ZHU Mengfei, HU Yingfeng, SHI Xueqin. Characterization and phylogenetic location analysis of chloroplast of the endangered plant Neotrichocolea bissetii[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2025, 42(1): 55−63 doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240356
Citation: YAN Dong-feng, ZHU Ying, YANG Xi-tian. Species diversity and stability of a natural Quercus forest in Baotianman,Henan Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(4): 628-633. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.017

Species diversity and stability of a natural Quercus forest in Baotianman,Henan Province

DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.017
More Information
  • Corresponding author: YANG Xi-tian
  • Publish Date: 2011-08-20
  • To measure and study the values and relationships between community diversity and stability of four communities(A,B,C,and D) in a natural Quercus(oak) forest,data from thirty-two sample plots of the Baotianman Nature Reserve in Henan Province were obtained and analyzed according to three diversity indexes: the Simpson index(D),the Shannon-Wiener index(H),and the Pielou index(R) as well as a community stability index:the improved M-Godron method. A correlation analysis of the three diversity indexes to the community stability values(SV) was also conducted. Results showed that communities A( SV = 0.084 6),B(SV = 0.239 4),and C(SV = 0.291 7) were stable,but community D(SV = 6.456 6) was unstable. Correlation coefficients for community stability versus species diversity [D(r = 0.998 3),H(r = 0.968 0),and R(r = 0.999 7)] were significant(P < 0.05). Thus,with more species diversity forest structure is more complex and stability is better. [Ch,2 fig. 2 tab. 15 ref.]
  • [1] SONG Wenlu, ZHANG Hua, FU Jie, ZHANG Jun, DU Weixin, YUAN Zhiyan, ZHAO Haihan.  Evaluation of forest community stability in Xianrendong National Nature Reserve, Liaoning . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(3): 505-515. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210330
    [2] XIE Lihong, CAO Hongjie, HUANG Qingyang, YANG Fan, WANG Jifeng, WANG Jianbo, NI Hongwei.  On the diversity and stability of forest communities in Wudalianchi Volcanoes . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(2): 235-245. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200255
    [3] NIU Zhengyang, ZHANG Xiaochen, QI Qi, XI Lianlian, CHEN Xin.  Phoebe sheareri community in the Jiangsu Baohuashan Nature Reserve . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(6): 1134-1141. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.06.010
    [4] XIA Wen, LU Jianguo, JING Lei.  Community structure and species diversity of a low impact development demonstration area in Zhenjiang City . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(4): 793-800. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.04.020
    [5] WU Shibin, KU Weipeng, ZHOU Xiaorong, JI Meifen, WU Jiasen.  Structural characteristics and species diversity for survival of the rare plant Ostrya multinervis . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(1): 31-37. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.01.005
    [6] LI Jun, LU Yunfeng, YANG Anna, BAI Zhiliang, WANG Yang, LOU Luhuan, TONG Zaikang.  Species diversity of natural Phoebe sheareri communities with different disturbance intensities . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(2): 279-288. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.009
    [7] WU Hao.  Variation characteristics of an invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides community along latitudinal gradients in spring . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(5): 816-824. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.05.007
    [8] DENG Hongjian, LI Weizhong, CAO Zhu, WANG Qing, WANG Guangru.  Species diversity based on sample size in a Pinus tabulaeformis mixed forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 67-75. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.010
    [9] WANG Limin, MIAO Xindong, YAN Caixia, MA Kai, MA Dandan, LI Genyou.  Structure characteristics and species diversity of Zanthoxylum micranthum in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(2): 215-219. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.02.009
    [10] MA Kai, XIA Guo-hua, YAN Dao-liang, XIE Wen-yuan, YAN Cai-xia, WU Jia-sen, LI Gen-you.  Structural characteristics and species diversity of the endangered plant Ardisia violacea . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(4): 498-509. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.04.004
    [11] WANG Xiao-qing, LIU Fang-yan, LI Kun, CHEN You-gen.  Species diversity and seedling regeneration of three Terminalia franchetii communities in the hot-dry Yuanmou Valley . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(2): 241-247. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.02.011
    [12] WEI Qi, LOU Lu-huan, LENG Jian-hong, BAO Qi-min, ZHONG Chao-liang, SHENG Nian-hua.  Community structure and species diversity of Camellia trichoclada . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(4): 634-639. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.018
    [13] QIN Jing, HE Kang-ning, LIU Shuo, ZHENG Jia-li, WANG Zhan-lin.  Species composition and diversity for plant communities in conversion of farmland back to forest areas of Qinghai Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(3): 410-416. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.03.015
    [14] AI Xun-ru, YI Yong-mei, YAO Lan, WANG Bo-quan, XIONG Biao.  Effects of human disturbance on species diversity of Pinus massoniana-Cunninghamia lanceolata mixed forest in Suobuya Stone Forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(2): 178-184. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.02.003
    [15] SHEN Nian-hua, WAN Zhi-zhou, TANG Geng-guo, WANG Chun, CHENG Hong-mei.  Community structure and species diversity of a Quercus variabilis forest on Mount Zijinshan . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(5): 696-700.
    [16] JING Li, ZHU Zhi-hong, WANG Xiao-an, GUO Hua.  Community characteristics of a Pinus tabulaeformis secondary forest and a planted forest in the Xunyangba Region of the Qinling Mountains . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(6): 711-717.
    [17] LI Gui-xiang, SHI Hai-jing, MENG Guang-tao, FANG Xiang-jing, CHAI Yong, HE Li-ping, ZHANG Zheng-hai, YANG Yong-xiang.  Community structural properties and species diversity in primary Pinus yunnanensis forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(4): 396-400.
    [18] AI Jian-guo, MEI Sheng-long, LIU Sheng-long, DING Bing-yang.  Species diversity of Fokienia hodginsii community in Nature Reserve of Mount Fengyang in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(1): 41-45.
    [19] TANG Meng-ping, ZHOU Guo-mo, SHI Yong-jun, CHEN Yong-gang, WU Ya-qi, ZHAO Ming-shui.  Minimum sampling area and species diversity of evergreen broadleaved forest community in Mount Tianmu . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(4): 357-361.
    [20] WANG Gui-xia, LI Chuan-rong, XU Jing-wei, XIA Jiang-bao.  Review of methods of measuring community biodiversity in temperate forests . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2004, 21(4): 486-491.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 23.3 %FULLTEXT: 23.3 %META: 75.4 %META: 75.4 %PDF: 1.3 %PDF: 1.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.2 %其他: 8.2 %其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %Austin: 0.0 %Austin: 0.0 %Baden: 0.1 %Baden: 0.1 %Beauharnois: 0.1 %Beauharnois: 0.1 %Brazil: 0.0 %Brazil: 0.0 %Canada: 0.0 %Canada: 0.0 %Canton: 0.1 %Canton: 0.1 %Carrboro: 0.0 %Carrboro: 0.0 %China: 1.0 %China: 1.0 %Dallas: 0.1 %Dallas: 0.1 %Danville: 0.0 %Danville: 0.0 %Denmark: 0.0 %Denmark: 0.0 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Egypt: 0.1 %Egypt: 0.1 %Grove City: 0.1 %Grove City: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.1 %Howard: 0.0 %Howard: 0.0 %Indianapolis: 0.1 %Indianapolis: 0.1 %Jonesboro: 0.0 %Jonesboro: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.3 %Malvern: 0.3 %Mexico: 0.0 %Mexico: 0.0 %Mount Vernon: 0.0 %Mount Vernon: 0.0 %Norman: 0.0 %Norman: 0.0 %Reno: 0.0 %Reno: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.4 %Rochester: 0.4 %Seattle: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %Slovenia: 0.0 %Slovenia: 0.0 %Sweden: 0.0 %Sweden: 0.0 %Sydney Mines: 0.0 %Sydney Mines: 0.0 %United States: 0.6 %United States: 0.6 %Waycross: 0.1 %Waycross: 0.1 %[]: 1.7 %[]: 1.7 %三明: 0.0 %三明: 0.0 %上海: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %亨茨维尔: 0.1 %亨茨维尔: 0.1 %伊瓦格: 0.1 %伊瓦格: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯顿: 0.1 %休斯顿: 0.1 %佛罗里达: 0.1 %佛罗里达: 0.1 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %克里夫兰: 0.0 %克里夫兰: 0.0 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰辛: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %凤凰城: 0.2 %凤凰城: 0.2 %北京: 14.1 %北京: 14.1 %匹兹堡: 0.0 %匹兹堡: 0.0 %华盛顿: 0.1 %华盛顿: 0.1 %南京: 0.0 %南京: 0.0 %南充: 0.1 %南充: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %博伊西: 0.0 %博伊西: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.1 %博阿努瓦: 0.1 %卡瑞: 0.1 %卡瑞: 0.1 %卡罗尔顿: 0.0 %卡罗尔顿: 0.0 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %圣克拉拉: 0.2 %圣克拉拉: 0.2 %圣安东尼奥: 0.1 %圣安东尼奥: 0.1 %塔克维拉: 0.0 %塔克维拉: 0.0 %塔科马: 0.0 %塔科马: 0.0 %大克罗伊茨: 0.0 %大克罗伊茨: 0.0 %大庆: 0.0 %大庆: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %奥马哈: 0.0 %奥马哈: 0.0 %威尔明顿: 0.1 %威尔明顿: 0.1 %威廉斯堡: 0.1 %威廉斯堡: 0.1 %孟菲斯: 0.0 %孟菲斯: 0.0 %安條克: 0.1 %安條克: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 1.2 %密蘇里城: 1.2 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %帕萨迪纳: 0.0 %帕萨迪纳: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %庆阳: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.1 %开罗: 0.1 %开罗: 0.1 %弗吉: 0.0 %弗吉: 0.0 %弗吉尼亚: 0.3 %弗吉尼亚: 0.3 %弗洛里森特: 0.0 %弗洛里森特: 0.0 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %得梅因: 0.0 %得梅因: 0.0 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.2 %新加坡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.0 %无锡: 0.0 %旧金山: 0.1 %旧金山: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %昆明: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %晋中: 0.1 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %桑达斯基: 0.0 %桑达斯基: 0.0 %梅诺莫尼: 0.0 %梅诺莫尼: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %: 0.1 %: 0.1 %檀香山: 0.0 %檀香山: 0.0 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %沃思堡: 0.1 %沃思堡: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %波士顿: 0.1 %波士顿: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %渥太华: 0.0 %渥太华: 0.0 %温尼伯: 0.1 %温尼伯: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %特伦托: 0.0 %特伦托: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.0 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.0 %纳什维尔: 0.1 %纳什维尔: 0.1 %纽卡斯尔: 0.0 %纽卡斯尔: 0.0 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍曾德奥克斯: 0.0 %绍曾德奥克斯: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %美国加利福尼亚: 0.0 %美国加利福尼亚: 0.0 %美国弗吉尼亚阿什本: 0.0 %美国弗吉尼亚阿什本: 0.0 %美国爱荷华得梅因: 0.0 %美国爱荷华得梅因: 0.0 %艾伯塔: 0.1 %艾伯塔: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 5.7 %芒廷维尤: 5.7 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芬兰赫尔辛基: 0.0 %芬兰赫尔辛基: 0.0 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.0 %菲律宾: 0.2 %菲律宾: 0.2 %蒂尔堡: 0.1 %蒂尔堡: 0.1 %西宁: 52.2 %西宁: 52.2 %谢尔比: 0.1 %谢尔比: 0.1 %贝克斯菲尔德: 0.1 %贝克斯菲尔德: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %达拉斯: 0.0 %达拉斯: 0.0 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %郑州: 0.0 %郑州: 0.0 %都伯林: 0.2 %都伯林: 0.2 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %阿布奎基: 0.1 %阿布奎基: 0.1 %雷德蒙德: 0.1 %雷德蒙德: 0.1 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %马斯库斯: 0.0 %马斯库斯: 0.0 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %黔西南: 0.0 %黔西南: 0.0 %其他其他AustinBadenBeauharnoisBrazilCanadaCantonCarrboroChinaDallasDanvilleDenmarkEdinburgEgyptGrove CityHamiltonHowardIndianapolisJonesboroMalvernMexicoMount VernonNormanRenoRochesterSeattleSloveniaSwedenSydney MinesUnited StatesWaycross[]三明上海临汾亨茨维尔伊瓦格休斯敦休斯顿佛罗里达保定克里夫兰兰州兰辛凤凰城北京匹兹堡华盛顿南京南充南昌博伊西博阿努瓦卡瑞卡罗尔顿合肥呼和浩特哥伦布圣克拉拉圣安东尼奥塔克维拉塔科马大克罗伊茨大庆天津奥马哈威尔明顿威廉斯堡孟菲斯安條克宣城密蘇里城布雷登顿帕萨迪纳平顶山广州庆阳开罗弗吉弗吉尼亚弗洛里森特张家口得梅因扬州拉斯维加斯新加坡无锡旧金山昆明晋中杭州桂林桑达斯基梅诺莫尼森尼韦尔檀香山武汉沃思堡法兰克福波士顿洛杉矶深圳渥太华温尼伯温州漯河潍坊烟台特伦托瑟普赖斯石家庄福州科珀斯克里斯蒂纳什维尔纽卡斯尔纽约绍兴绍曾德奥克斯绵阳美国加利福尼亚美国弗吉尼亚阿什本美国爱荷华得梅因艾伯塔芒廷维尤芝加哥芬兰赫尔辛基苏州莫斯科菲律宾蒂尔堡西宁谢尔比贝克斯菲尔德贵阳达拉斯运城邯郸郑州都伯林长沙长治阳泉阿布奎基雷德蒙德青岛马斯库斯驻马店黔西南Highcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(5056) PDF downloads(1288) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Species diversity and stability of a natural Quercus forest in Baotianman,Henan Province

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.017
    Corresponding author: YANG Xi-tian

Abstract: To measure and study the values and relationships between community diversity and stability of four communities(A,B,C,and D) in a natural Quercus(oak) forest,data from thirty-two sample plots of the Baotianman Nature Reserve in Henan Province were obtained and analyzed according to three diversity indexes: the Simpson index(D),the Shannon-Wiener index(H),and the Pielou index(R) as well as a community stability index:the improved M-Godron method. A correlation analysis of the three diversity indexes to the community stability values(SV) was also conducted. Results showed that communities A( SV = 0.084 6),B(SV = 0.239 4),and C(SV = 0.291 7) were stable,but community D(SV = 6.456 6) was unstable. Correlation coefficients for community stability versus species diversity [D(r = 0.998 3),H(r = 0.968 0),and R(r = 0.999 7)] were significant(P < 0.05). Thus,with more species diversity forest structure is more complex and stability is better. [Ch,2 fig. 2 tab. 15 ref.]

ZHU Mengfei, HU Yingfeng, SHI Xueqin. Characterization and phylogenetic location analysis of chloroplast of the endangered plant Neotrichocolea bissetii[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2025, 42(1): 55−63 doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240356
Citation: YAN Dong-feng, ZHU Ying, YANG Xi-tian. Species diversity and stability of a natural Quercus forest in Baotianman,Henan Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(4): 628-633. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.017

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return