留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生长和生理生化的影响

杨王庭 邵香君 周菊敏 桂仁意

杨王庭, 邵香君, 周菊敏, 桂仁意. 不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生长和生理生化的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286
引用本文: 杨王庭, 邵香君, 周菊敏, 桂仁意. 不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生长和生理生化的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286
YANG Wangting, SHAO Xiangjun, ZHOU Jumin, GUI Renyi. Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentration on growth, physiology and biochemistry of hydroponic Phyllostachys violascens seedlings[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286
Citation: YANG Wangting, SHAO Xiangjun, ZHOU Jumin, GUI Renyi. Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentration on growth, physiology and biochemistry of hydroponic Phyllostachys violascens seedlings[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286

本文已在中国知网网络首发,可在知网搜索、下载并阅读全文。

不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生长和生理生化的影响

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286
基金项目: 浙江省科技计划项目(2017C02016)
详细信息
    作者简介: 杨王庭,从事竹林培育与利用研究。E-mail: yangwangtings@163.com
    通信作者: 桂仁意,教授,博士,从事竹林培育与利用研究。E-mail: gry@zafu.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: S723.1

Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentration on growth, physiology and biochemistry of hydroponic Phyllostachys violascens seedlings

  • 摘要:   目的   了解溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹Phyllostachys violascens水培苗生长、生理指标及根系结构的影响,初步探究雷竹水培苗对缺氧的适应性机制。   方法   以雷竹水培苗为材料,设置0、2、4、6、8 mg·L−1不同溶解氧质量浓度进行处理,分析不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生物量积累、叶面积、根系活力、抗氧化酶活性、光合色素质量分数及根系结构的影响。   结果   雷竹水培苗生物量积累、叶面积、根系活力、叶片抗氧化酶活性和光合色素质量分数均随溶解氧质量浓度的升高而显著升高(P<0.05)。8 mg·L−1处理组中雷竹水培苗叶片超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化氢酶、过氧化物酶和抗坏血酸过氧化物酶活性达到峰值,分别为746.13×16.67 nkat·g−1、63.13×16.67 nkat·g−1·min−1、59 395.45×16.67 nkat·g−1·min−1和407.46 ×16.67 nkat·g−1·min−1。水培条件下,雷竹水培苗根系中形成溶生型通气组织,其面积占根系横截面面积的百分比随溶解氧质量浓度降低而显著升高(最高达到7.1%),通气组织个数变化趋势则相反(P<0.05)。   结论   水培条件下,溶解氧质量浓度越高,雷竹水培苗长势越好,且雷竹水培苗生长对氧气的需求大于8 mg·L−1。水培条件下,缺氧会诱导雷竹根中形成溶生型通气组织,但不足以使其具有高度耐水淹的能力。图5参50
  • 图  1  处理期间各组溶解氧质量浓度变化

    Figure  1  Changes in dissolved oxygen concentration of each group during treatment

    图  2  不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生物量积累和叶面积的影响

    A. 生物量积累;B. 叶面积

    Figure  2  Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentration on biomass accumulation and leaf area of hydroponic Ph. violascens seedlings

    图  3  不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗根系活力和光合色素的影响

    A. 叶绿素a;B. 叶绿素b;C. 类胡萝卜素;D. 根系活力

    Figure  3  Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentration on the root activity and the content of photosynthetic pigments of hydroponic Ph. violascens seedlings

    图  4  不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗叶片SOD、CAT、POD、APX活性的影响

    Figure  4  Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentration on SOD, CAT, POD, APX activity in the leaves of hydroponic Ph. violascens seedlings

    图  5  不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗根系距根尖10、30、50、70 mm处通气组织面积占比和形成数量的影响

    对照雷竹根系及各处理中雷竹水培苗根系距根尖10 mm处无通气组织形成,故图中不显示数据

    Figure  5  Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentrations on the percentage and the number of aerenchyma of root cross-sectional area at 10,30,50,70 mm from the tips of roots of hydroponic Ph. violascens seedlings

  • [1] DAIMS H, WAGNER M. Nitrospira [J]. Trends Microbiol, 2018, 26(5): 462 − 463.
    [2] GEIGENBERGER P. Response of plant metabolism to too little oxygen [J]. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2003, 6(3): 247 − 256.
    [3] DREW M C. Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia [J]. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1997, 48(1): 223 − 250.
    [4] BAILEY-SERRES J, FUKAO T. Plant responses to hypoxia–is survival a balancing act? [J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2004, 9(9): 449 − 456.
    [5] ANNALISA P, SOFIA C, ANTONELLA L, et al. ROS production and scavenging under anoxia and re-oxygenation in Aarabidopsis cells: a balance between redox signaling and impairment [J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 1803.
    [6] MUNIR R, KONNERUP D, KHAN H A, et al. Sensitivity of chickpea and faba bean to root-zone hypoxia, elevated ethylene and carbon dioxide: root responses to low O2, ethylene, or high CO2 [J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2019, 42(1): 85 − 97.
    [7] HATTORI Y, NAGAI K, FURUKAWA S, et al. The ethylene response factors SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2 allow rice to adapt to deep water [J]. Nature, 2009, 460(7258): 1026 − 1030.
    [8] YAMAUCHI T, YOSHIOKA M, FUKAZAWA A, et al. An NADPH oxidase RBOH functions in rice roots during lysigenous aerenchyma formation under oxygen-deficient conditions [J]. Plant Cell, 2017, 29(4): 775 − 790.
    [9] BAILEY-SERRES J, FUKAO T, GIBBS D J, et al. Making sense of low oxygen sensing [J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2012, 17(3): 129 − 138.
    [10] YAMAUCHI T, SHIONO K, NAGANO M, et al. Ethylene biosynthesis is promoted by very-long-chain fatty acids during lysigenous aerenchyma formation in rice roots [J]. Plant Physiol, 2015, 169(4): 180 − 193.
    [11] BAILEY-SERRES J, VOESENSK L A C J. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity [J]. Ann Rev Plant Biol, 2008, 59(1): 313 − 339.
    [12] SHIONO K, OGAWA S, YAMAZAKI S, et al. Contrasting dynamics of radial O2-loss barrier induction and aerenchyma formation in rice roots of two lengths [J]. Ann Bot, 2011, 107(1): 89 − 99.
    [13] HE C, FINLAYSON S A, DREW M C, et al. Ethylene biosynthesis during aerenchyma formation in roots of maize subjected to mechanical impedance and hypoxia [J]. Plant Physiol, 1996, 112(4): 1679 − 1685.
    [14] RAJHI I, YAMAUCHI T, TAKAHASHI H, et al. Identification of genes expressed in maize root cortical cells during lysigenous aerenchyma formation using laser microdissection and microarray analyses [J]. New Phytol, 2011, 190(2): 351 − 368.
    [15] THOMSON C J, ARMSTRONG W, WATERS I, et al. Aerenchyma formation and associated oxygen movement in seminal and nodal roots of wheat [J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2010, 13(4): 395 − 403.
    [16] STEFFENS B, GESKE T, SAUTER M. Aerenchyma formation in the rice stem and its promotion by H2O2 [J]. New Phytol, 2011, 190(2): 369 − 378.
    [17] EVANS D E. Aerenchyma formation [J]. New Phytol, 2003, 161(1): 35 − 49.
    [18] ARMSTRONG J, ARMSTRONG W. Phragmites australis: a preliminary study of soil-oxidizing sites and internal gas transport pathways [J]. New Phytol, 1988, 108(4): 373 − 382.
    [19] SURALTA R R, YAMAUCHI A. Root growth, aerenchyma development, and oxygen transport in rice genotypes subjected to drought and waterlogging [J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2008, 64(1): 75 − 82.
    [20] 陈龙飞. 笋用雷竹高产栽培[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2000(5): 15.

    CHEN Longfei. High-yield cultivation of bamboo shoots [J]. J Anhui For Sci Technol, 2000(5): 15.
    [21] 周国模, 金爱武, 何钧潮, 等. 覆盖保护地栽培措施对雷竹笋用林丰产性能的影响[J]. 中南林学院学报, 1999, 19(2): 52 − 54.

    ZHOU Guomo, JIN Aiwu, HE Junchao, et al. The influence of cultivation techniques used in covered protected plots on the high-yield property of Lei bamboo plantation for edible shoots [J]. J Cent South For Univ, 1999, 19(2): 52 − 54.
    [22] 董林根, 吴伟根, 郑钢, 等. 经营干扰对雷竹叶面积指数的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 1999, 17(2): 14 − 16.

    DONG Lingeng, WU Weigeng, ZHENG Gang, et al. Decline in bamboo leaf area index as affected by management disturbance [J]. Econ For Res, 1999, 17(2): 14 − 16.
    [23] XU Mengjie, ZHUANG Shunyao, GUI Renyi. Soil hypoxia induced by an organic-material mulching technique stimulates the bamboo rhizome up-floating of Phyllostachys praecox[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 14353. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-14798-8.
    [24] NILSSON R L K, MAGNESCHI L, LORETI E, et al. Transcript profiling of the anoxic rice coleoptile [J]. Plant Physiol, 2007, 144(1): 218 − 231.
    [25] 张岚清, 沈德魁. 含氧气氛下的稻杆低温烘焙研究[J]. 北京化工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(5): 27 − 32.

    ZHANG Lanqing, SHEN Dekui. Oxidative torrefaction of rice straw under different oxygen concentrations [J]. J Beijing Univ Chem Technol Nat Sci, 2017, 44(5): 27 − 32.
    [26] YOSHINAO M, YUSUKE K, MASAYA K, et al. Diel O2 dynamics in partially and completely submerged deepwater rice: leaf gas films enhance internodal O2 status, influence gene expression and accelerate stem elongation for ‘Snorkelling’ during submergence [J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2019, 60(5): 973 − 985.
    [27] JIANG Yiwei, HUANG Bingru. Effects of calcium on antioxidant activities and water relations associated with heat tolerance in two cool-season grasses [J]. J Exp Bot, 2001, 52(355): 341 − 349.
    [28] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
    [29] YOSHIYUKI N, KOZI A. Spinach chloroplasts scavenge hydrogen peroxide on illumination [J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 1980, 21(7): 1295 − 1307.
    [30] 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
    [31] 袁晓华, 杨中汉. 植物生理生化实验[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1983.
    [32] BJÖRKMAN O. The effect of oxygen concentration on photosynthesis in higher plants [J]. Physiol Plant, 2006, 19(3): 618 − 633.
    [33] CHÉRIF M, TIRILLY Y, BELANGER R R. Effect of oxygen concentration on plant growth, lipidperoxidation, and receptivity of tomato roots to pythium F under hydroponic conditions [J]. Eur J Plant Pathol, 1997, 103(3): 255 − 264.
    [34] QUEBEDEAUX B, HARDY R W F. Reproductive growth and dry matter production of Glycine max (L.) Merr in response to oxygen concentration [J]. Plant Physiol, 1975, 55(1): 102 − 107.
    [35] 郑小兰, 侯亚兵, 王瑞娇, 等. 根际氧浓度对番茄幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(4): 208 − 214. doi:  10.7668/hbnxb.2017.04.033

    ZHENG Xiaolan, HOU Yabing, WANG Ruijiao, et al. Effects of oxygen concentration in rhizosphere on the growth of tomato seedlings [J]. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2017, 32(4): 208 − 214. doi:  10.7668/hbnxb.2017.04.033
    [36] ALMEIDA A M, VRIEZEN W H, van der STRAETEN D. Molecular and physiological mechanisms of flooding avoidance and tolerance in rice [J]. Russ J Plant Physiol, 2003, 50(6): 743 − 751.
    [37] STOIMENOVA M, IGAMBERDIEV A U, GUPTA K J, et al. Nitrite-driven anaerobic ATP synthesis in barley and rice root mitochondria [J]. Planta, 2007, 226(2): 465 − 474.
    [38] VISSER E J W, VOESENEK L A C J, VARTAPETIAN B B, et al. Flooding and Plant Growth[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1984.
    [39] 郭益昌, 庄舜尧, 胡昱彦, 等. 埋管通气对雷竹林土壤氧气体积分数的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(1): 69 − 75. doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.009

    GUO Yichang, ZHUANG Shunyao, HU Yuyan, et al. Soil oxygen content of Phyllostachys violascens with pipe-buried aeration [J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2020, 37(1): 69 − 75. doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.009
    [40] ARMSTRONG W D. Aeration in higher plants [J]. Adv Bot Res, 1980, 7: 225 − 332.
    [41] 焦彦生, 郭世荣, 李娟, 等. 钙对根际低氧胁迫下黄瓜幼苗活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(10): 2056 − 2062. doi:  10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.10.016

    JIAO Yansheng, GUO Shirong, LI Juan, et al. Effect of low rhizospere oxygen stress on reactive oxygen species metabolism in cucumber seedlings [J]. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2006, 26(10): 2056 − 2062. doi:  10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.10.016
    [42] LI Pengxia, ZHANG Xuan, HU Huali, et al. High carbon dioxide and low oxygen storage effects on reactive oxygen species metabolism in Pleurotus eryngii [J]. Postharvest Biol Technol, 2013, 85: 141 − 146.
    [43] de GARA L. Class Ⅲ peroxidases and ascorbate metabolism in plants [J]. Phytochem Rev, 2004, 3(1): 195 − 205.
    [44] ZHAN Gaomiao, LI Rongjun, HU Zhiyong, et al. Cosuppression of RBCS3B in Arabidopsis leads to severe photoinhibition caused by ROS accumulation [J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2014, 33(7): 1091 − 1108.
    [45] 吕文静. H2S介导镉调控ROS平衡抑制不结球白菜根生长机理研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2016.

    LÜ Wenjing. Mechanism of H2S Mediated Cadmium Regulation ROS Inhibites Non-heading Chinese Cabbage Root Growth[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016.
    [46] GIBBS D J, LEE S C, ISA N M, et al. Homeostatic response to hypoxia is regulated by the N-end rule pathway in plants [J]. Nature, 2011, 479(7373): 415 − 418.
    [47] YAMAUCHI T, RAJHI I, NAKAZONO M. Lysigenous aerenchyma formation in maize root is confined to cortical cells by regulation of genes related to generation and scavenging of reactive oxygen species [J]. Plant Signaling Behav, 2011, 6(5): 759 − 761.
    [48] SOSIŃSKA A, MALESZEWSKI S. Effect of high oxygen concentration on photosynthesis in rape plants pretreated in low temperature [J]. Zeitschriftfür Pflanzenphysiologie, 1982, 108(5): 397 − 399.
    [49] ZABALZA A, van DONGEN J T, FROEHLICH A, et al. Regulation of respiration and fermentation to control the plant internal oxygen concentration [J]. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149(2): 1087 − 1098.
    [50] AYI Q, BO Zeng, LIU Jianhui, et al. Oxygen absorption by adventitious roots promotes the survival of completely submerged terrestrial plants [J]. Ann Bot, 2016, 118(4): 675 − 683.
  • [1] 钱武兵, 李建设, 高艳明, 周文波.  营养液中添加不同盐类对水培番茄果实糖组分和相关酶活性的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(6): 1120-1127. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.06.016
    [2] 施泉, 陈晓沛, 林新春, 徐永汉, 徐英武.  雷竹和拟南芥SOC1多聚体差异性分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(2): 183-190. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.02.001
    [3] 张玮, 林振清, 杨前宇, 陈浙勇, 谢锦忠.  椽竹出笋与幼竹生长规律 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(3): 478-482. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.03.022
    [4] 欧建德.  福建闽楠人工幼林氮磷钾施肥效应与施肥模式 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(1): 92-97. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.013
    [5] 陈珊, 陈双林, 郭子武, 樊艳荣.  林地覆盖经营对雷竹叶片主要养分特征的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(2): 272-279. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.02.016
    [6] 王艺, 丁贵杰.  干旱胁迫下外生菌根真菌对马尾松幼苗生长和微量元素吸收的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(6): 822-828. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.06.004
    [7] 张蕊, 王秀花, 陈柳英, 冯建国, 周志春.  不同红豆树人工林生长和心材特性的差异 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(3): 412-419. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.014
    [8] 毛达民, 陆媛媛, 郑林水, 李石玄川, 吴礼栋.  鞭笋挖掘后毛竹竹鞭的生长规律 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(5): 833-836. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.05.026
    [9] 邵继锋, 桂仁意, 季海宝, 李国栋, 方伟.  毛竹实生苗水培体系初步建立 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(1): 86-94. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.014
    [10] 刘丽, 陈双林, 李艳红.  基于林分结构和竹笋产量的有机材料覆盖雷竹林退化程度评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(1): 15-21. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.01.003
    [11] 吴江, 刘鹏, 吴家胜.  遮光对杨桐生长及叶片色素质量分数的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(5): 786-789. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.05.024
    [12] 林磊, 周志春, 范辉华, 金国庆, 陈柳英, 王月生.  木荷生长与形质地理变异和木制工艺材种源选择 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(5): 625-632.
    [13] 刘伟, 周善松, 张先祥, 冯建国, 吴雪梅.  不同立地条件下木荷容器苗与裸根苗造林对比试验 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(6): 829-834.
    [14] 王月英, 郭秀珠, 陈义增, 徐剑东.  生长调节物质及营养液对5 种水培花卉的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(2): 232-235.
    [15] 徐胜光, 李淑仪, 蓝佩玲, 廖新荣, 陈昌和, 徐旭常.  燃煤烟气脱硫副产物用于桉树的效果及机理 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2004, 21(1): 15-21.
    [16] 朱玉球, 童再康, 黄华宏, 姜全荣.  红叶石楠硬枝水培生根试验 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2004, 21(1): 28-32.
    [17] 姜培坤, 俞益武, 张立钦, 许小婉.  雷竹林地土壤酶活性研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2000, 17(2): 132-136.
    [18] 张立钦, 郑勇平, 吴纪良, 孙品雷, 杨彤.  黑杨派新无性系水培苗对盐胁迫反应的研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2000, 17(2): 121-125.
    [19] 樊后保, 臧润国.  模拟酸雨对樟树种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响` . 浙江农林大学学报, 1996, 13(4): 412-417.
    [20] 方伟, 何钧潮, 卢学可, 陈健华.  雷竹早产高效栽培技术 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1994, 11(2): 121-128.
  • 加载中
  • 链接本文:

    http://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286

    http://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2021/2/1

计量
  • 文章访问数:  30
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-04-20
  • 修回日期:  2020-12-15

不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生长和生理生化的影响

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286
    基金项目:  浙江省科技计划项目(2017C02016)
    作者简介:

    杨王庭,从事竹林培育与利用研究。E-mail: yangwangtings@163.com

    通信作者: 桂仁意,教授,博士,从事竹林培育与利用研究。E-mail: gry@zafu.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: S723.1

摘要:    目的   了解溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹Phyllostachys violascens水培苗生长、生理指标及根系结构的影响,初步探究雷竹水培苗对缺氧的适应性机制。   方法   以雷竹水培苗为材料,设置0、2、4、6、8 mg·L−1不同溶解氧质量浓度进行处理,分析不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生物量积累、叶面积、根系活力、抗氧化酶活性、光合色素质量分数及根系结构的影响。   结果   雷竹水培苗生物量积累、叶面积、根系活力、叶片抗氧化酶活性和光合色素质量分数均随溶解氧质量浓度的升高而显著升高(P<0.05)。8 mg·L−1处理组中雷竹水培苗叶片超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化氢酶、过氧化物酶和抗坏血酸过氧化物酶活性达到峰值,分别为746.13×16.67 nkat·g−1、63.13×16.67 nkat·g−1·min−1、59 395.45×16.67 nkat·g−1·min−1和407.46 ×16.67 nkat·g−1·min−1。水培条件下,雷竹水培苗根系中形成溶生型通气组织,其面积占根系横截面面积的百分比随溶解氧质量浓度降低而显著升高(最高达到7.1%),通气组织个数变化趋势则相反(P<0.05)。   结论   水培条件下,溶解氧质量浓度越高,雷竹水培苗长势越好,且雷竹水培苗生长对氧气的需求大于8 mg·L−1。水培条件下,缺氧会诱导雷竹根中形成溶生型通气组织,但不足以使其具有高度耐水淹的能力。图5参50

English Abstract

杨王庭, 邵香君, 周菊敏, 桂仁意. 不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生长和生理生化的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286
引用本文: 杨王庭, 邵香君, 周菊敏, 桂仁意. 不同溶解氧质量浓度对雷竹水培苗生长和生理生化的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286
YANG Wangting, SHAO Xiangjun, ZHOU Jumin, GUI Renyi. Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentration on growth, physiology and biochemistry of hydroponic Phyllostachys violascens seedlings[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286
Citation: YANG Wangting, SHAO Xiangjun, ZHOU Jumin, GUI Renyi. Effects of different dissolved oxygen concentration on growth, physiology and biochemistry of hydroponic Phyllostachys violascens seedlings[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200286

返回顶部

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回