Effects of shading treatment on growth and physiological characteristics of <i>Clematis henryi</i>

CHEN Zihang; TAO Li; CHOU Tianze; YANG Hanxi; LIU Zhigao; YU Huiting; SHEN Yamei

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230508

Volume 41 Issue 3

May 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Zhejiang A&F University > 2024 > 41(3): 615-623

CHEN Zihang, TAO Li, CHOU Tianze, YANG Hanxi, LIU Zhigao, YU Huiting, SHEN Yamei. Effects of shading treatment on growth and physiological characteristics of Clematis henryi[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(3): 615-623. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230508

Citation:

CHEN Zihang, TAO Li, CHOU Tianze, YANG Hanxi, LIU Zhigao, YU Huiting, SHEN Yamei. Effects of shading treatment on growth and physiological characteristics of Clematis henryi[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(3): 615-623. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230508

Effects of shading treatment on growth and physiological characteristics of Clematis henryi

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230508

CHEN Zihang^1
,,
TAO Li¹,
CHOU Tianze¹,
YANG Hanxi¹,
LIU Zhigao^{1, 2
,
,},
YU Huiting¹,
SHEN Yamei^{1, 2}

1.
College of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China
2.
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Garden Plants, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2023-10-18
Accepted Date: 2024-03-22
Rev Recd Date: 2024-01-17

Available Online: 2024-05-22

Publish Date: 2024-05-22

Abstract

Objective This study, with an investigation of the physiological response mechanism of Clematis henryi to different light intensity, is aimed to provide scientific basis for its introduction, cultivation, and landscaping applications. Method With three-year-old C. henryi cutting seedlings used as experimental materials, five light treatments were set up: full sunlight (ck), 80% (T1), 60% (T2), 50% (T3), and 40% (T4) shading before a study was conducted of the effects of different shading levels on the growth and physiology of C. henryi plants. Result (1) Shading treatment significantly increased the number of tillers, number of segments and segment spacing of plants (P＜0.05), with the increase in the number of tillers and segment spacing of plants under T1 treatment being the highest (63.0% and 24.3%, respectively), and the segment spacing of plants under T1, T2 and T3 treatments being higher than that of the control (27.5%, 8.4% and 32.1% respectively). (2) Shading treatment significantly promoted protein synthesis and decreased MDA production (P＜0.01), with the mass molar concentration of MDA in T1 treatment being the lowest, and the mass fraction of soluble protein (SP) reaching the maximum at 30 d (11.2 mg·g⁻¹). (3) The mass concentration of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b increased continuously, with each index of the shading group being higher than that of the control at 60 d, and the total mass concentration of chlorophyll reaching the maximum value (2.28 mg·L⁻¹) at 30 d, which was 3.9 times that of the control. (4) The activities of POD and CAT showed the trend of rise-fall-rise with the shading from high to low, while the activities of the two enzymes increased gradually over time, and the opposite was true for SOD. Conclusion C. henryi exhibited strong shade tolerance, with shading levels of 50% − 60% significantly promoting the growth and dry matter accumulation of branches and leaves, enhancing ornamental value. Therefore, suitable shading environments should be selected for summer cultivation to ensure the healthy growth of plants. [Ch, 3 fig. 4 tab. 30 ref.]
- Clematis henryi,
- shading treatment,
- protect enzyme activity,
- chlorophyll,
- physiological index

Relative Article

[1]	XIA Honglei, WANG Lei, FANG Chaochu, WANG Minyan, LIU Wanpeng, SHEN Cheng, ZHANG Jin. Effects of river sediment as the main substrate on the growth and physiological indexes of Agrostis stolonifera ‘PENN A-4’ . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(5): 1075-1084. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240157
[2]	LI Chengcheng, WU Qichao, MA Yan, LI Yuhao, ZANG Dekui. Physiological responses and evalution of cold resistance of six Osmanthus fragrans cultivars under low temperature stress . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(4): 828-836. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200606
[3]	LI Donglin, JIN Yaqin, CUI Mengfan, HUANG Linxi, PEI Wenhui. Growth, photosynthesis and ultrastructure of mesophyll cells for Cercidiphyllum japonicum seedlings with shading in summer . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(3): 496-505. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190370
[4]	DENG Bo, YAN Lipeng, LIU Guihua, XU Mengyuan. Effects of shading and fertilization on growth and nitrogen accumulation of Phoebe zhennan seedlings . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(3): 489-495. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190399
[5]	JIN Di, ZHANG Mingru, WANG Jiajia, GAO Lei, HOU Ping. Effects of shading and drought stress on photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of potted Dicranopteris dichotoma . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(6): 1054-1063. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190666
[6]	XU Linyu, LIU Shouzan, BAI Yan, DING Heng, HU Xiaotian, WU Xueqian, XU Haishun, ZHENG Bingsong. Effects of light intensity treatments on photosynthetic characteristics in Tetrastigma hemsleyanum . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2018, 35(3): 467-475. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.03.010
[7]	ZHU Tingting, WANG Yixiang, ZHU Xudan, YOU Yujie, QIU Wanting. Photosynthetic characteristics with shading for Schima superba and Liquidambar formosana . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(1): 28-35. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.01.005
[8]	WANG Qiao, NIE Xin, LIU Xiumei, WANG Huatian, MENG Xianpeng, CAO Guiping, LI Jian, HUANG Changbao. Photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence of three Pinus tree species with shading . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016, 33(4): 643-651. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.04.013
[9]	LEI Yan, LI Qingwei, LI Wenguang, JING Shan, CHEN Junyu. Physiological characteristics of adaptability for two ground-cover chrysanthemum cultivars with shading . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(5): 708-715. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.008
[10]	WANG Ying, LU Guoquan, WANG Chenjing, ZHAO Xiwu. Cold-resistance in two Caladium bicolor cultivars . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(2): 285-290. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.02.018
[11]	SUN Sunan, WANG Xiaode, XU Teng, ZHANG Cheng, WANG Kaili, DENG Linxi. Ecological physiology of Taxodium distichum leaves color changes in autumn and winter . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(2): 302-307. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.02.021
[12]	ZENG Dejing, WANG Cheng, LIU Jun, YIN Lijuan. Morphological characteristics and physiological indexes of Clerodendrum trichotomum with waterlogging . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(2): 172-178. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.02.003
[13]	WU Jiang, LIU Peng, WU Jia-sheng. Seedling growth and leaf pigments of Cleyera japonica with shade treatments . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(5): 786-789. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.05.024
[14]	WU Jian-hua, ZHANG Ru-min, GAO Yan. Membrane lipid peroxidation and protective enzyme systems with drought stressed Artemisia frigida leaves . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(3): 329-333. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.03.002
[15]	XU Zhao-dan, LIN Xia-zhen, JIANG Ting. Shading with growth，physiological indexes，biochemical indexes of three ground-cover plants . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(1): 69-75. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.01.011
[16]	YING Ye-qing, GUO Jing, WEI Jian-fen, YAN Jin-feng, LU Ying, FANG Wei. Physiological characteristics of Chimonobambusa marmorea f. variegata with natural drought stress and rewetting . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(4): 513-517. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.04.006
[17]	LIN Xia-zhen, LU Ting. Morphological and photosynthetic characteristics of Ligularia stenocephala with shading . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(5): 614-618.
[18]	CHEN Ke, WANG Xiao-de. Physiological indices of three liana species(Mucuna sempervirens, Hedera nepalensis var. sinensis and Euonymus fortunei) with drought resistance . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(3): 314-318.
[19]	LINWu-xing. Self-allelopathy from root solutions on chlorophyll and carbohydrate of Casuarina equisetifolia seedlings . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(1): 12-16.
[20]	RUANZhi-ping, LIAO Qi-liao, DING Yin-long. Comparative study of physiological indices of four palm species during winter in Xiamen . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2007, 24(1): 115-118.

References

[1]	SHAO Weili, LIAO Dihua, LIU Zhigao, et al. Establishment and application of comprehensive evaluation system for ornamental quality of Clematis cultivars [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(6): 1229 − 1237.
[2]	CHEN Xiaolei, SHAO Weili, LI Siyuan, et al. Genetic analysis of phenotypic traits in F1 hybrids of 6 Clematis cultivars [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(1): 72 − 80.
[3]	ZHANG Junfang, WANG Yanli, LI Zizhen, et al. Distribution characteristics and ornamental evaluation of wild Clematis in Gansu Province [J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2022, 41(4): 71 − 79.
[4]	SHAO Weili, LIU Zhigao, SHEN Yamei, et al. Introduction, domestication and ornamental evaluation of 13 wild Clematis species from Zhejiang Province [J]. Chinese Garden, 2012, 38(11): 116 − 121.
[5]	JIN Mengjiao, LIU Bo, WANG Kangkang, et al. Light energy utilization and response of chlorophyll synthesis under different light intensities in Mikania micrantha [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2347 − 2359.
[6]	LIU Cong, TIAN Tian, LI Shan, et al. Growth response of Chinese woody plant seedlings to different light intensities [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 518 − 527.
[7]	LIANG Kang, ZHANG Tingzhong, CHEN Juyan, et al. Effects of different light intensitieson growthand diurnal variation of photosynthesis of Sorbus wilsoniana seedlings [J]. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 50(3): 23 − 27.
[8]	ZHANG Yan. Research on the Light Adaptability of Seven Potentilla Species [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2021.
[9]	XIA Chan, LI He, WANG Peilan, et al. Effects of shading on the photosynthetic characteristics of Cyclobalanopsis gilva seedlings [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2021, 41(7): 72 − 79.
[10]	CHEN Wenyun, PU Chunxia. Resourcei nvestigation of medicinal species of Clematis in Yunnan Province [J]. Journal of Yunnan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2006, 29(1): 31 − 33.
[11]	LI Hesheng. Experimental Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[12]	NIU Huan, WEI Kunhua, XU Qian, et al. Effects of different illuminances on growth, physiological characteristics, and medicinal components of Anoectochilus roxburghii [J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(1): 26 − 36, 43.
[13]	WU Fanglan. The Responses of Growth and Physiological and Metabolites of Michelia hedyosperma Seedlings under Red and Blue Light [D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2022.
[14]	LIU Wenwen, RAO Dandan, WU Erhuan, et al. Effects of shading on leaf traits and photosynthetic characteristics of Alsophila spinulosa seedlings [J/OL]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2023-12-29[2024-01-17]. https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202311002.
[15]	ZHENG Yahui. Effects of shading on the physiological characters of Chinese torreya seedlings [J]. Anhui Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 47(1): 20 − 22.
[16]	WANG Kai. Effect of Weak Light and Salinity Stress on Physiological Characteristics of Two Species of Clematis [D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2017.
[17]	HOU Fuyun, DONG Shunxu, ZHANG Haiyan, et al. Research on antioxidant defense system of purple sweet potato under shading conditions [J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 45(6): 48 − 50.
[18]	LÜ Jinhui, WANG Xuan, FENG Yanmeng, et al. Effects of shading on the photosynthetic characteristics and anatomical structure of Trollius chinensis Bunge [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(19): 6033 − 6043.
[19]	LIU Chunyan, HUANG Yong, GUO Meng, et al. Effects of shading on growth and physiological characteristics of Rehmannia glutinosa [J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(4): 59 − 67.
[20]	XIONG Shifa, WU Liwen, CHEN Yicun, et al. Response of leaf of Quercus fabri seedlings from different provenances to drought stress and drought resistance evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 39(12): 3924 − 3933.
[21]	PENG Sixian, SUN Jiayi, LUAN Mu, et al. Response of photosynthetic fluorescence and antioxidant enzyme activity to different light intensities in Wikstroemia monnula [J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2023-12-19[2024-01-17]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20231219.1359.031.
[22]	FENG Cancan. Effects of Shading Treatment on Growth and Flowering Quality of Hibiscus mutabilis L. [D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020.
[23]	LI Donglin, JIN Yaqin, CUI Mengfan, et al. Effects of shading on physiological characteristics and ultrastructure of mesophyll cell of Emmenopterys henryi leaves [J]. Plant Research, 2020, 40(1): 29 − 40.
[24]	SUN Xiaoling, XU Yuefei, MA Luyi, et al. A review of acclimation of photosynthetic pigment composition in plant leaves to shade environment [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(8): 989 − 999.
[25]	WANG Kai, ZHU Jiaojun, YU Lizhong, et al. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and light use efficiency of Phellodendron amurense seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(5): 1003 − 1012.
[26]	SHI Kai, LI Ze, ZHANG Weijian, et al. Influence of different light intensity on the growth, diurnal change of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of tung tree seedling [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2018, 38(8): 35 − 42, 50.
[27]	ZHU Yuxue, ZHANG Mintao, LIU Ying, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of heat-tolerance of 4 cultivars of early large-flowered group Clematis [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Agricultural Science Edition), 2017, 35(1): 58 − 65, 71.
[28]	FAN Xuan. The Effects of Shading on the Growth, Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Epilobium fangii [D]. Nanchong: China West Normal University, 2017.
[29]	LIU Zhigao, SHAO Weili, SHEN Yamei, et al. Evaluation of heat tolerance and screening the index for the assessment of heat tolerance in cultivars of Clematis [J]. Chinese Journal of Nuclear Agriculture, 2019, 34(1): 203 − 213.
[30]	YANG Ya’nan. Effects of Shading on Photosynthetic Physiology and Flowering Characteristics of Osmanthus fragrans [D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2016.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(3) / Tables(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(173) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()

Proportional views

HTML

单叶铁线莲Clematis henryi为多年生常绿木质藤本，为毛茛科Ranunculaceae铁线莲属Clematis植物。铁线莲属植物种类丰富，全世界约300种，中国分布108种。该属植物多为藤本，兼具药用以及观赏价值，栽培品种多样，在西方园林中应用广泛，素有“藤本皇后”之美誉^[1−2]。中国拥有丰富的铁线莲属植物资源，但绝大多数仍处于野生状态^[3]。单叶铁线莲花为白色或淡黄色，聚伞花序，花量大，具芳香，花期为12月至翌年2月，有效填补了现有铁线莲品种冬季少花的空白，具有极大的开发利用潜力^[4]。

光照对植物的生长和发育具有重要的作用，除了影响光合作用之外，也影响植物体内激素的产生和形态建成、生理特征、新陈代谢和基因表达调控等^[5−6]。城市园林中的小环境光照强度变化多样，光照过强会灼伤植株叶片，破坏光系统，过低则降低植物的光合效率，影响植物生长和观赏效果^[7]。研究表明：遮光条件下植株具有形态可塑性，植物可以通过调节体内保护酶活性和次生代谢物含量适应遮光环境，夏季适度遮光能够明显提高光合作用^[8−9]。选择适宜的光照环境，对园林植物健康生长，以及生态价值、观赏价值的充分发挥起到决定性作用。现有铁线莲品种多为春秋季开花的喜阳类型，单叶铁线莲作为冬季开花且具有良好耐阴性的植株种类，可以满足林下栽培、室内观赏等多种景观需求，将有效扩大铁线莲品种的栽培应用范围。因单叶铁线莲药用价值高，前人对其研究多集中在药材性状、资源调查、药理作用等方面^[10]，而关于单叶铁线莲的园林应用和遮光对其生理特性影响的研究尚未见报道。本研究对不同遮光强度下单叶铁线莲幼苗的生长发育及生理特性进行研究，探讨其对不同遮光强度响应的生理机制，为单叶铁线莲在园林中的栽培应用提供依据。

1. 材料与方法

1.1. 研究区概况及研究材料

研究在浙江农林大学东湖校区铁线莲种质资源圃中(30°13′19.2″N，119°22′33.6″E)进行。该区属亚热带湿润型季风气候，雨量充足且四季分明，年平均气温为13.0~21.0 ℃，年均降水量为1 427.0 mm，年均日照时数为1 939.0 h，无霜期为23.0 d。2022年3月2日选取60株长势良好、生长一致的3年生单叶铁线莲扦插植株移栽于上口径16.0 cm、下口径12.0 cm、高13.5 cm的容器中，单株定植，栽培基质[V(珍珠岩)∶V(泥炭土)=1∶1]一致。容器苗置于大棚内(遮光强度为73%)，常规栽培及管理。研究区5、6、7月日均最高气温分别为26.0、33.0、36.0 ℃；正午最高光强分别为1 300 、1 550 、1 800 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹。

1.2. 方法

2022年5月20日，从上述移栽的植株中选取生长健康，且长势一致的40株用于后续研究。共设5个遮光处理，遮光率分别为80% (T1)、60% (T2)、50% (T3)、40% (T4)和0 (ck)，每个处理8株，植株间距为25 cm，防止相互遮挡，期间常规栽培管理。15 d后开始进行形态和光合生理指标的测定。

1.3. 形态和光合生理指标测定

1.3.1. 形态指标与生物量测定

2022年6月5日开始，分别于遮光后的15 d (6月5日)、30 d (6月20日)和60 d (7月20日)共3次测量并记录每组单叶铁线莲的分蘖数、节数以及节间距，并取平均值，拍照记录叶片变化。7月30日，各处理分别取3株带回实验室，冲去根部泥土，60 ℃烘干至恒量，测定生物量。

1.3.2. 可溶性蛋白、丙二醛、叶绿素测定

2022年6月5日开始，每15 d测定1次，分别于遮光后的15 d (6月5日)、30 d (6月20日)、45 d (7月5日)和60 d (7月20日)共测定4次。可溶性蛋白(SP)采用考马斯亮蓝法测定^[11]；丙二醛(MDA)采用硫代巴比妥酸显色法测定^[11]；叶绿素采用乙醇浸提-分光光度法测定^[11]。

1.3.3. 保护酶活性测定

采样时间同1.3.2。超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性采用南京建成科技有限公司的试剂盒测定，以每克组织在1 mL反应液中SOD抑制率达50%时所对应的SOD量为1个SOD活力单位；过氧化物酶(POD)活性采用愈创木酚法测定^[11]；过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性采用苏州格锐思生物科技有限公司的试剂盒测定，以25 ℃下每克组织每分钟催化分解1 μmol过氧化氢为1个酶活单位。

1.4. 数据处理

所有数据均采用Excel 2010和Origin 2022进行整理和作图，利用SPSS 26.0进行方差分析和相关性分析。文中数据均为平均值±标准差。

3. 讨论

3.1. 植株形态指标对遮光处理的响应

单叶铁线莲的分蘖数、节数和节间距分别于不同遮光强度下达到最高值，但与金线莲Anoectochilus roxburghii^[12]和绢毛匍匐委陵菜Potentilla reptans^[8]生长过程中不同器官生长发育适宜的光照强度并不一致。表明光因子对植株可塑性具有一定的影响，弱光刺激植株株节的纵向生长，以获得更多的光能^[13]，适度遮光有效保持叶色浓绿，强光胁迫使叶片发黄、皱缩。研究表明：遮光下桫椤Alsophila spinulosa幼苗叶绿素显著增加，全光照下出现日灼现象^[14]。本研究中单叶铁线莲在50%~60%的遮光下生物量最高，这与香榧Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’在不同遮光水平下的研究结果一致^[15]，表明中度遮光有利于耐阴植物的生物量积累，保持较好的生命活力。耐阴种类齿叶铁线莲C. serratifolia和褐毛铁线莲C. fusca^[16]的光补偿点为8~24 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹，自然分布环境多在落叶和常绿阔叶混交林下，这与单叶铁线莲生境相似。邵伟丽等^[4]研究发现：单叶铁线莲比毛叶铁线莲C. lanuginosa、毛萼铁线莲C. hancockiana等6个野生种耐阴性更强，建议在选择遮光的小环境中栽培，本研究也得到类似结果。此外，单叶铁线莲园林应用过程中应保持适度遮光，促进分蘖数、节数、节间距的增加和叶绿素的形成和积累，使叶色浓绿，提升垂直绿化景观效果，遮光强度设置还要综合考虑光照强度对其不同器官生长发育的影响，保障观赏效果。

3.2. 可溶性蛋白、丙二醛和叶绿素对遮光处理的响应

MDA作为膜脂过氧化产物，反映膜脂过氧化及膜受伤害的程度，可溶性蛋白含有多种参与植物体内代谢的酶类，是维持正常渗透势的重要渗透调节物质。本研究中短期(30 d)轻度遮光(T4)和不遮光(ck)处理植株的MDA质量摩尔浓度均显著低于其他处理，可能是短期弱光胁迫导致植株体内膜脂过氧化产物积累，低光强下紫心甘薯Ipomoea batatas^[17]也得到类似结果。遮光组可溶性蛋白质量分数均显著高于对照，表明低光强有利于单叶铁线莲积累光合产物，这与金莲花Trollius chinensis^[18]和地黄Rehmannia glutinosa^[19]的研究结果相似。7月强光高温胁迫叠加，各处理组MDA质量摩尔浓度升高，可溶性蛋白质量分数降低，活性氧产生速度超过抗氧化物清除能力，细胞质膜通透性变大，细胞质外渗，导致植物生理代谢紊乱，植物体通过消耗可溶性蛋白来维持细胞膨压和降低渗透势，降低损害^[20]。同时，遮光条件下植株MDA质量摩尔浓度减少，这与北江荛花Wikstroemia monnula^[21]在遮光条件下的研究结果一致，表明遮光处理有效减缓了植株受到的伤害。

叶绿素直接影响叶肉细胞光合作用的强弱，是植物适应和利用环境因子的重要指标^[22]。处理30 d时，遮光组叶绿素总量均高于对照，单叶铁线莲通过增加叶绿素质量浓度来提高光合效率，这与香果树Emmenopterys henryi^[23]在遮光处理下叶绿素质量浓度的变化一致。T1、T2和T3处理在6月的叶绿素a/b低于对照，且随着时间的推移逐渐降低，说明其通过增加叶绿素b或者降低叶绿素a，提高了叶片对短波蓝紫光的吸收，又有利于维持光系统Ⅰ (PSⅠ)与光系统Ⅱ (PSⅡ)之间的能量平衡，从而提高自身对遮光环境的适应性^[24]，这与黄波罗Phellodendron amurense^[25]在遮光下叶片叶绿素质量浓度变化的研究结论相似。叶绿素a+b的增加以及叶绿素a/b的降低均是植物对弱光环境适应以及耐阴性强的表现^[26]。单叶铁线莲耐阴性较强，适度遮光可以促进叶绿素积累，使叶色保持浓绿，同时可以缓解夏季外界强光造成的损害。

3.3. 保护酶活性对遮光处理的响应

逆境条件下植物体内产生大量自由基会危害植物细胞膜系统，严重时会导致细胞死亡^[9]。与此对应，植物细胞会构建一套保护酶系统，减少活性氧和自由基对细胞的损害。研究初期，遮光组的SOD和POD活性显著高于对照，说明在较低光强下单叶铁线莲通过维持这2种酶的较高活性来清除活性氧，这与遮光处理下赤皮青冈Quercus gilva的酶活性变化相同^[9]。伴随7月高温的出现，轻度遮光(T3、T4)和对照植株的SOD活性增长显著，这与铁线莲品种^[27]面对高温胁迫时SOD活性变化规律一致；同时重度遮光(T1、T2)处理的SOD活性降幅较小，表明遮光度增加对植株起到了有效保护作用。植物体清除胁迫过程中细胞内产生的H₂O₂需依赖CAT和POD的共同作用^[28]，单叶铁线莲POD和CAT活性在7月持续增长，表明其通过协同机制来消除过剩光能带来的危害，这与铁线莲品种应对热胁迫的生理机制类似^[29]。此外，POD活性增幅高于CAT也表明前者在协同作用中占主导地位，这与四季桂Osmanthus fragrans ‘Semperflorens’^[30]叶片酶活性对光照的响应相似。

4. 结论

单叶铁线莲耐阴性好，40%~50%的遮光度可显著促进新枝和新叶的生长，园林应用中可在林下、建筑物北侧及室内窗台区域栽培，单叶铁线莲的开发利用将有效扩展观赏铁线莲的应用场景。夏季高温和强光叠加对单叶铁线莲植株生长的胁迫加剧，植物体通过POD和CAT等保护酶的协同作用缓解过剩光能对细胞的伤害。栽培过程中应选择不低于60%的遮光环境，保障植株的健康生长。

Reference (30)

[1]	邵伟丽, 廖娣华, 刘志高, 等. 铁线莲栽培品种观赏性综合评价体系的建立与应用[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(6): 1229 − 1237.	SHAO Weili, LIAO Dihua, LIU Zhigao, et al. Establishment and application of comprehensive evaluation system for ornamental quality of Clematis cultivars [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(6): 1229 − 1237.
[2]	陈晓蕾, 邵伟丽, 厉思源, 等. 6个铁线莲品种杂交F1代表型性状遗传分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40(1): 72 − 80.	CHEN Xiaolei, SHAO Weili, LI Siyuan, et al. Genetic analysis of phenotypic traits in F1 hybrids of 6 Clematis cultivars [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(1): 72 − 80.
[3]	张君芳, 王艳莉, 李子珍, 等. 甘肃省野生铁线莲属植物分布特征及观赏性评价[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2022, 41(4): 71 − 79.	ZHANG Junfang, WANG Yanli, LI Zizhen, et al. Distribution characteristics and ornamental evaluation of wild Clematis in Gansu Province [J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2022, 41(4): 71 − 79.
[4]	邵伟丽, 刘志高, 申亚梅, 等. 13种浙江省野生铁线莲引种驯化与观赏性评价[J]. 中国园林, 2012, 38(11): 116 − 121.	SHAO Weili, LIU Zhigao, SHEN Yamei, et al. Introduction, domestication and ornamental evaluation of 13 wild Clematis species from Zhejiang Province [J]. Chinese Garden, 2012, 38(11): 116 − 121.
[5]	金梦娇, 刘博, 王抗抗, 等. 薇甘菊光能利用及叶绿素合成在不同光照强度下的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2347 − 2359.	JIN Mengjiao, LIU Bo, WANG Kangkang, et al. Light energy utilization and response of chlorophyll synthesis under different light intensities in Mikania micrantha [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2347 − 2359.
[6]	刘从, 田甜, 李珊, 等. 中国木本植物幼苗生长对光照强度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2): 518 − 527.	LIU Cong, TIAN Tian, LI Shan, et al. Growth response of Chinese woody plant seedlings to different light intensities [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 518 − 527.
[7]	梁康, 张廷忠, 陈菊艳, 等. 不同光照强度对华西花楸幼苗生长和光合日变化的影响[J]. 贵州林业科技, 2022, 50(3): 23 − 27.	LIANG Kang, ZHANG Tingzhong, CHEN Juyan, et al. Effects of different light intensitieson growthand diurnal variation of photosynthesis of Sorbus wilsoniana seedlings [J]. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 50(3): 23 − 27.
[8]	张艳. 7种委陵菜属植物光适应性研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2021.	ZHANG Yan. Research on the Light Adaptability of Seven Potentilla Species [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2021.
[9]	夏婵, 李何, 王佩兰, 等. 不同光照强度对赤皮青冈幼苗光合特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(7): 72 − 79.	XIA Chan, LI He, WANG Peilan, et al. Effects of shading on the photosynthetic characteristics of Cyclobalanopsis gilva seedlings [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2021, 41(7): 72 − 79.
[10]	陈文允, 普春霞. 云南省铁线莲属药用资源调查[J]. 云南中医学院学报, 2006, 29(1): 31 − 33.	CHEN Wenyun, PU Chunxia. Resourcei nvestigation of medicinal species of Clematis in Yunnan Province [J]. Journal of Yunnan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2006, 29(1): 31 − 33.
[11]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.	LI Hesheng. Experimental Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[12]	牛欢, 韦坤华, 徐倩, 等. 不同光照度对金线莲生长、生理特性和药用成分的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2019, 29(1): 26 − 36, 43.	NIU Huan, WEI Kunhua, XU Qian, et al. Effects of different illuminances on growth, physiological characteristics, and medicinal components of Anoectochilus roxburghii [J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(1): 26 − 36, 43.
[13]	吴芳兰. 红蓝光质下香梓楠苗木生长生理及代谢产物的响应[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2022.	WU Fanglan. The Responses of Growth and Physiological and Metabolites of Michelia hedyosperma Seedlings under Red and Blue Light [D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2022.
[14]	刘雯雯, 饶丹丹, 吴二焕, 等. 遮阴对桫椤幼苗的叶片性状及光合特性的影响[J/OL]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023-12-29 [2024-01-17]. https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki. issn1671-8151.202311002.	LIU Wenwen, RAO Dandan, WU Erhuan, et al. Effects of shading on leaf traits and photosynthetic characteristics of Alsophila spinulosa seedlings [J/OL]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2023-12-29[2024-01-17]. https://doi.org/10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.202311002.
[15]	郑亚辉. 遮阴对香榧幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2019, 47(1): 20 − 22.	ZHENG Yahui. Effects of shading on the physiological characters of Chinese torreya seedlings [J]. Anhui Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 47(1): 20 − 22.
[16]	王凯. 弱光和盐碱逆境对两种铁线莲生理特性的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2017.	WANG Kai. Effect of Weak Light and Salinity Stress on Physiological Characteristics of Two Species of Clematis [D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2017.
[17]	侯夫云, 董顺旭, 张海燕, 等. 遮荫条件下紫心甘薯的抗氧化防御系统研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2013, 45(6): 48 − 50.	HOU Fuyun, DONG Shunxu, ZHANG Haiyan, et al. Research on antioxidant defense system of purple sweet potato under shading conditions [J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 45(6): 48 − 50.
[18]	吕晋慧, 王玄, 冯雁梦, 等. 遮荫对金莲花光合特性和叶片解剖特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(19): 6033 − 6043.	LÜ Jinhui, WANG Xuan, FENG Yanmeng, et al. Effects of shading on the photosynthetic characteristics and anatomical structure of Trollius chinensis Bunge [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(19): 6033 − 6043.
[19]	刘春琰, 黄勇, 郭猛, 等. 遮阴对地黄生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 51(4): 59 − 67.	LIU Chunyan, HUANG Yong, GUO Meng, et al. Effects of shading on growth and physiological characteristics of Rehmannia glutinosa [J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(4): 59 − 67.
[20]	熊仕发, 吴立文, 陈益存, 等. 不同种源白栎幼苗叶片对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 39(12): 3924 − 3933.	XIONG Shifa, WU Liwen, CHEN Yicun, et al. Response of leaf of Quercus fabri seedlings from different provenances to drought stress and drought resistance evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 39(12): 3924 − 3933.
[21]	彭思娴, 孙家怡, 栾牧, 等. 北江荛花光合荧光及抗氧化酶活性对不同光照强度的响应[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2023-12-19[2024-01-17]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20231219.1359.031.	PENG Sixian, SUN Jiayi, LUAN Mu, et al. Response of photosynthetic fluorescence and antioxidant enzyme activity to different light intensities in Wikstroemia monnula [J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2023-12-19[2024-01-17]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20231219.1359.031.
[22]	冯灿灿. 遮阴对木芙蓉生长及开花品质的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2020.	FENG Cancan. Effects of Shading Treatment on Growth and Flowering Quality of Hibiscus mutabilis L. [D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020.
[23]	李冬林, 金雅琴, 崔梦凡, 等. 遮荫对香果树叶片生理特性及叶肉细胞超微结构的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(1): 29 − 40.	LI Donglin, JIN Yaqin, CUI Mengfan, et al. Effects of shading on physiological characteristics and ultrastructure of mesophyll cell of Emmenopterys henryi leaves [J]. Plant Research, 2020, 40(1): 29 − 40.
[24]	孙小玲, 许岳飞, 马鲁沂, 等. 植株叶片的光合色素构成对遮阴的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(8): 989 − 999.	SUN Xiaoling, XU Yuefei, MA Luyi, et al. A review of acclimation of photosynthetic pigment composition in plant leaves to shade environment [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(8): 989 − 999.
[25]	王凯, 朱教君, 于立忠, 等. 遮阴对黄波罗幼苗的光合特性及光能利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(5): 1003 − 1012.	WANG Kai, ZHU Jiaojun, YU Lizhong, et al. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and light use efficiency of Phellodendron amurense seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(5): 1003 − 1012.
[26]	石凯, 李泽, 张伟建, 等. 不同光照对油桐幼苗生长、光合日变化及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(8): 35 − 42, 50.	SHI Kai, LI Ze, ZHANG Weijian, et al. Influence of different light intensity on the growth, diurnal change of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of tung tree seedling [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2018, 38(8): 35 − 42, 50.
[27]	朱玉雪, 张敏涛, 刘莹, 等. 4种早花大花组铁线莲的耐热性综合评价[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2017, 35(1): 58 − 65, 71.	ZHU Yuxue, ZHANG Mintao, LIU Ying, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of heat-tolerance of 4 cultivars of early large-flowered group Clematis [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Agricultural Science Edition), 2017, 35(1): 58 − 65, 71.
[28]	范宣. 遮阴对川西柳叶菜生长发育与生理生化的影响[D]. 南充: 西华师范大学, 2017.	FAN Xuan. The Effects of Shading on the Growth, Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Epilobium fangii [D]. Nanchong: China West Normal University, 2017.
[29]	刘志高, 邵伟丽, 申亚梅, 等. 铁线莲品种耐热性分析及评价指标筛选[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 34(1): 203 − 213.	LIU Zhigao, SHAO Weili, SHEN Yamei, et al. Evaluation of heat tolerance and screening the index for the assessment of heat tolerance in cultivars of Clematis [J]. Chinese Journal of Nuclear Agriculture, 2019, 34(1): 203 − 213.
[30]	杨亚男. 遮荫对四季桂光合生理及开花特性的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2016.	YANG Ya’nan. Effects of Shading on Photosynthetic Physiology and Flowering Characteristics of Osmanthus fragrans [D]. Ya’an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2016.

处理	分蘖数/个			节数/个			节间距/cm
处理	15 d	30 d	60 d	15 d	30 d	60 d	15 d	30 d	60 d
T1	2.10±0.10 a	3.00±0.10 a	3.20±0.16 AB	10.20±0.10 AB	13.00±0.10 A	13.60±0.16 a	16.00±0.10 A	16.80±0.10 A	17.00±0.16 B
T2	1.75±0.04 a	2.50±0.85 ab	2.70±0.20 AB	8.20±0.04 B	10.00±0.85 B	12.10±0.20 ab	14.00±0.04 B	14.30±0.30 B	14.50±0.20 C
T3	2.00±0.13 a	3.40±0.30 a	3.50±0.20 AB	10.20±0.13 AB	12.00±0.30 AB	12.30±0.20 ab	17.00±0.13 A	17.50±0.30 A	17.90±0.20 A
T4	2.10±0.07 a	3.50±0.05 a	3.60±0.10 AB	10.30±0.07 AB	12.50±0.05 AB	13.00±0.10 a	13.00±0.07 B	14.00±0.05 BC	14.20±0.10 C
ck	1.75±0.20 a	2.00±0.15 b	2.10±0.01 B	12.50±0.20 A	13.00±0.15 AB	13.00±0.01 a	13.00±0.20 B	13.10±0.15 C	13.10±0.01 D
说明：不同大写字母表示同一时间不同处理间差异极显著(P＜0.01)；不同小写字母表示同一时间不同处理间差异显著(P＜0.05)。

处理	生物量/g
T1	35.0±3.1 b
T2	40.5±2.0 a
T3	41.4±1.7 a
T4	33.2±2.4 b
ck	25.6±1.3 c
说明：不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P＜0.05)。

处理时间/d	叶绿素a/(mg·L⁻¹)					叶绿素b/(mg·L⁻¹)
处理时间/d	T1	T2	T3	T4	ck	T1	T2	T3	T4	ck
15	0.44±0.06 B	0.79±0.29 A	0.43±0.13 B	0.73±0.14 AB	0.67±0.06 AB	0.11±0.05 a	0.26±0.16 a	0.11±0.04 a	0.18±0.05 a	0.15±0.03 a
30	0.60±0.12 A	0.42±0.13 AB	0.62±0.00 A	0.34±0.11 B	0.29±0.09 B	0.23±0.03 A	0.13±0.06 BC	0.20±0.01 AB	0.07±0.06 C	0.07±0.05 C
45	1.54±0.16 A	0.66±0.09 B	0.29±0.04 D	0.48±0.06 C	0.24±0.02 C	0.73±0.08 A	0.38±0.04 B	0.24±0.02 CD	0.30±0.02 BC	0.22±0.01 D
60	0.62±0.10 A	0.42±0.05 B	0.28±0.01 C	0.42±0.03 B	0.15±0.03 D	0.23±0.03 A	0.13±0.02 B	0.14±0.08 AB	0.14±0.02 AB	0.13±0.02 B

处理时间/d	叶绿素a+b/(mg·L⁻¹)					叶绿素a/b
处理时间/d	T1	T2	T3	T4	ck	T1	T2	T3	T4	ck
15	0.55±0.10 B	1.05±0.35 A	0.54±0.16 B	0.91±0.17 AB	0.82±0.03 AB	4.37±1.30 a	3.82±1.93 a	3.98±0.87 a	4.17±1.08 a	4.68±1.15 a
30	0.83±0.15 A	0.56±0.18 AB	0.81±0.01 A	0.42±0.16 B	0.36±0.14 B	2.64±0.28 a	3.35±0.80 a	3.11±0.09 a	6.95±4.51 a	5.93±3.95 a
45	2.28±0.25 A	1.03±0.12 B	0.53±0.05 CD	0.78±0.07 BC	0.47±0.03 D	2.10±0.02 A	1.74±0.08 B	1.24±0.07 D	1.55±0.11 C	1.11±0.05 D
60	0.85±0.13 A	0.55±0.06 B	0.42±0.07 BC	0.56±0.03 B	0.28±0.06 C	2.74±0.06 A	3.73±0.25 A	4.24±2.46 A	3.05±0.36 A	1.24±0.17 B
说明：不同大写字母表示同一时间不同处理间差异极显著(P＜0.01)；不同小写字母表示同一时间不同处理间差异显著(P＜0.05)。

指标	生物量	分蘖数	节数	节间距	叶绿素总量	可溶性蛋白	MDA	CAT	POD	SOD
生物量	1
分蘖数	0.152	1
节数	−0.142	0.542*	1
节间距	0.585*	0.421	0.300	1
叶绿素总量	0.303	0.733**	0.579*	0.420	1
可溶性蛋白	0.854**	0.423	0.102	0.718**	0.531*	1
MDA	−0.684**	−0.302	−0.234	−0.707**	−0.623*	−0.789**	1
CAT	−0.325	−0.594*	−0.375	−0.143	−0.794**	−0.468	0.604*	1
POD	−0.403	−0.461	−0.453	−0.952**	−0.454	−0.613*	0.689**	0.203	1
SOD	−0.631*	−0.442	−0.012	−0.444	−0.535*	−0.744**	0.684**	0.692**	0.425	1
说明：表示显著相关(P＜0.05)；*表示极显著相关(P＜0.01)。