Impact of scenic area environment and sports experience satisfaction on tourists’ perception of environmental restoration

ZHANG Jianguo; LIU Yuxiao

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200243

Volume 38 Issue 1

Jan. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Zhejiang A&F University > 2021 > 38(1): 184-192

ZHANG Jianguo, LIU Yuxiao. Impact of scenic area environment and sports experience satisfaction on tourists’ perception of environmental restoration[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(1): 184-192. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200243

Citation:

ZHANG Jianguo, LIU Yuxiao. Impact of scenic area environment and sports experience satisfaction on tourists’ perception of environmental restoration[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(1): 184-192. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200243

Impact of scenic area environment and sports experience satisfaction on tourists’ perception of environmental restoration

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200243

ZHANG Jianguo^{1, 2
,},
LIU Yuxiao²

1.
School of Economics and Management, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China
2.
College of Landscape Architecture/College of Tourism and Health, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2020-03-26
Rev Recd Date: 2020-09-28

Available Online: 2021-01-21

Publish Date: 2021-01-21

Abstract

Objective This study aims to investigate the relationship between environmental perception, sports experience and health efficacy of scenic spots. Method Using random sampling, the tourists in Lingjiu mountain forest sports town in Quzhou City of Zhejiang were investigated by questionnaire to obtain the relevant data. The structural equation was used to analyze the impact of environmental perception and leisure sports experience satisfaction of forest sports scenic spots on tourists’ environmental restoration perception. Result (1) The environmental perception satisfaction had a significant positive impact on tourists’ perception of environmental restoration. The mean value of standardized path coefficient was 0.26. The influence of the four dimensions on environmental restoration perception from large to small was ductility (0.29), charisma (0.27), compatibility (0.25), distance (0.23). Among the elements of environmental perception in forest scenic spots, the load of ecological environment quality on tourists’ satisfaction of forest environmental perception was the largest, which was 0.74. (2) Leisure sports experience satisfaction had a significant positive impact on tourists’ perception of environmental restoration (P＜0.05). The average value of standardized path coefficient was 0.86, and the degree of influence on the four dimensions of environmental restoration perception from large to small was distance (0.90), compatibility (0.88), charisma (0.84), ductility (0.82), which showed little difference between the four dimensions. In the satisfaction of leisure sports experience, the load of sports facilities and sports interest was the largest, both were 0.59. (3) From the difference of path coefficient, the effect of leisure sports experience satisfaction on environmental restoration sensitivity (0.86) was significantly higher than that of environmental perception satisfaction of scenic area (0.26). Conclusion Both the environmental quality of forest scenic spots and forest leisure sports experience have a significant positive impact on tourists’ perception of environmental restoration, but the impact of forest leisure sports experience is greater than that of scenic spots. The most important factor affecting the satisfaction of forest scenic spot environmental perception is the quality of ecological environment, and the biggest factor affecting the satisfaction of leisure sports experience is the richness of sports facilities and the interest of forest sports. For forest sports tourist attractions, more attention should be paid to how to improve the richness and interest of forest leisure sports. [Ch, 2 fig. 1 tab. 24 ref.]

Relative Article

[1]	ZHU Jinli, LIN Xiaoqiu, SHAO Hongrui, LI Wenxiao, DONG Jianwen, ZHENG Yu. Effects of the tourists’ place perception and environmental behavior on health benefit evaluation at Fuzhou National Forest Park . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(3): 634-643. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230534
[2]	GU Wenjun, XU Aijun, YIN Jianxin. Measuring method of multiple trees attributes based on structure from motion . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(4): 792-799. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210547
[3]	CHEN Wei, GU Lei, FENG Yiyong, ZHU Aiqin, ZHU Weiqiang. Impact of risk attitude and risk perception on farmers’ willingness to transfer carbon sequestration forests . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(6): 1270-1278. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210216
[4]	YU Fei, LI Zhiyong. Analysis of tourists' perception of forest cultural value in Mount Tianmu . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(2): 366-373. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.02.023
[5]	XIONG Can, TANG Huichao, XU Bin, HONG Quan. Using characteristics and satisfaction of country greenway . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(1): 154-161. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.01.019
[6]	SHEN Xiao, ZHANG Jianguo. Web-based text analysis of tourism image perception of Shaoxing Mirror Lake National Urban Wetland Park . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2018, 35(1): 145-152. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.01.019
[7]	JIN Wan, SHEN Yueqin, ZHAO Xingquan, MAO Bitian. Research on farmers' satisfaction and influence factors of joint-stock reform of rural collective property in Zhejiang . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(1): 170-177. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.01.023
[8]	CHENG Zhangfeng, GUO Rui, WANG Yiping, WENG Dongming, JIANG Chaoyang, LIU Wei, WENG Huajun. Evaluation of a forest soil environment based on collembolan diversity in Qingliangfeng of Zhejiang . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 104-109. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.015
[9]	DAI Xiaoting, YANG Jianzhou, FENG Xiangjin. Analysis of pricing theory and composition of forest environmental resources based on marginal opportunity cost . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(3): 406-411. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.03.017
[10]	GU Xiao-yan, MENG Ming-hao, YU Yi-wu. Comprehensive development of leisure agriculture and outdoor activities . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(1): 104-110. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.01.018
[11]	YAO Zhao-bin, GAO Yong, ZHAN Min, ZHANG Jian-guo. Research on satisfactory degree of senior summer tourists . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 949-952. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.019
[12]	BAO Ya-fang, SUN Zhi. Visitors’ satisfaction of unattended interpretation services in Zhejiang’s national forest parks . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(6): 891-895.
[13]	HUANG Li-bin, ZHANG Min, ZHU Xi-chen, ZHAN Shun-long, LI Dong-lin. Poll investigation of village landscaping in new countryside construction in south Jiangsu Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(3): 411-416.
[14]	ZENG Yan-ru, CHENG Zhang-feng, ZHENG Nan-zhong. Forest certification and sustainable development of rural areas and the environment in China . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(3): 266-271.
[15]	LI Lan-ying, GAO Lan, WEN Ya-li, HUANG Shui-ling. Countermeasures and environmental influence analysis of forest diseases . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(5): 491-496.
[16]	MENG Ming-hao, YU Yi-wu, GU Xiao-yan, LI Tian-you, ZHANG Zhi-pan. Case study of composing commentary system for tourist attractions . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2005, 22(5): 572-576.
[17]	HU Yun-jiang. Environment ethic supporting resource environment protection . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2002, 19(1): 72-75.
[18]	WU Wei-guang, WANG Chuan-chang. Advance of research in forest environmental value evaluation . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2002, 19(4): 446-451.
[19]	Zheng Jianyue. Study on the Sports Interest of College Students. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1996, 13(3): 350-353.
[20]	Zhang Xiafei. An Elementary Analysis of Sports Injuries about College Students. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1995, 12(1): 93-97.

References

[1]	VELARDE M D, FRY G, TVEIT M. Health effects of viewing landscapes: landscape types in environmental psychology [J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2007, 6(4): 199 − 212.
[2]	KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989: 360.
[3]	HARTIG T, KORPELA K, EVANS G W, et al. Validation of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness [J]. Göteborg Psychol Rep, 1996, 26(7): 1 − 64.
[4]	WANG Xinxin, RODIEK S, WU Chengzhao, et al. Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China [J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2016, 15: 112 − 122.
[5]	LIU Qunyue, CHEN Ye, ZHANG Wei, et al. Tourists’ environmental preferences, perceived restoration and perceived health at Fuzhou National Forest Park [J]. Resour Sci, 2018, 40(2): 381 − 391.
[6]	LEHTO X Y. Assessing the perceived restorative qualities of vacation destinations [J]. J Travel Res, 2012, 52(3): 325 − 339.
[7]	CHEN Guanghua, HUANG Songshan, ZHANG Dandan. Understanding Chinese vacationers’ perceived destination restorative qualities: cross-cultural validation of the perceived destination restorative qualities scale [J]. J Travel Tourism Mark, 2017, 34(8): 1115 − 1127.
[8]	HUANG Zhangzhan, HUANG Fangming, ZHOU Xianjie. The relationships between environment preferences and restorative perceptions of environment: a case of mountainscape [J]. Outdoor Recreation Stud, 2008, 21(1): 1 − 25.
[9]	CHEN Ganghua, XI Wang. The impact of visitors’ perceived destination restorative qualities on satisfaction and post-tour behavioral intentions: a case study of Nankunshan [J]. Tourism Sci, 2018, 32(4): 17 − 30.
[10]	LIU Qunyue, YOU Da, ZHU Liying, et al. The relationship between place attachment and restorative perception of tourists visiting Fuzhou urban parks [J]. Resour Sci, 2017, 39(7): 1303 − 1313.
[11]	TAN Shaohua, SUN Yawen, SHEN Jize. Research on the impact of urban park environment on public health: from the perspectives of psycholpgical perception and behaviors [J]. Urban Archit, 2018(8): 24 − 28.
[12]	GRAHN P, STIGSDOTTER U K. The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration [J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2010, 94(3/4): 264 − 275.
[13]	PESCHARDT K K, STIGSDOTTER U K. Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces [J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2013, 112: 26 − 39.
[14]	ZHENG Qunming, LIU Jia, ZHU Yan, et al. Perception on the sub-health improvement of tourists by forest healthcare tourism [J]. Resour Sci, 2017, 39(6): 1171 − 1181.
[15]	LI Changjun, JIA Henan, ZUO Junnan. Effects, mechanisms and prospects of exercise promoting mental health [J]. Sports Sci Technol China, 2015, 51(1): 132 − 139.
[16]	TAN Shaohua, GUO Jianfeng, ZHAO Wanmin. Research progress of restoration and stress relief benefits in urban natural environment [J]. Areal Res Dev, 2010, 29(4): 55 − 60.
[17]	LEHTO X, KIRILLOVA K, LI H, et al. Across-cultural validation of the perceived destination restorative qualities scale: the Chinese perspective [J]. Asia Pac J Tourism Res, 2017, 22(3): 329 − 343.
[18]	ZENG Zhen, ZHU Nanyan, DAI Zhongwei, et al. Research on the relationship among urban greenway tourists’ recreational motivation, satisfaction and assessment of health benefits: a case study of Sanming Greenway [J]. Ecol Econ, 2019, 35(6): 125 − 130.
[19]	FANG Cheng, WANG Cheng, GUO Erguo, et al. Relationship between recreation in suburban forest park and tourists’ physiological health: a case study of Baiwang Mountain Forest Park, Beijing [J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2010, 38(3): 87 − 88, 107.
[20]	PENG Huiyun, TAN Shaohua. Study on the influencing mechanism of restoration effect of urban park environment: a case sudy of Chongqing [J]. Chin Landscape Archit, 2018, 34(9): 5 − 9.
[21]	OLIVER R L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions [J]. J Mark Res, 1980, 17(4): 460 − 469.
[22]	HIPP A, OGUNSEITAN O A. Effect of environmental conditions on perceived psychological restorativeness of coastal parks [J]. J Environ Psychol, 2011, 31(4): 421 − 429.
[23]	CHEN Ganghua, XI Wang, HUANG Songshan, et al. Influences of coastal resort vacationers’ environmental and climate satisfactions on their perceived destination restorative qualities [J]. Resour Sci, 2019, 41(3): 430 − 440.
[24]	TAN Shaohua, PENG Huiyun. A study on impact factor of vest-pocket park alleviating stress of human [J]. Chin Landscape Archit, 2016, 32(8): 65 − 70.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(2) / Tables(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(1214) PDF downloads(34) Cited by()

Proportional views

HTML

随着城市现代化的推进，城市居民生活中的诸多不健康行为，导致身体疲惫与精神压力问题日益严重。在压力繁重的今天，人们为了纾解压力前往户外进行休闲游憩，以得到休息并促进身心健康^[1]。目前，逐渐兴起的森林运动旅游，正是从森林环境的康养保健功能出发，结合运动项目，为城市居民提供休闲游憩、运动健身、康复疗养等活动的新兴旅游业态。旅游对纾解生活压力与精神疲劳有较好结果。KAPLAN等^[2]率先开展环境恢复性研究，提出了注意力恢复理论和环境恢复性的维度。此后，该理论便成为学界的研究基础框架。目前，关于环境恢复性的研究热点主要集中于研究方法的探索和量表的开发。HARTIG等^[3]基于KAPLAN等^[2]的理论进一步研究开发了感知恢复量表(PRS)。PRS能以人的主观角度探究环境的恢复性效应，因而在相关学术领域应用广泛。如WANG等^[4]运用PRS探究上海多个公园的游客恢复性感知。此后经过一些研究发现：PRS量表存在诸多问题，因而进行了一系列修正改良^[5-7]。中国关于PRS的研究多采用黄章展等^[8]改良后的适用于中国环境的量表。目前，在研究环境恢复性的影响因素方面已有较多成果，主要集中在研究环境恢复性的客观影响因素，如环境、气候等^[9-11]。大量研究证明：环境质量的好坏能够影响人的环境恢复性感知，这也是目前相关研究的主要方向。如GRAHN等^[12]通过研究发现：人对自然环境的感知与人类健康之间存在着联系。PESCHARDT等^[13]发现：城市中建筑密集区的绿地对人的心理恢复有着积极的影响。在游憩体验过程中，人的感受不但取决于客观环境，也受其他因素(如活动、心理等)影响。郑群明等^[14]发现：亚健康旅游者的运动体验对身体的健康恢复有正向影响。李昌俊等^[15]发现：锻炼有益于人际关系与心理健康的发展。已有研究表明：游客的环境恢复性感知能够影响其对环境的满意度、喜好等方面^[16]。因而在研究环境恢复性感知时，不但要考虑客观因素影响，还应从人的主观角度剖析其对环境恢复性的影响。游客的运动体验为环境恢复性感知的重要影响因素，目前还基本没有研究。同时，研究环境与运动满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的关系，可以探究环境因素与运动体验对游客环境恢复性感知的影响程度区别。森林运动作为新兴的康养旅游模式，还缺乏对其环境恢复性的相关研究。本研究通过探索森林运动小镇景区环境与运动体验满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的作用机理与影响程度，进一步了解森林运动小镇环境恢复性的关键影响要素，为森林运动小镇的设计、管理与运营提供理论参考，以期提升游客环境恢复性感知。因此，本研究拟构建森林运动型景区环境满意度、运动体验满意度和游客环境恢复性感知三者关系的结构模型，以浙江省衢州市柯城区灵鹫山森林运动小镇游客问卷调查结果分析为例进行模型验证，探究森林运动型景区环境和运动体验满意度对环境恢复性感知的影响。

3. 结果分析

3.1. 森林运动小镇环境满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的影响分析

游客对于景区环境质量的主观感知通常与他们对环境恢复性感知存在着相关性^[22]。本研究同样发现：森林运动小镇环境满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的4个维度有显著的正向影响，其标准化路径系数的平均数值为0.26。森林运动小镇环境满意度到游客环境恢复性感知4个维度的标准化路径系数中，延展性值最大，远离值最小，总体上呈现为延展性(0.29)＞魅力性(0.27)＞兼容性(0.25)＞远离(0.23)，4个维度之间差异不大。这一结果与灵鹫山森林运动小镇的旅游开发现状较为吻合。该景区以森林运动体验为核心主题，在森林环境方面虽然与城市居住区有着较大的差异，但在森林覆盖率普遍较高、生态环境相对较好的南方地区，并没有特殊的吸引力。森林运动小镇环境的满意度对于游客环境恢复性感知的4个维度均有显著的正向影响，但路径系数数值较低，均小于0.30，表明森林运动小镇景区环境满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的影响虽然显著且呈正向，但其影响较小。

在森林运动旅游区环境满意度的4个观察变量中，景区生态环境对景区环境满意度的标准化路径系数最大，为0.74，而自然资源对景区环境满意度的标准化路径系数最小，为0.57。表明前来灵鹫山森林运动小镇的游客在森林运动体验中，最在意景区的生态环境是否舒适。良好的生态环境能显著提升游客环境满意度，而自然资源、文化历史等对游客的整体环境满意度相对影响较小。

3.2. 运动体验满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的影响分析

运动体验满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的标准化路径系数均值为0.86，有显著的正向影响。表明运动体验满意度每增加1个单位，游客环境恢复性感知就会增加0.86个单位，游客的运动体验越感到满意，越能感受到环境的恢复功能。表明运动体验满意度是提升灵鹫山森林运动小镇的游客恢复性感知的重要因素，这与该森林旅游景区的核心吸引力高度吻合。

在运动体验满意度到游客环境恢复性感知的标准化路径系数的4个维度中，总体上呈现为远离(0.90)＞兼容性(0.88)＞魅力性(0.84)＞延展性(0.82)。灵鹫山森林运动小镇的核心体验项目是丛林穿越等有一定挑战性的森林活动项目，大部分游客前来旅游主要是为了参与森林运动项目，获取与众不同的旅游体验。因此，随着游客运动体验满意度的增加，增加最多的是游客的远离感，即远离日常生活、工作所在地，会给其带来生活压力的地方。游客在运动旅游区感受到森林运动的魅力后，能感到精神与身体的放松，通过使游客脱离一成不变的日常生活状态从而减缓压力。游客在游玩过程中也会产生归属感并适应、喜欢运动旅游区的休闲方式与运动氛围。同时，游客在对森林运动旅游区的运动体验感受良好时，也会感受到森林环境的独特魅力与延展性。

在游客运动体验满意度的6个观察变量中，运动设施丰富多样与能提升运动兴趣的标准化路径系数最大(0.59)，而专项运动项目的标准化路径系数最小(0.55)。表明丰富多样的运动设施能够丰富游客的运动体验并给游客带来多方面的感受，满足各类游客的需要；能激发游客运动兴趣的体验项目，能激活游客情绪，使其更易沉浸于运动型景区；而专项运动项目具有一定的参与门槛，在一定程度上弱化了游客的吸引力和满意度。对于灵鹫山森林运动小镇而言，游客主要为家庭式休闲旅游，既可以通过森林步道徒步达到运动健身的效果，也可以根据具体情况，选择难易程度适宜的项目体验森林运动带来的挑战自我和强身健体的效果；而作为团队成员参与单位团队建设活动的集体行为时，不是所有成员都喜欢高强度挑战性的运动项目，但是“愤怒的小鸟” “高空滑鼠”“从林穿越” “树梢滑翔” “比翼双飞”(空中双人滑索)等种类丰富的运动项目、高质量的运动设施和专业的教练辅导人员，可以使游客在放松的同时体验到高质量、安全的森林运动活动，在体验森林运动与众不同魅力的同时极大地提升了体验满意度。

4. 结论与讨论

4.1. 结论

本研究通过建立森林运动小镇景区环境和运动体验满意度与游客环境恢复性感知之间的结构模型，探讨分析了两者对游客环境恢复性感知的作用方式与影响程度，并为今后探讨游客环境恢复性感知的影响因素与作用机理提供了新的理论基础与研究思路。

本研究表明：研究模型假设成立，森林运动旅游区环境与运动体验的满意度均对游客环境恢复性感知及其4个维度有显著正向影响。这一结果与以往研究是相符的，如陈钢华等^[23]发现：三亚游客对环境感知舒适时，环境对他们恢复性效应会显著提高。曾真等^[18]也发现：游客在绿道活动时，体验较好的游客能够满足自己的旅游期望，进而取得较好的游客环境恢复性感知。本研究还发现：森林运动旅游区环境满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的标准化路径系数相对运动体验满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的标准化路径系数较小，即游客的运动体验较环境满意度更能影响游客环境恢复性感知。

综上所述，①森林运动小镇的环境和运动体验满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的4个维度均存在显著正向影响，且运动体验满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的影响程度比环境满意度影响要大。②在森林运动小镇环境满意度的4个观察变量中，景区的生态环境要素对环境满意度的负荷量最大，表明较好的生态环境是提升环境恢复性效应的主要因素。③在游客运动满意度的6个观察变量中，运动设施丰富多样与能提升运动兴趣的标准化路径系数最大，表明丰富多样的运动设施和森林运动项目的趣味性能够丰富游客的运动体验并给游客带来较高的体验满意度。

4.2. 讨论

本研究发现：森林运动小镇景区满意度对游客环境恢复性感知的4个维度呈正向影响，这与以往对环境恢复性研究结论相符。以往研究多数认为自然因素在环境恢复性中占主导地位^[24]，且大多数研究的对象为公园、景区等自然游憩场所。自然环境是游客的主要感知内容，因此环境因素对游客环境恢复性感知的影响巨大。森林运动小镇作为当前一大旅游趋势，暂无对其游客环境恢复性感知的研究，且没有关于运动体验与环境恢复性关系的研究。本研究填补了相关学术理论的空白。

本研究发现：在森林运动小镇游览后，影响游客环境恢复性感知因素中，运动体验有着决定性的作用，而非以往研究发现的环境为主导因素。表明多数游客前往森林运动小镇带有目的性和期待性，运动体验的不同感受会带给游客不同程度的游客环境恢复性感知，为以后森林运动小镇和其他特色景区的环境恢复性研究提供了新思路，同时也为森林运动型景区的设计、管理及经营提供了理论参考。

5. 发展建议

5.1. 加强景区生态环境质量管理

优质的景区生态环境能让游客在游览过程中获得良好的体验，进而提高环境恢复性感知。景区管理方应重视旅游区的环境质量，做好管理工作，如加强动植物的保护管理，维护良好的森林生态生物圈；加强对森林小气候各指标的监控，维护舒适的森林生态环境，为游客提供森林氧吧式运动游憩环境。

5.2. 优化游客运动体验感受

参加森林运动旅游的游客在森林环境中进行体验后能获得的环境恢复性效应主要通过参加休闲游憩和专项运动产生。运动体验作为一大主观要素，对游客参与运动后的健康促进效应有显著正向影响，因而提升游客的运动体验质量就成为管理者提升景区品质的重要方向。

提升运动体验满意度，首先要考虑到参与活动人群的多元化。在确保安全性的前提下，运动设施应丰富多样，适应各年龄段人群活动，提升运动项目的可参与度，做到难易结合，不管老幼均能参加健康适宜的运动。有趣、多样的运动项目更能吸引游人注意力与好奇心，放松心情并使其融入运动氛围，使其身心压力更容易得到释放。

本研究主要针对环境和运动体验2个要素探究其对游客的环境恢复性感知的影响，而游客在体验森林运动的同时，视觉环境、天气状况等也会对游客环境恢复性感知产生一定的影响，因此在后续研究中，可选择多样的自变量多角度、全面地探究环境恢复性效应。

Reference (24)

[1]	VELARDE M D, FRY G, TVEIT M. Health effects of viewing landscapes: landscape types in environmental psychology [J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2007, 6(4): 199 − 212.
[2]	KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989: 360.
[3]	HARTIG T, KORPELA K, EVANS G W, et al. Validation of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness [J]. Göteborg Psychol Rep, 1996, 26(7): 1 − 64.
[4]	WANG Xinxin, RODIEK S, WU Chengzhao, et al. Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China [J]. Urban For Urban Greening, 2016, 15: 112 − 122.
[5]	刘群阅, 陈烨, 张薇, 等. 游憩者环境偏好、恢复性评价与健康效益评估关系研究: 以福州国家森林公园为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(2): 381 − 391.	LIU Qunyue, CHEN Ye, ZHANG Wei, et al. Tourists’ environmental preferences, perceived restoration and perceived health at Fuzhou National Forest Park [J]. Resour Sci, 2018, 40(2): 381 − 391.
[6]	LEHTO X Y. Assessing the perceived restorative qualities of vacation destinations [J]. J Travel Res, 2012, 52(3): 325 − 339.
[7]	CHEN Guanghua, HUANG Songshan, ZHANG Dandan. Understanding Chinese vacationers’ perceived destination restorative qualities: cross-cultural validation of the perceived destination restorative qualities scale [J]. J Travel Tourism Mark, 2017, 34(8): 1115 − 1127.
[8]	黄章展, 黄芳铭, 周先捷. 环境偏好与环境恢复性知觉关系之研究: 以山景景观为例[J]. 户外游憩研究, 2008, 21(1): 1 − 25.	HUANG Zhangzhan, HUANG Fangming, ZHOU Xianjie. The relationships between environment preferences and restorative perceptions of environment: a case of mountainscape [J]. Outdoor Recreation Stud, 2008, 21(1): 1 − 25.
[9]	陈钢华, 奚望. 旅游度假区游客环境恢复性感知对满意度与游后行为意向的影响: 以广东南昆山为例[J]. 旅游科学, 2018, 32(4): 17 − 30.	CHEN Ganghua, XI Wang. The impact of visitors’ perceived destination restorative qualities on satisfaction and post-tour behavioral intentions: a case study of Nankunshan [J]. Tourism Sci, 2018, 32(4): 17 − 30.
[10]	刘群阅, 尤达, 朱里莹, 等. 游憩者场所依恋与恢复性知觉关系研究: 以福州城市公园为例[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(7): 1303 − 1313.	LIU Qunyue, YOU Da, ZHU Liying, et al. The relationship between place attachment and restorative perception of tourists visiting Fuzhou urban parks [J]. Resour Sci, 2017, 39(7): 1303 − 1313.
[11]	谭少华, 孙雅文, 申纪泽. 城市公园环境对人群健康的影响研究: 基于感知与行为视角[J]. 城市建筑, 2018(8): 24 − 28.	TAN Shaohua, SUN Yawen, SHEN Jize. Research on the impact of urban park environment on public health: from the perspectives of psycholpgical perception and behaviors [J]. Urban Archit, 2018(8): 24 − 28.
[12]	GRAHN P, STIGSDOTTER U K. The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration [J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2010, 94(3/4): 264 − 275.
[13]	PESCHARDT K K, STIGSDOTTER U K. Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces [J]. Landscape Urban Plann, 2013, 112: 26 − 39.
[14]	郑群明, 刘嘉, 朱岩, 等. 森林保健旅游对游客亚健康改善的感知研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(6): 1171 − 1181.	ZHENG Qunming, LIU Jia, ZHU Yan, et al. Perception on the sub-health improvement of tourists by forest healthcare tourism [J]. Resour Sci, 2017, 39(6): 1171 − 1181.
[15]	李昌俊, 贾贺男, 左俊楠. 锻炼促进心理健康的效果、机制与展望[J]. 中国体育科技, 2015, 51(1): 132 − 139.	LI Changjun, JIA Henan, ZUO Junnan. Effects, mechanisms and prospects of exercise promoting mental health [J]. Sports Sci Technol China, 2015, 51(1): 132 − 139.
[16]	谭少华, 郭剑锋, 赵万民. 城市自然环境缓解精神压力和疲劳恢复研究进展[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2010, 29(4): 55 − 60.	TAN Shaohua, GUO Jianfeng, ZHAO Wanmin. Research progress of restoration and stress relief benefits in urban natural environment [J]. Areal Res Dev, 2010, 29(4): 55 − 60.
[17]	LEHTO X, KIRILLOVA K, LI H, et al. Across-cultural validation of the perceived destination restorative qualities scale: the Chinese perspective [J]. Asia Pac J Tourism Res, 2017, 22(3): 329 − 343.
[18]	曾真, 朱南燕, 戴忠炜, 等. 城市绿道游憩者游憩动机、满意度与健康效益评估的关系研究: 以三明绿道为例[J]. 生态经济, 2019, 35(6): 125 − 130.	ZENG Zhen, ZHU Nanyan, DAI Zhongwei, et al. Research on the relationship among urban greenway tourists’ recreational motivation, satisfaction and assessment of health benefits: a case study of Sanming Greenway [J]. Ecol Econ, 2019, 35(6): 125 − 130.
[19]	房城, 王成, 郭二果, 等. 城郊森林公园游憩与游人生理健康关系: 以北京百望山森林公园为例[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(3): 87 − 88, 107.	FANG Cheng, WANG Cheng, GUO Erguo, et al. Relationship between recreation in suburban forest park and tourists’ physiological health: a case study of Baiwang Mountain Forest Park, Beijing [J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2010, 38(3): 87 − 88, 107.
[20]	彭慧蕴, 谭少华. 城市公园环境的恢复性效应影响机制研究: 以重庆为例[J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(9): 5 − 9.	PENG Huiyun, TAN Shaohua. Study on the influencing mechanism of restoration effect of urban park environment: a case sudy of Chongqing [J]. Chin Landscape Archit, 2018, 34(9): 5 − 9.
[21]	OLIVER R L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions [J]. J Mark Res, 1980, 17(4): 460 − 469.
[22]	HIPP A, OGUNSEITAN O A. Effect of environmental conditions on perceived psychological restorativeness of coastal parks [J]. J Environ Psychol, 2011, 31(4): 421 − 429.
[23]	陈钢华, 奚望, 黄松山, 等. 海滨旅游度假区游客环境和气候满意度对环境恢复性感知的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(3): 430 − 440.	CHEN Ganghua, XI Wang, HUANG Songshan, et al. Influences of coastal resort vacationers’ environmental and climate satisfactions on their perceived destination restorative qualities [J]. Resour Sci, 2019, 41(3): 430 − 440.
[24]	谭少华, 彭慧蕴. 袖珍公园缓解人群精神压力的影响因子研究[J]. 中国园林, 2016, 32(8): 65 − 70.	TAN Shaohua, PENG Huiyun. A study on impact factor of vest-pocket park alleviating stress of human [J]. Chin Landscape Archit, 2016, 32(8): 65 − 70.

潜在变量	观测变量	旋转因子矩阵值	组合信度	平均提取方差值	克朗巴哈系数
A景区游客环境感知满意度	A₁自然资源丰富	0.698	0.841	0.584	0.759
	A₂设施与服务良好	0.761
	A₃景区生态环境舒适	0.808
	A₄文化及历史吸引人	0.785

B运动体验满意度	B₁运动设施丰富多样	0.758	0.862	0.535	0.807
	B₂项目安全易操作	0.752
	B₃运动趣味性强	0.733
	B₄休闲游憩运动舒适	0.699
	B₅专项运动项目丰富有趣	0.679
	B₆运动项目可参与度高	0.658

C远离	C₁有一种脱离世俗的体验	0.667	0.844	0.501	0.736
	C₂可以摆脱疲倦的日常生活休养	0.640
	C₃可以让我完全休息的地方	0.768
	C₄可以帮助我放松紧绷的心情	0.693
	C₅感觉到工作及日常生不受活的拘束	0.718

D延展性	D₁周围的景物是协调一致的	0.647	0.823	0.531	0.705
	D₂对于环境中看不见的景观感到有趣	0.797
	D₃使我延伸出许多美好联想	0.784
	D₄景观的组成元素是相配的	0.677

E魅力性	E₁具有吸引人的特质	0.688	0.835	0.564	0.735
	E₂可有更多的探索与发现	0.763
	E₃这个环境是有魅力的	0.778
	E₄想花更多的时间来观察	0.756

F兼容性	F₁可以从事我喜欢的运动	0.660	0.863	0.542	0.789
	F₂很快适应这样的场景	0.723
	F₃感觉属于这里	0.788
	F₄能找到自得其乐的方法	0.778
	F₅想做的事情与环境一致	0.731