林业科学研究院，浙江杭州 310023

基金项目:

浙江省公益技术研究农业项目（2012C32019）;浙江省林业厅林业科技推广项目（2012B10）;杭州市科技发展计划项目（20130432B99）

作者简介:
顾建强，从事生态学研究。

通信作者: 徐志宏，教授，博士，从事农业昆虫与害虫防治等研究。

收稿日期: 2014-03-07
修回日期: 2014-05-27
刊出日期: 2015-02-20

中图分类号: S763.3；X176

关键词:

摘要: 通过扫网法和踏查法，调查了浙江省建德市薄壳山核桃Carya illinoensis林地昆虫多样性情况，共采集昆虫589头，鉴定至11目160种。基于9个生物学性状、4个物种多样性指数和7个功能多样性指数，研究了建德薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性和功能多样性2个维度的生物多样性，探究了两者的相互关系。结果表明：①同翅目Homoptera，半翅目Hemiptera，鞘翅目Coleoptera，鳞翅目Lepidoptera为优势目，整个昆虫亚群落的物种多样性和功能多样性均为最大。②选取的功能指数能较好地反映各群落的功能多样性情况。③功能性状距离（FAD），功能性状平均距离（MFAD），功能树状图指数（FD）随物种丰富度的增加而增大，属于物种丰富度单调递增指数（MSR）；功能性状距离与功能性状平均距离是同一类指数。④功能多样性对害虫防治有指导意义。表6参30

English Abstract

Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand

1. School of Agricultural and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, Zhejiang China;

2. Forest Pest Management and Quarantine Station of Jiande City, Jiande 311600, Zhejiang China;

3. Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2014-03-07
Rev Recd Date: 2014-05-27
Publish Date: 2015-02-20

Keywords:

Abstract: To determine relation of functional diversity with species richness, we investigated insect diversity of a pecan stand in Jiande, the sweep sampling and the route survey method were applied. Then, based on nine biological traits including ecological characters, four indexes of species diversity （Richness，Shannon，Simpson and Evenness） and six indexes of functional diversity （Functional richness, Functional attribute diversity，Modified FAD，Functional dendrogram，Convex hull hyper-volume，Functional specialization）were obtained. Also, two dimensions of insect diversity （species diversity and functional diversity） and the relationship between both dimensions were studied using the MSR index. 589 insect specimens collected in the survey, which were identified 160 species belonging to 11 orders. Results of the analysis by DPS 14.10，FDiversity and Excel 2003 revealed that: 1） advantage of orders were Homoptera, Coleoptera, and Lepidoptera; and the greatest species diversity and functional diversity were in an insect sub-community. 2） Also, the selected functional traits easily distinguished the functional diversity among the community. 3） FAD, MFAD, and FD indexes increased with increasing species diversity. belonging to MSR index （Monotonically increasing with Species Richness）, in this case community will be more stable and the pests in the pecan stand will easily be suppressed in low density. Also, FAD and MFAD were similar. Thus, functional diversity in the pecan stand could be used as guidance for pest control.［Ch, 6 tab. 30 ref.］

引用本文:

Citation:

GU Jianqiang, CHEN Donghui, XU Kuiyuan, CHEN Youwu, WU Jiawei, ZHOU Jin, XU Zhihong. Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 116-122. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

全文HTML

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

留言板

薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性、功能多样性及其相互关系分析

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

作者简介: 顾建强，从事生态学研究。

通信作者: 徐志宏，教授，博士，从事农业昆虫与害虫防治等研究。

Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand

计量

出版历程

薄壳山核桃林地昆虫物种多样性、功能多样性及其相互关系分析

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017

1. 浙江农林大学 农业与食品科学学院 浙江 临安 311300; 2. 浙江省建德市森林病虫防治检疫站 浙江 建德 311600; 3. 浙江省林业科学研究院，浙江 杭州 310023

作者简介: 顾建强，从事生态学研究。

通信作者: 徐志宏，教授，博士，从事农业昆虫与害虫防治等研究。

English Abstract

Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand

1. School of Agricultural and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, Zhejiang China; 2. Forest Pest Management and Quarantine Station of Jiande City, Jiande 311600, Zhejiang China; 3. Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China

全文HTML

目录

1. 浙江农林大学农业与食品科学学院浙江临安 311300;

2. 浙江省建德市森林病虫防治检疫站浙江建德 311600;

3. 浙江省林业科学研究院，浙江杭州 310023

作者简介:
顾建强，从事生态学研究。

1. School of Agricultural and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, Zhejiang China;

2. Forest Pest Management and Quarantine Station of Jiande City, Jiande 311600, Zhejiang China;

3. Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China