Effects of light intensity and nitrogen application on photosynthetic physiological parameters of Styrax obassia seedlings
-
摘要:
目的 筛选更有利于玉铃花Styrax obassia光合生理参数表达的光强、施氮组合处理,揭示光强、氮素变化与玉铃花幼苗生长的关系。 方法 采用盆栽育苗方法,构建光氮双因素控制试验:4种遮光处理[全光对照(透光率100.00%)、轻度遮光(透光率为47.30%,L1),中度遮光(20.00%,L2)和高度遮光(7.75%,L3)]与3种施氮处理[N2 (施纯氮0.63 g),N1(施纯氮0.21 g)和N0(不施氮)],测定分析玉铃花的光响应进程和光合色素质量分数的变化特征。 结果 ①随遮光程度和施氮量的增加,玉铃花幼苗的净光合速率、表观量子效率和总叶绿素质量分数呈现相应的增加,暗呼吸速率则相对减弱,其光饱和点为140.00~481.33 μmol·m−2·s−1,光补偿点为6.00~34.67 μmol·m−2·s−1、叶绿素a/b之比<2。②全光及L1遮光+N2处理组合时,玉铃花植株出现枯死现象。③L1遮光处理下,净光合速率的从大到小变化顺序为N1、N0、N2;L3遮光下,当光合有效辐射>400.00 μmol·m−2·s−1时,N2处理玉铃花的净光合速率显著高于N0处理和N1处理(P<0.05);④光强与氮肥施加对玉铃花幼苗光合色素质量分数的影响均达到极显著水平(P<0.01),影响趋势从大到小依次表现为光照、氮素、光照+氮素。 结论 玉铃花幼苗具有较强的耐荫性,其光合生理参数最佳的光氮处理组合为高度遮光(L3),并施纯氮0.63 g(N2)。图1表3参26 Abstract:Objective This study aims to screen the combination treatment of light intensity and nitrogen application that is more conducive to the expression of photosynthetic physiological parameters, so as to reveal the relationship between the changes of light intensity and nitrogen and the growth of Styrax obassia seedlings. Method Potted seedling cultivation method was adopted to construct the two-factor control test of light and nitrogen. Four shading treatments were prepared: all-light control with 100.00% transmittance, light shading with 47.30% transmittance (L1), moderate shading with 20.00% (L2) and high shading 7.75% (L3). Three nitrogen application treatments were included: N2 (0.63 g pure nitrogen), N1 (0.21 g pure nitrogen) and N0 (no nitrogen application). The light response process and the variation characteristics of photosynthetic pigment content were determined and analyzed. Result (1)With the increase of shading degree and nitrogen application rate, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), apparent quantum efficiency (AQY) and total chlorophyll (Chl) content of S. obassia seedlings increased, while dark respiration rate (Rd) decreased, and light saturation point (LSP) ranged from 140.00 to 481.33 μmol·m−2·s−1. Light compensation point (LCP) varied from 6.00 to 34.67 μmol·m−2·s−1, and the ratio of Chl a to Chl b was less than 2. (2) Under all light and L1 shading+N2 treatment, the plants died. (3) Under L1 shading, the change of Pn ranging from large to small was N1, N0, and N2. Under L3 shading, when photosynthetic effective radiation (PAR)was greater than 400 μmol·m−2·s−1, the Pn of N2 was significantly higher than that of N0 and N1 (P<0.05). (4) Both light intensity and nitrogen application had significant effects on photosynthetic pigment content (P<0.01), and the influence trend in descending order was light, nitrogen, and light+nitrogen. Conclusion The seedlings of S. obassia have strong shade tolerance, and the optimal combination treatment of light and nitrogen is L3+N2. [Ch, 1 fig. 3 tab. 26 ref.] -
表 1 不同光强与氮肥施加下玉铃花幼苗光合光响应特征参数的变化
Table 1. Changes of photosynthetic light response characteristic parameters of S. obassia seedlings under different light intensity and nitrogen application
处理 LSP/(μmol·m−2·s−1) LCP/(μmol·m−2·s−1) AQY/(mmol−1) Pmax/(μmol·m−2·s−1) Rd/(μmol·m−2·s−1) 光强 氮素 L1 N0 288.00±30.87 b 34.67±5.44 a 0.043±0.301 a 1.649±0.155 de 0.464±0.001 b N1 220.00±28.28 b 29.33±5.76 ab 0.046±0.111 a 1.924±0.225 cde 0.512±0.005 ab N2 140.00±1.89 b 24.00±2.83 ab 0.066±0.080 a 1.247±0.068 e 0.352±0.014 ab L2 N0 164.00±8.49 b 16.00±2.83 ab 0.054±0.305 a 3.246±0.102 b 0.346±0.001 ab N1 226.66±38.84 b 16.00±9.98 ab 0.060±0.056 a 2.276±0.090 cd 0.297±0.009 ab N2 324.00±33.04 ab 14.67±2.18 ab 0.067±0.089 a 2.127±0.217 cde 0.295±0.019 ab L3 N0 270.00±29.70 b 12.00±8.49 ab 0.065±0.080 a 2.733±0.525 bc 0.276±0.002 b N1 306.66±47.19 ab 8.00±3.77 b 0.075±0.110 a 1.943±0.166 cde 0.170±0.011 ab N2 481.33±86.52 a 6.00±1.41 b 0.080±0.421 a 4.121±0.248 a 0.132±0.061 a 说明:数据为平均值±标准误,小写字母表示同一指标在不同处理之间差异显著(P<0.05) 表 2 光强与氮肥施加对玉铃花幼苗光合色素质量分数的影响
Table 2. Effects of light and nitrogen interaction on photosynthetic pgment contents in seedlings of S. obassia
处理 CChl a/(mg·g−1) CChl b/(mg·g−1) (CChl a+CChl b)/(mg·g−1) CCar/(mg·g−1) CChl a/CChl b 光强 氮素 L1 N0 1.621±0.050 d 0.711±0.024 f 2.332±0.074 f 0.253±0.008 a 2.284±0.019 a N1 1.929±0.033 b 2.399±0.115 d 4.327±0.082 d 0.176±0.017 b 0.822±0.054 c N2 2.080±0.016 a 1.691±0.098 e 3.770±0.085 e 0.257±0.029 a 1.269±0.085 b L2 N0 1.799±0.031 c 2.960±0.126 c 4.760±0.098 c 0.083±0.023 cd 0.619±0.037 d N1 1.640±0.014 d 3.598±0.049 b 5.239±0.038 b 0.123±0.017 bc 0.457±0.010 e N2 1.577±0.020 de 3.806±0.082 b 5.382±0.064 b 0.075±0.018 cd 0.417±0.015 e L3 N0 1.525±0.011 e 4.114±0.024 a 5.638±0.018 c 0.073±0.012 cd 0.371±0.005 e N1 1.530±0.014 e 4.134±0.025 a 5.664±0.016 c 0.070±0.018 cd 0.370±0.005 e N2 1.496±0.020 e 4.136±0.056 a 5.632±0.040 c 0.058±0.024 a 0.362±0.009 e 说明:数据为平均值±标准误,小写字母表示同一指标在不同处理之间差异显著(P<0.05) 表 3 光强与氮肥施加对玉铃花幼苗光合色素质量分数影响的方差分析
Table 3. Anova analysis of the effects of light intensity and nitrogen application on photosynthetic pigment content of S. obassia seedlings
变异来源 因变量 平方和 自由度 均方 F P 光强 CChl a 0.722 2 0.361 102.841 0 CChl b 49.298 2 24.649 661.922 0 CCar 0.161 2 0.081 37.618 0 CChl a+CChl b 38.378 2 19.189 727.67 0 CChl a/CChl b 9.629 2 4.814 808.793 0 氮素 CChl a 0.080 2 0.040 11.322 0 CChl b 5.853 2 2.927 78.592 0 CCar 0.008 2 0.004 1.815 0.177 CChl a+CChl b 7.242 2 3.621 137.307 0 CChl a/CChl b 2.666 2 1.333 223.955 0 光强+氮素 CChl a 0.793 4 0.198 56.493 0 CChl b 4.565 4 1.141 30.645 0 CCar 0.032 4 0.008 3.775 0.012 CChl a+CChl b 7.301 4 1.825 69.216 0 CChl a/CChl b 3.859 4 0.965 162.081 0 -
[1] KATAHATA S, NARAMOTO M, KAKUBARI Y, et al. Photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen partitioning in foliage of the evergreen shrub Daphniphyllum humile along a natural light gradient [J]. Tree Physiol, 2007, 27(2): 199 − 208. doi: 10.1093/treephys/27.2.199 [2] ZHANG Lingling, WEN Dazhi. Structural and physiological responses of two invasive weeds, Mikania micrantha and Chromolaena odoratato contrasting light and soil water conditions [J]. J Plant Res, 2008, 122(1): 69 − 79. [3] 曾希柏, 侯光炯, 青长乐, 等. 土壤-植物系统中光照与氮素的相互关系研究[J]. 生态学报, 2000, 20(1): 104 − 109. ZENG Xibo, HOU Guangjiong, QING Changle, et al. Interrelation of light and nitrogen in soil-plant system [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2000, 20(1): 104 − 109. [4] 陈琳, 曾杰, 徐大平, 等. 氮素营养对西南桦幼苗生长及叶片养分状况的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(5): 35 − 40. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100506 CHEN Lin, ZENG Jie, XU Daping, et al. Effects of exponential nitrogen loading on growth and foliar nutrient status of Betula alnoides seedlings [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2010, 46(5): 35 − 40. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100506 [5] 陈涛, 陈忠毅. 安息香科植物地理分布研究[J]. 植物研究, 1996, 16(1): 59 − 68. CHEN Tao, CHEN Zhongyi. The geographical distribution of Styracaceae [J]. Bull Bot Res, 1996, 16(1): 59 − 68. [6] 童丽丽, 刘政, 许晓岗, 等. 中国安息香属植物的形态特征及自然地理分布[J]. 金陵科技学院学报, 2019, 35(2): 75 − 80. TONG Lili, LIU Zheng, XU Xiaogang, et al. Morphological characteristics and natural geographical distribution of Styrax speciesin China [J]. J Jinling Inst Technol, 2019, 35(2): 75 − 80. [7] 彭重华, 张程, 巫涛, 等. 湖南安息香科种质资源及其在园林中的应用前景[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(7): 76 − 79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2011.07.027 PENG Zhonghua, ZHANG Cheng, WU Tao, et al. Resources of the Styracaceae in Hunan and their application to landscaping [J]. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2011, 38(7): 76 − 79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2011.07.027 [8] MACHADO J L, WALTERS M B, REICH P B. Below-ground resources limit seedling growth in forest understories but do not alter biomass distribution [J]. Ann For Sci, 2003, 60(4): 319 − 330. doi: 10.1051/forest:2003023 [9] 王亚江, 葛梦婕, 颜希亭, 等. 光、氮及其互作对超级粳稻产量和物质生产特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(1): 154 − 165. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00154 WANG Yajiang, GE Mengjie, YAN Xiting, et al. Effects of light, nitrogen and their interaction on grain yieldand matter production characteristics of Japonica super rice [J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(1): 154 − 165. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00154 [10] 褚泽龙. 玉铃花种子休眠与萌发特性研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015. CHU Zelong. Study on Dormancy and Germination Characteristics of Styrax obassia Sieb. et Zucc. Seeds[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015. [11] 王萱. 玉铃花遗传多样性的AFLP分析[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2016. WANG Xuan. Genetic Diversity of Styrax obassia Sieb. et Zucc. Based on AFLP Markers[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2016. [12] 邢世岩, 董雷雷, 胡爱华, 等. 玉玲花种苗特性研究[J]. 种子, 2008, 27(3): 60 − 62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2008.03.019 XIN Shiyan, DONG Leilei, HU Aihua, et al. Study on seeds and seedlings characteristics of Styrax obassia Sieb. et Zucc. [J]. Seed, 2008, 27(3): 60 − 62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2008.03.019 [13] 万琦, 赵楠楠, 张明如, 等. 玉铃花开花动态与繁育系统特征[J/OL]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39[2022-03-28]. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210455. WAN Qi, ZHAO Nanna, ZHANG Mingru, et al. Flowering dynamics and breeding system of Styrax obassia [J/OL]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2022, 39[2022-03-28]. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210455. [14] 周磊, 刘美玲, 李铁华, 等. 施肥对细叶桢楠容器苗生长与光合的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(7): 80 − 87. ZHOU Lei, LIU Meiling, LI Tiehua, et al. Effects of fertilization on growth and photosynthetic of Phoebe hui seedlings [J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2021, 41(7): 80 − 87. [15] 张志良, 瞿伟菁, 李小方. 植物生理实验指导[M]. 4版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009. ZHANG Zhiliang, QU Weijing, LI Xiaofang. The Guidance of Plant Physiology Experiments[M]. 4th Ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009. [16] FARQUHAR G D, SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis [J]. Ann Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33(1): 317 − 345. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533 [17] 庞立东, 李卫军, 朱进忠. 追施氮肥对苏丹草光合特性及种子产量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2014, 31(12): 2286 − 2292. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0371 PANG Lidong, LI Weijun, ZHU Jinzhong. Effects of topdressing nitrogen fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and seed yields of sudangrass [J]. Pratacultural Sci, 2014, 31(12): 2286 − 2292. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0371 [18] 蔡建国, 韦孟琪, 章毅, 等. 遮阴对绣球光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(5): 570 − 576. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0245 CAI Jianguo, WEI Mengqi, ZHANG Yi, et al. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of Hydrangea macrophylla [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(5): 570 − 576. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0245 [19] 刘柿良, 马明东, 潘远智, 等. 不同光强对2种桤木幼苗光合特性和抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(10): 1062 − 1074. LIU Shiliang, MA Mingdong, PAN Yuanzhi, et al. Effects of light regimes on photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant system in seedlings of two alder species [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(10): 1062 − 1074. [20] 殷东生, 沈海龙. 森林植物耐荫性及其形态和生理适应性研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(8): 2687 − 2698. YIN Dongsheng, SHEN Hailong. Shade tolerance and the adaptability of forest plants in morphology and physiology: a review [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 27(8): 2687 − 2698. [21] 尹子旭, 卢玉生, 张美曼, 等. 光、氮及其互作对设施绿竹叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 3979 − 3988. YIN Zixu, LU Yusheng, ZHANG Meiman, et al. Interactive effects of light intensity and nitrogen supply on leaf carbon and nitrogen metabolism of Dendrocalamopsis oldhami [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2020, 39(12): 3979 − 3988. [22] 徐琳煜, 刘守赞, 白岩, 等. 不同光强处理对三叶青光合特性的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(3): 467 − 475. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.03.010 XU Linyu, LIU Shouzan, BAI Yan, et al. Effects of light intensity treatments on photosynthetic characteristics in Tetrastigma hemsleyanum [J]. J Zhejiang A&F Univ, 2018, 35(3): 467 − 475. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.03.010 [23] 陶巧静, 吴月燕, 付涛, 等. 弱光胁迫对西洋杜鹃生理特性和叶片超微结构的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(3): 84 − 92. TAO Qiaojing, WU Yueyan, FU Tao, et al. Effect of low light stress on physiological characteristics and ultrastructure of Rhododendron hybridum leaves [J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2015, 51(3): 84 − 92. [24] 沈娟, 李谦盛, 倪迪安. 2种大吴风草的耐荫特性研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50(7): 967 − 972. SHEN Juan, LI Qiansheng, NI Di’an. Study on the shade tolerance characters of two Farfugium japonicum plants [J]. Plant Physiol J, 2014, 50(7): 967 − 972. [25] 黄玲璞. 光氮互作对格木幼苗生长、生理特性的影响研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2018. HUANG Lingpu. A Research on Interaction of Light and Nitrigen on Erythrophleum fordii Oliv. Seedlings[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2008. [26] 粟春青, 亢亚超, 韦艺, 等. 光氮互作对闽楠幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2019, 48(2): 207 − 212. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2019.02.013 SU Chunqing, KANG Yachao, WEI Yi, et al. Effects of photon-nitrogen interaction on growth of Phoebe bournei seedlings [J]. Guangxi For Sci, 2019, 48(2): 207 − 212. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2019.02.013 -
-
链接本文:
https://zlxb.zafu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210605

计量
- 文章访问数: 36
- 被引次数: 0