Volume 32 Issue 1
Jan.  2015
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Zhejiang A&F University  > 2015  >  32(1): 116-122

GU Jianqiang, CHEN Donghui, XU Kuiyuan, et al. Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 116-122. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017
Citation: GU Jianqiang, CHEN Donghui, XU Kuiyuan, et al. Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 116-122. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017
shu

Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand

DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017
  • 1.

    School of Agricultural and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, Zhejiang China;

  • 2.

    Forest Pest Management and Quarantine Station of Jiande City, Jiande 311600, Zhejiang China;

  • 3.

    Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China

  • Received Date: 2014-03-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2014-05-27
  • Publish Date: 2015-02-20
  • To determine relation of functional diversity with species richness, we investigated insect diversity of a pecan stand in Jiande, the sweep sampling and the route survey method were applied. Then, based on nine biological traits including ecological characters, four indexes of species diversity （Richness，Shannon，Simpson and Evenness） and six indexes of functional diversity （Functional richness, Functional attribute diversity，Modified FAD，Functional dendrogram，Convex hull hyper-volume，Functional specialization）were obtained. Also, two dimensions of insect diversity （species diversity and functional diversity） and the relationship between both dimensions were studied using the MSR index. 589 insect specimens collected in the survey, which were identified 160 species belonging to 11 orders. Results of the analysis by DPS 14.10，FDiversity and Excel 2003 revealed that: 1） advantage of orders were Homoptera, Coleoptera, and Lepidoptera; and the greatest species diversity and functional diversity were in an insect sub-community. 2） Also, the selected functional traits easily distinguished the functional diversity among the community. 3） FAD, MFAD, and FD indexes increased with increasing species diversity. belonging to MSR index （Monotonically increasing with Species Richness）, in this case community will be more stable and the pests in the pecan stand will easily be suppressed in low density. Also, FAD and MFAD were similar. Thus, functional diversity in the pecan stand could be used as guidance for pest control.［Ch, 6 tab. 30 ref.］
  • [1] NAN Guowei, WANG Jinghui, QIN Shuying, HAN Lei, HE Xinyu.  Diversity characteristics of herbaceous species under Robinia pseudoacacia forest in different years . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(5): 978-985. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240128
    [2] ZHANG Chuanying, LI Tingting, GONG Xiaofei, PAN Jiangyan, GONG Zhengyu, PAN Jun, JIAO Jiejie, WU Chuping.  Habitat community characteristics and species diversity of Chimonanthus nitens in Wuxi River Basin, Suichang . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(4): 848-858. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220570
    [3] ZENG Hong, CHEN Conglin, YU Jing, XIANG Lin, SUN Yimiao, HU Mingyue, HAO Jianfeng.  Effects of human interference on species diversity and biomass of Eucalyptus grandis plantation in Cangping Mountain Park in Ya’an . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(2): 253-261. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.20950756.20200312
    [4] ZHANG Rong, LI Tingting, JIN Suo, YU Shunyao, WANG Yu, LI Yujiang, QI Jinqiu, HAO Jianfeng.  Effects of human disturbance on species diversity and soil physiochemical properties of Schima superba community in Mengding Mountain . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(5): 867-875. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190554
    [5] JIN Mengli, HU Jun, QI Shi, LU Jinsheng, LI Yue, JIANG Jiuhua.  Reconstruction measures of species diversity of low-function Platycladus orientalis forest in Beijing . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(1): 27-35. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.004
    [6] XIA Wen, LU Jianguo, JING Lei.  Community structure and species diversity of a low impact development demonstration area in Zhenjiang City . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(4): 793-800. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.04.020
    [7] CHEN Feilong, HUANG Fengsheng, XIA Junyong, WANG Yiping.  Insect community structures of Carya cathayensis forests with different management modes in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(3): 429-436. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.03.001
    [8] HE Rongxiao, YANG Fan, CUI Ming.  Urban forest community structure and correlation analysis on the plant diversity index in Haikou City, China . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(6): 1142-1150. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.06.011
    [9] DENG Hongjian, LI Weizhong, CAO Zhu, WANG Qing, WANG Guangru.  Species diversity based on sample size in a Pinus tabulaeformis mixed forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 67-75. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.010
    [10] WEI Qi, LOU Lu-huan, LENG Jian-hong, BAO Qi-min, ZHONG Chao-liang, SHENG Nian-hua.  Community structure and species diversity of Camellia trichoclada . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(4): 634-639. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.018
    [11] YAN Dong-feng, ZHU Ying, YANG Xi-tian.  Species diversity and stability of a natural Quercus forest in Baotianman，Henan Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(4): 628-633. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.017
    [12] XU Hua-chao, HAO Xiao-dong, HUANG Jun-hao, YE Tan-xian, YE Li-xin.  Insects diversity of Fengyangshan Mountain in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.001
    [13] AI Xun-ru, YI Yong-mei, YAO Lan, WANG Bo-quan, XIONG Biao.  Effects of human disturbance on species diversity of Pinus massoniana-Cunninghamia lanceolata mixed forest in Suobuya Stone Forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(2): 178-184. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.02.003
    [14] SHEN Nian-hua, WAN Zhi-zhou, TANG Geng-guo, WANG Chun, CHENG Hong-mei.  Community structure and species diversity of a Quercus variabilis forest on Mount Zijinshan . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(5): 696-700.
    [15] LI Gui-xiang, SHI Hai-jing, MENG Guang-tao, FANG Xiang-jing, CHAI Yong, HE Li-ping, ZHANG Zheng-hai, YANG Yong-xiang.  Community structural properties and species diversity in primary Pinus yunnanensis forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(4): 396-400.
    [16] AI Jian-guo, MEI Sheng-long, LIU Sheng-long, DING Bing-yang.  Species diversity of Fokienia hodginsii community in Nature Reserve of Mount Fengyang in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(1): 41-45.
    [17] TANG Meng-ping, ZHOU Guo-mo, SHI Yong-jun, CHEN Yong-gang, WU Ya-qi, ZHAO Ming-shui.  Minimum sampling area and species diversity of evergreen broadleaved forest community in Mount Tianmu . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(4): 357-361.
    [18] FAN Hai-lan, HONG Wei, HONG Tao, WU Chen-zhen, SONG Ping, ZHU Hui, ZHANG Qiong, LIN Yong-ming.  Effects of controlled burning on species diversity of undergrowth in Choerospondias axillaris plantations . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2005, 22(5): 495-500.
    [19] CHEN Shi-pin.  Changes in species diversity of plants in Cyclobalanopsis chungii forest during the course of restoration . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2004, 21(3): 258-262.
    [20] JIN Ze-xin.  On species diversity of secondary successional community of evergreen broad-leaved forests at Mount Tiantai of Zhejiang . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2002, 19(2): 133-137.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 24.1 %FULLTEXT: 24.1 %META: 74.1 %META: 74.1 %PDF: 1.8 %PDF: 1.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.1 %其他: 8.1 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %Austin: 0.0 %Austin: 0.0 %Baden: 0.2 %Baden: 0.2 %Baltimore: 0.0 %Baltimore: 0.0 %Bruderheim: 0.0 %Bruderheim: 0.0 %Buraidah: 0.1 %Buraidah: 0.1 %Canada: 0.1 %Canada: 0.1 %Canton: 0.3 %Canton: 0.3 %China: 0.8 %China: 0.8 %Colombia: 0.0 %Colombia: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Edinburg: 0.2 %Edinburg: 0.2 %Egypt: 0.1 %Egypt: 0.1 %France: 0.1 %France: 0.1 %Girard: 0.0 %Girard: 0.0 %Grove City: 0.0 %Grove City: 0.0 %Gwynn Oak: 0.0 %Gwynn Oak: 0.0 %Italy: 0.1 %Italy: 0.1 %Khobar: 0.2 %Khobar: 0.2 %Lewisburg: 0.0 %Lewisburg: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.1 %Malvern: 0.1 %Norman: 0.1 %Norman: 0.1 %Oregon: 0.0 %Oregon: 0.0 %Perth Amboy: 0.1 %Perth Amboy: 0.1 %Pontevedra: 0.0 %Pontevedra: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %Saudi Arabia: 0.1 %Saudi Arabia: 0.1 %Spain: 0.0 %Spain: 0.0 %The Bronx: 0.0 %The Bronx: 0.0 %United Kingdom: 0.0 %United Kingdom: 0.0 %United States: 1.2 %United States: 1.2 %Waycross: 0.1 %Waycross: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.1 %[]: 2.9 %[]: 2.9 %上海: 0.7 %上海: 0.7 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %伊萨卡: 0.0 %伊萨卡: 0.0 %休斯敦: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.0 %伦敦: 0.0 %佛罗里达: 0.0 %佛罗里达: 0.0 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %凤凰城: 0.1 %凤凰城: 0.1 %加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚北温哥华: 0.0 %加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚北温哥华: 0.0 %加拿大安大略: 0.0 %加拿大安大略: 0.0 %加拿大安大略滨湖尼亚加拉: 0.0 %加拿大安大略滨湖尼亚加拉: 0.0 %加拿大纽芬兰与拉布拉多甘德: 0.1 %加拿大纽芬兰与拉布拉多甘德: 0.1 %北京: 19.7 %北京: 19.7 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南昌: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.1 %博阿努瓦: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %合肥: 0.0 %合肥: 0.0 %吉达: 0.0 %吉达: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %圣彼得堡: 0.0 %圣彼得堡: 0.0 %坦佩: 0.0 %坦佩: 0.0 %埃克塞特: 0.1 %埃克塞特: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.1 %天津: 0.0 %天津: 0.0 %奥斯汀: 0.1 %奥斯汀: 0.1 %奥科伊: 0.1 %奥科伊: 0.1 %安德森: 0.1 %安德森: 0.1 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %密蘇里城: 0.6 %密蘇里城: 0.6 %布雷登顿: 0.0 %布雷登顿: 0.0 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %弗吉: 0.1 %弗吉: 0.1 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %得克萨斯州: 0.0 %得克萨斯州: 0.0 %抚州: 0.0 %抚州: 0.0 %无锡: 0.0 %无锡: 0.0 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %杭州: 1.0 %杭州: 1.0 %株洲: 0.2 %株洲: 0.2 %格里利: 0.0 %格里利: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.2 %森尼韦尔: 0.2 %武汉: 0.1 %武汉: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %法国利摩日: 0.0 %法国利摩日: 0.0 %泰安: 0.1 %泰安: 0.1 %海口: 0.0 %海口: 0.0 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %清水: 0.0 %清水: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %漯河: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.1 %瑟普赖斯: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %纳什维尔: 0.1 %纳什维尔: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.0 %纽瓦克: 0.0 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约州: 0.0 %纽约州: 0.0 %美国乔治亚: 0.1 %美国乔治亚: 0.1 %美国弗吉尼亚: 0.0 %美国弗吉尼亚: 0.0 %美国德克萨斯: 0.0 %美国德克萨斯: 0.0 %美国德克萨斯卡蒂: 0.1 %美国德克萨斯卡蒂: 0.1 %美国纽约: 0.1 %美国纽约: 0.1 %美国肯塔基欧文斯伯勒: 0.0 %美国肯塔基欧文斯伯勒: 0.0 %艾卜哈: 0.1 %艾卜哈: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 8.7 %芒廷维尤: 8.7 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %萨斯卡通: 0.0 %萨斯卡通: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.0 %葡萄牙里斯本: 0.1 %葡萄牙里斯本: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %西宁: 44.2 %西宁: 44.2 %西雅图: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %运城: 0.0 %运城: 0.0 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %都伯林: 0.0 %都伯林: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阿苏萨: 0.0 %阿苏萨: 0.0 %其他其他AustinBadenBaltimoreBruderheimBuraidahCanadaCantonChinaColombiaDoylestownEdinburgEgyptFranceGirardGrove CityGwynn OakItalyKhobarLewisburgMalvernNormanOregonPerth AmboyPontevedraRochesterRussian FederationSaudi ArabiaSpainThe BronxUnited KingdomUnited StatesWaycrossWixom[]上海丽水伊萨卡休斯敦伦敦佛罗里达兰州凤凰城加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚北温哥华加拿大安大略加拿大安大略滨湖尼亚加拉加拿大纽芬兰与拉布拉多甘德北京匹兹堡南京南昌博阿努瓦台北合肥吉达哥伦布嘉兴圣彼得堡坦佩埃克塞特多伦多天津奥斯汀奥科伊安德森宣城密蘇里城布雷登顿广州弗吉张家口得克萨斯州抚州无锡昆明杭州株洲格里利森尼韦尔武汉泉州法国利摩日泰安海口深圳清水漯河潍坊瑟普赖斯盐城石家庄福州纳什维尔纽瓦克纽约纽约州美国乔治亚美国弗吉尼亚美国德克萨斯美国德克萨斯卡蒂美国纽约美国肯塔基欧文斯伯勒艾卜哈芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州萨斯卡通萨默维尔葡萄牙里斯本蚌埠西宁西雅图运城郑州都伯林重庆阳泉阿苏萨Highcharts.com

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 李妍，舒金平，华克达，张亚波，应玥，张威. 暗影饰皮夜蛾线粒体基因组全序列测定与分析. 浙江农林大学学报. 2024(04): 724-734 . 本站查看
    2. 闫创，阮小玉，王稳稳，胡路伟，李想，王懿祥，张云慧，张方梅. 信阳高空灯下昆虫种群群落结构的分析. 信阳农林学院学报. 2021(03): 107-110 .
    3. 刘莉，姚文华，韩丽. 保山城区金龟子的种类调查及多样性分析. 保山学院学报. 2020(02): 5-8 .
    4. 郑晓旭，肖能文，赵慕华，文栋，何帅洁，李雪梅，杨凤连，吴刚. 湖北三峡库区兴山县昆虫多样性调查与评估. 昆虫学报. 2020(12): 1497-1507 .
    5. 李雪梅，肖能文，何帅洁，郑晓旭，刘宇琛，吴刚. 武陵山区湖北省鹤峰县昆虫多样性调查与评价. 植物保护学报. 2020(06): 1381-1382 .

    Other cited types(6)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Get Citation
PDF
XML

Article views(3090) PDF downloads(717) Cited by(11)

Related
Proportional views

Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017
  • 1. School of Agricultural and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, Zhejiang China;
  • 2. Forest Pest Management and Quarantine Station of Jiande City, Jiande 311600, Zhejiang China;
  • 3. Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China
  • Received Date: 2014-03-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2014-05-27
  • Publish Date: 2015-02-20

Abstract: To determine relation of functional diversity with species richness, we investigated insect diversity of a pecan stand in Jiande, the sweep sampling and the route survey method were applied. Then, based on nine biological traits including ecological characters, four indexes of species diversity （Richness，Shannon，Simpson and Evenness） and six indexes of functional diversity （Functional richness, Functional attribute diversity，Modified FAD，Functional dendrogram，Convex hull hyper-volume，Functional specialization）were obtained. Also, two dimensions of insect diversity （species diversity and functional diversity） and the relationship between both dimensions were studied using the MSR index. 589 insect specimens collected in the survey, which were identified 160 species belonging to 11 orders. Results of the analysis by DPS 14.10，FDiversity and Excel 2003 revealed that: 1） advantage of orders were Homoptera, Coleoptera, and Lepidoptera; and the greatest species diversity and functional diversity were in an insect sub-community. 2） Also, the selected functional traits easily distinguished the functional diversity among the community. 3） FAD, MFAD, and FD indexes increased with increasing species diversity. belonging to MSR index （Monotonically increasing with Species Richness）, in this case community will be more stable and the pests in the pecan stand will easily be suppressed in low density. Also, FAD and MFAD were similar. Thus, functional diversity in the pecan stand could be used as guidance for pest control.［Ch, 6 tab. 30 ref.］

GU Jianqiang, CHEN Donghui, XU Kuiyuan, et al. Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 116-122. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017
Citation: GU Jianqiang, CHEN Donghui, XU Kuiyuan, et al. Insect species diversity, functional diversity, and their mutual relationship in a pecan stand[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 116-122. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.017
shu

    HTML

Catalog

  • HTML

浙ICP备11046845号

Copyright by 2019 Editorial Department of Journal of Zhejiang A&F University

Address: No. 666, Wu Su street, Ling'an District, Hangzhou, ZhejiangPost Code: 311300Tel: 0571-63732749

E-Mail: :zlxb@zafu.edu.cn

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return