Flower color phenotype and pigment accumulation characteristics of Sinicalycanthus chinensis, Calycanthus floridus var. glaucus and their hybrid progenies

LIU Yuqi; YANG Liyuan; WANG Yiguang; XIAO Zheng; ZHOU Lihua; ZHAO Hongbo

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220543

Volume 40 Issue 4

Aug. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Zhejiang A&F University > 2023 > 40(4): 747-755

LIU Yuqi, YANG Liyuan, WANG Yiguang, et al. Flower color phenotype and pigment accumulation characteristics of Sinicalycanthus chinensis, Calycanthus floridus var. glaucus and their hybrid progenies[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(4): 747-755. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220543

Citation:

LIU Yuqi, YANG Liyuan, WANG Yiguang, et al. Flower color phenotype and pigment accumulation characteristics of Sinicalycanthus chinensis, Calycanthus floridus var. glaucus and their hybrid progenies[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(4): 747-755. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220543

Flower color phenotype and pigment accumulation characteristics of Sinicalycanthus chinensis, Calycanthus floridus var. glaucus and their hybrid progenies

DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220543

LIU Yuqi^{1, 2
,},
YANG Liyuan^{1, 2},
WANG Yiguang^{1, 2},
XIAO Zheng^{1, 2},
ZHOU Lihua¹,
ZHAO Hongbo^{1, 2
,
,}

1.
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Utilization for Garden Plants, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China
2.
College of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2022-08-23
Accepted Date: 2023-04-10
Rev Recd Date: 2023-03-28

Available Online: 2023-07-13

Publish Date: 2023-08-20

Abstract

Objective This paper, with a comparative analysis conducted of the changes of flower color of the Sinicalycanthus chinensis, the Calycanthus floridus var. glaucus and their hybrid progenies, is aimed to analyze the different metabolite basis of the flower color. Method Targeted metabolomics methods were adopted to determine the content of related metabolites in the petals of S. chinensis, C. floridus var. glaucus, and their hybrid progenies, screen the differential metabolites and decide the metabolic pathways involved in the differential metabolites before identification and analysis were performed to analyze the metabolite basis of petals showing different colors. Result (1) In terms of the flower color phenotype, the lightness (L*) values, yellowness (b*) values and hue angles (h) of the inner and outer petals of S. chinensis were significantly higher than those of C. floridus var. glaucus (P＜0.05). The redness (a*) values of outer petals of S. chinensis were significantly lower than those of C. floridus var. glaucus; the chroma (C*) values of inner petals of S. chinensis were significantly higher than those of C. floridus var. glaucus (P＜0.05). L* values of the hybrid offsprings were significantly lower than those of the inner and outer petals of S. chinensis, but significantly higher than those of C. floridus var. glaucus; a* values of the hybrid progenies were significantly higher than those of the parents, b* values were significantly lower than those of the inner and outer petals of S. chinensis while C* values were significantly lower than those of the inner and outer petals of S. chinensis; C* values of the hybrid progenies were significantly lower than those of the inner petals of S. chinensis, and significantly higher than those of the outer petals of S. chinensis and C. floridus var. glaucus. whereas h were significantly lower than those of the parents (P＜0.05). (2) A total of 1 059 metabolites were detected by widely targeted metabolomics with the relative content of flavonoids being the highest among the three different metabolites of the petals. (3) With KEGG metabolic pathway enrichment analysis performed on the differential metabolites, it was shown that among the 3 groups, the number of metabolites annotated in metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and flavonoid biosynthesis was the largest. (4) The comparison of the relative contents of the main coloring substances in the three plants showed that the relative contents of anthocyanins and flavonoids dropped from high to low in the descending order of hybrid progenies, C. floridus var. glaucus and S. chinensis while the relative contents of flavonols dropped from high to low in the descending order of C. floridus var. glaucus, hybrid progenies and S. chinensis. (5) The analysis of the correlation between pigment components and flower color phenotypes showed that flavones were negatively correlated with L* value, but negatively correlated with h (P＜0.05) whereas there was a very significant negative correlation between flavonols and L* value (P＜0.01); Anthocyanins were negatively correlated with h (P＜0.05) while chalcones and L* value showed an extremely significant negative correlation (P＜0.01). Conclusion There were significant differences in petal flower color phenotype and metabolites among S. chinensis, C. floridus var. glaucus, and hybrid progenies. The significant differences in metabolites, mainly flavonoids, and their main annotation pathways among the three were clarified, laying a foundation for further study in mechanism of the flower colors of these three plants. [Ch, 4 fig. 5 tab. 20 ref.]
- Sinicalycanthus chinensis,
- Calycanthus floridus var. glaucus,
- widely targeted metabolome,
- flower color,
- flavonoids,
- hybrid progenies

Relative Article

[1]	ZHOU Xiawen, SHI Congguang, ZHOU Fangwei, XU Liang, YANG Shaozong, HE Qiuling. Research progress on classification, variation mechanism and application value of plant leaf color mutants . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2025, 42(): 1-11. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240397
[2]	CHEN Yingzhi, KONG En, LU Xinke, WANG Yiguang, DONG Bin, ZHAO Hongbo. Impact and evaluation of different drying methods on the quality of Prunus mume flowers . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(6): 1261-1273. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240256
[3]	YING Yuxin, CHEN Junyu, YAO Lingtiao, XU Zhangting, YU Zhenming, KAI Guoyin. Cloning and expression analysis of RcF3H in Rubus chingii . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(6): 1180-1188. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240326
[4]	ZHANG Zhongzhao, XIE Wenyuan, ZHANG Peilin. Community characteristics of Sinocalycanthus chinensis in Dalei Mountains of Tiantai County . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(2): 262-270. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200349
[5]	HUANG Yaohui, ZHANG Chao, ZHOU Lihua, ZHAO Hongbo. Development and primer screening of SSR markers based on transcriptome sequences in Sinocalycanthus chinensis . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(4): 589-596. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.04.004
[6]	WANG Wenpeng, ZHOU Lihua, ZHAO Hongbo, BAO Zhiyi. Intergeneric cross-compatibility from pollen-pistil interactions of three Calycanthaceae species . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(5): 756-762. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.015
[7]	SUN Yufen, NING Huijuan, ZHANG Shaoyi, CHU Yi, FAN Yirong. Proliferation and differentiation of rhizomes from a filial generation of Cymbidium goeringii×Cymbidium hybridum . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(1): 156-161. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.01.024
[8]	CAI Xuan, SU Fan, JIN He-xian, YAO Chong-huai, WANG Cai-yun. Components and extraction methods for petal pigments of Osmanthus fragrans ‘Siji Gui’ . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(4): 559-564. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.04.014
[9]	YU Ji-ying, ZHANG Yang, ZHENG Jin-kai, WANG Chun, XU Hong-lei. Inherited offspring characteristics from Phalaenopsis ‘Taipei Gold’ × Phalaenopsis ‘Sara Gold’ . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(4): 550-553. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.04.012
[10]	ZHAO Hong-bo, ZHOU Li-hua, HAO Ri-ming. Flower development and pistil receptivity in Sinocalycanthus chinensis and Calycanthus floridus var. oblongifolius . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(3): 302-307.
[11]	SHENG Ning, YAO Qing-ju, REN Quan-jin, XIONG Yu-ning, SUN Xiao-fang. Morphology and photosynthesis of an intergeneric hybrid between Sinocalycanthus chinensis and Calycanthus floridus . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(6): 728-732.
[12]	CHEN Ying, CAO Fu-liang. Leave source from callus induction and flavonoid content in callus from different tissues of five Ginkgo biloba cultivars . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(2): 150-155.
[13]	LI Gen-you, LOU Lu-huan, JIN Shui-hu, CHEN Zheng-hai, LIU An-xin, SUN Meng-jun. Community flora of Chimonanthus praecox in Zhejiang . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2002, 19(2): 127-132.
[14]	LIN Tong-long. Chinese fir :genetic variation and combination selection in DBH growth and wood volume weight for filial generation . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2000, 17(2): 142-145.
[15]	HUANG Jian-qin, HE Xiao-chun, JIN Shui-hu, ZHU Xiang-dong, WU Zheng-huang. Double fertilization and seed formation of Calycanthus chinensis . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1999, 16(3): 219-223.
[16]	Xu Yaoliang, Zhang Ruohui, Zhou Cheng. Study on Communities of Calycanthus chinensis. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1997, 14(4): 355-362.
[17]	Liu Honge, Zhang Rouhui, Huang Shaofu, ZhaoZhifen. study on chormosomes,of 8 Species of Calyeathaeeae。 . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1996, 13(1): 28-33.
[18]	Lai Huanlin, Wang Zhangrong. Analysis of Reproductive Phenology and Strobili Number of Clonal from A Clonal Seed Orchard of Masson's Pine. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1996, 13(4): 405-410.
[19]	Huang Jianqin, Zhang Rouhui (Chang Roh-hwei). Comparative Atanomy of Leaf from 9 species of Calyeanthaceae. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1995, 12(3): 237-241.
[20]	He Fuji, Wang Dongmi, Lu Shijun, Xu Jiquan, Gao Qiliang. Result Analysis on Progeny Tests of Horsetail Beefwood Superlor Trees . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1993, 10(2): 139-144.

References

[1]	ZHANG Zhongzhao, XIE Wenyuan, ZHANG Peilin. Community characteristics of Sinocalycanthus chinensis in Dalei Mountains of Tiantai County [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(2): 262 − 270.
[2]	DAI Silan, HUANG He, FU Jianxin, et al. Advances in molecular breeding of ornamental plants [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2013, 48(6): 589 − 607.
[3]	LASSEIGNE F T, FANTZ P R, RAULSTON J C, et al. Sinocalycalycanthus raulstonii (Calycanthaceae): a new intergeneric hybrid between Sinocalycanthus chinensis and Calycanthus floridus [J]. HortScience, 2001, 36(4): 765 − 767.
[4]	ZHANG Ruohui. A Rare and Endangered Plant in Zhejiang: Sinicalycanthus chinensis [M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishing House, 1994: 154 − 156.
[5]	WANG Wenpeng, ZHOU Lihua, LIU Huahong, et al. Histological mechanism of reproductive barrier in intergeneric cross between Sinocalycanthus chinensis and Calycanthus floridus var. oblongifolius [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2013, 40(10): 1943 − 1950.
[6]	HUANG Yaohui. Pollinator System and the Fitness of Filial Generation in Different Controlled Pollination of Sinocalycanthus chinensis [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2016.
[7]	FENSTER C B, ARMBRUSTER W S, WILSON R, et al. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization [J]. Annual Review of Ecology,Evolution,and Systematics, 2004, 35: 375 − 403.
[8]	HUANG Shuangquan, GUO Youhao. Research progress in pollination biology [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45(3): 225 − 237.
[9]	ROBERTS L D, SOUZA A L, GERSZTEN R E, et al. Targeted metabolomics [J/OL]. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 2012, 30(1): Unit 30.2[2022-08-01]. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb3002s98.
[10]	CHEN Wei, GONG Liang, GUO Zilong, et al. A novel integrated method for large-scale detection, identification, and quantification of widely targeted metabolites: application in the study of rice metabolomics [J]. Molecular Plant, 2013, 6(6): 1769 − 1780.
[11]	TANAKA Y, TSUDA S, KUSUMI T. Metabolic engineering to modify flower color [J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1998, 39(11): 1119 − 1126.
[12]	ZHAO Changling, GUO Weiming, CHEN Junyu. Biochemical and molecular biological mechanisms of plant flower color and its genetic engineering improvement [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2003, 23(6): 1024 − 1035.
[13]	WILLIAMS C A, GRAYER R J. Anthocyanins and other flavonoids [J]. Natural Product Reports, 2004, 21(4): 539 − 573.
[14]	CHEN Sumei, LI Chonghui, ZHU Xirong, et al. The identification of flavonoids and the expression of genes of anthocyanin biosynthesis in the chrysanthemum flowers [J]. Biologia Plantanum, 2012, 56(3): 458 − 464.
[15]	THILL J, MIOSIC S, AHMED R, et al. ‘Le Rouge et le Noir’: a decline in flavone formation correlates with the rare color of black dahlia (Dahlia variabilis Hort. ) flowers [J/OL]. BMC Plant Biology, 2012, 12(1): 225[2022-08-01]. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-225.
[16]	SCHMITZER V, VEBERIC R, OSTERC G, et al. Color and phenolic content changes during flower development in groundcover rose [J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2010, 135(3): 195 − 202.
[17]	CHEN Jian, LU Changping, CHEN Chentian, et al. Preliminary analysis of anthocyanin components in different gerbera varieties [J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2009, 35(suppl 1): 73 − 76.
[18]	WANG Wenpeng, ZHOU Lihua, ZHAO Hongbo, et al. Intergeneric cross-compatibility from pollen-pistil interactions of three Calycanthaceae species [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(5): 756 − 762.
[19]	SHUPERT D, ANDERSON N, BYRNE D. The inheritance of several traits in three diploid interspecific rose populations [J]. HortScience, 2004, 39(4): 807 − 808.
[20]	XUE Li. Study on Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Mechanism of Flower Color Formation in Red-flowered Strawberry [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2016.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(4) / Tables(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(429) PDF downloads(179) Cited by()

Proportional views

HTML

夏蜡梅Sinicalycanthus chinensis为蜡梅科Calycanthaceae夏蜡梅属Sinocalycanthus落叶灌木，花型独特，观赏价值高，为中国特有珍稀野生花卉，属于国家二级保护植物^[1]。同科蜡梅属Calycanthus植物光叶红蜡梅Calycanthus floridus var. glaucus为美国蜡梅C. floridus一变种，与美国蜡梅的区别主要是叶片、叶柄及幼枝无毛或近无毛。广泛的杂交有助于扩大植物的基因库^[2]， LASSEIGNE等^[3]最早获得了夏蜡梅与美国蜡梅的属间杂种，并通过反复杂交和进一步回交选育出了不同花色的品种。夏蜡梅与光叶红蜡梅亲缘关系近，但在花被片形状、大小和颜色方面差别较大。夏蜡梅花大，有内、外两型花被片，外被片呈倒卵状椭圆形或倒卵形，白色、边缘淡紫红色，内被片肉质贝壳状，中部以上淡黄色、中部以下为黄白色并在腹面基部具淡紫红色斑点^[4]；光叶红蜡梅花褐紫色，具清香^[5]。夏蜡梅与光叶红蜡梅花期均为每年的4—5月初夏时节。研究发现：夏蜡梅的主要传粉昆虫为蜂类，而光叶红蜡梅主要传粉昆虫为甲虫类^[6]。植物花的特征涉及传粉生物与进化生态，传粉者对不同花部特征的偏好是近缘物种之间分离和分化的一种重要机制，尤其是花色的分化。花色进化的假设当中，“传粉者选择假说”受到大部分学者的支持，即传粉者对花色的选择性和偏向性导致物种之间花色不同^[7]。花色的多样性是植物多样性中最为复杂的性状之一^[8]。

广泛靶向代谢组学利用多反应监测(MRM)模型，定性、定量检测样本中代谢物含量，具有高效、高灵敏、高覆盖的特点^[9−10]。因此，利用广泛靶向代谢组学对植物中花色素相关代谢产物进行鉴定与分析，可以深入解析植物不同花色形成的物质基础。鉴于此，本研究以夏蜡梅、光叶红蜡梅、光叶红蜡梅×夏蜡梅杂交后代为材料，比较杂交后代与双亲之间花色表型与代谢物之间的差异，并对差异代谢通路进行富集，为深入探究不同品种花色形成的分子机制提供参考。

1. 材料与方法

1.1. 材料

材料为浙江农林大学平山试验基地种植的夏蜡梅、光叶红蜡梅、光叶红蜡梅(♀)×夏蜡梅(♂)杂交后代，共3组样品。

1.2. 花色表型测定

在相同的光源下，以白色A4纸为背景，用英国皇家园艺学会比色卡(RHSCC)与新鲜植物花瓣的花色进行比对，并记录对应数值。使用CR-10型便携式色差仪(日本柯尼卡美能达公司)测定花瓣颜色，根据所测明度(L*)、红度(a*)、黄度(b*)，计算彩度(C*)和色相角(h)，公式为：C*=(a*²+b*²)^1/2，h=$ {\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}}^{-1} $(b*/a*)。测量时，每个品种取3株不同个体上3朵盛开期的花朵(共9朵)置于白色A4纸上，以色差仪集光孔对准测量，其中夏蜡梅因其内外轮花瓣颜色不同，故对内外轮花瓣分开进行表型测定。每朵花测量5次取平均值。

1.3. 代谢物提取方法

3组样品分别取5株个体上生长发育一致的花混合，放入液氮速冻后于−80 ℃保存，用于代谢组分析，其中夏蜡梅采用的混合样品包括内轮和外轮花瓣，反映的是花器官整体的色素。将生物样品放置于冻干机(Scientz-100F)中真空冷冻干燥，然后利用研磨仪(MM 400，Retsch)研磨(30 Hz，90 s)至粉末状后称取100 mg的粉末，溶解于1.2 mL质量分数为70%的甲醇提取液中，每30 min涡旋1次，每次持续30 s，共涡旋6次，样本置于4 ℃冰箱过夜；待到离心(12 000 r·min⁻¹，600 s)后，吸取上清，用微孔滤膜(0.22 μm孔径)过滤样品，并保存于进样瓶中，用于超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)分析。

1.4. 色谱质谱采集条件

数据采集仪器系统主要包括超高效液相色谱(UPLC)和串联质谱(MS/MS)。

液相条件为：色谱柱为AgilentSB-C18 1.8 µm，2.1 mm×100.0 mm；流动相条件A相为超纯水(加入质量分数为0.1%的甲酸)，B相为乙腈(加入质量分数为0.1%的甲酸)；洗脱梯度的体积比在0 min时B相5%，9.00 min内B相体积比例线性增加到95%，并维持在95% 1.00 min，10.00~11.10 min时B相体积比降为5%，并以5%平衡至14.00 min；流速为0.35 mL·min⁻¹；柱温为40 ℃；进样量为4 μL。

质谱条件为：离子源温度为550 ℃，涡轮喷雾；离子喷雾电压(IS) 5 500 V (正离子模式)/−4 500 V (负离子模式)；离子源气体Ⅰ (GSⅠ)、气体Ⅱ (GSⅡ)和帘气(CUR)分别设置为0.345、0.414和0.172 MPa，碰撞诱导电离参数设置为高。在QQQ和LIT模式下分别用10和100 μmol·L⁻¹聚丙二醇溶液进行仪器调谐和质量校准。QQQ扫描使用MRM模式，并将碰撞气体(氮气)设置为中等。

1.5. 数据分析

代谢物定性分析基于迈维生物技术有限公司的自建数据库(MWDB)、公共数据库代谢物信息和二级谱信息完成。利用三重四级杆质谱的多反应监测模式(MRM)对代谢物进行定量分析。不同样品代谢物数据利用软件Analyst 1.6.3处理后进行质谱定性定量分析。检测到的代谢物采用主成分分析(PCA)法分析。分别提取所有样品自变量与因变量中的成分，通过最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)计算成分间的相关性来寻找差异代谢物。利用差异倍数值(F_C)来筛选差异代谢物。筛选log₂F_C≥2.0或log₂F_C≤0.5的代谢物为差异代谢物。最后利用京都基因和基因组数据库数据库(KEGG)对差异代谢物进行注释，并对注释结果按照KEGG数据库中通路类型进行分类和富集分析。

3. 讨论与结论

植物花色的形成是多种因子协同作用的结果，涉及多种代谢物质，其中最主要的是色素。色素有许多种类，主要包括类胡萝卜素、类黄酮和生物碱等三大类^[11−13]。类黄酮是一类具有苯基苯并吡喃基本结构的植物次生代谢产物，广泛存在于植物体内，它产生的颜色范围最广，从淡黄色到蓝紫色，是各种观赏植物花瓣中最重要的色素之一，在菊花Chrysanthemum morifolium^[14]、大丽花Dahlia pinnata^[15]、月季Rosa chinensis^[16]等花瓣中是主要色素。在黄酮类化合物中，主要有红色系和纯黄系。其中，红色系主要包括花青素，它能调控的颜色从粉红色到蓝紫色^[17]；其他黄酮类化合物主要属于纯黄系列，如深黄色的查尔酮，淡黄色或近乎无色的黄酮和黄酮醇等。本研究中夏蜡梅内轮花瓣黄色，光叶红蜡梅和杂交后代花紫红色，对花瓣代谢物中的花青素、黄酮、黄酮醇和查尔酮相对含量分析表明：3种植物花瓣中的类黄酮组分与花色表型密切相关。黄酮与L*呈负相关，表明黄酮相对含量越高则花瓣明度越低，与h呈负相关；黄酮醇与L*呈极显著负相关，说明黄酮醇相对含量越高则花瓣明度越低；花青素与h呈负相关；查尔酮与L*呈极显著负相关表明黄酮醇相对含量越高则花瓣明度越低。

类黄酮是控制植物花色的主要色素之一，其中花青素在类黄酮中占据重要地位。矢车菊素是花青素中呈现紫色的主要色素^[15]，本研究中，3种植物共筛选出10种矢车菊素差异代谢物，紫红色花的光叶红蜡梅和杂交后代中矢车菊素相对含量显著高于夏蜡梅，说明矢车菊素在光叶红蜡梅、杂交后代紫红色花的形成中扮演重要作用。查尔酮能使花瓣呈现深黄色，3种植物共筛选出14种查尔酮差异代谢物，查尔酮相对含量由高到低依次为夏蜡梅、杂交后代、光叶红蜡梅，故推测查尔酮是夏蜡梅内轮花瓣呈现深黄色的主要物质。

夏蜡梅与光叶红蜡梅的杂交后代花部性状介于双亲之间，花大、呈不同程度的紫红色^[18]。研究植物花色遗传规律有助于了解杂交后代的选育过程，对提高杂交后代品质以及培育不同色系的新品种具有重要意义。SHUPERT等^[19]利用３个回交群体研究了月季粉色性状的遗传规律，发现粉色由1个主要的共显性基因控制。薛莉^[20]研究发现：植物杂交后代的花色遗传为少数基因控制的质量性状，色素含量遗传为多基因控制的数量性状。目前夏蜡梅与光叶红蜡梅杂交后代花色遗传机制尚不明确，后续研究可根据本研究结果在花色表型与分子标记之间建立关联，以更加全面地了解杂交后代花色的遗传变异。

Reference (20)

[1]	张忠钊, 谢文远, 张培林. 天台县大雷山夏蜡梅群落学特征分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(2): 262 − 270.	ZHANG Zhongzhao, XIE Wenyuan, ZHANG Peilin. Community characteristics of Sinocalycanthus chinensis in Dalei Mountains of Tiantai County [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(2): 262 − 270.
[2]	戴思兰, 黄河, 付建新, 等. 观赏植物分子育种研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2013, 48(6): 589 − 607.	DAI Silan, HUANG He, FU Jianxin, et al. Advances in molecular breeding of ornamental plants [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2013, 48(6): 589 − 607.
[3]	LASSEIGNE F T, FANTZ P R, RAULSTON J C, et al. Sinocalycalycanthus raulstonii (Calycanthaceae): a new intergeneric hybrid between Sinocalycanthus chinensis and Calycanthus floridus [J]. HortScience, 2001, 36(4): 765 − 767.
[4]	张若蕙. 浙江珍稀濒危植物: 夏蜡梅[M]. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 1994: 154 − 156.	ZHANG Ruohui. A Rare and Endangered Plant in Zhejiang: Sinicalycanthus chinensis [M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishing House, 1994: 154 − 156.
[5]	王文鹏, 周莉花, 刘华红, 等. 夏蜡梅与美国蜡梅属间杂交障碍的组织学机理[J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(10): 1943 − 1950.	WANG Wenpeng, ZHOU Lihua, LIU Huahong, et al. Histological mechanism of reproductive barrier in intergeneric cross between Sinocalycanthus chinensis and Calycanthus floridus var. oblongifolius [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2013, 40(10): 1943 − 1950.
[6]	黄耀辉. 夏蜡梅传粉系统和不同交配后代适合度的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2016.	HUANG Yaohui. Pollinator System and the Fitness of Filial Generation in Different Controlled Pollination of Sinocalycanthus chinensis [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A&F University, 2016.
[7]	FENSTER C B, ARMBRUSTER W S, WILSON R, et al. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization [J]. Annual Review of Ecology,Evolution,and Systematics, 2004, 35: 375 − 403.
[8]	黄双全, 郭友好. 传粉生物学的研究进展[J]. 科学通报, 2000, 45(3): 225 − 237.	HUANG Shuangquan, GUO Youhao. Research progress in pollination biology [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45(3): 225 − 237.
[9]	ROBERTS L D, SOUZA A L, GERSZTEN R E, et al. Targeted metabolomics [J/OL]. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 2012, 30(1): Unit 30.2[2022-08-01]. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb3002s98.
[10]	CHEN Wei, GONG Liang, GUO Zilong, et al. A novel integrated method for large-scale detection, identification, and quantification of widely targeted metabolites: application in the study of rice metabolomics [J]. Molecular Plant, 2013, 6(6): 1769 − 1780.
[11]	TANAKA Y, TSUDA S, KUSUMI T. Metabolic engineering to modify flower color [J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1998, 39(11): 1119 − 1126.
[12]	赵昶灵, 郭维明, 陈俊愉. 植物花色呈现的生物化学、分子生物学机制及其基因工程改良[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(6): 1024 − 1035.	ZHAO Changling, GUO Weiming, CHEN Junyu. Biochemical and molecular biological mechanisms of plant flower color and its genetic engineering improvement [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2003, 23(6): 1024 − 1035.
[13]	WILLIAMS C A, GRAYER R J. Anthocyanins and other flavonoids [J]. Natural Product Reports, 2004, 21(4): 539 − 573.
[14]	CHEN Sumei, LI Chonghui, ZHU Xirong, et al. The identification of flavonoids and the expression of genes of anthocyanin biosynthesis in the chrysanthemum flowers [J]. Biologia Plantanum, 2012, 56(3): 458 − 464.
[15]	THILL J, MIOSIC S, AHMED R, et al. ‘Le Rouge et le Noir’: a decline in flavone formation correlates with the rare color of black dahlia (Dahlia variabilis Hort. ) flowers [J/OL]. BMC Plant Biology, 2012, 12(1): 225[2022-08-01]. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-225.
[16]	SCHMITZER V, VEBERIC R, OSTERC G, et al. Color and phenolic content changes during flower development in groundcover rose [J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2010, 135(3): 195 − 202.
[17]	陈建, 吕长平, 陈晨甜, 等. 不同花色非洲菊品种花色素成分初步分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 35(增刊1): 73 − 76.	CHEN Jian, LU Changping, CHEN Chentian, et al. Preliminary analysis of anthocyanin components in different gerbera varieties [J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2009, 35(suppl 1): 73 − 76.
[18]	王文鹏, 周莉花, 赵宏波, 等. 蜡梅与光叶红蜡梅和夏蜡梅属间杂交亲和性初步研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5): 756 − 762.	WANG Wenpeng, ZHOU Lihua, ZHAO Hongbo, et al. Intergeneric cross-compatibility from pollen-pistil interactions of three Calycanthaceae species [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(5): 756 − 762.
[19]	SHUPERT D, ANDERSON N, BYRNE D. The inheritance of several traits in three diploid interspecific rose populations [J]. HortScience, 2004, 39(4): 807 − 808.
[20]	薛莉. 红花草莓种质创新及花色形成机理研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016.	XUE Li. Study on Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Mechanism of Flower Color Formation in Red-flowered Strawberry [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2016.

植物材料	RHSCC	CIELab颜色系统
植物材料	RHSCC	明度(L*)	红度(a*)	黄度(b*)	彩度(C*)	色相角(h)
夏蜡梅外轮花瓣	76D	70.81±9.44 a	5.41±4.12 c	12.09±2.66 b	13.24±4.90 c	1.15±0.57 b
夏蜡梅内轮花瓣	9B	64.20±10.11 b	7.49±3.19 bc	36.74±11.62 a	37.49±12.05 a	1.37±1.30 a
光叶红蜡梅	186A	23.31±2.47 d	10.73±2.86 b	5.16±2.10 c	11.91±3.55 c	0.45±0.63 c
杂交后代	N77A	29.72±6.19 c	26.45±7.37 a	4.02±2.34 c	26.76±7.74 b	0.15±0.31 d
说明：RHSCC表示英国皇家园艺学会比色卡。差异显著分析使用LSD法，同列不同小写字母表示差异显著(P＜0.05)。

物质	一级分类	二级分类	在3种植物中的表达情况
黄酮类生物合成途径
3,4,2′,4′,6′-五羟基查尔酮-4′-O-葡萄糖苷 3,4,2′,4′,6′- 　　pentahydroxychalcone-4′-O-glucoside	类黄酮	查尔酮	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
3,4,2′,4′,6′-五羟基查尔酮 3,4,2′,4′,6′-pentahydroxychalcone	类黄酮	查尔酮	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
柚皮素查尔酮 naringenin chalcone	类黄酮	查尔酮	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
根皮苷phloretin-2′-O-glucoside (phlorizin)	类黄酮	查尔酮	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
柚皮素-7-O-新橙皮糖苷 (柚皮苷) naringenin-7-O- 　　neohesperidoside (naringin)	类黄酮	二氢黄酮	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
高圣草酚homoeriodictyol	类黄酮	二氢黄酮	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
柚皮素-7-O-葡萄糖苷 (樱桃苷) naringenin-7-O-glucoside (prunin)	类黄酮	二氢黄酮	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
异樱花素 isosakuranetin(5,7-dihydroxy-4′-methoxyflavanone)	类黄酮	二氢黄酮	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
3-O-乙酰短叶松黄烷酮 3-O-acetylpinobanksin	类黄酮	二氢黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
短叶松素 pinobanksin	类黄酮	二氢黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
二氢杨梅素(蛇葡萄素) dihydromyricetin (ampelopsin)	类黄酮	二氢黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
二氢槲皮素(花旗松素) dihydroquercetin(taxifolin)	类黄酮	二氢黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅
香橙素 (二氢山奈酚) aromadendrin (dihydrokaempferol)	类黄酮	二氢黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
绿原酸 (3-O-咖啡酰奎宁酸) chlorogenic acid (3-O-caffeoylquinic acid)	酚酸类	酚酸类	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
五羟黄酮 tricetin (5,7,3′,4′,5′-pentahydroxyflavone)	类黄酮	黄酮	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
高良姜素 galangin (3,5,7-trihydroxyflavone)	类黄酮	黄酮	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
儿茶素 catechin	类黄酮	黄酮	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
3′,4,4′,5,7-五羟基黄烷 3′,4,4′,5,7-pentahydroxyflavan (luteoforol)	类黄酮	黄酮	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅
橙皮素 hesperetin	类黄酮	黄酮	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
木犀草素 luteolin (5,7,3′,4′-tetrahydroxyflavone)	类黄酮	黄酮	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅；光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
山奈酚 kaempferol (3,5,7,4′-tetrahydroxyflavone)	类黄酮	黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代＞光叶红蜡梅
表没食子儿茶素 epigallocatechin	类黄酮	黄烷醇类	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
没食子儿茶素 gallocatechin	类黄酮	黄烷醇类	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
表儿茶素 epicatechin	类黄酮	黄烷醇类	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅
阿夫儿茶精 afzelechin (3,5,7,4′-tetrahydroxyflavan)	类黄酮	黄烷醇类	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
5-O-对香豆酰奎宁酸 5-O-p-coumaroylquinic acid	酚酸类	酚酸类	光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
花青素合成途径
矢车菊素-3-O-桑布双糖苷 cyanidin-3-O-sambubioside 　　[cyanidin-3-O-(2″-O-xylosyl) glucoside]	类黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅；夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
矢车菊素-3-O- (2″-O-葡萄糖基)葡萄糖苷 cyanidin-3-O- 　　(2″-O-glucosyl) glucoside	类黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
矢车菊素-3-O- (6″-O-对香豆酰)葡萄糖苷 cyanidin-3-O- 　　(6″-O-p-coumaroyl) glucoside	类黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代；夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
矢车菊素-3,5-二-O-葡萄糖苷 cyanidin-3,5-O-diglucoside (cyanin)	类黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代；夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
矢车菊素-3-O-葡萄糖苷 cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (kuromanin)	类黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代；夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
矢车菊素-3-O-芸香糖苷cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside (keracyanin)	黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
矢车菊素-3-O- (2″-O-葡萄糖基)葡萄糖苷 cyanidin-3-O- 　　(2″-O-glucosyl) glucoside	黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
天竺葵素-3-O-芸香糖苷 pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside	类黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＜杂交后代；夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅
芍药花素 3-O-葡萄糖苷 peonidin-3-O-glucoside	类黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代；夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
天竺葵素-3-O-葡萄糖苷 pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside	类黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代；夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
飞燕草素-3-O-芸香糖苷delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside	黄酮	花青素	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
异喹啉生物碱的生物合成途径
原儿茶醛 protocatechualdehyde	酚酸类	酚酸类	夏蜡梅＜光叶红蜡梅
多巴胺 dopamine	生物碱	生物碱	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
L-酪胺 L-tyramine	氨基酸及其衍生物	氨基酸及其衍生物	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
3,4-二羟基-L-苯丙氨酸 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine	氨基酸及其衍生物	氨基酸及其衍生物	夏蜡梅＞光叶红蜡梅
黄酮和黄酮醇类生物合成途径
西伯利亚落叶松黄酮 laricitrin	黄酮	黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
山奈酚-3-O-鼠李糖苷 (阿福豆苷)(番泻叶山奈苷) 　　kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside (afzelin)(kaempferin)	黄酮	黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
芹菜素-7-O-葡萄糖苷 apigenin-7-O-glucoside (cosmosiin)	黄酮	黄酮	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
槲皮素-3-O-鼠李糖苷(槲皮苷) quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (quercitrin)	黄酮	黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
山奈酚-3-O-半乳糖苷(三叶豆苷) kaempferol-3-O-galactoside (trifolin)	黄酮	黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
山奈酚-3-O-葡萄糖苷(紫云英苷)(黄芪苷) 　　kaempferol-3-O-glucoside (astragalin)	黄酮	黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
木犀草素-7-O-新橘皮糖苷 (忍冬苷) luteolin-7-O-neohesperidoside (lonicerin)	黄酮	黄酮	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
槲皮素-3-O-桑布双糖苷 quercetin-3-O-sambubioside	黄酮	黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
槲皮素-3-O-(2″-O-木糖基)芸香糖苷 quercetin-3-O-(2″-O-xylosyl) rutinoside	黄酮	黄酮醇	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
泛醌和其他萜类醌生物合成
对羟基苯甲酸 4-hydroxybenzoic acid	酚酸类	酚酸类	夏蜡梅＞杂交后代
高龙胆酸 homogentisic acid	酚酸类	酚酸类	夏蜡梅＜杂交后代
3-[(1-羧乙烯基)氧基]苯甲酸 3-[(1-carboxyvinyl) oxy]benzoic acid	酚酸类	酚酸类	夏蜡梅＜杂交后代
D-δ-生育三烯酚 δ-tocotrienol	其他类	维生素	夏蜡梅＜杂交后代
甲基萘醌 (维生素 K2) menaquinone (vitamin K2)	其他类	维生素	夏蜡梅＜杂交后代
糖酵解/糖异生
磷酸二羟基丙酮 dihydroxyacetone phosphate	其他类	糖及醇类	光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
D-葡萄糖 D-glucose	其他类	糖及醇类	光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
3-磷酸-D-甘油酸 3-phospho-D-glyceric acid	其他类	糖及醇类	光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
熊果苷 arbutin	酚酸类	酚酸类	光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
磷酸肌醇代谢
磷酸二羟基丙酮 dihydroxyacetone phosphate	其他类	糖及醇类	光叶红蜡梅＜杂交后代
肌醇 inositol	其他类	糖及醇类	光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代
D-葡萄糖醛酸 D-glucoronic acid	其他类	糖及醇类	光叶红蜡梅＞杂交后代

植物	相对含量
植物	花青素	黄酮	黄酮醇	查尔酮
夏蜡梅	4.40×10⁷	2.71×10⁸	9.38×10⁷	7.02×10⁶
光叶红蜡梅	6.21×10⁷	3.68×10⁸	2.92×10⁸	4.94×10⁶
杂交后代	7.51×10⁷	3.78×10⁸	2.64×10⁸	5.28×10⁶

花色表型	黄酮	黄酮醇	花青素	查尔酮
L*	−0.978*	−0.994**	−0.887	−0.994**
a*	0.779	0.659	0.924	−0.645
b*	−0.751	−0.743	−0.714	0.741
C*	−0.252	−0.339	−0.094	0.347
h	−0.977*	−0.936	−0.978*	0.930
说明：表示显著相关(P＜0.05)；*表示极显著相关(P＜0.01)。