TANG Hailong, GONG Wei, WANG Jingyan, et al. Nutrients and microbes in soils of Zanthoxylum armatum with water and fertilizer treatments[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(2): 318-325. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.013
Citation: TANG Hailong, GONG Wei, WANG Jingyan, et al. Nutrients and microbes in soils of Zanthoxylum armatum with water and fertilizer treatments[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(2): 318-325. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.013

Nutrients and microbes in soils of Zanthoxylum armatum with water and fertilizer treatments

DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.013
  • Received Date: 2018-03-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-05-09
  • Publish Date: 2019-04-20
  • To explore water and fertilizer coupling effects on growth, nutrient content, and microbial populations in soils of Zanthoxlum armatum, a pot experiment with soil field water capacity (FWC, including 20.0%, 40.0%, 60.0%, and 80.0% field water-holding capacity), nitrogen (including 0, 75.0, 150.0, and 300.0 kg·hm-2), phosphate (including 0, 30.0, 60.0, and 120.0 kg·hm-2), and potassium (including 0, 75.0, 150.0, and 300.0 kg·hm-2) fertilizers, four factors and four levels in an orthogonal design, was conducted a randomized block design was used with three replicates of each of the sixteen treatments. Results showed that with an increase in soil water content, ground diameter (D), height (H), and D2H of Z. armatum; populations of soil bacteria, actynomycete, fungi, and total microbes; as well as content of hydrolysis-N and available-P increased first and then decreased. The D, H, and D2H of Z. armatum, and content of hydrolysis-N, available-P, and available-K increased with a rise of fertilization (N, P2O5, and K2O) levels. The soil microbial populations and nutrient content were significantly correlated to D and H of Z. armatum (P < 0.05), and the degree of subordination for soil fertility was significantly correlated to D2H (P < 0.05). The regression relationships of soil fertility membership (y) with soil water content (x1), nitrogen fertilizer (x2), phosphorus fertilizer (x3), and potassium fertilizer (x4) were analyzed, and the obtained optimal combination of water and fertilizer was 61.5% field water capacity, 244.3 kg·hm-2 of nitrogen fertilizer, 112.4 kg·hm-2 of phosphate fertilizer, and 240.1 kg·hm-2 of potassium fertilizer.
  • [1] MAO Haonan, YANG Xing, LU Kouping, WU Jiasen, WANG Hailong.  Effect of iron-modified biochars on soil nutrients and bioavailability of As and Pb . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(6): 1222-1232. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240171
    [2] YAN Fangbin, ZHENG Jingming, GONG Yinting, ZHAO Yichen, ZHANG Jiaqi.  Effects of garden waste reuse treatments on soil nutrients and microbial carbon source utilization in plantation soil . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(5): 1045-1053. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220620
    [3] GU Shaoru, YANG Xing, CHEN Hanbo, YANG Bingshuang, DAI Zhinan, CHEN Junhui, FANG Zheng, WANG Hailong.  Effects of biochar from Procambarus clarkii shells and Ficus microcarpa branches on soil nutrients and bioavailability of Cd and Pb . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(1): 176-187. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220182
    [4] CHEN Meiling, LIU Xin, CHEN Xinfeng, MENG Miaojing, ZHANG Jinchi, NIE Hui, ZENG Jingyi, XIE Dejin.  Effects of acid rain type change on soil nutrient characteristics and microbial C and N in the Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(6): 1278-1288. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220132
    [5] ZHU Danmiao, CHEN Junhui, JIANG Peikun.  Research progress on soil organic carbon and microbial characteristics of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation and their influencing factors . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(5): 973-984. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200598
    [6] CHEN Shuang, WANG Liangkai, WEN Tao, MAO Xinyu, XU Ming, SHAO Xiaohou.  Purification effect of immobilized effective microorganism community of fly ash ceramsite on aquaculture wastewater . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(4): 761-768. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190443
    [7] JU Jiao, LI Yingchao, WANG Libing, LI Dongxing, CHEN Mengyuan, HE Sanjun, ZHENG Lei, YU Haiyan.  Coupling effects of soil water and fertilizer application on the growth of Quercus variabilis seedlings . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(4): 673-682. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190456
    [8] ZHU Rongwei, GE Zhiwei, RUAN Honghua, XU Jin, PENG Sili.  Fractal dimension of soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon with nitrogen additions . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(4): 656-663. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.04.004
    [9] PENG Xinyi, LI Yongchun, WANG Xiuling, LI Yongfu, CHEN Zhihao, XU Qiufang.  Effects of invasive plants on soil microbial communities: a review . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(5): 1019-1027. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.05.023
    [10] BIAN Sainan, CHANG Pengjie, WANG Ninghang, LIU Zhigao, ZHANG Mingru, WU Jiasheng, SHEN Yamei, WANG Xiaode.  Leaf growth, chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, and expression of photosystem-related genes in Camptotheca acuminata with different N forms'fertilization . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(5): 908-916. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.05.009
    [11] GONG Chen, WANG Xudong, NI Xing, LE Tiantian, ZENG Shiyuan, YE Zhengqian.  Effects of long-term application of edible fungus residue and chemical fertilizers on fractions of labile organic carbon and available nutrients in rice field soils . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2018, 35(2): 252-260. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.02.008
    [12] ZANG Xiaolin, ZHANG Hongqin, WANG Xinzhao, MA Yuandan, Baoyintaogetao, GAO Yan, ZHANG Rumin.  Effect on functional diversity of Artemisia frigida rhizosphere soil microbial community with grazing . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(1): 86-95. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.01.013
    [13] TONG Jing, LIU Kefeng, SUN Xiangyang, LI Suyan, ZHANG Xiufang.  Nitrogen nutrient solutions for growth of Salvia splendens'Chengxiang Gongzhu' with N, P and K absorption . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(3): 465-472. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.03.012
    [14] WANG Dan, MA Yuandan, GUO Huiyuan, GAO Yan, ZHANG Rumin, HOU Ping.  Soil nutrients and microorganisms with simulated acid rain stress and Cryptomeria fortunei litter . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(2): 195-203. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.02.005
    [15] WANG Zi, MA Lü-yi, JIA Zhong-kui, GONG Ning-ning.  Interaction of water and fertilizer on seedling height for first-year growth Populus × euramericana ‘74/76’ with drip irrigation . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(1): 29-34. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.01.006
    [16] ZHANG Chun-miao, ZHANG You-zhen, YAO Fang, ZHANG Yuan-yuan, DOU Chun-ying, YE Zheng-qian, HU Guo-liang, HUANG Jian-qin.  Temporal and spatial variation of soil pH and nutrient availability for Carya cathayensis orchards in Lin'an . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 845-849. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.002
    [17] WEI Yuan, ZHANG Jin-chi, YU Yuan-chun, YU Li-fei.  Ecological characteristics of soil microbial amount during succession of degraded karst vegetation on the Guizhou Plateau . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(6): 842-848.
    [18] YUAN Ying-hong, FANHou-bao, WANG Qiang, QIUXiu-qun2, CHENQiu-feng, LI Yan-yan, HUANG Yu-zi, LIAO Ying-chun.  Available nutrients with increased N deposition in soils of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(4): 437-444.
    [19] WANG Rui-ping, LIU Qiang, PENG Shao-lin, LIN Kai-hao, WEN Yan, XUE Ning.  Dynamics of microorganisms in litters of different tree species at Jianfengling . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(3): 255-258.
    [20] JIANG Pei-kun, YU Yi-wu.  Nutrition elements contained in leafs of Phyllostachys praecox f .preveynalis and soil nutrients . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2000, 17(4): 360-363.
  • [1]
    ZHANG Hua, YE Meng. Research status on the taxonomic and component of green Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim.[J]. Northern Hortic, 2010(14):199-203.
    [3]
    WANG Jingyan, GONG Wei, XIAO Qianwen, et al. A new cold tolerance green Chinese prickly ash cultivar 'Hanyuan Putao Qingjiao'[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2016, 43(7):1425-1426.
    [4]
    CHEN Lijuan, FENG Qi, WEI Yongping, et al. Effects of saline water irrigation and fertilization regimes on soil microbial metabolic activity[J]. J Soil Sed, 2016, 17(2):1-8.
    [5]
    SHANG Fangze, REN Shumei, YANG Peiling, et al. Effects of different irrigation water types, N fertilizer types, and soil moisture contents on N2O emissions and N fertilizer transformations in soils[J]. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2016, 227(7):1-18.
    [6]
    BOSSIO D A, FLECK J A, SCOW K M, et al. Alteration of soil microbial communities and water quality in restored wetlands[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2006, 38(6):1223-1233.
    [7]
    WEI Zexiu, LIANG Yinli, INOUEM I, et al. Effects of different water and fertilizer supply on cucumber soil nutrient content, enzyme activity, and microbial diversity[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2009, 20(7):1678-1684.
    [8]
    CHEN Hongfei, PANG Xiaomin, ZHANG Ren, et al. Effects of different irrigation and fertilizer application regimes on soil enzyme activities and microbial functional diversity in rhizosphere of ratooning rice[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43(10):1507-1517.
    [9]
    WANG Jingyan, TANG Hailong, GONG Wei, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on growth, nutrients absorption and fertilizer use of Zauthoxylum buugeauum Maxim 'Hanyuan' seedling[J]. J Nanjing For Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2016, 40(3):33-40.
    [12]
    WANG Yu, FU Delong, PAN Lulu, et al. The coupling effect of water and fertilizer on the growth of tea plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntz)[J]. J Plant Nutr, 2016, 39(5):620-627.
    [13]
    ZHANG Zhiliang, ZHANG Fucang, ZHENG Caixia, et al. Effects of soil water and nitrogen nutrition on growth and hydraulic conductivity of fruit tree seedling[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2009, 25(6):46-51.
    [14]
    ZHANG Nan, YANG Xueqin, CAO Dechang, et al. Soil water and fertilizer factors on the trade-off of growth and lignification of populus[J]. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2013, 33(4):771-779.
    [15]
    LIU Duling, LIU Shuming. Comparative drought resistance of different varieties of Zanthoxylum bungeanum[J]. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2010, 28(6):183-189.
    [16]
    DONG Wenyi, ZHAO Yan, ZHANG Zhiyi, et al. Coupling effects of water and fertilizer on the biomass of Populus tomentosa seedlings[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21(9):2194-2200.
    [17]
    LANDESMAN W J, DIGHTON J. Response of soil microbial communities and the production of plant-available nitrogen to a two-year rainfall manipulation in the New Jersey Pinelands[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42(10):1751-1758.
    [18]
    ZENG Chengcheng, CHEN Jinping, WEI Hong, et al. Effects of Salix variegata on soil microorganisms and enzymatic activity in contaminated soils under flooding conditions[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2017, 37(13):4327-4334.
    [19]
    BROCKETT B F T, PRESCOTT C E, GRAYSTON S J. Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2012, 44(1):9-20.
    [20]
    TAYLOR J P, WILSON B, MILLS M S, et al. Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2002, 34(3):387-401.
    [21]
    GUO Peng, WANG Congyan, FENG Xiaoguang, et al. Mixed inorganic and organic nitrogen addition enhanced extracellular enzymatic activities in a subtropical forest soil in East China[J]. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2011, 216(1/4):229-237.
    [22]
    DAI Jingzhong, YAN Ruirui, WEI Zhijun, et al. Effects of short-term fertilization on soil microorganisms in a mown Leymus chinensis meadow[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36(9):2431-2437.
    [23]
    LI Huijie, XU Fuli, LIN Yun, et al. Effects of N, P and K fertilization on soil enzyme activities and soil fertility in mintane Jujube forest of hilly loess region[J]. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2012, 30(4):53-59.
    [24]
    MA Dongyun, GUO Tiancai, SONG Xiao, et al. Effects of urea application rate on the quantity of microorganisms and activity of enzymes in wheat rhizosphere[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(12):5222-5228.
    [25]
    CHEN Lixin. Effect of fertilization on soil enzymes and microbes in Larix gemlinii plantations[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15(6):1000-1004.
    [26]
    ZHANG Xuelin, XU Jun, AN Tingting, et al. Relationship between rhizosphere soil properties and yield of maize at different nitrogen levels[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49(14):2687-2699.
    [27]
    MA Yajuan, XU Fuli, WANG Weiling, et al. Increase of soil nutrients and enzymatic activity by adding nitrogen and phosphorus to Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation[J]. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2015, 21(3):664-674.
    [28]
    LIU Sai, XU Rong, CHEN Jun, et al. Comparative study on soil fertility and quality of Ningxia Zhongning medlar under different fertilization modes[J]. China J Chin Mater Med, 2011, 36(19):2641-2644.
    [29]
    YING Jiaoyan, LI Xiaoxiao, WANG Nana, et al. Contrasting effects of nitrogen forms and soil pH on ammonia oxidizing microorganisms and their responses to long-term nitrogen fertilization in a typical steppe ecosystem[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2017, 107:10-18.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 25.5 %FULLTEXT: 25.5 %META: 73.7 %META: 73.7 %PDF: 0.8 %PDF: 0.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 4.2 %其他: 4.2 %其他: 1.0 %其他: 1.0 %Austin: 0.1 %Austin: 0.1 %Ballwin: 0.0 %Ballwin: 0.0 %Beauharnois: 0.1 %Beauharnois: 0.1 %Canada: 0.0 %Canada: 0.0 %Canton: 0.1 %Canton: 0.1 %China: 1.0 %China: 1.0 %Doylestown: 0.1 %Doylestown: 0.1 %Grove City: 0.0 %Grove City: 0.0 %India: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %Keller: 0.0 %Keller: 0.0 %Lewisburg: 0.0 %Lewisburg: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.1 %Malvern: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Perth Amboy: 0.0 %Perth Amboy: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %Romania: 0.1 %Romania: 0.1 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %United States: 0.4 %United States: 0.4 %Wixom: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.1 %[]: 0.8 %[]: 0.8 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %丽水: 0.2 %丽水: 0.2 %亚特兰大: 0.0 %亚特兰大: 0.0 %亨德森: 0.0 %亨德森: 0.0 %伊瓦格: 0.1 %伊瓦格: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.0 %休斯敦: 0.0 %伯明翰: 0.1 %伯明翰: 0.1 %佛罗里达: 0.0 %佛罗里达: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %列克星敦: 0.1 %列克星敦: 0.1 %加利福尼亚: 0.1 %加利福尼亚: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.0 %加拿大魁北克: 0.0 %加拿大魁北克: 0.0 %北京: 16.6 %北京: 16.6 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %华盛顿: 0.1 %华盛顿: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南京: 0.1 %南昌: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %卡罗尔顿: 0.0 %卡罗尔顿: 0.0 %台州: 2.4 %台州: 2.4 %圣克拉拉: 0.0 %圣克拉拉: 0.0 %埃克塞特: 0.0 %埃克塞特: 0.0 %塞利根斯塔特: 0.0 %塞利根斯塔特: 0.0 %大急流城: 0.0 %大急流城: 0.0 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %奥兰多: 0.0 %奥兰多: 0.0 %孟买: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %宿州: 0.0 %宿州: 0.0 %密蘇里城: 0.5 %密蘇里城: 0.5 %布劳利: 0.0 %布劳利: 0.0 %广元: 0.0 %广元: 0.0 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %张家口: 1.6 %张家口: 1.6 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %斯托姆莱克: 0.0 %斯托姆莱克: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %杭州: 2.4 %杭州: 2.4 %格兰茨帕斯: 0.1 %格兰茨帕斯: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.0 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沧州: 0.0 %沧州: 0.0 %法拉盛: 0.0 %法拉盛: 0.0 %泽西: 0.0 %泽西: 0.0 %济南: 0.0 %济南: 0.0 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %温特黑文: 0.0 %温特黑文: 0.0 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %科隆: 0.0 %科隆: 0.0 %纽瓦克: 0.0 %纽瓦克: 0.0 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约州: 0.0 %纽约州: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 8.0 %芒廷维尤: 8.0 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.0 %蒙哥马利: 0.0 %蒙哥马利: 0.0 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 51.3 %西宁: 51.3 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %邓肯: 0.1 %邓肯: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %都伯林: 0.0 %都伯林: 0.0 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %长沙: 0.0 %长沙: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.3 %阳泉: 0.3 %阿什本: 0.0 %阿什本: 0.0 %阿布奎基: 0.0 %阿布奎基: 0.0 %阿波普卡: 0.1 %阿波普卡: 0.1 %雅安: 0.0 %雅安: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %黔西南: 0.1 %黔西南: 0.1 %其他其他AustinBallwinBeauharnoisCanadaCantonChinaDoylestownGrove CityIndiaKellerLewisburgMalvernNahantPerth AmboyRochesterRomaniaSan LorenzoSeattleUnited StatesWixom[]上海东莞临汾丽水亚特兰大亨德森伊瓦格休斯敦伯明翰佛罗里达信阳兰州列克星敦加利福尼亚加利福尼亚州加拿大魁北克北京十堰华盛顿南京南昌博阿努瓦卡罗尔顿台州圣克拉拉埃克塞特塞利根斯塔特大急流城天津奥兰多孟买宿州密蘇里城布劳利广元广州张家口扬州拉斯维加斯斯托姆莱克晋城杭州格兰茨帕斯森尼韦尔武汉沈阳沧州法拉盛泽西济南深圳温州温特黑文湖州漯河潍坊瑟普赖斯石家庄科隆纽瓦克纽约纽约州绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莫斯科萨默维尔蒙哥马利衢州西宁西安贵阳运城邓肯邯郸郑州都伯林金华长沙长治阳泉阿什本阿布奎基阿波普卡雅安青岛黔西南Highcharts.com
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 张晓娜,朱秀娟,王林林,马瑞真. 花椒水肥耦合效应研究现状及展望. 防护林科技. 2024(02): 74-77+82 .
    2. 赵俊波,胡兵辉. 水肥调控对茶树土壤酶及土壤养分的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(02): 130-140 .
    3. 王正江,张灿,王帅,赵敬坤,彭先容,杨裕然,李振轮. 青花椒开黄花的生理变化及调控初步研究. 植物生理学报. 2023(02): 315-323 .
    4. 何振嘉,范王涛,杜宜春,王启龙. 基于土体有机重构的水肥耦合对土壤理化性质和水稻产量的影响. 中国农业科技导报. 2022(03): 176-185 .
    5. 纪道丹,Kuanysh Kassen,惠文斌,李孟楼. 5种叶面肥对大红袍花椒生长和生理特性的影响. 西北林学院学报. 2022(04): 135-142 .
    6. 付满意,王震,徐猛,杨博. 花椒属经济林施肥研究进展. 农业与技术. 2021(18): 82-85 .
    7. 李婷,姜丹,常晓茜,华国栋,刘春生. 16种植物挥发油对柏子仁黄曲霉菌的抑制作用考察. 中国实验方剂学杂志. 2020(05): 132-136 .
    8. 孟妍君,秦鹏. 珠江三角洲滨海湿地土壤微生物群落多样性与养分的耦合关系. 水土保持研究. 2020(06): 77-84 .

    Other cited types(13)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(3)  / Tables(3)

Article views(2921) PDF downloads(90) Cited by(21)

Related
Proportional views

Nutrients and microbes in soils of Zanthoxylum armatum with water and fertilizer treatments

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.013

Abstract: To explore water and fertilizer coupling effects on growth, nutrient content, and microbial populations in soils of Zanthoxlum armatum, a pot experiment with soil field water capacity (FWC, including 20.0%, 40.0%, 60.0%, and 80.0% field water-holding capacity), nitrogen (including 0, 75.0, 150.0, and 300.0 kg·hm-2), phosphate (including 0, 30.0, 60.0, and 120.0 kg·hm-2), and potassium (including 0, 75.0, 150.0, and 300.0 kg·hm-2) fertilizers, four factors and four levels in an orthogonal design, was conducted a randomized block design was used with three replicates of each of the sixteen treatments. Results showed that with an increase in soil water content, ground diameter (D), height (H), and D2H of Z. armatum; populations of soil bacteria, actynomycete, fungi, and total microbes; as well as content of hydrolysis-N and available-P increased first and then decreased. The D, H, and D2H of Z. armatum, and content of hydrolysis-N, available-P, and available-K increased with a rise of fertilization (N, P2O5, and K2O) levels. The soil microbial populations and nutrient content were significantly correlated to D and H of Z. armatum (P < 0.05), and the degree of subordination for soil fertility was significantly correlated to D2H (P < 0.05). The regression relationships of soil fertility membership (y) with soil water content (x1), nitrogen fertilizer (x2), phosphorus fertilizer (x3), and potassium fertilizer (x4) were analyzed, and the obtained optimal combination of water and fertilizer was 61.5% field water capacity, 244.3 kg·hm-2 of nitrogen fertilizer, 112.4 kg·hm-2 of phosphate fertilizer, and 240.1 kg·hm-2 of potassium fertilizer.

TANG Hailong, GONG Wei, WANG Jingyan, et al. Nutrients and microbes in soils of Zanthoxylum armatum with water and fertilizer treatments[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(2): 318-325. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.013
Citation: TANG Hailong, GONG Wei, WANG Jingyan, et al. Nutrients and microbes in soils of Zanthoxylum armatum with water and fertilizer treatments[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(2): 318-325. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.013
  • 竹叶花椒Zanthoxylum armatum属芸香科Rutaceae花椒属Zanthoxylum植物,其果实是重要的调味料、香油料和中药材,因其具有适应性广、生长迅速、早实丰产、抗病虫性强和盛产期长,以及耐干旱瘠薄、根系发达和固土保水保肥能力强等优点,在退耕还林工程中,作为经济价值高、生态效益好的经济树种广泛栽植[1]。竹叶花椒以其叶片狭长如同竹叶状而得名,又因其成熟后鲜果碧绿色、干果灰绿色而又被称为“青花椒”[2-3]。目前,竹叶花椒已成为低海拔山丘区新的经济增长点,在国家实施精准扶贫带动山区农民脱贫致富过程中发挥了重要作用。另外,竹叶花椒喜热喜肥,不耐水淹,适宜在排水良好和湿润肥沃的土壤条件下生长[4-5]。因此,进行科学的水肥管理对促进竹叶花椒更好生长和尽早挂果投产具有重要作用[6]。目前,有关土壤水分和施肥对土壤养分含量和微生物特性的研究较多,如韦泽秀等[7]研究发现:适当的水肥处理使土壤有效养分含量和微生物多样性显著提高,土壤生产潜力增加;陈鸿飞等[8]研究发现:合理的水肥调控有利于增加土壤中养分的有效性,提高土壤微生物的功能多样性;王景燕等[9]研究发现:水肥耦合对汉源花椒Z. buugeauum ‘Hanyuan’的地径、苗高和生物量有显著提高作用。有关水肥管理对花椒土壤养分和微生物影响等方面的研究尚未见报道,难以满足当前花椒产业发展需要。本研究以竹叶花椒新品种汉源葡萄青椒Z. armatum ‘Hanyuan Putaoqing’为对象,通过水肥处理盆栽试验明确不同土壤含水量和氮、磷、钾配方施肥量对竹叶花椒生长、土壤有效养分和微生物特性的影响,为竹叶花椒栽培管理过程中,水肥管理提供参考。

  • 供试土壤为四川农业大学成都校区周边农田耕层(0~20 cm)沙壤土。多点采集有代表性的土壤样品共计约1.0 kg,土样自然风干去除杂质过5 mm筛混匀后待用,用于测定土壤理化性质本底值。盆栽前土壤理化性质:pH 7.5,土壤含水量为25.2%的田间持水量,有机质16.6 g·kg-1,全氮1.0 g·kg-1,碱解氮80.3 mg·kg-1,全磷0.48 g·kg-1,有效磷15.4 mg·kg-1,全钾23.9 g·kg-1和速效钾22.5 mg·kg-1。栽植前,取风干土6.3 kg(相当于6.0 kg烘干土),其中2/3先装入聚乙烯塑料盆内(盆口直径22 cm,盆底直径20 cm,高23 cm)中,另外1/3与需添加的肥料充分混匀后再装在上部,盆内土壤厚度约20 cm。

    水肥耦合试验采用4因素4水平正交试验设计,共计16个处理(表 1),3次重复,每重复栽植3盆,总计9盆·处理-1,共计144盆。土壤含水量设置为20.0%,40.0%,60.0%和80.0%的田间持水量,氮肥(尿素,氮质量分数为46.4%,施肥量以氮计)施肥量设置为0,75.0,150.0和300.0 kg·hm-2,磷肥(过磷酸钙,五氧化二磷质量分数为12.0%,施肥量以五氧化二磷计)施肥量设置为0,30.0,60.0和120.0 kg·hm-2,钾肥(硫酸钾,氧化钾质量分数为51.0%,施肥量以氧化钾计)施肥量设置为0,75.0,150.0和300.0 kg·hm-2。盆内具体的施肥量按照单位面积进行折算,所有肥料均一次性施入。在2016年4月中旬将苗高约10 cm的竹叶花椒‘汉源葡萄青椒’幼苗移植于各处理盆栽土壤中,试验在温室大棚内完成(本试验中温室大棚只避雨不控制温度和湿度)。整个试验过程中,各处理土壤田间持水量采用每日定时称量补水法进行调控。

    处理编号 施肥处理 含水量/% 施肥量/(kg·hm-2 地径D/cm 苗高H/cm D2H
    五氧化二磷 氧化钾
    1 W20N0P0K0(ck) 20 0 0 0 0.40 ± 0.02 f 52.2 ± 2.9 f 8.4 ± 0.6 f
    2 W20N75P30K75 20 75 30 75 0.52 ± 0.02 e 59.9 ± 2.6 e 16.0 ± 1.3 f
    3 W20N150P60K150 20 150 60 150 0.63 ± 0.03 d 69.3 ± 3.4 cd 27.6 ± 2.2 e
    4 W20N300P120K300 20 300 120 300 0.65 ± 0.03 cd 71.5 ± 3.2 cd 29.8 ± 3.5 de
    5 W40N0P30K150 40 0 30 150 0.63 ± 0.04 d 66.2 ± 3.5 de 26.6 ± 2.4 e
    6 W40N75P0K300 40 75 0 300 0.70 ± 0.03 cd 72.8 ± 3.7 cd 35.3 ± 4.1 cde
    7 W40N150P120K0 40 150 120 0 0.71 ± 0.04 cd 75.4 ± 4.3 bcd 38.0 ± 5.5 cde
    8 W40N300P60K75 40 300 60 75 0.73 ± 0.04 bc 80.8 ± 3.7 ab 43.4 ± 5.5 bc
    9 W40N0P60K300 60 0 60 300 0.69 ± 0.03 cd 76.9 ± 4.0 bc 36.9 ± 4.6 cde
    10 W60N75P120K150 60 75 120 150 0.77 ± 0.03 ab 88.8 ± 3.5 a 53.0 ± 5.6 ab
    11 W60N150P0K75 60 150 0 75 0.81 ± 0.05 a 89.9 ± 3.6 a 58.6 ± 9.1 a
    12 W60N300P30K0 60 300 30 0 0.83 ± 0.05 a 92.0 ± 5.0 a 63.1 ± 9.4 a
    13 W80N0P120K75 80 0 120 75 0.66 ± 0.04 cd 70.4 ± 3.9 cd 30.5 ± 4.6 de
    14 W80N75P60K0 80 75 60 0 0.73 ± 0.03 bc 78.5 ± 4.0 bc 41.4 ± 5.3 bcd
    15 W80N150P30K300 80 150 30 300 0.75 ± 0.04 bc 82.7 ± 4.7 ab 46.2 ± 6.5 bc
    16 W80N300P0K150 80 300 0 150 0.73 ± 0.04 bc 78.8 ± 4.7 bc 41.5 ± 2.8 bcd
    说明:数值后同列不同字母表示处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)

    Table 1.  4 factors and 4 levels orthogonal test scheme processing, ground diameter (D) and height (H) of seedlings

  • 于2016年11月中旬,用游标卡尺和卷尺测定竹叶花椒幼苗地径和苗高。将竹叶花椒苗从盆中移出后采集土壤样品,一份带回实验室风干后用于测定土壤碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾质量分数;另外一份用无菌袋装好,带回实验室用于测定土壤细菌、放线菌和真菌数量。碱解氮采用碱解-扩散法,有效磷采用Olsen法,速效钾采用乙酸铵浸提-火焰光度法[10];微生物数量采用稀释平板法[11]

  • 采用SPSS 22.0和Excel 2013对数据进行统计分析;用单因素方差分析(one-way ANOVA)对各处理竹叶花椒苗高、地径、土壤速效养分和土壤微生物数量进行方差分析;采用最小显著差异法(SSR)和多因素方差分析对处理间各指标进行多重比较。数据为平均值±标准差。指标间相关性采用Pearson相关性分析。采用隶属函数法对每个处理土壤碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾质量分数,细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量进行转换,数据转换公式为:xu)=(x-xmin)/(xmax-xmin)。其中:xu),xxminxmax分别表示各指标隶属度值、指标测定值、该指标值的最小值和最大值;然后将每个处理土壤碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾质量分数隶属度相加得到土壤养分隶属度,细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量隶属度值相加得到土壤微生物隶属度,所有土壤肥力指标的隶属度值累加得到土壤肥力隶属度,值越大土壤肥力就越高。

  • 表 1可知:不同水肥处理竹叶花椒幼苗地径和苗高差异显著。与W20N0P0K0处理(ck)相比,其他各处理的地径和苗高均显著增加。地径和苗高以W60N300P30K0处理的最大,分别比ck增加107.5%和76.2%。地径平方与苗高的乘积(D2H)在各水肥处理下的变化规律与地径相似,以W60N300P30K0处理最高,比ck增加648.1%。由表 2多因素方差分析可知:土壤含水量和氮肥施入量对D2H影响显著(P<0.05)。说明适量的土壤水分和较高的氮肥施入有利于竹叶花椒的高粗生长。

    指标 因素 SS df F P R
    D2H 土壤含水量 6 424.549 3 63.342 0.000 32.421
    2 598.600 3 25.620 0.000 18.842
    五氧化二磷 30.339 3 0.299 0.826 2.022
    氧化钾 3.733 3 0.037 0.990 0.693
    微生物隶属度 土壤含水量 20.109 3 173.981 0.000 1.812
    7.165 3 61.989 0.000 0.985
    五氧化二磷 0.109 3 0.942 0.431 0.128
    氧化钾 0.102 3 0.884 0.459 0.128
    养分隶属度 土壤含水量 4.912 3 49.771 0.000 0.882
    1.216 3 12.318 0.000 0.422
    五氧化二磷 1.801 3 18.255 0.000 0.544
    氧化钾 2.359 3 23.900 0.000 0.524
    土壤肥力隶属度 土壤含水量 44.833 3 167.813 0.000 2.694
    14.197 3 53.142 0.000 1.407
    五氧化二磷 2.301 3 8.613 0.000 0.605
    氧化钾 2.590 3 9.696 0.000 0.568
    说明:SSdfFPR分别表示离均差平方和,自由度,F值,显著水平和极差

    Table 2.  Multifactor variance analysis of the D2H and soil fertility of Zanthoxylum armatum

  • 图 1可知:不同水肥处理下土壤碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾质量分数差异显著。与ck相比,其他各处理的有效养分质量分数均显著增加,土壤碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾质量分数均随氮磷钾施肥量的增加而增加。W60N300P30K0处理的碱解氮质量分数最高,比ck增加51.3%;W60N75P120K150处理的有效磷质量分数最高,比ck增加39.7%;W80N150P30K300处理的速效钾质量分数最高,比ck增加37.9%。利用隶属函数对碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾质量分数转化,三者之和为土壤养分隶属度。由表 2多因素方差分析可知:土壤水分和氮磷钾肥施入量对土壤养分隶属度影响显著(P<0.05)。说明适当的增加土壤施肥量可显著提高土壤有效养分质量分数。

    Figure 1.  Soil available nutrients of Zanthoxylum armatum under different water and fertilizer treatments

  • 图 2可知:不同水肥处理土壤细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量差异显著。与ck相比,其他各处理的细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量均显著增加。细菌和总微生物数量以W60N150P0K75处理的最高,分别比ck增加341.9%和307.5%;放线菌和真菌数量以W60N300P30K0处理的最高,分别比ck增加271.6%和208.2%。利用隶属函数对细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量转化,相加之和为土壤微生物隶属度。由表 2多因素方差分析可知:土壤水分和氮肥施入量对土壤微生物隶属度影响显著(P<0.05)。说明保证磷钾养分充足的基础上,着重调节土壤水分和氮肥施入量可以提高竹叶花椒土壤微生物数量。

    Figure 2.  Soil microbial population of Zanthoxylum armatum under different water and fertilizer treatments

  • 图 3可知:不同水肥处理下竹叶花椒幼苗土壤肥力隶属度差异显著。与ck相比,其他各处理的土壤肥力隶属度均显著增加,比ck的增加41.5%~307.5%。土壤肥力隶属度以W60N75P120K150处理的最高。D2H和土壤肥力隶属度呈显著相关(R2=0.904)。相关分析表明(表 3):竹叶花椒幼苗地径、苗高和D2H,土壤碱解氮和有效磷质量分数及细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量显著相关(P<0.05),而与速效钾质量分数相关性不显著。土壤肥力隶属度与土壤碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾质量分数及细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量相关性显著(P<0.05)。说明土壤肥力隶属度在一定程度上能表征竹叶花椒苗木品质的高低。

    Figure 3.  Soil fertility subordinate degree of Zanthoxylum armatum under different water and fertilizer treatments

    指标 碱解氮 有效磷 速效钾 细菌 放线菌 真菌 微生物总量 土壤肥力隶属度
    地径D 0.814** 0.396* 0.271 0.855** 0.883** 0.909** 0.859** 0.894**
    苗高H 0.868** 0.400* 0.224 0.928** 0.930** 0.932** 0.930** 0.928**
    D2H 0.858** 0.343* 0.171 0.913** 0.930** 0.927** 0.916** 0.898**
    碱解氮 1.000 0.292 0.148 0.895** 0.893** 0.903** 0.896** 0.895**
    有效磷 0.292 1.000 0.026 0.352* 0.364* 0.345* 0.353* 0.496**
    速效钾 0.148 0.026 1.000 0.206 0.195 0.206 0.206 0.396*
    土壤肥力隶属度 0.895** 0.496** 0.396* 0.947** 0.945** 0.940** 0.949** 1.000
    说明:**和*分别表示在0.01和0.05水平显著;n=48

    Table 3.  Correlative coefficient between soil nutrients, microbial biomass and growth of Zanthoxylum armatum

    通过对土壤肥力隶属度(y)与土壤含水量(x1)、氮肥(x2)、磷肥(x3)和钾肥(x4)的多元回归,分别拟合得到方程y=-0.001 4x12+ 0.174x1-1.527(R2=0.779),y= -0.000 025x22+ 0.012x2+ 2.076(R2=0.763),y= -0.000 045x32+ 0.010x2+2.609(R2=0.793)和y=-0.000 011x42+ 0.005 2x4+ 2.562(R2=0.821),建立竹叶花椒土壤肥力隶属度与水肥条件的关系。通过以上方程预测得到在土壤水分含量为61.47%,施肥量为244.28 kg·hm-2氮、112.36 kg·hm-2五氧化二磷和240.05 kg·hm-2氧化钾时,能显著增加土壤肥力,提高青花椒苗木品质。

  • 土壤水分和养分含量是植株生长的基础,在栽培管理过程中合理的水肥管理措施能显著促进植株生长[12]。本研究发现,土壤含水量过低过高都会影响竹叶花椒植株生长,在土壤含水量为60%时竹叶花椒的地径、苗高和D2H达到最大值。这与张志亮等[13]和张楠等[14]的研究结果相似,在土壤水分含量为46.1%~70.0%时,能显著促进苗木的生长。而刘杜玲等[15]的研究发现,轻度干旱胁迫有利于花椒幼苗叶片叶绿素的合成,增加光合产物的形成和积累,从而促进植株的生长。这可能是本研究的竹叶花椒幼苗为长期水分梯度处理,而刘杜玲等[15]的研究为短期水分胁迫处理。王景燕等[9]通过建立汉源花椒幼苗生长隶属度与水肥关系的方程,预测适宜汉源花椒幼苗生长和苗木品质提高的施肥量。本研究通过建立方程,预测施肥量为244.3 kg·hm-2氮肥,112.4 kg·hm-2磷肥和240.1 kg·hm-2钾肥时,竹叶花椒的生长最佳,可能是随着施肥量的增加,植物生长及生物量也会随之增加,超过最适量后,植物生长受到肥料胁迫,生长和生物量下降[16]

    土壤水分作为土壤微生物活动的关键因子,其含量过高或过低均会对土壤微生物产生胁迫[17]。微生物作为土壤生态过程的直接参与者,促进土壤能量流动和物质循环,提高土壤养分含量。本研究中,随着土壤水分含量的增加,土壤细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量均增加,超过60%土壤含水量后,又呈降低趋势。这与曾成城等[18]和BROCKETT等[19]的研究结果相似。适宜的水分条件能促进植物生长,加快土壤熟化,为土壤微生物提供充足的营养,使土壤微生物数量增加[20-21]。本研究还发现:土壤碱解氮含量随土壤含水量的增加呈先增加后减少的变化趋势,在60%土壤含水量时达到最大值,而有效磷和速效钾含量随土壤含水量的增加无显著差异,可能是由于盆栽试验条件下,土壤养分淋失较慢,且本研究土壤养分供给量超过竹叶花椒生长所需的量。

    施肥是作物种植和土壤管理的基本措施,适量施肥能快速增加土壤养分、改善土壤环境和促进作物生长[22]。微生物作为土壤生化反应的参与者,对土壤环境变化敏感,与施肥种类及施肥量关系密切[23]。本研究发现,施肥处理土壤细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量均显著高于未施肥处理,且配方施肥土壤微生物数量更高,随氮、磷、钾施肥量的增加,土壤微生物数量呈先增加后降低的变化趋势;土壤有效养分随施肥量的增加而增加。这与马冬云等[24]和陈立新[25]研究结果基本一致。而代景忠等[22]的研究发现,施肥显著增加了土壤中真菌的数量,随施肥水平增加,真菌和放线菌数量逐渐增大,细菌数量则逐渐减小。这可能与本研究中的土壤特性和施肥量梯度有关。也有研究[26-28]发现:随施肥水平的增加,土壤微生物数量降低,可能与土壤pH降低和土壤表层板结有关,且肥料偏施导致土壤养分失衡,抑制植物生长和微生物繁殖[29]。因此,合理的配方施肥比例和施肥量是提高土壤有效养分含量和微生物数量的关键。

  • 本研究水肥处理显著增加了竹叶花椒植株地径和苗高,促进土壤有效养分含量和微生物数量的增加。植株苗高和地径、土壤微生物数量、碱解氮和有效磷质量分数均随土壤水分含量的增加呈先增加后降低的变化趋势。植株苗高和地径及土壤有效养分质量分数随施肥量的增加而增加,土壤细菌、放线菌、真菌和总微生物数量随施肥量的增加呈先增加后降低的变化趋势。土壤微生物数量与碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾质量分数显著相关,土壤微生物数量与地径和苗高显著相关;土壤肥力隶属度与D2H显著相关。多元回归拟合方程预测,适宜于植株生长、养分含量提高和微生物数量增加的土壤水分含量为61.47%,氮、磷(五氧化二磷)和钾(氧化钾)施肥量分别为244.3,112.4和240.1 kg·hm-2时对促进竹叶花椒幼苗生长,提高土壤肥力具有重要作用。

Reference (29)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return