本文已在中国知网网络首发,可在知网搜索、下载并阅读全文。
北京奥林匹克森林公园不同植被类型土壤呼吸时空动态特征
DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20250206
Spatiotemporal dynamics of soil respiration across different vegetation types in Beijing Olympic Forest Park
-
摘要:
目的 探究城市森林不同植被类型土壤呼吸的时空动态特征及其影响因素,以期为区域碳预估提供理论参考。 方法 以北京奥林匹克森林公园为研究对象,采用便携式土壤呼吸测量仪,于2023年4—10月每月测定该公园26个样地(乔木群落与乔灌混交群落各13个)的土壤呼吸、土壤温度和土壤含水量,并结合高分辨率归一化植被指数,对土壤呼吸的季节与空间变化及其影响因素进行拟合分析。 结果 ①土壤呼吸和土壤温度的季节动态一致,均呈现先上升后下降单峰变化。乔木群落土壤呼吸均值为4.83 μmol·m−2·s−1,大于乔灌混交群落的4.42 μmol·m−2·s−1。②土壤温度可以分别解释乔木群落和乔灌混交群落土壤呼吸季节变化的90.0%和73.0%, 土壤含水量可以分别解释28.0%和37.0%,综合考虑温度−水分的双因子模型可以分别解释93.0%和82.0%。③乔灌混交群落土壤呼吸的空间变异系数与土壤含水量变化趋势相似,两者极显著正相关[决定系数(R2)为0.88,P<0.01],乔木群落土壤呼吸空间变化与土壤温度之间呈现极显著的非线性关系(R2=0.65,P<0.01)。④土壤呼吸对土壤温度的响应存在时空差异,时间上为近似直线增加,空间上为非线性响应,而土壤呼吸虽然时间和空间上都随土壤含水量的增加而增加,但其增加速率存在差异。 结论 城市森林土壤呼吸对环境因素的响应存在时空差异:土壤温度是主导城市森林土壤呼吸季节变化的主要因素,城市森林土壤呼吸空间变化主要影响因素在不同植被类型间存在差异。图6表2参38 Abstract:Objective This study aims to investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics, as well as the driving factors of soil respiration across different vegetation types of urban forests, so as to provide theoretical references for regional carbon estimation. Method Taking Beijing Olympic Forest Park as the research object, a portable soil respiration measurement system was used to measure soil respiration (Rs), soil temperature (Ts), and soil water content (CSW) of 26 sample plots (13 in the arbor community and 13 in the arbor-shrub mixed community) monthly from April to October in 2023. And combined with high-resolution normalized difference vegetation index (INDV), a fitting analysis was conducted on the seasonal and spatial variations of Rs and the influencing factors. Result (1) The seasonal dynamics of Rs and Ts were consistent, showing a unimodal pattern of first increasing and then decreasing. The average Rs in the arbor community (4.83 μmol·m−2·s−1) was higher than that in the arbor-shrub mixed community (4.42 μmol·m−2·s−1). (2) Ts accounted for 90.0% and 73.0% of the seasonal variation in Rs in the arbor and arbor-shrub mixed community, respectively, while CSW explained 28.0% and 37.0%. A dual-factor model incorporating both temperature and moisture could explain 93.0% and 82.0% of the variation, respectively. (3) The spatial coefficient of variation of Rs in the arbor-shrub mixed community was similar to the variation trend of CSW, with a significant positive correlation between the two (R2=0.88, P<0.01). In contrast, there was a highly significant nonlinear relationship between the spatial variation of Rs and Ts (R2=0.65, P<0.01) in the arbor community. (4) The response of Rs to Ts varied in time and space, with an approximately linear increase in time and a nonlinear response in space. Although Rs increased with the increase of CSW in both time and space, the rate of increase varied. Conclusion The response of Rs to environmental factors in urban forests exhibits spatiotemporal variations. Ts is the driving factor of seasonal variations in Rs, while the dominant factors of spatial variation of urban forest Rs vary among different vegetation types. [Ch, 6 fig. 2 tab. 38 ref.] -
Key words:
- urban forest /
- soil respiration /
- seasonal variation /
- spatial variation /
- Beijing
-
表 1 不同植被类型土壤呼吸与土壤温度和土壤含水量的双因子模型
Table 1. Dual-factor models of soil respiration with soil temperature and soil water content across different vegetation types
植被类型 回归方程 决定系数(R2) 显著性水平 乔木群落 $ {R}_{\mathrm{s}}=0.26{T}_{\mathrm{s}}+0.07{C}_{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{W}}-2.89 $ 0.93 P<0.01 乔灌混交群落 $ {R}_{{\mathrm{s}}}=0.21{T}_{\mathrm{s}}+0.1{0C}_{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{W}}-2.54 $ 0.82 P<0.05 说明:Rs. 土壤呼吸;Ts. 土壤温度;CSW. 土壤含水量。 表 2 土壤呼吸及其影响因子之间的相关系数
Table 2. Correlation coefficients between soil respiration and its influencing factors
植被类型 季节 月份 相关系数 植被类型 季节 月份 相关系数 Rs-Ts Rs-CSW Rs-INDV Rs-Ts Rs-CSW Rs-INDV 乔木群落 春 4 0.577* 0.132 0.435 乔灌混
交群落春 4 0.088 0.602* 0.023 5 −0.013 0.136 5 −0.304 0.122 夏 6 0.226 0.562* 0.285
下载: