40个品种菊的切花用途评价

宁惠娟; 邵锋; 戴思兰; 包志毅

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

40个品种菊的切花用途评价

宁惠娟 , 邵锋 , 戴思兰 , 包志毅

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2009 > 26(3): 389-394

宁惠娟, 邵锋, 戴思兰, 包志毅. 40个品种菊的切花用途评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.

引用本文:

宁惠娟, 邵锋, 戴思兰, 包志毅. 40个品种菊的切花用途评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.

NING Hui-juan, SHAO Feng, DAI Si-lan, BAO Zhi-yi. Application evaluation of cutting flowers of 40 chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.

Citation:

NING Hui-juan, SHAO Feng, DAI Si-lan, BAO Zhi-yi. Application evaluation of cutting flowers of 40 chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.

40个品种菊的切花用途评价

1.
浙江林学院园林学院，浙江临安 311300;
2.
北京林业大学园林学院，北京 100083

详细信息

通信作者: 宁惠娟

Application evaluation of cutting flowers of 40 chrysanthemum cultivars

1.
School of Landscape Architecture，Zhejiang Forestry College，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;
2.
College of Landscape Architecture，Beijing Forestry University，Beijing 100083，China

More Information

Corresponding author: NING Hui-juan

摘要: 依据菊花Chrysanthemum morifolium切花品种的评价标准，从众多品种菊中初选了40个大花型秋菊品种。将40个初选品种与2个对照品种金黄切花和神马按切花菊的生产要求进行栽培试验，在栽培过程中观察各品种的性状表现，并根据专家意见从菊花特异性、一致性和稳定性（DUS）测试技术中确定出适合于切花选择的14个测试性状：株型、植株高度、茎曲直性、节间长度、叶的硬度、叶柄的着生角度、叶色、花梗长度、外花瓣角度、花径、花色、短日照到开花的周期、清水瓶插寿命和病虫害抗性。每个品种随机挑选10株进行性状测试，最后运用层次分析法赋予各性状一定的权重，通过综合打分，从40个大花型秋菊品种中选出了唐山6?鄄48、桃花尖、麒麟阁、东篱陶黄和黄托桂等5个适合做切花菊的品种，同时建立了一套科学的切花菊评价标准。表6参8
- 园艺学 /
- 切花菊 /
- 栽培试验 /
- 性状测试 /
- 层次分析法
Abstract: Based on the evaluation criteria of cutting chrysanthemum（Chrysanthermum morifolium），40 autumn chrysanthemum cultivars of big-flower type were selected from abundant chrysanthemum cultivars. Cultivation experiments on 40 cultivars and 2 contrast cultivars（‘Jinhuangqiehua’ and ‘Jinba’） were conducted according to the production requirements of cutting chrysanthemum. And the performance of each cultivars was observed in the course of cultivation experiment. According to professional suggestions，14 test characters fitting for cutting flower were selected from DUS（distinctness，uniformity，stability） test technology for chrysanthemum. We selected 10 individual plants of every culticars at random for 14 cutting flower character test. Finally，individual character of cutting chrysanthemum cultivars was weighed and evaluated through the analytic hierarchy process，and 5 excellent cutting chrysanthemum cultivars were selected from 40 autumn chrysanthemum cultivars of big-flower type，namely，‘Tangshan 6-48’，‘Taohuajian’，‘Qilinge’，‘Dongli Taohuang’ and ‘Huangtuogui’. Meanwhile，a set of evaluation criteria of cutting chrysanthemum were established. ［Ch，6 tab. 8 ref.］
- horticulture /
- cutting chrysanthemum /
- cultivation experiment /
- character test /
- AHP（analytic hierarchy process）

[1]	赵勋刚, 胡雨村, 王文辉, 胡云卿. 乌海市生态环境评价及驱动因子分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(5): 990-998. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.05.019
[2]	罗彤彤, 庞天虹, 马骥, 李慧, 邱晓婷, 黄放放, 杜长霞. 褪黑素对切花月季‘卡罗拉’保鲜效应的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(5): 981-986. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.05.025
[3]	徐义康, 高飞, 施柳, 孙夏莉, 王方, 许双双, 臧运祥. 利用隶属函数法综合评价8个大白菜品种性状 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(5): 845-852. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.05.008
[4]	丁绍刚, 朱嫣然. 基于层次分析法与模糊综合评价法的医院户外环境综合评价体系构建 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(6): 1104-1112. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.019
[5]	朱咪咪, 张迟, 常爱玲, 党婉誉, 周彩红, 俞狄虎, 吴莹莹, 张敏. ‘无籽’瓯柑小孢子母细胞减数分裂特性基因RAD51和MS1的表达差异分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(6): 921-927. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.06.001
[6]	魏乐, 李素艳, 李燕, 龚小强, 孙向阳. 园林废弃物堆肥替代泥炭用于天竺葵和金盏菊栽培 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(5): 849-854. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.05.017
[7]	李燕, 孙向阳, 龚小强. 园林废弃物堆肥替代泥炭用于红掌和鸟巢蕨栽培 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5): 736-742. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.012
[8]	许秀玉, 肖莉, 王明怀, 张华新. 沿海抗台风树种评价体系构建与选择 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(4): 516-522. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.04.004
[9]	雷燕, 李庆卫, 李文广, 景珊, 陈俊愉. 2个地被菊品种对不同遮光处理的生理适应性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5): 708-715. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.008
[10]	孙燕, 杨秀珍, 钱璐, 李惠. 花生壳栽培基质对大花蕙兰‘世界和平’生长及生理特性的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(4): 566-571. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.04.011
[11]	张亚利, 王立翠, 李健, 刘炤, 奉树成. 部分茶花品种在上海的栽培土壤及生长状况分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(1): 44-49. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.01.007
[12]	褚怡, 范义荣, 张韶伊, 孙玉芬, 宁惠娟. 大花蕙兰与国兰花粉活力及柱头可授性分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2013, 30(6): 950-954. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.06.022
[13]	颜晓捷, 黄坚钦, 邱智敏, 努尔阿米娜·热合曼, 朱旻华, 吴家森. 生草栽培对杨梅果园土壤理化性质和果实品质的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(6): 850-854.
[14]	李玉发, 房伟民, 陈发棣, 石常磊. 日光温室多头切花菊品质模拟 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(3): 404-409. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.03.014
[15]	郑艳伟, 范义荣, 郭晨瑛, 范庆君, 张庆宝. 浙皖两地牡丹的栽培及应用现状 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(6): 835-841.
[16]	翟玫瑰, 李纪元, 徐迎春, 李辛雷, 李玉红, 倪穗. 茶花幼苗无土栽培基质配方研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(6): 817-822.
[17]	张飞, 房伟民, 陈发棣, 赵宏波, 贾文珂. 切花菊花器性状的遗传变异与相关性研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(3): 293-297.
[18]	姜贝贝, 房伟民, 陈发棣, 顾俊杰. 氮磷钾配比对切花菊‘神马’生长发育的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(6): 692-697.
[19]	王齐瑞, 谭晓风, 张琳. 覆草栽培对甜樱桃生长及光合速率的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(1): 24-28.
[20]	周媛, 姚崇怀, 王彩云. 桂花切花品种筛选 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(6): 660-663.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/id/448

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2009/3/389

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 4978
HTML全文浏览量: 236
PDF下载量: 219
被引次数: 0

40个品种菊的切花用途评价

1. 浙江林学院园林学院，浙江临安 311300;

2. 北京林业大学园林学院，北京 100083

通信作者: 宁惠娟

刊出日期: 2009-06-20

关键词:

摘要: 依据菊花Chrysanthemum morifolium切花品种的评价标准，从众多品种菊中初选了40个大花型秋菊品种。将40个初选品种与2个对照品种金黄切花和神马按切花菊的生产要求进行栽培试验，在栽培过程中观察各品种的性状表现，并根据专家意见从菊花特异性、一致性和稳定性（DUS）测试技术中确定出适合于切花选择的14个测试性状：株型、植株高度、茎曲直性、节间长度、叶的硬度、叶柄的着生角度、叶色、花梗长度、外花瓣角度、花径、花色、短日照到开花的周期、清水瓶插寿命和病虫害抗性。每个品种随机挑选10株进行性状测试，最后运用层次分析法赋予各性状一定的权重，通过综合打分，从40个大花型秋菊品种中选出了唐山6?鄄48、桃花尖、麒麟阁、东篱陶黄和黄托桂等5个适合做切花菊的品种，同时建立了一套科学的切花菊评价标准。表6参8

English Abstract

Application evaluation of cutting flowers of 40 chrysanthemum cultivars

1. School of Landscape Architecture，Zhejiang Forestry College，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;

2. College of Landscape Architecture，Beijing Forestry University，Beijing 100083，China

Corresponding author: NING Hui-juan

Publish Date: 2009-06-20

Keywords:

Abstract: Based on the evaluation criteria of cutting chrysanthemum（Chrysanthermum morifolium），40 autumn chrysanthemum cultivars of big-flower type were selected from abundant chrysanthemum cultivars. Cultivation experiments on 40 cultivars and 2 contrast cultivars（‘Jinhuangqiehua’ and ‘Jinba’） were conducted according to the production requirements of cutting chrysanthemum. And the performance of each cultivars was observed in the course of cultivation experiment. According to professional suggestions，14 test characters fitting for cutting flower were selected from DUS（distinctness，uniformity，stability） test technology for chrysanthemum. We selected 10 individual plants of every culticars at random for 14 cutting flower character test. Finally，individual character of cutting chrysanthemum cultivars was weighed and evaluated through the analytic hierarchy process，and 5 excellent cutting chrysanthemum cultivars were selected from 40 autumn chrysanthemum cultivars of big-flower type，namely，‘Tangshan 6-48’，‘Taohuajian’，‘Qilinge’，‘Dongli Taohuang’ and ‘Huangtuogui’. Meanwhile，a set of evaluation criteria of cutting chrysanthemum were established. ［Ch，6 tab. 8 ref.］

宁惠娟, 邵锋, 戴思兰, 包志毅. 40个品种菊的切花用途评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.

引用本文:

宁惠娟, 邵锋, 戴思兰, 包志毅. 40个品种菊的切花用途评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.

NING Hui-juan, SHAO Feng, DAI Si-lan, BAO Zhi-yi. Application evaluation of cutting flowers of 40 chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.

Citation:

NING Hui-juan, SHAO Feng, DAI Si-lan, BAO Zhi-yi. Application evaluation of cutting flowers of 40 chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.