Temporal and spatial relationship between spiders and Ricanidae in tea gardens
-
摘要:
目的 探讨蜘蛛类天敌与广翅蜡蝉科Ricanidae的时间和空间关系，为利用和保护自然天敌提供科学依据。 方法 应用地统计学方法、灰色系统分析方法和生态位分析法对‘安吉白茶’‘Anjibaicha’、‘黄山大叶种’‘Huangshandayezhong’、‘龙井43’‘Longjing 43’、‘农抗早’‘Nongkangzao’、‘平阳特早’‘Pingyangtezao’和‘乌牛早’‘Wuniuzao’等6种茶园盛发期的广翅蜡蝉及11种蜘蛛种群动态进行分析，研究11种蜘蛛与广翅蜡蝉时间和空间关系的密切程度。 结果 根据空间关系密切指数之和可知：6种茶园与广翅蜡蝉空间关系密切的前5位蜘蛛依次是鞍型花蟹蛛Xysticus ephippiafus (5.7415)、斜纹猫蛛Oxyopes sertatus (5.6942)、草间小黑蛛Erigonidium graminicolum (5.6886)、八点球腹蛛Theridion octomaculatum (5.6502)和粽管巢蛛Clubiona japonicola (5.5373)；根据时间关系密切指数之和可知：6种茶园与广翅蜡蝉时间关系密切的前5位蜘蛛依次是草间小黑蛛 (5.6026)、三突花蟹蛛Misumenops tricuspidatus (5.4279)、八点球腹蛛 (5.3519)、鳞纹肖蛸Tetragnatha squamata (5.0791)和锥腹肖蛸Tetragnatha maxillosa (5.0686)。 结论 综合分析得出，与广翅蜡蝉时间和空间关系密切的前3位蜘蛛依次是草间小黑蛛 (11.2912)、八点球腹蛛 (11.0021)和三突花蟹蛛 (10.9935)。表10参27 Abstract:Objective The objective of this study is to exlore the temporal and spatial relationship between natural enemies of spiders and Ricanidae, so as to provide scientific basis for the use and protection of natural enemies. Method Geostatistics, grey system analysis and niche analysis were used to analyze the population dynamics of Ricanidae and 11 spiders during their blooming period in 6 kinds of tea gardens, including ‘Anjibaicha’, ‘Huangshandayezhong’, ‘Longjing 43’, ‘Nongkangzao’, ‘Pingyangtezao’ and ‘Wuniuzao’. The close degree of temporal and spatial relationship between 11 species of spiders and Ricanidaein was studied. Result According to the sum of spatial closeness indices of the 6 tea plantations, the top 5 spiders closely related to the space of Ricanidae were Xysticus ephippiafus (5.7415), Oxyopes sertatus (5.6942), Erigonidium graminicolum (5.6986), Theridion octomaculatum (5.6502) and Clubiona japonicola (5.5373) in descending order. According to the sum of time relationship index, the top 5 spiders closely related to the time of Ricanidae were E. graminicolum (5.6026), Misumenops tricuspidatus (5.4279), Theridion octomaculatum (5.3519), Tetragnatha squamata (5.0791) and Tetragnatha maxillosa (5.0686). Conclusion According to the comprehensive analysis, the top 3 spiders closely related to the time and space of Ricanidae from large to small are E. graminicolum (11.2912), Theridion octomaculatum (11.0021) and M. tricuspidatus (10.9935). [Ch, 10 tab. 27 ref.] -
Key words:
- Ricanidae /
- temporal and spatial relationship /
- geostatistics /
- grey correlation degree /
- niche analysis
-
表 1 广翅蜡蝉与蜘蛛的种群数量动态
Table 1. Population dynamics of the Ricanidae and spiders
茶树品种 日期 害虫数量/头 天敌数量/头 X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 ‘安吉白茶’ 06-20 11 1 5 3 3 7 2 8 9 0 1 0 07-08 110 34 29 132 42 13 32 65 4 46 60 0 08-10 45 7 24 162 19 36 32 27 13 19 34 42 08-22 71 17 30 89 45 27 22 20 3 26 12 13 09-06 65 19 11 38 56 38 19 20 8 21 28 22 09-17 24 11 15 4 12 7 12 9 5 10 11 10 合计 326 89 114 428 177 128 119 149 42 122 146 87 ‘黄山大叶种’ 06-20 3 8 32 18 2 2 17 10 4 7 6 0 07-08 69 30 23 23 26 56 29 19 24 33 26 0 08-10 47 23 20 65 22 29 30 31 25 28 30 26 08-22 49 17 31 57 22 19 24 34 10 44 37 17 09-06 15 10 24 28 20 18 13 35 0 28 21 39 09-17 23 9 20 7 37 9 6 8 0 10 17 15 合计 206 97 150 198 129 133 119 137 63 150 137 97 ‘龙井43’ 06-20 18 5 2 12 2 7 7 2 1 8 0 0 07-08 106 22 11 38 30 49 37 30 8 46 21 0 08-10 59 27 36 36 37 18 27 27 8 25 36 24 08-22 51 34 33 27 51 23 28 34 12 31 33 2 09-06 45 10 16 14 128 21 22 16 0 13 15 13 09-17 12 5 10 14 23 6 7 12 0 13 15 14 合计 291 103 108 141 271 124 128 121 29 136 120 53 ‘农抗早’ 06-20 4 5 5 5 0 20 5 1 1 4 1 0 07-08 252 65 51 88 6 14 38 48 6 74 93 0 08-10 56 23 15 60 20 27 26 30 0 25 29 24 08-22 74 19 29 59 33 23 25 38 3 40 38 6 09-06 34 9 19 23 57 19 18 25 2 17 23 6 09-17 21 17 13 10 31 17 13 31 13 21 21 19 合计 441 138 132 245 147 120 125 173 25 181 205 55 ‘平阳特早’ 06-20 10 8 18 2 0 15 10 5 3 10 1 1 07-08 88 46 24 34 22 26 7 48 16 74 28 0 08-10 23 17 17 42 33 17 13 29 2 9 16 0 08-22 52 18 21 48 31 8 10 34 22 49 35 29 09-06 8 12 14 18 39 29 16 26 0 15 14 10 09-17 13 12 12 19 37 13 12 13 0 14 11 9 合计 194 113 106 163 162 108 68 155 43 171 105 49 ‘乌牛早’ 06-20 7 5 8 6 0 0 11 4 0 4 0 0 07-08 147 20 33 33 4 6 28 52 6 65 45 0 08-10 121 26 18 57 20 26 20 34 14 27 31 21 08-22 62 20 28 26 43 18 25 29 3 34 40 16 09-06 22 9 14 22 23 27 19 18 4 24 17 10 09-17 24 15 19 11 11 7 18 19 10 15 15 10 合计 383 95 120 155 101 84 121 156 37 169 148 57 说明：X1. 三突花蟹蛛Misumenops tricuspidatus；X2. 粽管巢蛛Clubiona japonicola；X3. 斑管巢蛛Clubiona reichlini； X4. 斜纹猫蛛Oxyopes sertatus；X5. 鞍型花蟹蛛Xysticus ephippiafus；X6. 黑色跳蛛Plexippus paykulli；X7. 鳞纹肖蛸 Tetragnatha squamata；X8. 锥腹肖蛸Tetragnatha maxillosa；X9. 草间小黑蛛Erigonidium graminicolum；X10. 八点球腹蛛 Theridion octomaculatum；X11. 条纹蝇虎Plexippus setipet 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 ‘安吉白茶’茶园广翅蜡蝉与蜘蛛的半变异函数特征参数
Table 2. Semivariogram characteristic parameters of Ricanidae and spiders in a ‘Anjibaicha’ tea garden
日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 06-20 Y 13.504 0 0.904 5 07-08 Y 2.984 0 0.818 9 08-10 Y 1.077 0 0.942 1 X1 1.673 2 0.853 1 X1 9.060 0 0.637 7 X1 2.424 2 0.852 9 X2 2.132 0 0.919 1 X2 23.721 0 0.532 3 X2 3.273 2 0.391 3 X3 1.839 8 0.926 7 X3 5.011 0 0.924 7 X3 3.021 0 0.888 3 X4 6.710 8 0.804 8 X4 6.933 0 0.924 9 X4 1.038 2 0.680 1 X5 8.959 0 0.673 0 X5 3.393 4 0.715 6 X5 9.101 0 0.567 2 X6 2.500 8 0.204 1 X6 5.796 6 0.777 2 X6 8.905 4 0.600 1 X7 3.087 5 0.579 1 X7 3.140 7 0.862 7 X7 4.923 0 0.715 0 X8 9.014 0 0.730 7 X8 2.191 7 0.805 4 X8 4.011 0 0.930 6 X9 0.000 0 0.000 0 X9 1.550 2 0.894 2 X9 6.918 0 0.685 6 X10 3.212 3 0.714 5 X10 2.073 1 0.866 8 X10 4.4867 0.866 7 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 3.548 5 0.752 6 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 08-22 Y 8.007 0 0.881 4 09-06 Y 7.009 0 0.905 1 09-17 Y 2.201 1 0.586 9 X1 1.778 5 0.857 4 X1 2.123 3 0.809 9 X1 8.984 0 0.743 5 X2 2.000 0 0.983 2 X2 6.010 0 0.478 9 X2 5.125 0 0.530 6 X3 1.037 0 0.940 1 X3 4.572 2 0.714 8 X3 6.758 3 0.862 7 X4 5.711 3 0.837 3 X4 4.362 2 0.661 7 X4 4.975 3 0.778 6 X5 9.103 0 0.479 1 X5 3.136 0 0.714 7 X5 4.493 5 0.685 6 X6 1.669 8 0.866 2 X6 2.201 1 0.586 9 X6 8.137 0 0.746 7 X7 3.481 2 0.577 4 X7 8.146 0 0.480 0 X7 1.514 2 0.881 8 X8 3.001 0 0.847 7 X8 2.220 4 0.801 1 X8 4.354 2 0.740 4 X9 1.998 0 0.890 6 X9 3.983 0 0.599 4 X9 1.803 3 0.891 4 X10 8.406 2 0.957 8 X10 4.192 0 0.713 1 X10 2.667 5 0.980 8 X11 3.347 3 0.595 4 X11 0.903 1 0.754 4 X11 1.704 0 0.875 6 说明：Y. 广翅蜡蝉；X1~X11见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 ‘黄山大叶种’茶园广翅蜡蝉与蜘蛛的半变异函数特征参数
Table 3. Semivariogram characteristic parameters of Ricanidae and spiders in a ‘Huangshandayezhong’ tea garden
日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 06-20 Y 2.330 4 0.984 4 07-08 Y 9.000 0 0.664 6 08-10 Y 0.122 9 0.896 0 X1 6.933 0 0.845 3 X1 3.815 5 0.374 5 X1 3.945 6 0.771 2 X2 8.012 0 0.800 8 X2 8.650 5 0.647 2 X2 5.001 0 0.857 1 X3 1.2164 0.991 3 X3 0.430 9 0.724 5 X3 1.560 4 0.822 8 X4 2.059 2 0.969 8 X4 5.103 0 0.807 7 X4 3.671 2 0.745 3 X5 16.690 0 0.946 9 X5 12.625 0 0.927 7 X5 5.998 0 0.826 8 X6 3.004 0 0.622 1 X6 1.106 0 0.801 4 X6 4.912 0 0.826 6 X7 2.511 9 0.778 4 X7 2.118 8 0.883 9 X7 4.998 0 0.779 0 X8 7.814 0 0.742 8 X8 0.507 3 0.939 5 X8 7.000 0 0.937 0 X9 7.983 0 0.806 6 X9 3.457 1 0.787 2 X9 12.544 0 0.812 0 X10 2.017 6 0.967 5 X10 4.410 4 0.649 3 X10 6.470 3 0.869 5 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 3.233 3 0.449 3 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 08-22 Y 8.997 0 0.602 8 09-06 Y 47.772 0 0.948 3 09-17 Y 3.214 1 0.609 2 X1 20.918 0 0.782 2 X1 14.149 0 0.734 4 X1 5.004 0 0.885 8 X2 1.798 3 0.712 9 X2 4.892 0 0.873 6 X2 2.833 3 0.764 7 X3 5.109 8 0.707 1 X3 6.013 0 0.712 6 X3 3.500 9 0.791 9 X4 4.434 7 0.650 2 X4 7.002 0 0.715 1 X4 0.7480 0.547 9 08-22 X5 4.178 9 0.766 3 09-06 X5 3.551 4 0.776 8 09-17 X5 1.954 5 0.846 1 X6 9.001 0 0.776 3 X6 0.194 0 0.874 6 X6 4.617 0 0.876 9 X7 4.911 0 0.585 8 X7 3.512 3 0.104 7 X7 9.008 0 0.697 3 X8 3.017 0 0.759 8 X8 0.000 0 0.000 0 X8 0.000 0 0.000 0 X9 2.002 0 0.854 7 X9 4.000 0 0.789 9 X9 3.931 0 0.671 3 X10 4.978 0 0.778 9 X10 0.994 0 0.906 3 X10 3.984 9 0.677 9 X11 6.611 7 0.628 2 X11 8.163 0 0.731 9 X11 9.023 0 0.859 6 说明：Y. 广翅蜡蝉；X1~X11见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 ‘龙井43’茶园广翅蜡蝉与蜘蛛的半变异函数特征参数
Table 4. Semivariogram characteristic parameters of Ricanidae and spiders in a ‘Longjing 43’ tea garden
日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 06-20 Y 3.695 0 0.611 3 07-08 Y 6.063 0 0.860 6 08-10 Y 3.801 2 0.945 1 X1 2.136 5 0.910 3 X1 4.379 1 0.485 7 X1 3.024 0 0.912 2 X2 3.376 1 0.498 1 X2 1.699 3 0.877 9 X2 2.093 0 0.942 6 X3 11.266 0 0.885 1 X3 8.910 0 0.834 2 X3 3.568 8 0.665 5 X4 3.231 4 0.846 9 X4 1.805 6 0.732 4 X4 3.020 1 0.106 0 X5 9.272 0 0.739 7 X5 10.252 0 0.947 3 X5 1.993 0 0.913 5 X6 1.419 2 0.945 1 X6 7.131 0 0.915 2 X6 9.017 0 0.814 9 X7 16.690 0 0.946 9 X7 3.214 0 0.752 0 X7 1.562 1 0.801 6 X8 4.139 9 0.791 8 X8 2.137 6 0.758 3 X8 4.747 1 0.726 6 X9 0.616 3 0.677 3 X9 10.438 0 0.954 0 X9 5.009 0 0.881 2 X10 0.000 0 0.000 0 X10 6.889 7 0.755 8 X10 3.822 2 0.896 3 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 2.252 2 0.853 2 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 08-22 Y 5.813 0 0.732 0 09-06 Y 6.002 0 0.934 1 09-17 Y 8.917 0 0.965 7 X1 2.000 0 0.952 1 X1 2.905 1 0.586 4 X1 7.998 0 0.922 8 X2 6.019 0 0.836 1 X2 2.462 5 0.756 4 X2 4.194 3 0.703 3 X3 3.166 0 0.645 4 X3 8.984 0 0.800 3 X3 4.466 7 0.092 3 X4 2.814 6 0.851 5 X4 5.001 0 0.827 3 X4 1.109 0 0.739 3 X5 3.902 2 0.695 5 X5 1.734 6 0.917 3 X5 8.916 0 0.652 4 X6 5.992 0 0.830 9 X6 0.935 0 0.496 8 X6 0.978 0 0.742 7 X7 2.001 0 0.952 1 X7 5.997 0 0.797 5 X7 0.4324 0.876 2 X8 3.000 0 0.855 5 X8 0.000 0 0.000 0 X8 0.000 0 0.000 0 X9 2.392 9 0.891 3 X9 6.000 0 0.801 9 X9 3.998 9 0.875 7 X10 6.000 0 0.836 1 X10 4.108 4 0.738 9 X10 3.165 1 0.522 4 X11 5.132 0 0.249 0 X11 3.951 0 0.360 6 X11 3.715 8 0.946 2 说明：Y. 广翅蜡蝉；X1~X11见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 ‘农抗早’茶园广翅蜡蝉与蜘蛛的半变异函数特征参数
Table 5. Semivariogram characteristic parameters of Ricanidae and spiders in a ‘Nongkangzao’ tea garden
日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 06-20 Y 4.818 2 0.286 9 07-08 Y 3.898 7 0.680 9 08-10 Y 7.000 0 0.775 5 X1 5.134 0 0.842 8 X1 8.174 0 0.904 0 X1 6.575 6 0.845 0 X2 2.973 1 0.801 0 X2 2.431 9 0.588 9 X2 4.001 0 0.739 7 X3 3.400 9 0.908 5 X3 6.923 0 0.744 5 X3 2.347 4 0.932 1 X4 0.000 0 0.000 0 X4 3.742 8 0.789 3 X4 10.784 0 0.937 8 X5 2.108 4 0.931 1 X5 5.003 0 0.922 5 X5 4.983 0 0.676 1 X6 7.989 0 0.694 9 X6 89.809 0 0.830 8 X6 2.975 0 0.918 8 X7 0.000 0 0.000 0 X7 0.582 5 0.699 2 X7 5.000 0 0.949 5 X8 5.202 0 0.872 6 X8 1.727 9 0.967 5 X8 0.000 0 0.000 0 X9 3.626 7 0.872 6 X9 3.605 2 0.844 3 X9 4.688 7 0.480 9 X10 2.237 6 0.940 2 X10 3.926 9 0.724 1 X10 1.011 0 0.645 1 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 10.087 0 0.983 1 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 08-22 Y 7.339 5 0.773 2 09-06 Y 13.055 0 0.894 0 09-17 Y 3.753 6 0.900 4 X1 3.864 9 0.774 1 X1 3.982 0 0.851 0 X1 2.904 0 0.842 9 X2 1.417 7 0.891 9 X2 1.158 6 0.821 8 X2 7.985 0 0.698 4 X3 7.093 0 0.853 6 X3 2.100 6 0.978 0 X3 7.101 0 0.756 4 X4 2.094 5 0.842 9 X4 10.784 0 0.937 8 X4 7.004 0 0.909 5 X5 5.174 7 0.895 6 X5 3.002 0 0.822 5 X5 1.601 8 0.729 9 X6 2.999 0 0.957 2 X6 9.001 7 0.279 9 X6 4.888 0 0.627 0 X7 4.291 5 0.913 9 X7 1.697 4 0.597 3 X7 1.234 2 0.844 3 X8 18.398 0 0.642 9 X8 3.997 3 0.897 8 X8 3.142 0 0.761 8 X9 7.028 0 0.851 8 X9 2.999 0 0.830 6 X9 4.973 0 0.807 0 X10 5.231 0 0.751 0 X10 3.894 0 0.656 0 X10 1.134 9 0.841 9 X11 3.961 0 0.671 9 X11 8.000 0 0.685 6 X11 7.149 1 0.528 7 说明：Y.广翅蜡蝉；X1~X11见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 ‘平阳特早’茶园广翅蜡蝉与蜘蛛的半变异函数特征参数
Table 6. Semivariogram characteristic parameters of Ricanidae and spiders in a ‘Pingyangtezao’ tea garden
日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 06-20 Y 12.659 0 0.505 1 07-08 Y 4.000 0 0.652 5 08-10 Y 3.821 9 0.850 3 X1 1.874 5 0.801 3 X1 7.002 0 0.758 9 X1 1.716 6 0.937 2 X2 3.654 7 0.889 0 X2 4.189 5 0.878 5 X2 3.000 0 0.871 0 X3 6.132 0 0.651 1 X3 1.608 2 0.880 6 X3 3.835 8 0.438 5 X4 0.000 0 0.000 0 X4 4.607 8 0.871 6 X4 4.030 9 0.708 1 X5 3.902 9 0.856 7 X5 0.119 3 0.923 5 X5 1.716 6 0.937 2 X6 3.001 0 0.833 1 X6 4.201 7 0.603 5 X6 0.573 3 0.827 2 X7 3.754 0 0.414 0 X7 7.567 0 0.335 9 X7 0.942 0 0.769 9 X8 3.002 0 0.515 3 X8 3.736 0 0.554 9 X8 5.017 0 0.895 0 X9 7.069 7 0.437 3 X9 3.460 9 0.704 3 X9 8.000 0 0.844 3 X10 4.139 9 0.791 8 X10 12.751 0 0.910 6 X10 7.000 0 0.820 3 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 08-22 Y 3.097 0 0.906 1 09-06 Y 5.998 0 0.964 2 09-17 Y 1.924 8 0.950 2 X1 7.043 0 0.836 2 X1 12.909 0 0.899 9 X1 5.234 6 0.823 4 X2 3.000 0 0.703 9 X2 5.000 0 0.818 1 X2 3.899 6 0.695 7 X3 7.815 8 0.618 8 X3 1.153 5 0.755 7 X3 4.224 9 0.753 1 X4 12.567 0 0.828 1 X4 10.427 0 0.580 5 X4 7.002 0 0.665 4 X5 1.149 1 0.676 3 X5 2.153 0 0.817 9 X5 4.028 0 0.682 0 X6 2.995 0 0.663 2 X6 6.007 0 0.642 6 X6 6.001 0 0.742 2 X7 4.385 2 0.895 5 X7 3.001 0 0.543 9 X7 7.876 9 0.719 0 X8 4.005 0 0.912 3 X8 0.000 0 0.000 0 X8 0.000 0 0.000 0 X9 5.012 0 0.884 2 X9 5.241 0 0.779 4 X9 1.843 0 0.865 3 X10 4.864 0 0.901 5 X10 7.006 0 0.632 6 X10 0.871 2 0.866 8 X11 2.023 5 0.906 1 X11 7.952 4 0.684 8 X11 4.048 7 0.747 4 说明：Y. 广翅蜡蝉；X1~X11见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
表 7 ‘乌牛早’茶园广翅蜡蝉与蜘蛛的半变异函数特征参数
Table 7. Semivariogram characteristic parameters of Ricanidae and spiders in a ‘Wuniuzao’ tea garden
日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 06-20 Y 11.994 0 0.852 5 07-08 Y 2.356 5 0.951 6 08-10 Y 4.867 0 0.918 5 X1 1.868 5 0.286 7 X1 3.827 0 0.860 3 X1 11.011 0 0.895 9 X2 3.442 5 0.719 7 X2 4.910 0 0.748 5 X2 6.040 2 0.355 6 X3 3.248 8 0.995 6 X3 2.839 0 0.904 5 X3 6.121 0 0.668 5 X4 0.000 0 0.000 0 X4 9.981 3 0.844 4 X4 9.299 5 0.952 2 X5 0.000 0 0.000 0 X5 2.693 4 0.962 5 X5 11.011 0 0.895 9 X6 0.983 0 0.825 7 X6 4.053 0 0.864 2 X6 0.559 7 0.945 1 X7 0.000 0 0.000 0 X7 1.863 9 0.657 0 X7 0.525 0 0.755 9 X8 6.998 0 0.685 2 X8 24.281 0 0.853 2 X8 2.617 2 0.950 6 X9 5.749 0 0.651 4 X9 3.119 0 0.816 5 X9 0.784 9 0.986 0 X10 0.000 0 0.000 0 X10 2.000 0 0.882 1 X10 4.974 0 0.787 7 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 0.000 0 0.000 0 X11 1.387 9 0.831 5 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 日期 物种 变程 决定系数 08-22 Y 3.047 0 0.621 5 09-06 Y 3.845 8 0.608 0 09-17 Y 3.822 0 0.703 9 X1 2.879 0 0.681 5 X1 0.593 0 0.754 4 X1 4.019 5 0.862 4 X2 0.786 0 0.826 8 X2 3.000 0 0.849 9 X2 1.668 3 0.758 3 X3 2.114 8 0.761 3 X3 1.374 7 0.971 6 X3 8.002 0 0.890 4 X4 1.022 0 0.815 2 X4 7.139 0 0.786 3 X4 7.001 0 0.925 8 X5 3.893 4 0.850 9 X5 1.897 0 0.660 1 X5 9.919 2 0.925 6 X6 8.146 0 0.812 2 X6 4.931 0 0.653 7 X6 8.010 0 0.874 4 X7 7.132 0 0.748 3 X7 2.410 1 0.868 8 X7 1.411 4 0.854 4 X8 2.6328 0.932 9 X8 1.961 4 0.851 0 X8 5.994 0 0.875 7 X9 5.063 0 0.864 7 X9 8.7793 0.497 1 X9 8.002 0 0.867 8 X10 6.853 3 0.849 4 X10 0.409 2 0.923 4 X10 4.000 0 0.806 4 X11 3.444 8 0.275 2 X11 4.788 6 0.686 3 X11 9.059 7 0.874 1 说明：Y. 广翅蜡蝉；X1~X11见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
表 8 6种茶园蜘蛛与广翅蜡蝉的关系指数
Table 8. Relationship index between six species of tea garden spiders and the Ricanidae
天敌 ‘安吉白茶’ ‘黄山大叶种’ ‘龙井43’ 空间关系灰
色关联度时间生态位
重叠指数空间关系灰
色关联度时间生态位
重叠指数空间关系灰
色关联度时间生态位
重叠指数数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 X1 0.671 3 10 0.171 6 3 0.800 3 3 0.152 4 3 0.891 7 1 0.148 7 6 X2 0.712 2 8 0.149 0 8 0.762 4 8 0.111 2 10 0.853 7 2 0.132 6 9 X3 0.724 4 7 0.161 9 5 0.800 9 2 0.138 1 7 0.816 5 5 0.148 3 7 X4 0.829 9 3 0.161 0 6 0.830 9 1 0.132 9 8 0.813 9 6 0.126 8 10 X5 0.827 8 2 0.135 4 9 0.767 6 6 0.169 2 2 0.817 3 4 0.169 3 1 X6 0.664 5 11 0.152 9 7 0.719 8 10 0.141 5 6 0.739 4 10 0.155 8 4 X7 0.788 4 5 0.172 4 2 0.769 4 5 0.127 9 9 0.741 7 9 0.149 8 5 X8 0.833 0 1 0.106 2 11 0.717 5 11 0.179 2 1 0.725 3 11 0.164 6 2 X9 0.754 5 6 0.173 2 1 0.756 5 7 0.145 0 4 0.796 3 8 0.158 7 3 X10 0.817 4 4 0.171 2 4 0.761 6 9 0.142 0 5 0.826 9 3 0.140 5 8 X11 0.690 3 9 0.116 2 10 0.772 1 4 0.104 2 11 0.798 4 7 0.104 9 10 天敌代号 ‘农抗早’ ‘平阳特早’ ‘乌牛早’ 空间关系灰
色关联度时间生态位
重叠指数空间关系灰
色关联度时间生态位
重叠指数空间关系灰
色关联度时间生态位
重叠指数数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 X1 0.873 3 3 0.140 3 2 0.721 1 8 0.144 4 3 0.761 1 4 0.129 9 4 X2 0.831 1 7 0.126 7 4 0.825 7 2 0.109 0 7 0.788 6 2 0.123 9 6 X3 0.831 0 8 0.125 8 5 0.742 2 7 0.116 1 6 0.788 8 1 0.117 6 7 X4 0.867 5 5 0.039 1 11 0.747 8 6 0.090 0 10 0.732 4 7 0.100 0 11 X5 0.879 8 2 0.065 0 9 0.819 8 3 0.096 5 9 0.751 1 6 0.110 8 9 X6 0.749 0 11 0.110 0 6 0.749 4 5 0.076 5 11 0.711 5 10 0.115 9 8 X7 0.824 1 9 0.104 3 7 0.707 7 9 0.130 7 5 0.730 0 8 0.145 9 1 X8 0.817 6 10 0.082 9 8 0.685 0 10 0.174 7 1 0.754 6 5 0.129 5 5 X9 0.891 3 1 0.132 4 3 0.846 6 1 0.161 6 2 0.772 5 3 0.145 5 2 X10 0.869 7 4 0.141 5 1 0.789 6 4 0.133 9 4 0.722 9 9 0.142 2 3 X11 0.837 1 6 0.043 3 10 0.634 7 11 0.100 1 8 0.698 8 11 0.109 2 10 说明：天敌代号见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
表 9 6种茶园蜘蛛与广翅蜡蝉时、空关系的密切指数
Table 9. The close index of the temporal and spatial relationship between spiders and the Ricanidae
天敌代号 6种茶园空间关系密切指数+时间关系密切指数 ‘安吉白茶’ ‘黄山大叶种’ ‘龙井43’ 数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 X1 0.805 9+0.990 8 6 0.963 2+0.850 4 3 1.000 0+0.878 3 2 X2 0.855 0+0.860 3 8 0.917 6+0.620 5 10 0.957 4+0.783 2 8 X3 0.869 6+0.934 8 5 0.963 9+0.770 6 5 0.915 7+0.876 0 4 X4 0.996 3+0.929 6 3 1.000 0+0.741 6 4 0.912 8+0.749 0 10 X5 0.993 6+0.781 8 7 0.923 8+0.944 2 1 0.916 5+1.000 0 1 X6 0.797 7+0.882 8 9 0.866 3+0.789 6 8 0.829 1+0.920 3 7 X7 0.946 5+0.995 4 2 0.926 0+0.713 7 9 0.831 8+0.884 8 9 X8 1.000 0+0.612 9 10 0.863 5+1.000 0 2 0.813 4+0.972 2 5 X9 0.905 8+1.000 0 4 0.910 5+0.809 2 6 0.893 0+0.937 4 3 X10 0.981 3+0.988 5 1 0.916 6+0.792 4 7 0.927 3+0.829 9 6 X11 0.828 7+0.670 9 11 0.929 2+0.581 5 11 0.895 4+0.619 6 11 天敌代号 6种茶园空间关系密切指数+时间关系密切指数 ‘农抗早’ ‘平阳特早’ ‘乌牛早’ 数值 排位 数值 排位 数值 排位 X1 0.979 8+0.991 5 2 0.851 8+0.826 6 4 0.964 9+0.890 3 4 X2 0.932 3+0.895 4 4 0.975 3+0.623 9 5 0.999 7+0.849 2 5 X3 0.932 3+0.889 0 5 0.876 7+0.664 6 7 1.000 0+0.806 0 7 X4 0.973 3+0.276 3 10 0.883 3+0.515 2 9 0.928 5+0.685 4 11 X5 0.987 1+0.459 4 9 0.968 3+0.552 4 8 0.952 2+0.759 4 8 X6 0.840 3+0.777 4 7 0.885 1+0.437 9 11 0.902 0+0.794 4 9 X7 0.924 6+0.737 1 6 0.835 9+0.748 1 6 0.925 5+1.000 0 2 X8 0.917 3+0.585 9 8 0.809 1+1.000 0 2 0.956 6+0.887 6 6 X9 1.000 0+0.933 7 3 1.000 0+0.925 0 1 0.979 3+0.997 3 1 X10 0.975 8+1.000 0 1 0.932 7+0.766 5 3 0.916 5+0.974 6 3 X11 0.939 2+0.306 0 11 0.749 7+0.573 0 10 0.885 9+0.748 5 10 说明：天敌代号见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
表 10 茶园蜘蛛与广翅蜡蝉关系的密切指数合计
Table 10. Total close index of the relationship between spiders and Ricanidae in tea plantations
天敌代号 空间关系密切指数合计 排位 时间关系密切指数 排位 时间和空间关系密切指数合计 排位 X1 5.5656 6 5.4279 2 10.9935 3 X2 5.5373 5 4.6325 7 10.2698 7 X3 5.5582 7 4.941 0 6 10.4992 4 X4 5.6942 2 3.8971 10 9.5913 10 X5 5.7415 1 4.4972 9 10.2387 8 X6 5.1535 11 4.6024 8 9.7229 9 X7 5.3903 8 5.0791 4 10.4694 5 X8 5.3599 9 5.0686 5 10.4185 6 X9 5.6886 3 5.6026 1 11.2912 1 X10 5.6502 4 5.3519 3 11.0021 2 X11 5.2281 10 3.4995 11 8.7276 11 说明：天敌代号见表1说明
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 张汉鹄. 我国茶树蜡蝉区系及其主要种类[J]. 茶叶科学, 2004, 24(4): 240 − 242. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2004.04.003 ZHANG Hanhu. Fauna of tea Fulgora and the major species in China [J]. J Tea Sci, 2004, 24(4): 240 − 242. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2004.04.003 [2] 张汉鹄, 谭济才. 中国茶树害虫及其无公害治理[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 2004: 272 − 274. ZHANG Hanhu, TAN Jicai. Chinese Tea Tree Pests and Their Pollution-free Management [M]. Hefei: Anhui Science & Technology Publishing House, 2004: 271 − 274. [3] 孙晓玲, 蔡晓明, 王国昌, 等. 茶园中广翅蜡蝉成虫对不同颜色的趋向选择[J]. 茶叶科学, 2011, 31(2): 95 − 99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2011.02.003 SUN Xiaoling, CAI Xiaoming, WANG Guochang, et al. Tendency to different colors by Ricaniidae insects in tea garden [J]. J Tea Sci, 2011, 31(2): 95 − 99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2011.02.003 [4] 楼君, 滕莹, 蔡晓郡, 等. 柿广翅蜡蝉生物学特性及防治技术[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(7): 1378 − 1381. LOU Jun, TENG Ying, CAI Xiaojun, et al. Biological characteristics and control of Ricania sublimbata Gacodi [J]. J Zhejiang Agric Sci, 2021, 62(7): 1378 − 1381. [5] 孙丽娟, 衣维贤, 王思芳, 等. 山东广翅蜡蝉在青岛地区的发生规律及产卵习性[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(1): 199 − 202, 217. SUN Lijuan, YI Weixian, WANG Sifang, et al. Occurrence regularity and oviposition habits of Ricania shantungensis in Qingdao region, Shandong Province [J]. Plant Prot, 2021, 47(1): 199 − 202, 217. [6] 潘鹏亮, 洪枫, 陈俊华, 等. 3种广翅蜡蝉前翅形态数值特征提取与分析[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2020, 57(4): 980 − 987. PAN Pengliang, HONG Feng, CHEN Junhua, et al. Extraction and analysis of numerical characteristics from forewings of three plant hopper species (Homoptera: Ricaniidae) [J]. Chin J Appl Entomol, 2020, 57(4): 980 − 987. [7] 段文心, 陈祥盛. 中国疏广蜡蝉属比较形态学研究[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2020, 39(4): 1 − 9. DUAN Wenxin, CHEN Xiangsheng. Comparative morphological of Euricania species from China [J]. J Mount Agric Biol, 2020, 39(4): 1 − 9. [8] 金银利, 马全朝, 张方梅, 等. 信阳茶区柿广翅蜡蝉越冬种群的发生与为害规律[J]. 茶叶科学, 2019, 39(5): 595 − 601. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2019.05.013 JIN Yinli, MA Quanchao, ZHANG Fangmei, et al. Occurrence and damage of overwintering populations of Ricania sublimbata Jacobi in Xinyang tea-producing area [J]. J Tea Sci, 2019, 39(5): 595 − 601. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2019.05.013 [9] 顾昌华. 铜仁地区广翅蜡蝉种类及主要生物学、生态学和防治研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2008. GU Changhua. Research of Species in Ricanidae and Their Biology, Ecology and Control of Main Species in Tongren [D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2008. [10] 曾莉, 王平盛, 许玫. 茶树对假眼小绿叶蝉的抗性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2001, 21(2): 90 − 93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2001.02.003 ZENG Li, WANG Pingsheng, XU Mei. Studies on the resistance of tea plant to leafhopper (Empoasca vitis Go. ) [J]. J Tea Sci, 2001, 21(2): 90 − 93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2001.02.003 [11] 扈克明, 张艳梅, 王佳芳, 等. 不同茶树品种间小绿叶蝉类群数量动态与抗虫性比较[J]. 茶叶科学, 2003, 23(1): 57 − 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2003.01.012 HU Keming, ZHANG Yanmei, WANG Jiafang, et al. Comparison on the population dynamics and leafhopper resistance on different tea cultivars [J]. J Tea Sci, 2003, 23(1): 57 − 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2003.01.012 [12] 邹武, 林乃铨, 王庆森. 福建主要茶树品种理化特性与假眼小绿叶蝉种群数量的相关性分析[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 2006, 15(2): 129 − 134. ZOU Wu, Lin Naiquan, WANG Qingsen. Correlationships between physical and biochemical leaf characteristics of 4 tea varieties and the population of Empoasca vitis [J]. Entomol J East China, 2006, 15(2): 129 − 134. [13] 马新华, 邹武, 毛迎新, 等. 福建茶树害螨发生动态及其与茶树品种理化特性的相关性分析[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 2007, 16(3): 196 − 201. MA Xinhua, ZOU Wu, MAO Yingxin, et al. The fluctuations of the index of pest mite situation and their correlations with the physical and chemical characteristics on 5 tea varieties in Fujian [J]. Entomol J East China, 2007, 16(3): 196 − 201. [14] 李新月, 谭济才, 李夕英. 湖南省茶园蜘蛛种类及其保护利用[J]. 茶叶通讯, 2012, 39(1): 9 − 14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-525X.2012.01.002 LI Xinyue, TAN Jicai, Li Xiying. Investigation of species and protection measures of tea garden spiders in Hunan Province [J]. Tea Commun, 2012, 39(1): 9 − 14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-525X.2012.01.002 [15] 陈银方, 陈忠华, 宋昌琪, 等. 茶园蜘蛛调查和保护研究概述[J]. 蛛形学报, 2004, 13(2): 125 − 128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9628.2004.02.013 CHEN Yinfang, CHEN Zhonghua, SONG Changqi, et al. Review on the investigation and protection measurement of spiders in Chinese tea gardens [J]. Acta Arachnol Sin, 2004, 13(2): 125 − 128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9628.2004.02.013 [16] 程娴, 张书平, 余燕, 等. 天敌与广翅蜡蝉空间关系的研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(1): 51 − 61. CHENG Xian, ZHANG Shuping, YU Yan, et al. Study on the spatial relationship between natural enemies and Ricanidae [J]. Acta Appl Entomol, 2019, 56(1): 51 − 61. [17] 李姝, 王杰, 黄宁兴, 等. 捕食性天敌储蓄植物系统研究进展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19): 3975 − 3987. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.19.011 LI Shu, WANG Jie, HUANG Ningxing, et al. Research progress and prospect on banker plant systems of predators for biological control [J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2020, 53(19): 3975 − 3987. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.19.011 [18] 候景儒, 黄竞先. 多元地质统计学的基本理论与方法[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1990: 87 − 102. HOU Jingru, HUANG Jingxian. Basic Theory and Methods of Multivariate Geostatistics[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1990: 87 − 102. [19] 戈峰. 现代生态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 95 − 103. GE Feng. Modern Ecology [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002: 95 − 103. [20] ROSSI R E, MULLA D J, JOURNEL A G, et al. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence [J]. Ecol Monogr, 1992, 62(2): 277 − 314. doi: 10.2307/2937096 [21] 邓聚龙. 灰色系统理论教程[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 1990: 33 − 84. DENG Julong. A Course in Grey System Theory [M]. Wuhan: Huazhong Science and Engineering University Press, 1990: 33 − 84. [22] LEVINS R. Evolution in Changing Environments[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968: 120 − 121. [23] 余燕, 王振兴, 李尚, 等. 天敌对‘乌牛早’茶园4种害虫空间跟随关系密切程度的年度差异[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(13): 4817 − 4833. YU Yan, WANG Zhenxing, LI Shang, et al. Degree of close spatial-following relationship between four insect pests and their natural enemies studied in a span of two years about ‘Wuniuzao’ tea garden [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(13): 4817 − 4833. [24] 张书平, 余燕, 李尚, 等. 天敌对白毫早茶园4种害虫空间跟随关系密切程度的年度间差异及其原因[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2018, 55(4): 725 − 747. ZHANG Shuping, YU Yan, LI Shang, et al. Spatial relationships among natural enemies and four insect pests over two consecutive years [J]. Chin J Appl Entomol, 2018, 55(4): 725 − 747. [25] 张书平, 余燕, 李尚, 等. 茶园害虫匮乏期天敌与蚊虫的空间关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(12): 4400 − 4412. ZHANG Shuping, YU Yan, LI Shang, et al. Spatial relationship between natural enemies and mosquitoes in the absence of insect pests in tea garden [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(12): 4400 − 4412. [26] 宋学雨, 钱广晶, 张书平, 等. 茶园天敌昆虫与卵形短须螨及双斑长跗萤叶甲的空间跟随关系[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(11): 89 − 97. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2019.11.10 SONG Xueyu, QIAN Guangjing, ZHANG Shuping, et al. Spatial-following relationships between Brevipapus obovatus, Monolepta hieroglyphica and their natural enemy insects in tea garden [J]. J China Agric Univ, 2019, 24(11): 89 − 97. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2019.11.10 [27] 刘爱国, 钱广晶, 宋学雨, 等. 合肥市白毫早、乌牛早茶园天敌与蓟马的空间跟随关系[J]. 植物保护学报, 2020, 47(2): 435 − 445. LIU Aiguo, QIAN Guangjing, SONG Xueyu, et al. Spatial-following relationship between Thrips and their natural enemies in the Baihaozao and Wuniuzao tea gardens in Hefei [J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sin, 2020, 47(2): 435 − 445. -
-
链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210734
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 55
- 被引次数: 0
