Soil microbial characteristics of evergreen broad-leaved forest at different altitudes in Fengyang Mountain, Zhejiang Province

HE Liu; CAO Minmin; LU Jianbing; ZHENG Xiang; LIU Shenglong; JIANG Jiang

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210820

Volume 39 Issue 6

Nov. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Zhejiang A&F University > 2022 > 39(6): 1267-1277

HE Liu, CAO Minmin, LU Jianbing, ZHENG Xiang, LIU Shenglong, JIANG Jiang. Soil microbial characteristics of evergreen broad-leaved forest at different altitudes in Fengyang Mountain, Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(6): 1267-1277. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210820

Citation:

HE Liu, CAO Minmin, LU Jianbing, ZHENG Xiang, LIU Shenglong, JIANG Jiang. Soil microbial characteristics of evergreen broad-leaved forest at different altitudes in Fengyang Mountain, Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(6): 1267-1277. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210820

Soil microbial characteristics of evergreen broad-leaved forest at different altitudes in Fengyang Mountain, Zhejiang Province

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210820

1.
Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecology Restoration, Co-Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China
2.
Administration of Fengyang Mountain, Fengyang Mountain-Baishanzu National Nature Reserve, Longquan 323700, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2021-12-24
Accepted Date: 2022-05-26
Rev Recd Date: 2022-05-20

Available Online: 2022-11-21

Publish Date: 2022-12-20

Abstract

Objective The objective is to explore the characteristics of soil microbial community of zonal vegetation in evergreen broad-leaved forest in Fengyang Mountain, Zhejiang Province, and to clarify the changes of soil microbial community along the elevation gradient and the main factors affecting structure and diversity of microbial community. Method Soil samples were collected at 343, 765, 1364 and 1611 m above sea level. High-throughput sequencing technology was used to explore the relationship between soil microbial community and altitude. Result The number of OTU of bacteria was more than that of fungi, and middle and low altitudes (343 and 765 m) displayed more OTUs. Chao 1 index decreased with the increase of altitude, while Shannon index had no obvious trend. The dominant taxa of bacteria at the phylum level were Acidobacteria (43.77%−51.55%), Proteobacteria (31.18%−35.77%) and Actinobacteria, (5.24%−7.99%), while the dominant groups of fungal community were Basidiomycota (33.16%−67.35%) and Ascomycota (22.98%−46.78%). Among the top 10 bacterial phyla in relative abundance, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae and Verrucomicrobia were significantly negatively correlated with altitude (P＜0.01). There were no altitudinal taxa in the fungal community at the phylum level. LefSe (LDA Effect Size) analysis exhibited more different taxa in the fungal community. In addition, PCoA showed that the soil microbial community had the characteristics of altitudinal differentiation bounded by 765 m, and the first axis of this PcoA (PC1) was significantly correlated with temperature, total phosphorus, total kalium and pH(P＜0.05). Conclusion The change of altitude leads to the change of soil microbial community characteristics in Fengyang Mountain, and temperature is the main driving factor. [Ch, 5 fig. 6 tab. 41 ref.]
- soil bacteria,
- soil fungi,
- altitude,
- high throughput sequencing,
- Fengyang Mountain

Relative Article

[1]	HU Ruiqi, FANG Weijun, WANG Yiping. Population diversity and temporal dynamics of large moths at different altitudes in Mount Tianmu . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(3): 535-541. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230469
[2]	LUO Zhengrong, ZHENG Weicheng, TANG Zhansheng, CAI Chenchen, CHEN Xubo, ZHENG Zihong. Soil microbial diversity and its influencing factors in the habitat of rare plant Emmenopterys henryi in Jiulongshan, Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(5): 1013-1023. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230532
[3]	ZHAO Dingrong, LU Mei, ZHAO Xuyan, SHAN Shengyang, SUN Guanfa, SUN Yujia, LIU Guoqing, GUO Chuniao, CHEN Zhiming. Response of soil bacterial community to wetland degradation in the Napahai Plateau . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(2): 406-418. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230331
[4]	CAO Shanzhi, ZHOU Jiashu, ZHANG Shaobo, YAO Yihan, LIU Juan, LI Yongfu. Effects of biochar-based urea and common urea on soil N₂O flux in Phyllostachys edulis forest soil . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(1): 135-144. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220254
[5]	GAO Ning, XING Yijing, XIONG Rui, SHI Wenhui. Mechanisms of plant P acquisition coordinated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(6): 1167-1180. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220765
[6]	PENG Sili, ZHANG Xin, WU Renjie, CAI Yanjiang, XING Wei, GE Zhiwei, MAO Lingfeng. Seasonal dynamic responses of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community to nitrogen additions in a poplar plantation . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(4): 792-800. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220640
[7]	HE Shuilian, HUANG Bei, LI Tianyuan, TIAN Min. Diversity of rhizosphere soil fungi and root endophytic fungi of Calanthe tsoongiana . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(6): 1158-1166. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230179
[8]	XU Rui, JIANG Chunqian, BAI Yanfeng, LIU Xiuhong, WANG Silong. Soil greenhouse gas fluxes in pure and mixed stands of Chinese fir . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(2): 307-317. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.012
[9]	YAO Lan, ZHANG Huanchao, HU Lihuang, WANG Genmei, FANG Yanming. Soil labile organic carbon and nitrogen and their relationship with enzyme activities in different vegetation zones along an altitudinal gradient on Mount Huangshan . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(6): 1069-1076. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.06.003
[10]	ZHANG Yong, HU Haibo, WANG Zeng, HUANG Yujie, LÜ Aihua, ZHANG Jinchi, LIU Shenglong. Varieties of active soil organic carbon of four forest types with varying incubation temperatures in Fengyang Mountain . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2018, 35(2): 243-251. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.02.007
[11]	CHEN Mengyang, YAO Zexiu, LI Yongchun, WU Hantao, XU Qiufang, WEI Jian, QIN Hua. Decolorizing synthetic dyes with fungi screened from a Phyllostachys violascens stand . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016, 33(3): 418-426. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.03.007
[12]	LI Bocheng, WU Qifeng, ZHANG Jinlin, QIAN Ma, QIN Hua, XU Qiufang. Fungal and bacterial contribution to soil N₂O production in Phyllostachys edulis and broadleaf forest ecosystems . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(6): 919-925. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.06.014
[13]	CHEN Yunfei, JIANG Hong, ZHOU Guomo, YANG Shuang, CHEN Jian. Seasonal changes in soil heat flux for a Lei bamboo forest with straw mulching . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(2): 165-171. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.02.002
[14]	DU Qun, XU Jun, WANG Jianwu, ZHANG Feng, JI Biyong. Correlation between forest carbon distribution and terrain elements of altitude and slope . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(3): 330-335. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.03.004
[15]	WANG Qun, ZHANG Jin-chi, TIAN Yue-liang, YE Li-xin, LIU Sheng-long. Stand spatial structure of a natural mixed forest in the Fengyang Mountains of Zhejiang . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(6): 875-882. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.06.011
[16]	LI Hai-fang, DUAN Wen-jun. Soil CO₂ and N₂O fluxes from four typical plantations in southern China . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(1): 26-32. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.005
[17]	XU Hua-chao, HAO Xiao-dong, HUANG Jun-hao, YE Tan-xian, YE Li-xin. Insects diversity of Fengyangshan Mountain in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(1): 1-6. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.01.001
[18]	LI Guo-hui, WEN Guo-sheng, TIAN Hai-tao, ZHANG Li-yang, LI Jia, HUANG Hao. Gall disease of Cryptomeria fortunei at different altitudes on Mount Tianmu，Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(4): 483-488. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.04.001
[19]	AI Jian-guo, MEI Sheng-long, LIU Sheng-long, DING Bing-yang. Species diversity of Fokienia hodginsii community in Nature Reserve of Mount Fengyang in Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(1): 41-45.
[20]	AI Jian-guo, DING Bing-yang, YU Ming-jian. A preliminary study of phytocoenosis characteristic of Fokienia hodginsii in Fengyangshan Nature Reserve . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2005, 22(2): 133-138.

References

[1]	CHANG E H, CHEN T H, TIAN G L, et al. The effect of altitudinal gradient on soil microbial community activity and structure in moso bamboo plantations [J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2016, 98: 213 − 220.
[2]	MA Yuhua, FENG Chun, WANG Zhaocheng, et al. Restoration in degraded subtropical broadleaved forests induces changes in soil bacterial communities [J/OL]. Global Ecol Conserv, 2021, 30: e01775[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01775.
[3]	SHAOPengshuai, LIANG Chao, RUBERT-NASON K, et al. Secondary successional forests undergo tightly-coupled changes in soil microbial community structure and soil organic matter [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2019, 128: 56 − 65.
[4]	NELSON M B, MARTINY A C, MARTINY J B H. Global biogeography of microbial nitrogen-cycling traits in soil [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2016, 113(29): 8033 − 8040.
[5]	WARING B G, AVERILL C, HAWKES C V. Differences in fungal and bacterial physiology alter soil carbon and nitrogen cycling: insights from meta-analysis and theoretical models [J]. Ecol Lett, 2013, 16(7): 887 − 894.
[6]	SUN Junming, IRZYKOWSKI W, JEDRYCZKA M, et al. Analysis of the genetic structure of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib. ) de Bary populations from different regions and host plants by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers [J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47(4): 385 − 395.
[7]	ŽIFČÁKOVÁ L, VĚTROVSKÝ T, HOWE A, et al. Microbial activity in forest soil reflects the changes in ecosystem properties between summer and winter [J]. Environ Microbiol, 2016, 18(1): 288 − 301.
[8]	FRAC M, HANNULA S E, BELKA M, et al. Fungal biodiversity and their role in soil health [J/OL]. Front Microbiol, 2018, 9: 707[2021-11-20]. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00707.
[9]	MARGESIN R, NIKLINSKA M A. Editorial: elevation gradients: microbial indicators of climate change? [J/OL]. Front Microbiol, 2019, 10: 2405[2021-11-20]. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02405.
[10]	SILES J A, CAJTHAML T, FILIPOVÁ A, et al. Altitudinal, seasonal and interannual shifts in microbial communities and chemical composition of soil organic matter in Alpine forest soils [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2017, 112: 1 − 13.
[11]	WU Jiejun, ANDERSON B J, BUCKLEY H L, et al. Aspect has a greater impact on alpine soil bacterial community structure than elevation [J/OL]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2017, 93(5): fiw253[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix032.
[12]	COLLINS H P, CAVIGELLI M A. Soil microbial community characteristics along an elevation gradient in the Laguna Mountains of Southern California [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2003, 35(8): 1027 − 1037.
[13]	LOOBY C I, MARTIN P H. Diversity and function of soil microbes on montane gradients: the state of knowledge in a changing world [J/OL]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2020, 96(9): fiaa122[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa122.
[14]	ZHOU Yujie, JIA Xia, ZHAO Yonghua, et al. A review on soil fungal community and its affectingfactors in forest ecosystem [J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2020, 29(8): 1703 − 1712.
[15]	LI Guixiang, MA Keming. Progress in the study of elevational patterns of soil microbial diversity [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(5): 1521 − 1529.
[16]	ZHAO Panpan, ZHOU Jiacong, LIN Kaimiao, et al. Effect of different altitudes on soil microbial biomass and community structure of Pinus taiwanensis forest in mid-subtropical zone [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(6): 2215 − 2225.
[17]	MENG Miaojing, GUO Xiaoping, ZHANG Jinchi, et al. Effects of altitude on soil microbial community in Fengyang Mountain coniferous and broad-leaved forest [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(19): 7057 − 7065.
[18]	LI Guixiang, XU Guorui, SHEN Congcong, et al. Contrasting elevational diversity patterns for soil bacteria between two ecosystems divided by the treeline [J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2016, 59(11): 1177 − 1186.
[19]	DAI Zhongmin, ZANG Huadong, CHEN Jie, et al. Metagenomic insights into soil microbial communities involved in carbon cycling along an elevation climosequences [J]. Environ Microbiol, 2021, 23(8): 4631 − 4645.
[20]	JIN Yuhua. Variations of Soil Microbial Diversity along an Elevation Gradient in the Wuyi Mountains [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2012.
[21]	DING Bingyang, CHEN Genrong, CHENG Qiubo, et al. A floristic statistics and analyses of seed plants of Fengyangshan Nature Reserve in Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Bot Yunnan, 2000, 22(1): 27 − 37.
[22]	XU Xiaopeng. Study on Plant Diversity and Its Influence Factors of the Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in Fengyang Mountain [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2017.
[23]	LU Rukun. The Analysis Method of Soil Agricultural Chemistry[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000.
[24]	BOLGER A M, LOHSE M, USADEL B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data [J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(15): 2114 − 2120.
[25]	MAGOČ T, SALZBERG S L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies [J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(21): 2957 − 2963.
[26]	CAPORASO J G, KUCZYNSKI J, STOMBAUGH J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data [J]. Nat Methods, 2010, 7(5): 335 − 336.
[27]	EDGAR R C, HAAS B J, CLEMENTE J C, et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection [J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(16): 2194 − 2200.
[28]	ROGNES T, FLOU T, NICHOLS B, et al. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics [J/OL]. Peer J, 2016, 4: 2409v1[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.7287/peerj. preprints. 2409v1.
[29]	SEGATA N, IZARD J, WALDRON L, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation [J/OL]. Genome Biol, 2011, 12(6): R60 [2021-11-20]. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60.
[30]	SHEN Congcong, NI Yingying, LIANG Wenjun, et al. Distinct soil bacterial communities along a small-scale elevational gradient in alpine tundra [J/OL]. Front Microbiol, 2015, 6: 582[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00582.
[31]	AN Qiandong, XU Meng, ZHANG Xubo, et al. Soil bacterial community composition and functional potentials along the vertical vegetation transect on Mount Segrila, Tibet, China [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2021, 32(6): 2147 − 2157.
[32]	SINGH D, LEE-CRUZ L, KIM W S, et al. Strong elevational trends in soil bacterial community composition on Mt. Halla, South Korea [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 68: 140 − 149.
[33]	HE Jing, YAN Bing, LI Junsheng, et al. Altitude distribution patterns and regional differences of soil bacterial community in northern slopes in the Middle Qinling Mountains [J]. Res Environ Sci, 2019, 32(8): 1374 − 1383.
[34]	WANG Juntao, ZHENG Yuanming, HU Hangwei, et al. Soil pH determines the alpha diversity but not beta diversity of soil fungal community along altitude in a typical Tibetan forest ecosystem [J]. J Soil Sediment, 2015, 15(5): 1224 − 1232.
[35]	LI Min, YAN Wei. Effects of altitude on rhizosphere fungal community structure of Pinus tabulaeformis in Wula Mountain, China [J]. Mycosystema, 2019, 38(11): 1992 − 2006.
[36]	KANOKRATANA P, UENGWETWANIT T, RATTANACHOMSRI U, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and metabolic potential of a primary tropical peat swamp forest microbial community by metagenomic analysis [J]. Microb Ecol, 2011, 61(3): 518 − 528.
[37]	DU Siyao, YU Miao, LIU Fanghua, et al. Effect of facility management regimes on soil bacterial diversity and community structure [J]. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017, 25(11): 1615 − 1625.
[38]	LIU Zihan, HUANG Fangyuan, LI Jinglai, et al. Effects of farmland and mulching patterns on soil microbial diversity and community structure in dryland [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(7): 2750 − 2760.
[39]	XUE Xiaomun, WANG Laiping, HAN Xueping, et al. Effects of different tree disk mulching on soil microbial community structure and diversity in dwarfing rootstock apple orchard [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(4): 1528 − 1536.
[40]	BASTIDA F, TORRES I F, MORENO J L, et al. The active microbial diversity drives ecosystem multifunctionality and is physiologically related to carbon availability in Mediterranean semi-arid soils [J]. Mol Ecol, 2016, 25(18): 4660 − 4673.
[41]	CHEN Yuemin, GAO Jintao, XIONG Decheng, et al. Effects of soil warming on soil microbial community structure and soil available nitrogen in subtropical young Chinese fir plantation [J]. J Subtrop Resour Environ, 2016, 11(4): 1 − 8.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(5) / Tables(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(444) PDF downloads(70) Cited by()

Proportional views

HTML

土壤微生物参与森林生态系统中很多生态过程^[1]。土壤细菌群落是土壤养分循环的参与者，在有机质的矿化、无机元素的转化以及土壤碳氮的积累等过程中发挥着重要作用^[2-5]；土壤真菌通过产生多种胞外酶，可以有效分解各类有机质，将死去的有机物转化为生物量、二氧化碳和有机酸，从而调节碳和养分的平衡^[6-8]。

气候变暖以及氮沉降对土壤微生物群落的结构、多样性和丰富度有显著影响^[9]。山地海拔梯度作为模拟气候变化的有效方法^[10]，其特点是在较短的地理距离上发生巨大的生物与非生物变化^[11]，例如温度和湿度等气候要素^[1]，因此，海拔梯度可以探究土壤微生物群落对气候变化的响应^[12]。研究表明：土壤微生物多样性随海拔的变化有多种模式，包括下降、增加、中海拔峰值和极端海拔峰值等^[13-15]。这是由于影响微生物群落变化的因子多种多样。LOOBY等^[13]在土壤微生物与海拔关系的研究综述中阐明：气候和土壤(尤其是pH)是驱动土壤微生物群落变化的主要机制。在对亚热带高山区域的研究中，赵盼盼等^[16]研究表明：温度与可溶性有机氮(DON)对土壤微生物群落结构变化起主导作用；孟苗婧等^[17]发现：土壤理化因子是海拔梯度上土壤微生物群落产生差异的主导因子。此外，植物群落对土壤特性有重要影响，从而改变土壤微生物的海拔分布^[18]。因此，气候因素、土壤理化性质和植物群落均影响土壤微生物多样性和群落组成^[19]。

目前，亚热带土壤微生物群落结构对海拔梯度响应的研究，主要针对细菌、真菌等大类的变化，而对不同分类水平下具体类群的关注相对较少。例如，在福建省戴云山自然保护区的研究表明：黄山松Pinus taiwanensis林土壤细菌/真菌比随海拔升高显著下降^[16]；对武夷山主要植被类型土壤的研究表明：真菌数量随海拔升高而降低^[20]。针对浙江凤阳山针阔混交林，孟苗婧等^[17]利用磷脂脂肪酸法发现革兰氏阴性细菌丰度随海拔升高而增大，并且这种变化与土壤理化性质有关。这些大类群的变化并不能很好地表征土壤细菌和真菌在门水平乃至属水平的变化特征，因此，本研究通过高通量测序，探索凤阳山常绿阔叶林土壤微生物群落在不同海拔梯度下的变化规律，以增加对土壤微生物群落组成和多样性的了解。

1. 研究区概况与研究方法

1.1. 研究区概况

研究区位于浙江省丽水市龙泉市凤阳山自然保护区(27°46′~27°58′N，119°06′~119°15′E)，面积约1.52万hm²，属中亚热带温暖湿润气候区。保护区年降水量为2 400 mm，年蒸发量为1 100 mm，年平均气温为12.3 ℃。主要天然植被为常绿阔叶林与针叶林，常绿阔叶林的优势属为木荷属Schima、润楠属Machilus、石栎属Lithocarpus、栲属Castanopsis、青冈属Cyclobalanopsis。土壤类型以红壤、黄壤为主，800 m以下为红壤，800 m以上为黄壤^{[17, 21-22]}。

1.2. 土壤样品采集

选取4个不同海拔梯度下坡度、坡向、地上植被特征基本一致的常绿阔叶林地。海拔选择以土壤类型分界和凤阳山常绿阔叶林海拔分布范围为依据，分别为低海拔343 m (EG₁)、中海拔765 m (EG₂)、高海拔1364 m (EG₃)、高海拔1 611 m (EG₄)。不同海拔的林分主要树种及郁闭度见表1。去除表面凋落物后，在每个海拔内设立10 m×10 m的样地3个，间隔10 m以上，在每个样地内沿对角线采集混合土壤样品，用于土壤理化性质的测定(表2)。考虑到土壤微生物异质性可能更强，在相同区域内按5 m×5 m，间隔10 m采集4个混合土样，−80 ℃冰箱保存，用于土壤微生物的高通量测序分析。由于本研究没有直接在研究地内监测温度，故采用凤阳山森林生态长期定位站设置的不同海拔梯度(241、600、900、1 364 m)温度监测数据进行拟合得到。年平均气温(y)随海拔(x)变化关系为y=−0.0063x+21.592 (R²=0.9942)。拟合得出4个海拔(EG₁、EG₂、EG₃、EG₄)的年平均气温分别为19.43、16.77、13.15、11.44 ℃。

海拔编号	树种组成	郁闭度/%
EG₁	木荷Schima superba、甜槠Castanopsis eyrei、青冈Cyclobalanopsis glauca、石栎Lithocarpus glaber、　檵木Loropetalum chinense等	91
EG₂	木荷、甜槠、青冈、檵木、山鸡椒Litsea cubeba等	87
EG₃	木荷、甜槠、青冈、杨桐Cleyera japonica、马银花Rhododendron ovatum等	92
EG₄	甜槠、青冈、马银花、尖叶山茶Camellia cuspidata、麂角杜鹃Rhododendron latoucheae等	90

Table 1. General Situation of the trees at different altitudes

海拔编号	pH	土壤湿度/%	总碳/(mg·g⁻¹)	全氮/(mg·g⁻¹)	全磷/(mg·g⁻¹)	全钾/(mg·g⁻¹)
EG₁	4.86±0.03 a	15.54±6.41 c	103.97±7.60 a	3.57±0.35 b	0.21±0.04 c	19.63±2.58 a
EG₂	4.93±0.18 a	43.45±19.89 b	160.53±96.86 a	9.43±4.65 a	0.51±0.12 b	14.13±1.37 b
EG₃	4.67±0.07 a	38.41±7.81 bc	117.23±25.94 a	7.13±1.12 ab	0.45±0.16 b	11.43±1.03 b
EG₄	4.73±0.21 a	71.36±14.42 a	125.97±45.76 a	9.63±3.09 a	0.73±0.05 a	14.37±1.58 b
说明：数值为平均值±标准差(n=3)，不同小写字母表示不同海拔间差异显著(P＜0.05)

Table 2. Physical and chemical properties of soil at different altitudes

1.3. 土壤理化性质测定

pH采用电位法(水土比为2.5∶1.0)通过pH计测定；土壤湿度采用环刀法测定；土壤总碳、全氮采用德国Element公司的元素分析仪测定(动态燃烧法)；土壤全磷采用酸溶-钼锑抗比色法，通过分光光度计测定；土壤全钾采用氢氧化钠熔融，火焰光度计测定^[23]。

1.4. DNA提取与高通量测序

采用土壤DNA试剂盒(试剂盒名称为MagPure Soil DNA KF Kit)，从0.25 g土壤样品中提取DNA，利用琼脂糖凝胶电泳和NanoDrop 2000检测DNA浓度。以基因组DNA为模板，根据测序区域的选择，使用带 barcode 的特异引物，Takara公司的TksGflex DNA Polymerase进行聚合酶链式反应(PCR)。细菌16SrDNAV3-V4扩增引物为343F-5′-TACGGRAGGCAGCAG-3′和798R-5′- AGGGTATCTAATCCT-3′，真菌ITS扩增引物为ITS1F-5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′和ITS2-5′- GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′。测序委托中国上海欧易生物医学科技有限公司Illumina MiSeq平台进行。将获得的原始序列用一系列软件Trimmonatic^[24]、Flash^[25]和QIIME中的split_libraries^[26]处理，得到优化序列，并使用 UCHIME软件^[27]去除嵌合体；利用Vsearch软件^[28]，生成操作分类单元(OTUs)，细菌、真菌相似度均为97%。

1.5. 数据分析

首先，对所有数据进行正态分布检验和方差齐性检验，结果均符合正态分布。对于土壤理化性质和微生物多样性指数的数据，使用SPSS软件进行单因素方差分析(one-way ANOVA)，确定不同海拔下土壤理化性质和土壤微生物多样性的差异(LSD最小显著差异法，显著性水平为P＜0.05)，其中土壤微生物覆盖度(goods_coverage，C_depth)指数表示测序的深度。其计算方法为：C_depth=1−n₁/N，其中：n₁为只含有1条序列的 OTU 数目；N为抽样中出现的总的序列数；对于门和属水平上各类群相对丰度的数据，利用Pearson相关分析来确定海拔与门和属水平上微生物群落的相关性；对于界、门、纲、目、科、属、种水平上土壤微生物相对丰度的数据，利用组间群落差异[LDA Effect Size(LefSe)]分析 (LefSe: http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/lefse/。设置标准：LDA大于2，P＜0.05)来研究不同海拔梯度下土壤微生物群落的差异类群^[29]，对于OTU水平上土壤微生物序列数的数据，使用Canoco 5.0进行主坐标分析(PCoA)。由于微生物和土壤理化性质样品数量不一致，无法一一对应进行关联分析，故通过Bootstrap重采样方法，将每个海拔土壤微生物(n=4)与土壤理化性质(n=3)进行两两组合(12种可能)，从12种可能中随机抽取3个作为重复(n=3)，4个海拔共采集12个样品；重采样通过Matlab进行1000次，每1次都计算土壤微生物与土壤理化性质的Pearson相关系数，得到相关系数的频率分布，最终计算得到平均相关系数。对照Pearson相关系数显著性检验表中0.05显著性水平下相关系数的临界值，采用双侧检验判断显著性。

3. 讨论

本研究通过高通量测序对浙江凤阳山不同海拔常绿阔叶林的细菌和真菌群落进行调查和分析，以探究海拔对土壤微生物分布的影响。α多样性分析结果显示：海拔343 m细菌群落具有较高的丰富度指数，随着海拔的上升，丰富度指数下降，高海拔地区细菌群落丰富度指数显著低于低海拔地区，但多样性指数在低海拔与高海拔间并无显著差异。细菌群落的丰富度受海拔形成的地理梯度影响较大。SHEN等^[30]在研究长白山不同海拔冻原生态系统土壤细菌群落的多样性格局时发现：细菌群落丰富度随海拔上升线性下降，安前东等^[31]在西藏的研究也得出了一致的结果。海拔与年平均气温和年降水量高度相关，因此土壤细菌群落受气候的影响大于受地球化学或土壤结构因素的影响^[32]。尽管如此，也不能排除其他因素对细菌丰富度的影响，比如土壤碳氮含量、pH等土壤理化因子可能是造成这种差异性格局的主要因素^[30-31]。本研究中，温度与丰富度指数相关性系数为0.886，是导致细菌群落丰富度沿海拔垂直分布的主要影响因子，而全磷、全钾也与细菌丰富度指数有一定的联系。此外，在部分研究中，并未发现细菌群落丰富度的垂直梯度模式。如贺婧等^[33]发现：太白山与朱雀山北坡的土壤细菌群落Chao 1指数无明显规律。与细菌群落不同的是，真菌群落丰富度指数虽然存在沿海拔上升而下降的趋势，但只在1 611 m处显著下降，因此真菌群落丰富度指数与温度的相关性弱于细菌群落。目前，大部分研究集中于对土壤细菌群落的海拔格局研究，关于真菌群落的相关报道较少。WANG等^[34]发现：土壤真菌丰富度与海拔呈显著负相关。李敏等^[35]研究指出：真菌丰富度指数与多样性指数在海拔1500 m时较低，但在海拔1800 m时较高，表明海拔对真菌多样性格局的影响尚不明确。

除土壤微生物群落的多样性格局，本研究还关注群落中特定类群的变化。门水平上，细菌群落以酸杆菌门、变形菌门和放线菌门为主。这些类群在植物多糖物质降解过程中起到了关键性作用^[36]。属水平上，凤阳山常绿阔叶林的优势属为Candidatus_Solibacter、Bryobacter、Acidibacter。其中，Candidatus_Solibacter与Bryobacter能够有效地利用碳源，与有机质相关^[37]。在不同的分类水平上，不同海拔细菌群落相对丰度存在显著差异。LefSe分析显示：细菌群落在1 364 m具有最多的差异类群，343 m处不存在差异类群。细菌群落某一特定类群丰度并没有在343 m显著增加，但对于一些类群，如硝化螺旋菌门、Acidibacter等，与海拔呈显著负相关(P＜0.05)。这些个体类群与海拔之间的关系可能有助于整体细菌群落的海拔格局的形成^[30]。真菌群落的优势菌群为担子菌门与子囊菌门。两者在刘子涵等^[38]、薛晓敏等^[39]的研究中也具有较高的丰度，是全球范围内最主要的土壤真菌门^[14]。作为腐生菌，担子菌门和子囊菌门能够有效地分解植物残体^[40]。根据LefSe的分析结果，虽然真菌群落比细菌群落具有更多差异类群，但是差异类群集中在分类水平较低的科、属上，且属水平上的相关性分析显示仅有2个属呈现垂直梯度的变化，因此真菌群落组成差异较大但具体类群沿海拔梯度垂直分布的特征不明显。

PCoA分析表明：无论是细菌群落还是真菌群落，海拔变化引起了土壤微生物群落组成的变化。343与765 m群落结构相似，且中低海拔与高海拔间存在明显分界，这与凤阳山土壤类型分界一致。厉桂香等^[15]将其归结为微生物群落具有海拔分异性。本研究结果表明：343与765 m处具有更多共享的OTU数目，从另一角度佐证了微生物群落的海拔分异性特征。细菌和真菌群落结构在PC1轴上与温度相关性最强。由于海拔343 m处土壤理化性质与其他海拔差异较大，当去除343 m的数据进一步做相关性分析发现，PC1轴上，温度的影响并没有改变，但土壤理化性质与PC1轴的相关性明显减弱，土壤全磷、全钾、湿度、pH不再与PC1轴显著相关；PC2轴上，土壤理化性质的影响进一步增强，土壤全磷、全钾、湿度从弱相关变为显著相关(去除343 m后，细菌群落全磷、全钾、湿度与PC2轴相关系数绝对值均高于0.710，真菌群落绝对值均高于0.678)。这说明土壤微生物群落结构在PC1轴上主要受到温度的调控，而在PC2轴上由土壤理化性质起主导作用。在增温实验中，也同样验证了温度对微生物群落结构的重要性^[41]。因此，温度是影响土壤微生物群落结构变化的主要因子，其次为土壤理化性质。

4. 结论

浙江凤阳山常绿阔叶林土壤微生物群落存在沿海拔梯度的变化规律，丰富度指数与相关性分析表明，细菌群落比真菌群落的垂直分布格局更明显。尽管真菌群落OTU数量少于细菌群落，但真菌群落具有更多的差异类群。此外，微生物的海拔效应表明，温度变化对土壤微生物群落空间结构的形成起着重要作用。

Reference (41)

[1]	CHANG E H, CHEN T H, TIAN G L, et al. The effect of altitudinal gradient on soil microbial community activity and structure in moso bamboo plantations [J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2016, 98: 213 − 220.
[2]	MA Yuhua, FENG Chun, WANG Zhaocheng, et al. Restoration in degraded subtropical broadleaved forests induces changes in soil bacterial communities [J/OL]. Global Ecol Conserv, 2021, 30: e01775[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01775.
[3]	SHAOPengshuai, LIANG Chao, RUBERT-NASON K, et al. Secondary successional forests undergo tightly-coupled changes in soil microbial community structure and soil organic matter [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2019, 128: 56 − 65.
[4]	NELSON M B, MARTINY A C, MARTINY J B H. Global biogeography of microbial nitrogen-cycling traits in soil [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2016, 113(29): 8033 − 8040.
[5]	WARING B G, AVERILL C, HAWKES C V. Differences in fungal and bacterial physiology alter soil carbon and nitrogen cycling: insights from meta-analysis and theoretical models [J]. Ecol Lett, 2013, 16(7): 887 − 894.
[6]	SUN Junming, IRZYKOWSKI W, JEDRYCZKA M, et al. Analysis of the genetic structure of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib. ) de Bary populations from different regions and host plants by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers [J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47(4): 385 − 395.
[7]	ŽIFČÁKOVÁ L, VĚTROVSKÝ T, HOWE A, et al. Microbial activity in forest soil reflects the changes in ecosystem properties between summer and winter [J]. Environ Microbiol, 2016, 18(1): 288 − 301.
[8]	FRAC M, HANNULA S E, BELKA M, et al. Fungal biodiversity and their role in soil health [J/OL]. Front Microbiol, 2018, 9: 707[2021-11-20]. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00707.
[9]	MARGESIN R, NIKLINSKA M A. Editorial: elevation gradients: microbial indicators of climate change? [J/OL]. Front Microbiol, 2019, 10: 2405[2021-11-20]. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02405.
[10]	SILES J A, CAJTHAML T, FILIPOVÁ A, et al. Altitudinal, seasonal and interannual shifts in microbial communities and chemical composition of soil organic matter in Alpine forest soils [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2017, 112: 1 − 13.
[11]	WU Jiejun, ANDERSON B J, BUCKLEY H L, et al. Aspect has a greater impact on alpine soil bacterial community structure than elevation [J/OL]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2017, 93(5): fiw253[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix032.
[12]	COLLINS H P, CAVIGELLI M A. Soil microbial community characteristics along an elevation gradient in the Laguna Mountains of Southern California [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2003, 35(8): 1027 − 1037.
[13]	LOOBY C I, MARTIN P H. Diversity and function of soil microbes on montane gradients: the state of knowledge in a changing world [J/OL]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2020, 96(9): fiaa122[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa122.
[14]	周煜杰, 贾夏, 赵永华, 等. 森林生态系统土壤真菌群落及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(8): 1703 − 1712.	ZHOU Yujie, JIA Xia, ZHAO Yonghua, et al. A review on soil fungal community and its affectingfactors in forest ecosystem [J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2020, 29(8): 1703 − 1712.
[15]	厉桂香, 马克明. 土壤微生物多样性海拔格局研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(5): 1521 − 1529.	LI Guixiang, MA Keming. Progress in the study of elevational patterns of soil microbial diversity [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(5): 1521 − 1529.
[16]	赵盼盼, 周嘉聪, 林开淼, 等. 海拔梯度变化对中亚热带黄山松土壤微生物生物量和群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(6): 2215 − 2225.	ZHAO Panpan, ZHOU Jiacong, LIN Kaimiao, et al. Effect of different altitudes on soil microbial biomass and community structure of Pinus taiwanensis forest in mid-subtropical zone [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(6): 2215 − 2225.
[17]	孟苗婧, 郭晓平, 张金池, 等. 海拔变化对凤阳山针阔混交林地土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(19): 7057 − 7065.	MENG Miaojing, GUO Xiaoping, ZHANG Jinchi, et al. Effects of altitude on soil microbial community in Fengyang Mountain coniferous and broad-leaved forest [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(19): 7057 − 7065.
[18]	LI Guixiang, XU Guorui, SHEN Congcong, et al. Contrasting elevational diversity patterns for soil bacteria between two ecosystems divided by the treeline [J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2016, 59(11): 1177 − 1186.
[19]	DAI Zhongmin, ZANG Huadong, CHEN Jie, et al. Metagenomic insights into soil microbial communities involved in carbon cycling along an elevation climosequences [J]. Environ Microbiol, 2021, 23(8): 4631 − 4645.
[20]	金裕华. 武夷山不同海拔土壤微生物多样性的变化特征[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2012.	JIN Yuhua. Variations of Soil Microbial Diversity along an Elevation Gradient in the Wuyi Mountains [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2012.
[21]	丁炳扬, 陈根荣, 程秋波, 等. 浙江凤阳山自然保护区种子植物区系的统计分析[J]. 云南植物研究, 2000, 22(1): 27 − 37.	DING Bingyang, CHEN Genrong, CHENG Qiubo, et al. A floristic statistics and analyses of seed plants of Fengyangshan Nature Reserve in Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Bot Yunnan, 2000, 22(1): 27 − 37.
[22]	徐筱芃. 浙江凤阳山常绿阔叶林树种多样性及其影响因素研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2017.	XU Xiaopeng. Study on Plant Diversity and Its Influence Factors of the Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in Fengyang Mountain [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2017.
[23]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.	LU Rukun. The Analysis Method of Soil Agricultural Chemistry[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000.
[24]	BOLGER A M, LOHSE M, USADEL B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data [J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(15): 2114 − 2120.
[25]	MAGOČ T, SALZBERG S L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies [J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(21): 2957 − 2963.
[26]	CAPORASO J G, KUCZYNSKI J, STOMBAUGH J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data [J]. Nat Methods, 2010, 7(5): 335 − 336.
[27]	EDGAR R C, HAAS B J, CLEMENTE J C, et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection [J]. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(16): 2194 − 2200.
[28]	ROGNES T, FLOU T, NICHOLS B, et al. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics [J/OL]. Peer J, 2016, 4: 2409v1[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.7287/peerj. preprints. 2409v1.
[29]	SEGATA N, IZARD J, WALDRON L, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation [J/OL]. Genome Biol, 2011, 12(6): R60 [2021-11-20]. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60.
[30]	SHEN Congcong, NI Yingying, LIANG Wenjun, et al. Distinct soil bacterial communities along a small-scale elevational gradient in alpine tundra [J/OL]. Front Microbiol, 2015, 6: 582[2021-11-20]. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00582.
[31]	安前东, 徐梦, 张旭博, 等. 西藏色季拉山垂直植被带土壤细菌群落组成及功能潜势[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2147 − 2157.	AN Qiandong, XU Meng, ZHANG Xubo, et al. Soil bacterial community composition and functional potentials along the vertical vegetation transect on Mount Segrila, Tibet, China [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2021, 32(6): 2147 − 2157.
[32]	SINGH D, LEE-CRUZ L, KIM W S, et al. Strong elevational trends in soil bacterial community composition on Mt. Halla, South Korea [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 68: 140 − 149.
[33]	贺婧, 闫冰, 李俊生, 等. 秦岭中段北坡不同海拔土壤中细菌群落的分布特征及区域差异比较[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(8): 1374 − 1383.	HE Jing, YAN Bing, LI Junsheng, et al. Altitude distribution patterns and regional differences of soil bacterial community in northern slopes in the Middle Qinling Mountains [J]. Res Environ Sci, 2019, 32(8): 1374 − 1383.
[34]	WANG Juntao, ZHENG Yuanming, HU Hangwei, et al. Soil pH determines the alpha diversity but not beta diversity of soil fungal community along altitude in a typical Tibetan forest ecosystem [J]. J Soil Sediment, 2015, 15(5): 1224 − 1232.
[35]	李敏, 闫伟. 海拔对乌拉山油松根围真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 菌物学报, 2019, 38(11): 1992 − 2006.	LI Min, YAN Wei. Effects of altitude on rhizosphere fungal community structure of Pinus tabulaeformis in Wula Mountain, China [J]. Mycosystema, 2019, 38(11): 1992 − 2006.
[36]	KANOKRATANA P, UENGWETWANIT T, RATTANACHOMSRI U, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and metabolic potential of a primary tropical peat swamp forest microbial community by metagenomic analysis [J]. Microb Ecol, 2011, 61(3): 518 − 528.
[37]	杜思瑶, 于淼, 刘芳华, 等. 设施种植模式对土壤细菌多样性及群落结构的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(11): 1615 − 1625.	DU Siyao, YU Miao, LIU Fanghua, et al. Effect of facility management regimes on soil bacterial diversity and community structure [J]. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017, 25(11): 1615 − 1625.
[38]	刘子涵, 黄方园, 黎景来, 等. 覆盖模式对旱作农田土壤微生物多样性及群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(7): 2750 − 2760.	LIU Zihan, HUANG Fangyuan, LI Jinglai, et al. Effects of farmland and mulching patterns on soil microbial diversity and community structure in dryland [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(7): 2750 − 2760.
[39]	薛晓敏, 王来平, 韩雪平, 等. 不同树盘覆盖对矮砧苹果园土壤微生物群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(4): 1528 − 1536.	XUE Xiaomun, WANG Laiping, HAN Xueping, et al. Effects of different tree disk mulching on soil microbial community structure and diversity in dwarfing rootstock apple orchard [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(4): 1528 − 1536.
[40]	BASTIDA F, TORRES I F, MORENO J L, et al. The active microbial diversity drives ecosystem multifunctionality and is physiologically related to carbon availability in Mediterranean semi-arid soils [J]. Mol Ecol, 2016, 25(18): 4660 − 4673.
[41]	陈岳民, 高金涛, 熊德成, 等. 土壤增温对中亚热带杉木幼林土壤微生物群落结构和有效氮的影响[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2016, 11(4): 1 − 8.	CHEN Yuemin, GAO Jintao, XIONG Decheng, et al. Effects of soil warming on soil microbial community structure and soil available nitrogen in subtropical young Chinese fir plantation [J]. J Subtrop Resour Environ, 2016, 11(4): 1 − 8.

细菌				真菌
海拔编号	Chao 1指数	Shannon指数	覆盖度	海拔编号	Chao 1指数	Shannon指数	覆盖度
EG₁	4506.81±41.85 a	9.2622±0.246 8 a	0.9773±0.000 6 b	EG₁	783.12±36.26 a	3.6031±0.6633 b	0.9911±0.0006 b
EG₂	4255.62±295.74 b	8.8781±0.214 4 b	0.9780±0.001 7 b	EG₂	807.96±115.36 a	5.0242±0.6876 a	0.9911±0.0013 b
EG₃	3688.80±100.61 c	9.0043±0.231 9 ab	0.9824±0.000 5 a	EG₃	729.86±52.44 ab	4.6790±0.4236 a	0.9921±0.0002 ab
EG₄	3791.13±110.41 c	8.9974±0.176 5 ab	0.9815±0.000 8 a	EG₄	653.00±67.50 b	4.5171±0.6495 ab	0.9928±0.0008 a
说明：数值为平均值±标准差(n = 4)，不同小写字母表示不同海拔间差异显著(P＜0.05)

细菌门	相关性系数	真菌门	相关性系数	细菌门	相关性系数	真菌门	相关性系数
酸杆菌门	0.032	担子菌门	−0.402	芽单胞菌门	−0.817**	壶菌门	−0.209
变形菌门	0.234	子囊菌门	0.173	迷踪菌门	−0.260	Cercozoa	−0.191
放线菌门	−0.417	接合菌门	0.437	髌骨细菌门	−0.490	新丽鞭菌门	−0.233
拟杆菌门	0.269	罗兹菌门	−0.308	硝化螺旋菌门	−0.723**	芽枝霉门	−0.236
厚壁菌门	0.525*	球囊菌门	−0.036	疣微菌门	−0.705**
说明：表示在0.05水平(双侧)上显著相关；*表示在0.01水平(双侧)上显著相关

细菌属		真菌属		细菌属		真菌属
属名	相关系数	属名	相关系数	属名	相关系数	属名	相关系数
Candidatus_Solibacter	−0.458	红菇属Russula	−0.645**	Granulicella	0.719**	Sebacina	0.197
Bryobacter	0.088	Archaeorhizomyces	0.290	Acidipila	0.639**	鹅膏菌属Amanita	0.250
Acidibacter	−0.520*	大团囊菌属Elaphomyces	−0.234	芽单胞菌属Gemmatimonas	−0.734**	Rossbeevera	−0.127
热酸菌属Acidothermus	0.514*	Xerocomus	0.200	分枝杆菌属Mycobacterium	0.035	丝盖伞属Inocybe	0.190
Candidatus_Koribacter	−0.178	丝膜菌属Cortinarius	0.182	鞘氨醇单胞菌属Sphingomonas	−0.778**	地舌菌属Geoglossum	−0.194
Burkholderia-Caballeronia- Paraburkholderia	0.648**	棉革菌属Tomentella	−0.259	拟杆菌属Bacteroides	0.224	Lactarius	0.311
Clade_Ia	0.472	湿伞属Hygrocybe	−0.097	MND1	−0.743**	粉褶菌属Entoloma	−0.209
Pajaroellobacter	0.740**	被孢霉属Morlierella	0.702**
说明：表示在0.05水平(双侧)上显著相关；*表示在0.01水平(双侧)上显著相关

指标	细菌多样性		细菌群落结构		真菌多样性		真菌群落结构
指标	Chao 1	Shannon	PC1	PC2	Chao 1	Shannon	PC1	PC2
温度	0.886*	0.320	−0.944*	−0.190	0.603*	−0.377	−0.939*	−0.241
总碳	−0.041	−0.208	−0.010	0.057	0.048	0.242	−0.026	0.033
全氮	−0.412	−0.415	0.380	0.262	−0.215	0.478	0.349	0.249
全磷	−0.588*	−0.394	0.618*	0.485	−0.448	0.435	0.581*	0.498
全钾	0.719*	0.427	−0.656*	0.325	0.207	−0.555	−0.671*	0.316
土壤湿度	−0.560	−0.360	0.600*	0.513	−0.461	0.382	0.562	0.530
pH	0.527	−0.016	−0.585*	0.176	0.343	−0.026	−0.616*	0.121
说明：*表示在0.05水平(双侧)上显著相关