不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较

黄丽霞; 袁位高; 江波; 朱锦茹; 彭佳龙

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较

黄丽霞 , 袁位高 , 江波 , 朱锦茹 , 彭佳龙

文章导航 > 浙江农林大学学报 > 2009 > 26(2): 209-214

黄丽霞, 袁位高, 江波, 朱锦茹, 彭佳龙. 不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 209-214.

引用本文:

黄丽霞, 袁位高, 江波, 朱锦茹, 彭佳龙. 不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 209-214.

HUANG Li-xia, YUAN Wei-gao, JIANG Bo, ZHU Jin-ru, PENG Jia-long. A comparative study on spatial structure of Myrica rubra forest under three different managements[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(2): 209-214.

Citation:

HUANG Li-xia, YUAN Wei-gao, JIANG Bo, ZHU Jin-ru, PENG Jia-long. A comparative study on spatial structure of Myrica rubra forest under three different managements[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(2): 209-214.

不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较

1.
浙江林学院林业与生物技术学院，浙江临安 311300;
2.
浙江省林业科学研究院，浙江杭州 310023;
3.
浙江省仙居县林业局，浙江仙居 317300

详细信息

通信作者: 袁位高

A comparative study on spatial structure of Myrica rubra forest under three different managements

1.
School of Forestry and Biotechnology，Zhejiang Forestry College，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;
2.
Zhejiang Forestry Academy，Hangzhou 310023，Zhejiang，China;
3.
Forest Enterprise of Xianju，Xianju 317300，Zhejiang，China

More Information

Corresponding author: YUAN Wei-gao

摘要: 对3种不同经营方式下杨梅Myrica rubra的混交度和角尺度进行了比较研究，采用胸径、生物量、冠幅和树高计测大小比数对不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构进行分析。研究结果表明，集约型杨梅林分的混交度为0，复合型的平均混交度大于粗放型的平均混交度；各样地的角尺度平均值为0.564 ～ 0.667，均属于集聚分布格局，但复合型的角尺度分布图基本上呈正态分布，所以复合型杨梅更接近于均匀分布；复合型经营方式下，杨梅林分的胸径大小比数、生物量大小比数、冠幅大小比数和树高大小比数较其他2种经营方式下分布均匀。复合型经营更有利于生态效益的发挥。在森林经营管理中，以杨梅为目的树种进行林分配置时，以树高优势较杨梅弱的下层树种为宜；择伐时应尽量保留大小比数比最近邻木高的个体。图6表2参13
- 森林培育学 /
- 杨梅 /
- 林分空间结构 /
- 混交度 /
- 角尺度 /
- 大小比数
Abstract: We compared Myrica rubra forest under three different managements using the analysis of forest spatial structure in Xianju County，Zhejiang Province，where the M. rubra is one of the majority economic tree species. The objective of the study was to provide a quantitative description of the spatial structure of the three plots （plot 1 named X1 is intension type；plot 2 named X2 is extensive type and plot 3 named X3 is compound type.），and to present a method for comparative analysis of the three forest sites. The results showed that，the mingling degree of the M. rubra on X1，X2 and X3 were 0，0.208 and 0.336 respectively. The average neighborhood comparison of each plot range from 0.564 to 0.667 all were belong to cluster distribution pattern，but the average neighborhood comparison of the compound forest was closer to normal distribution. Therefore compound M. rubra forest is closer to uniform distribution than other two types. The neighborhood comparison measured by diameter at breast height（DBH），biomass，canopy breadth，and tree height under compound type had a slighter fluctuation range than the other two. Compound type is the most beneficial way of the three managements to maximize the ecological benefits. It was possible that increasing individual’s DBH to enhance its biomass，and thus，to achieve its predominance status among individual’s competition was the main strategy of individual’s differentiation. Neighborhood comparison should also be taken as an instructive reference in modifying the spatial structure of stand.［Ch，6 fig. 2 tab. 13 ref.］
- silviculture /
- Myrica rubra /
- spatial structure /
- mingling /
- neighborhood pattern /
- neighborhood comparison

[1]	袁梓馨, 郭秋菊, 艾训儒, 姚兰, 朱江, 王蕾, 向钦. 金子山国有林场4种典型林分空间结构综合评价 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2024, 41(5): 928-938. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240162
[2]	吕康婷, 张二山, 李思颖, 靳姗姗, 周梦丽, 闫东锋. 黄山松人工林林分空间结构对林下植物多样性的影响 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(6): 1257-1266. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220139
[3]	武秀娟, 奥小平, 赵育鹏, 崔雪晴. 芦芽山阴坡华北落叶松-云杉天然次生林林分空间结构特征 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(1): 58-64. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200261
[4]	孙宇晗, 王士博, 王润涵, 郑小雨, 闫飞. 利用Voronoi图评价油松人工林空间结构 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(5): 877-884. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.05.012
[5]	梁森苗, 王伟, 戚行江, 张玉, 王君虹, 郑锡良, 胡桂仙. ‘早佳’杨梅的果实品质形成规律 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(3): 559-564. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.03.023
[6]	艾婧文, 刘健, 余坤勇, 张今朝, 曾琪, 郑文英. 群落特征和林分空间结构对森林公园景观美学质量贡献率及影响因子 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(6): 1087-1094. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.017
[7]	范佩佩, 韦新良, 郭如意, 汤孟平. 天目山针阔混交林林木空间特性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(5): 675-682. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.05.004
[8]	沈利芬, 项伟波, 范彩廷, 金鹏, 周明兵, 徐川梅. 杨梅开花生物学特性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(2): 278-284. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.02.016
[9]	邓宏兼, 李卫忠, 曹铸, 王庆, 王广儒. 基于不同取样尺度的油松针阔混交林物种多样性 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(1): 67-75. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.010
[10]	张结存, 徐丽华, 张茂震, 汤孟平. 基于物种空间结构和多样性的改进型混交度研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(3): 336-342. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.03.002
[11]	武爱彬, 游先祥, 赵艳霞, 秦彦杰, 刘欣. 应用3S获取与分析侧柏人工林空间结构研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(1): 57-63. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.01.009
[12]	王群, 张金池, 田月亮, 叶立新, 刘胜龙. 浙江凤阳山天然混交林林分空间结构分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(6): 875-882. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.06.011
[13]	邓英英, 汤孟平, 徐文兵, 陈永刚, 娄明华, 赵明水. 天目山近自然毛竹纯林的竹秆空间结构特征 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(2): 173-179. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.02.001
[14]	张会儒, 武纪成, 杨洪波, 陈新美. 长白落叶松-云杉-冷杉混交林林分空间结构分析 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(3): 319-325.
[15]	孟赐福, 曹志洪, 姜培坤, 徐秋芳, 周国模. 叶面施硼矫正杨梅缺硼的研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(5): 543-547.
[16]	方国景, 汤孟平, 章雪莲. 天目山常绿阔叶林的混交度研究 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2008, 25(2): 216-220.
[17]	何新华, 陈力耕, 郭长禄. 发根农杆菌介导的杨梅遗传转化研究初报 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2007, 24(4): 433-436.
[18]	孟赐福, 姜培坤, 曹志洪, 徐秋芳, 周国模. 杨梅的硼素营养及施硼技术 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2006, 23(6): 684-688.
[19]	李秀庭, 邱程明, 王白坡, 章新华, 沈爱巧. 日光大棚促成杨梅提早成熟 . 浙江农林大学学报, 2004, 21(2): 154-158.
[20]	王白坡, 戴文圣, 程晓建, 王利忠, 鄢荣保, 鲍李洪, 袁荣根. 低丘红壤上良种杨梅的表现及早结高产栽培技术 . 浙江农林大学学报, 1998, 15(3): 244-249.

链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/id/428

https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/zjnldxxb/2009/2/209

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 3941
HTML全文浏览量: 160
PDF下载量: 237
被引次数: 0

不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较

1. 浙江林学院林业与生物技术学院，浙江临安 311300;

2. 浙江省林业科学研究院，浙江杭州 310023;

3. 浙江省仙居县林业局，浙江仙居 317300

通信作者: 袁位高

刊出日期: 2009-04-20

关键词:

摘要: 对3种不同经营方式下杨梅Myrica rubra的混交度和角尺度进行了比较研究，采用胸径、生物量、冠幅和树高计测大小比数对不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构进行分析。研究结果表明，集约型杨梅林分的混交度为0，复合型的平均混交度大于粗放型的平均混交度；各样地的角尺度平均值为0.564 ～ 0.667，均属于集聚分布格局，但复合型的角尺度分布图基本上呈正态分布，所以复合型杨梅更接近于均匀分布；复合型经营方式下，杨梅林分的胸径大小比数、生物量大小比数、冠幅大小比数和树高大小比数较其他2种经营方式下分布均匀。复合型经营更有利于生态效益的发挥。在森林经营管理中，以杨梅为目的树种进行林分配置时，以树高优势较杨梅弱的下层树种为宜；择伐时应尽量保留大小比数比最近邻木高的个体。图6表2参13

English Abstract

A comparative study on spatial structure of Myrica rubra forest under three different managements

1. School of Forestry and Biotechnology，Zhejiang Forestry College，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;

2. Zhejiang Forestry Academy，Hangzhou 310023，Zhejiang，China;

3. Forest Enterprise of Xianju，Xianju 317300，Zhejiang，China

Corresponding author: YUAN Wei-gao

Publish Date: 2009-04-20

Keywords:

Abstract: We compared Myrica rubra forest under three different managements using the analysis of forest spatial structure in Xianju County，Zhejiang Province，where the M. rubra is one of the majority economic tree species. The objective of the study was to provide a quantitative description of the spatial structure of the three plots （plot 1 named X1 is intension type；plot 2 named X2 is extensive type and plot 3 named X3 is compound type.），and to present a method for comparative analysis of the three forest sites. The results showed that，the mingling degree of the M. rubra on X1，X2 and X3 were 0，0.208 and 0.336 respectively. The average neighborhood comparison of each plot range from 0.564 to 0.667 all were belong to cluster distribution pattern，but the average neighborhood comparison of the compound forest was closer to normal distribution. Therefore compound M. rubra forest is closer to uniform distribution than other two types. The neighborhood comparison measured by diameter at breast height（DBH），biomass，canopy breadth，and tree height under compound type had a slighter fluctuation range than the other two. Compound type is the most beneficial way of the three managements to maximize the ecological benefits. It was possible that increasing individual’s DBH to enhance its biomass，and thus，to achieve its predominance status among individual’s competition was the main strategy of individual’s differentiation. Neighborhood comparison should also be taken as an instructive reference in modifying the spatial structure of stand.［Ch，6 fig. 2 tab. 13 ref.］

黄丽霞, 袁位高, 江波, 朱锦茹, 彭佳龙. 不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 209-214.

引用本文:

黄丽霞, 袁位高, 江波, 朱锦茹, 彭佳龙. 不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2009, 26(2): 209-214.

Citation:

全文HTML

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

留言板

不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较

通信作者: 袁位高

A comparative study on spatial structure of Myrica rubra forest under three different managements

Corresponding author: YUAN Wei-gao

计量

出版历程

不同经营方式下杨梅林分空间结构比较

1. 浙江林学院 林业与生物技术学院，浙江 临安 311300; 2. 浙江省林业科学研究院，浙江 杭州 310023; 3. 浙江省仙居县林业局，浙江 仙居 317300

通信作者: 袁位高

English Abstract

A comparative study on spatial structure of Myrica rubra forest under three different managements

1. School of Forestry and Biotechnology，Zhejiang Forestry College，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China; 2. Zhejiang Forestry Academy，Hangzhou 310023，Zhejiang，China; 3. Forest Enterprise of Xianju，Xianju 317300，Zhejiang，China

Corresponding author: YUAN Wei-gao

全文HTML

目录

1. 浙江林学院林业与生物技术学院，浙江临安 311300;

2. 浙江省林业科学研究院，浙江杭州 310023;

3. 浙江省仙居县林业局，浙江仙居 317300

1. School of Forestry and Biotechnology，Zhejiang Forestry College，Lin’an 311300，Zhejiang，China;

2. Zhejiang Forestry Academy，Hangzhou 310023，Zhejiang，China;

3. Forest Enterprise of Xianju，Xianju 317300，Zhejiang，China