Research progress in the impact of different mycorrhizal types on soil carbon cycling

JIN Wenhao; SHAO Shuai; CHEN Junhui; QIN Hua

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210531

Volume 38 Issue 5

Oct. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Zhejiang A&F University > 2021 > 38(5): 953-962

JIN Wenhao, SHAO Shuai, CHEN Junhui, QIN Hua. Research progress in the impact of different mycorrhizal types on soil carbon cycling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(5): 953-962. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210531

Citation:

JIN Wenhao, SHAO Shuai, CHEN Junhui, QIN Hua. Research progress in the impact of different mycorrhizal types on soil carbon cycling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(5): 953-962. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210531

Research progress in the impact of different mycorrhizal types on soil carbon cycling

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210531

JIN Wenhao^{1, 2
,},
SHAO Shuai^{1, 2},
CHEN Junhui^{1, 2},
QIN Hua^{1, 2
,
,}

1.
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China
2.
College of Environment and Resources, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, Zhejiang, China

Received Date: 2021-07-29
Rev Recd Date: 2021-08-18

Available Online: 2021-10-12

Publish Date: 2021-10-20

Abstract

Mycorrhiza is a bridge between plants and soil in terrestrial ecosystems, and acts on soil carbon cycling by affecting litter decomposition, soil aggregation, and root exudates. Different types of mycorrhiza have different physiological functions, among which ectomycorrhiza (ECM) and arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) are the most widely distributed mycorrhizal types. Previous studies showed that different mycorrhizal types affected soil organic carbon input through the distribution of host photosynthetic products. The stability of soil organic carbon was affected by the differences of metabolites and winding action, and the soil organic carbon mineralization was affected by regulating the litter decomposition characteristics and interrelationship between mycorrhizae and microbe. In order to understand how ECM and AM affect soil carbon cycling and its key regulatory factors, this study reviewed the effects of different types of mycorrhiza on soil carbon cycling from four aspects and discussed the influence mechanisms: differences in the distribution process of photosynthetic products such as providing carbon and litter quantity to mycorrhizae, carbon sink functions of different mycorrhizal types and the impacts on soil aggregation, differences in soil organic carbon mineralization such as litter decomposition, priming effect and soil respiration in different dominant mycorrhizal ecosystems, and different accumulation capacity for soil carbon and corresponding microbial communities in different dominant mycorrhizal ecosystems. Finally, the future research direction is proposed, aiming to provide theoretical basis for how to enhance the carbon sink functions of ecosystems by relying on mycorrhiza in the context of “carbon neutrality”. [Ch, 2 fig. 94 ref.]
- ectomycorrhiza,
- arbuscular mycorrhiza,
- soil carbon cycling,
- soil aggregation,
- litter decomposition,
- priming effect

Relative Article

[1]	WU Haiping, YE Genhua, LI Weicheng. Allelopathic effects of Phyllostachys edulis extracts on Fritillaria thunbergii . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(3): 648-657. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220471
[2]	GAO Ning, XING Yijing, XIONG Rui, SHI Wenhui. Mechanisms of plant P acquisition coordinated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(6): 1167-1180. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220765
[3]	PENG Sili, ZHANG Xin, WU Renjie, CAI Yanjiang, XING Wei, GE Zhiwei, MAO Lingfeng. Seasonal dynamic responses of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community to nitrogen additions in a poplar plantation . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(4): 792-800. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220640
[4]	MA Xingcong, JIN Wenhao, TU Jiaying, SHENG Weixing, CHEN Junhui, QIN Hua. Impact of shifts among mycorrhizal types on soil aggregate composition and characteristics . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(6): 1149-1157. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230376
[5]	YANG Bo, WANG Shaojun, ZHAO Shuang, ZHANG Lulu, ZHANG Kunfeng, FAN Yuxiang, XIE Lingling, WANG Zhengjun, GUO Zhipeng, XIAO Bo. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Fraxinus malacophylla in rocky desertification habitats . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(5): 1028-1036. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210740
[6]	SUI Xiran, WU Lifang, WANG Yan, WANG Ziquan, XIAO Yuxin, LIU Yungen, YANG Bo. Characteristics of nutrient and enzyme activity in soil aggregates of different rocky desertification levels in central Yunnan Plateau . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(1): 115-126. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210168
[7]	JIAN Yongqi, WU Jiasen, SHENG Weixing, NIE Guohui, ZHENG Cheng, JIANG Peikun. Effects of thinning and stand types on litter stock and soil water-holding capacity . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(2): 320-328. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200355
[8]	CHEN Tao, ZHOU Lijun, QI Shi, SUN Baoping, NIE Zexu. Soil aggregate stability and anti-erodibility of typical forest stands in Huaying mountain area . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(6): 1161-1169. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210142
[9]	JIANG Zhonglong, YE Liuxin, LIU Jun, LIN Song, XU Minyu, WU Jiasen, LIU Juan, LIU Haiying. Effects of enclosure duration on litter and soil water holding capacity of Phyllostachys edulis forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(5): 860-866. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190603
[10]	QU Minghua, YU Yuanchun, LI Sheng, ZHANG Jinchi. Advances in research on activation of mineral nutrients by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(2): 394-405. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.022
[11]	WANG Yingying, ZHAO Bing, LI Ying. Heat resistance of Rhododendron with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(4): 733-740. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.04.013
[12]	ZHANG Jiayang, LIN Fang, ZHAN Naicai, REN Min. Morphological structure, composition, and organic carbon characteristics of soil agglomerations for alfalfa and ryegrass planting patterns . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(6): 1077-1086. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.06.004
[13]	CHEN Lulu, LEI Niya. Plant-soil feedback with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization and biomass of two introduced tree species . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2018, 35(3): 422-430. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.03.005
[14]	CHU Xin, PAN Ping, GUO Liling, NING Jinkui, OUYANG Xunzhi, WU Zirong. Comparing water-holding capacity in forest litter and soils for an aerially seeded Pinus massoniana plantation with different stand densities . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(5): 808-815. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.05.006
[15]	WANG Dan, MA Yuandan, GUO Huiyuan, GAO Yan, ZHANG Rumin, HOU Ping. Soil nutrients and microorganisms with simulated acid rain stress and Cryptomeria fortunei litter . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(2): 195-203. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.02.005
[16]	WANG Junlong, WANG Dan, YU Fei, SHEN Weidong, ZOU Cuicui, ZHANG Rumin, HOU Ping. Enzyme activity in rhizosphere soil of Cryptomeria fortunei seedlings with simulated acid rain and litter . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(3): 373-379. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.03.007
[17]	HUANG Shi-de. Soil respiration with precipitation and litter treatments in Schima superba and Pinus massoniana mixed forest . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(2): 218-225. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.02.011
[18]	WANG Yi, DING Gui-jie. Growth and microelement absorption for Pinus massoniana seedlings with ectomycorrhizae and water stress . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(6): 822-828. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.06.004
[19]	XU Feng-lan, WEI Tan, LIU Ai-qing. Studies on physical characters of soil in mixed forest of Chinese fir and paulownia . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2000, 17(3): 285-288.
[20]	Xu Qiufang, Qian Xinbiao, Gui Zuyun. Effects of Litter Decomposition of Different Stands on Soil Properties. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1998, 15(1): 27-31.

References

[1]	BRUNDRETT M C. Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis [J]. Plant Soil, 2009, 320(1/2): 37 − 77.
[2]	SMITH S E, READ D J. Mycorrhizal symbiosis [J]. Quart Rev Biol, 2008, 3(3): 273 − 281.
[3]	LIANG C, AMELUNG W, LEHMANN J, et al. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter [J]. Glob Change Biol, 2019, 25(11): 3578 − 3590.
[4]	SOUDZILOVSKAIA N A, HEIJDEN M G A, CORNELISSEN J H C, et al. Quantitative assessment of the differential impacts of arbuscular and ectomycorrhiza on soil carbon cycling [J]. New Phytol, 2015, 208(1): 280 − 293.
[5]	SOUDZILOVSKAIA N A, van BODEGOM P M, TERRER C, et al. Global mycorrhizal plant distribution linked to terrestrial carbon stocks[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13019-2.
[6]	GUO Liangdong, TIAN Chunjie. Progress of the function of mycorrhizal fungi in the cycle of carbon and nitrogen [J]. Microbiol China, 2013, 40(1): 158 − 171.
[7]	FERNANDEZ C W, LANGLEY J A, CHAPMAN S, et al. The decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal necromass [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 93: 38 − 49.
[8]	NOTTINGHAM A T, TURNER B L, WINTER K, et al. Root and arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelial interactions with soil microorganisms in lowland tropical forest [J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2013, 85(1): 37 − 50.
[9]	RILLIG M C. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes [J]. Ecol Lett, 2004, 7(8): 740 − 754.
[10]	TRESEDER K K, TURNER K M. Glomalin in ecosystems [J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2007, 71(4): 1257 − 1266.
[11]	CHENG L, BOOKER F L, TU C, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase organic carbon decomposition under elevated CO₂ [J]. Science, 2012, 337(6098): 1084 − 1087.
[12]	GADGIL R L, GADGIL P D. Mycorrhiza and litter decomposition [J]. Nature, 1971, 233(5315): 133.
[13]	LINDAHL B D, TUNLID A. Ectomycorrhizal fungi-potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs [J]. New Phytol, 2015, 205(4): 1443 − 1447.
[14]	AVERILL C, TURNER B L, FINZI A C. Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage [J]. Nature, 2014, 505(7484): 543 − 545.
[15]	BRZOSTEK E R, DRAGONI D, BROWN Z A, et al. Mycorrhizal type determines the magnitude and direction of root-induced changes in decomposition in a temperate forest [J]. New Phytol, 2015, 206(4): 1274 − 1282.
[16]	JANSA J, BUKOVSKÁ P, GRYNDLER M. Mycorrhizal hyphae as ecological niche for highly specialized hypersymbionts-or just soil free-riders?[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2013, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00134.
[17]	DRIGO B, PIJL A S, DUYTS H, et al. Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO₂[J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107(24). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912421107.
[18]	ORWIN K H, KIRSCHBAUM M U F, ST JOHN M G, et al. Organic nutrient uptake by mycorrhizal fungi enhances ecosystem carbon storage: a model-based assessment [J]. Ecol Lett, 2011, 14(5): 493 − 502.
[19]	YIN H, WHEELER E, PHILLIPS R P. Root-induced changes in nutrient cycling in forests depend on exudation rates [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 78: 213 − 221.
[20]	PARIHAR M, RAKSHIT A, MEENA V S, et al. The potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in C cycling: a review [J]. Arch Microbiol, 2020, 202(7): 1581 − 1596.
[21]	JIANG Yina, WANG Wanxiao, XIE Qiujing, et al. Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi [J]. Science, 2017, 356(6343): 1172 − 1175.
[22]	WIPF D, KRAJINSKI F, van TUINEN D, et al. Trading on the arbuscular mycorrhiza market: from arbuscules to common mycorrhizal networks [J]. New Phytol, 2019, 223(3): 1127 − 1142.
[23]	BAGO B, ZIPFEL W, WILLIAMS R M, et al. Translocation and utilization of fungal storage lipid in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis [J]. Plant Physiol, 2002, 128(1): 108 − 124.
[24]	LUGINBUEHL L H, MENARD G N, KURUP S, et al. Fatty acids in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are synthesized by the host plant [J]. Science, 2017, 356(6343): 1175 − 1178.
[25]	READ D J. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems [J]. Experientia, 1991, 47(4): 376 − 391.
[26]	READ D J, PEREZ-MORENO J. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystemsa journey towards relevance? [J]. New Phytol, 2003, 157: 475 − 492.
[27]	VARGAS R, BALDOCCHI D D, QUEREJETA J I, et al. Ecosystem CO₂ fluxes of arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal dominated vegetation types are differentially influenced by precipitation and temperature [J]. New Phytol, 2010, 185(1): 226 − 236.
[28]	SHI Zhaoyong, LIU Dehong, WANG Fayuan, et al. Effect of mycorrhizal strategy on net primary productivity of trees in global forest ecosystem [J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2012, 21(3): 404 − 408.
[29]	LIN Guigang, MCCORMACK M L, MA Chengen, et al. Similar below-ground carbon cycling dynamics but contrasting modes of nitrogen cycling between arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal forests [J]. New Phytol, 2017, 213(3): 1440 − 1451.
[30]	VESTERDAL L, ELBERLING B, CHRISTIANSEN J R, et al. Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species [J]. For Ecol Manage, 2012, 264: 185 − 196.

[32]	WITHINGTON J M, REICH P B, OLEKSYN J, et al. Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees [J]. Ecol Monogr, 2006, 3(76): 381 − 397.
[33]	HOBBIE S E, OGDAHL M, CHOROVER J, et al. Tree species effects on soil organic matter dynamics: the role of soil cation composition [J]. Ecosystems, 2007, 10(6): 999 − 1018.
[34]	MUELLER K E, EISSENSTAT D M, HOBBIE S E, et al. Tree species effects on coupled cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and acidity in mineral soils at a common garden experiment [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 111(1/3): 601 − 614.
[35]	TAYLOR M K, LANKAU R A, WURZBURGER N, et al. Mycorrhizal associations of trees have different indirect effects on organic matter decomposition [J]. J Ecol, 2016, 104(6): 1576 − 1584.
[36]	OOSTRA S, MAJDI H, OLSSON M. Impact of tree species on soil carbon stocks and soil acidity in southern Sweden [J]. Scand J For Res, 2007, 21(5): 364 − 371.
[37]	CLEMMENSEN K E, BAHR A, OVASKAINEN O, et al. Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest [J]. Science, 2013, 339: 1615 − 1618.
[38]	GODBOLD D L, HOOSBEEK M R, LUKAC M, et al. Mycorrhizal hyphal turnover as a dominant process for carbon input into soil organic matter [J]. Plant Soil, 2006, 281(1/2): 15 − 24.
[39]	ZHANG Jing, EKBLAD A, SIGURDSSON B D, et al. The influence of soil warming on organic carbon sequestration of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a sub-arctic grassland[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2020, 147: 107826. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107826.
[40]	ÖPIK M, DAVISON J, MOORA M, et al. DNA-based detection and identification of Glomeromycota: the virtual taxonomy of environmental sequences [J]. Botany, 2014, 92(2): 135 − 147.
[41]	MILLER R M, KLING M. The importance of integration and scale in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis [J]. Plant Soil, 2000, 226(2): 295 − 309.
[42]	MILLER R M, JASTROW J D, REINHARDT D R. External hyphal production of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in pasture and tallgrass prairie communities [J]. Oecologia, 1995, 103(1): 17 − 23.
[43]	RILLIG M C. Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation [J]. Can J Soil Sci, 2004, 84(4): 355 − 363.
[44]	RILLIG M C, WRIGHT S F, NICHOLS K A, et al. Large contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools in tropical forest soils [J]. Plant Soil, 2001, 233(2): 167 − 177.
[45]	LIU Manqiang, HU Feng, CHEN Xiaoyun. A review on mechanisms of soil organic carbon stabilization [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(6): 2642 − 2650.
[46]	SIX J, BOSSUYT H, DEGRYZE S, et al. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics [J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2004, 79(1): 7 − 31.
[47]	RILLIG M C, MUMMEY D L. Mycorrhizas and soil structure [J]. New Phytolt, 2006, 171(1): 41 − 53.
[48]	LEIFHEIT E F, VERESOGLOU S D, LEHMANN A, et al. Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation: a meta-analysis [J]. Plant Soil, 2013, 374(1/2): 523 − 537.
[49]	WILSON G W T, RICE C W, RILLIG M C, et al. Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: results from long-term field experiments [J]. Ecol Lett, 2009, 12(5): 452 − 461.
[50]	GILLESPIE A W, FARRELL R E, WALLEY F L, et al. Glomalin-related soil protein contains non-mycorrhizal-related heat-stable proteins, lipids and humic materials [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43(4): 766 − 777.
[51]	SEYFRIED G S, DALLING J W, YANG W H. Mycorrhizal type effects on leaf litter decomposition depend on litter quality and environmental context [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2021, 155: 1 − 18.
[52]	DICKIE I A, KOELE N, BLUM J D, et al. Mycorrhizas in changing ecosystems [J]. Botany, 2014, 92(2): 149 − 160.
[53]	MCGUIRE K L, TRESEDER K K. Microbial communities and their relevance for ecosystem models: decomposition as a case study [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42(4): 529 − 535.
[54]	CRAIG M E, TURNER B L, LIANG C, et al. Tree mycorrhizal type predicts within-site variability in the storage and distribution of soil organic matter [J]. Global Change Biol, 2018, 24(8): 3317 − 3330.
[55]	PHILLIPS R P, BRZOSTEK E, MIDGLEY M G. The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon-nutrient couplings in temperate forests [J]. New Phytol, 2013, 199(1): 41 − 51.
[56]	FERNANDEZ C W, KENNEDY P G. Revisiting the “Gadgil effect”: do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils? [J]. New Phytol, 2016, 209(4): 1382 − 1394.
[57]	STERKENBURG E, BAHR A, BRANDSTROM DURLING M, et al. Changes in fungal communities along a boreal forest soil fertility gradient [J]. New Phytol, 2015, 207(4): 1145 − 1158.
[58]	FIERER N, CRAINE J M, SCHIMEL M. Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition [J]. Ecology, 2005, 86(2): 320 − 326.
[59]	CHEEKE T E, PHILLIPS R P, BRZOSTEK E R, et al. Dominant mycorrhizal association of trees alters carbon and nutrient cycling by selecting for microbial groups with distinct enzyme function [J]. New Phytol, 2017, 214(1): 432 − 442.
[60]	TISSERANT E, KOHLER A, DOZOLME-SEDDAS P, et al. The transcriptome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices (DAOM 197198) reveals functional tradeoffs in an obligate symbiont [J]. New Phytol, 2012, 193(3): 755 − 769.
[61]	HERMAN D J, FIRESTONE M K, NUCCIO E, et al. Interactions between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a soil microbial community mediating litter decomposition [J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2012, 80(1): 236 − 247.
[62]	PATERSON E, SIM A, DAVIDSON J, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae promote priming of native soil organic matter mineralisation [J]. Plant Soil, 2016, 408(1/2): 243 − 254.
[63]	TALBOT J M, ALLISON S D, TRESEDER K K. Decomposers in disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in ecosystems under global change [J]. Funct Ecol, 2008, 22(6): 955 − 963.
[64]	KUZYAKOV Y. Sources of CO₂ efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2006, 38(3): 425 − 448.
[65]	AVERILL C, DIETZE M C, BHATNAGAR J M. Continental-scale nitrogen pollution is shifting forest mycorrhizal associations and soil carbon stocks [J]. Global Change Biol, 2018, 24(10): 4544 − 4553.
[66]	SMITH G, PEAY K. Stepping forward from relevance in mycorrhizal ecology [J]. New Phytol, 2020, 226(2): 292 − 294.
[67]	JIANG Shaotao, HU Xiaoxuan, KANG Yalong, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in the rhizospheric soil of litchi and mango orchards as affected by geographic distance, soil properties and manure input[J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2020, 152: 103593. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103593.
[68]	JIANG Shaotao, LIU Yongjun, LUO Jiajia, et al. Dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure and functioning along a nitrogen enrichment gradient in an alpine meadow ecosystem [J]. New Phytol, 2018, 220(4): 1222 − 1235.
[69]	CHENG Weixin, PARTON W, GONZALEZ-MELER M A, et al. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming [J]. New Phytol, 2014, 201(1): 31 − 44.
[70]	ZHU Weixing, EHRENFELD J G. The effects of mycorrhizal roots on litter decomposition, soil biota, and nutrients in a spodosolic soil [J]. Plant Soil, 1996, 179(1): 109 − 118.
[71]	SULMAN B N, BRZOSTEK E R, MEDICI C, et al. Feedbacks between plant N demand and rhizosphere priming depend on type of mycorrhizal association [J]. Ecol Lett, 2017, 20(8): 1043 − 1053.
[72]	SUBKE J A, VOKE N R, LERONNI V, et al. Dynamics and pathways of autotrophic and heterotrophic soil CO₂ efflux revealed by forest girdling [J]. J Ecol, 2011, 99(1): 186 − 193.
[73]	PHILLIPS R P, FAHEY T J. Tree species and mycorrhizal associations influence the magnitude of rhizosphere effects [J]. Ecology, 2006, 87(5): 1302 − 1313.
[74]	PHILLIPS C L, KLUBER L A, MARTIN J P, et al. Contributions of ectomycorrhizal fungal mats to forest soil respiration [J]. Biogeosciences, 2012, 9(6): 2099 − 2110.
[75]	HODGE A, CAMPBELL C D, FITTER A H. An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material [J]. Nature, 2001, 413(6853): 297 − 299.
[76]	SHAHZAD T, CHENU C, GENET P, et al. Contribution of exudates, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and litter depositions to the rhizosphere priming effect induced by grassland species [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2015, 80: 146 − 155.
[77]	COTRUFO M F, RANALLI M G, HADDIX M L, et al. Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter [J]. Nat Geosci, 2019, 12(12): 989 − 994.
[78]	FONTAINE S, HENAULT C, AAMOR A, et al. Fungi mediate long term sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43(1): 86 − 96.
[79]	YIN Liming, DIJKSTRA F A, PHILLIPS R P, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees cause a higher carbon to nitrogen ratio of soil organic matter decomposition via rhizosphere priming than ectomycorrhizal trees[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2021, 157: 108246. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108246.
[80]	NEUMANN J, MATZNER E. Contribution of newly grown extramatrical ectomycorrhizal mycelium and fine roots to soil respiration in a young Norway spruce site [J]. Plant Soil, 2014, 378(1/2): 73 − 82.
[81]	HODGE A, FITTER A H. Substantial nitrogen acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic material has implications for N cycling [J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci, 2010, 107(31): 13754 − 13759.
[82]	VERESOGLOU S D, SEN R, MAMOLOS A P, et al. Plant species identity and arbuscular mycorrhizal status modulate potential nitrification rates in nitrogen-limited grassland soils [J]. J Ecol, 2011, 99(6): 1339 − 1349.
[83]	NOTTINGHAM A T, TURNER B L, WINTER K, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelial respiration in a moist tropical forest [J]. New Phytolt, 2010, 186(4): 957 − 967.
[84]	METCALFE D B, ROCHA W, BALCH J K, et al. Impacts of fire on sources of soil CO₂ efflux in a dry Amazon rain forest [J]. Global Change Biol, 2018, 24(8): 3629 − 3641.
[85]	GUI Weiyang, REN Haiyan, LIU Nan, et al. Plant functional group influences arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal abundance and hyphal contribution to soil CO₂ efflux in temperate grasslands [J]. Plant Soil, 2018, 432(1/2): 1 − 14.
[86]	FENN K M, MALHI Y, MORECROFT M D. Soil CO₂ efflux in a temperate deciduous forest: environmental drivers and component contributions [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42(10): 1685 − 1693.
[87]	HEINEMEYER A, WILKINSON M, VARGAS R, et al. Exploring the overflow tap theory: linking forest soil CO₂ fluxes and individual mycorrhizosphere components to photosynthesis [J]. Biogeosciences, 2012, 9(1): 79 − 95.
[88]	MOYANO F E, KUTSCH W L, REBMANN C. Soil respiration fluxes in relation to photosynthetic activity in broad-leaf and needle-leaf forest stands [J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2008, 148(1): 135 − 143.
[89]	BRADFORD M A, KEISER A D, DAVIES C A, et al. Empirical evidence that soil carbon formation from plant inputs is positively related to microbial growth [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2013, 113(1/3): 271 − 281.
[90]	NORTHUP R, DAHLGREN R, VOGT K, et al. Polyphenol control of nitrogen release from pine litter [J]. Nature, 1995, 377(6546): 227 − 229.
[91]	WANG Xinqi, WANG Chuankuan, ZHANG Taidong. New perspectives on forest soil carbon and nitrogen cycling processes: roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal versus ectomycorrhizal tree species [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(10): 1113 − 1125.
[92]	OUIMETTE A P, OLLINGER S V, LEPINE L C, et al. Accounting for carbon flux to mycorrhizal fungi may resolve discrepancies in forest carbon budgets [J]. Ecosystems, 2019, 23(4): 715 − 729.
[93]	FERNANDEZ C W, SEE C R, KENNEDY P G. Decelerated carbon cycling by ectomycorrhizal fungi is controlled by substrate quality and community composition [J]. New Phytol, 2020, 226(2): 569 − 582.
[94]	VEN A, VERLINDEN M S, VERBRUGGEN E, et al. Experimental evidence that phosphorus fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis can reduce the carbon cost of phosphorus uptake [J]. Funct Ecol, 2019, 33(11): 2215 − 2225.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(2995) PDF downloads(175) Cited by()

Proportional views

HTML

菌根是植物根系与菌根真菌形成的共生体，广泛分布于陆地生态系统中，90%以上的维管植物根系能够形成菌根^[1]。菌根真菌能帮助植物吸收水分及氮、磷等营养物质，促进植物生长，同时从宿主植物获取碳水化合物以满足自身的生长需求^[2]。由于菌根真菌和植物之间存在碳源和养分的交换^[2]，能显著影响土壤有机碳的积累与转化^[3]，因此，了解菌根在土壤碳循环中的作用具有重要意义。根据宿主植物以及菌根真菌种类不同，菌根具有7种不同的类型，其中丛枝菌根(arbuscular mycorrhiza，AM)和外生菌根(ectomycorrhiza，ECM)是分布最为广泛、物种最为多样的菌根类型^{[1, 4]}。据估算，AM和ECM植被在地上生物量中的碳储量分别为(241.0±15.0)和(100.0±17.0) Gt，而非菌根植被的碳储量仅有(29.0±5.5) Gt^[5]。因此，菌根真菌在陆地生态系统碳氮循环过程中发挥着重要作用^[6]，其中对土壤碳循环的影响主要有3种方式：①将植物光合作用固定的产物运输到土壤，从而增加碳输入^[7-8]；②菌根共生体本身的碳汇功能及对土壤中有机碳的固定作用^[9-10]；③通过激发效应或控制土壤养分有效性调控有机碳矿化过程^[11-13]。由于AM和ECM在形态和生理功能(如营养获取方式、菌丝周转速率等)上有很大的不同^[2]，所以菌根介导的碳循环过程和方向在很大程度上取决于菌根类型和群落组成^[14-15]，以及与菌根存在相互作用的微生物群落^[16-17]。为了深入理解不同类型菌根对土壤碳循环的影响，本研究综述了外生菌根和丛枝菌根对宿主光合产物分配、有机碳固定、有机碳矿化等土壤碳循环过程的差异并分析其作用机制，最后总结该方向今后研究的重点。

1. 不同菌根类型宿主对光合产物分配的差异

植物主要通过光合产物的分配以及凋落物的输入来影响土壤碳循环过程。一般来说，菌根真菌主要由宿主提供碳水化合物以完成其整个生命周期^[2]，并作为一种重要载体将碳从植物运输到土壤中。不同菌根类型宿主给菌根提供碳水化合物的数量存在一定差异，ECM宿主通常可分配更多的碳水化合物^[4]，因此ECM真菌通常比AM真菌具有更高的生物量，最终ECM宿主比AM宿主通过菌根释放到土壤中的碳更多^[18-19]。对于AM真菌而言，宿主主要通过脂肪酸的形式提供碳源^[20-21]。由于AM真菌无法分泌脂肪酸合成酶，因此不能在缺乏宿主的情况下合成脂肪酸，这也是目前其作为专性营养生物的一种解释^[22]。脂质主要以三酰甘油、棕榈酸等脂肪酸的形式存储碳，广泛参与AM共生体的生命过程^[23]，是孢子(脂质占总干质量的95%)、根外菌丝(47%)、囊泡(58%)等结构的重要成分^[24]，但是目前碳以脂质形式从宿主转移到菌根真菌对土壤碳库的贡献尚未定量计算。因此，不同菌根类型宿主对于光合产物分配的差异会对土壤碳循环过程造成影响，其中菌根真菌起着重要的调控作用。不同菌根类型宿主除向菌根分配光合产物存在差异外，在凋落物输入量上也有显著差异，进而对土壤碳循环过程产生不同的影响。以AM为主导的生态系统一般具有更高的初级生产力，比以ECM占优势的生态系统产生更多的凋落物^{[14, 25-28]}。但也有研究表明：两者的凋落物输入量差异并不显著^[29-30]。ECM和AM宿主的根系特性差异也会显著影响地下凋落物输入量。由于ECM真菌的菌丝与幼根形成共生体，在植物根外形成菌丝套，在细胞间形成哈氏网结构^[31]，一定程度上代替了细根的作用，导致细根生物量降低。WITHINGTON等^[32]发现：AM宿主细根生物量显著高于ECM宿主，且细根周转迅速。有研究也同样发现：AM宿主的细根质量显著高于ECM宿主^[33-34]。但也有研究发现：AM和ECM宿主细根的生物量和质量差异并不显著^[35-36]。因此，不同菌根类型地上和地下凋落物输入量差异尚待进一步研究。

2. 不同类型菌根自身的碳汇功能差异

2.1. 不同类型菌根的生物量

菌根真菌的根外菌丝本身就是土壤中重要的碳源，在根外菌丝生物量上通常认为ECM真菌比AM真菌高出1个数量级^{[4, 15]}。据估算，ECM真菌根外菌丝占地下碳库总输入量的50%~60%，可能超过树叶凋落物及细根周转的量^{[4, 25, 37-38]}。相对于AM真菌，ECM真菌的菌丝死亡后产生更多次生代谢物，如几丁质、黑色素等，更难以被分解^[7]。因此，ECM真菌根外菌丝对于土壤碳汇的贡献大于AM真菌。尽管AM真菌的生物量较低，但它对土壤有机碳输入的贡献可能是巨大的^[39]。①AM真菌的宿主植物超过20万种^[40]，相较于ECM宿主而言更加丰富。②AM真菌生物量最高可占微生物生物量的20%以上^{[6, 20, 41-42]}，并且周转迅速(平均5~6 d)，这会导致大量的菌丝残体(细胞壁等)产生并积累，并且远离微生物活动强烈的根际区域^[20]，形成的有机碳不易分解。③AM真菌衰亡和降解后释放到土壤中的球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白(glomalin-related soil protein，GRSP)在不同的生态系统中可占土壤总有机碳的3%~12%^{[6, 10, 43-44]}，也是一类重要的土壤有机碳来源。由此可见，ECM和AM真菌生物量是土壤有机碳输入的重要驱动因素之一。

2.2. 不同类型菌根对土壤有机碳的固定作用

土壤有机碳重要稳定机制之一是团聚体的物理保护作用所导致的生物与有机碳的空间隔离^[44-45]。菌根真菌对于土壤团聚体的促进作用可以用“黏袋”(sticky-string-bag)机制来解释，即菌丝通过缠绕和胶结土壤颗粒形成土壤团聚体以减少有机碳分解^{[20, 46]}。在根系对团聚体形成的贡献方面，由于AM宿主细根生物量显著高于ECM宿主，所以AM宿主的细根在促进土壤团聚体形成过程中具有更大的贡献。根外菌丝也可以起到类似于根系缠绕的作用^[47]，ECM根外菌丝生物量显著高于AM，因此ECM菌丝对土壤团聚体形成的贡献可能更大。相较于AM优势系统，ECM优势系统土壤中有机氮(特别是可溶性有机氮)含量较高，导致其土壤微生物群落中真菌占主导地位，而真菌对于土壤中大团聚体(粒径＞250 μm)形成的作用可能更大^[48]，因此，ECM优势系统中微生物对大团聚体的贡献可能更高。除菌丝缠绕外，胶黏剂在土壤团聚体形成过程中的作用也不可忽视。AM真菌产生的球囊霉素(GRSP)可在土壤中维持6~42 a，能够作为胶结剂直接影响土壤团聚体的形成和稳定^{[43, 47-48]}。研究表明：土壤团聚体稳定性与GRSP含量呈显著正相关^{[43, 49]}，所以AM真菌对土壤团聚体的形成可能在时间尺度上具有更深远的影响，但是目前具体有多少GRSP来自AM真菌尚不清楚^[50]。除此之外，ECM真菌也可以通过产生疏水蛋白影响土壤团聚过程^[47]。

3. 不同类型菌根对土壤有机质矿化的影响

3.1. 不同类型菌根对凋落物分解的影响

AM和ECM宿主凋落物在化学性质上的差异导致其分解速率不同^[51]，从而对土壤碳循环产生影响。有研究表明：ECM凋落物碳氮比较高，其质量相对较低^[52-53]，ECM宿主凋落物比AM宿主凋落物的分解速率慢1倍以上^[29-30]，ECM优势系统土壤表层会有更多凋落物碳积累^[54]。目前一般认为AM宿主的凋落物分解过程中微生物受到氮限制的影响较小，因此AM占优势的生态系统中通常含有较多的腐殖质，而ECM占优势的生态系统中有较多半分解的凋落物积累^{[4, 14, 55]}。与AM优势生态系统相比，ECM优势生态系统土壤有机氮占比较大，宿主需要ECM真菌分泌胞外酶来矿化有机氮。菌根真菌与腐生微生物相互作用可以抑制凋落物的分解，这种抑制效应被称为“切换(gadgil)效应”^[12]。目前被广泛接受的机制是养分竞争假说，即认为ECM真菌可以分泌大量的氧化酶降解有机物，使ECM真菌可以直接利用土壤中的有机氮(如甲壳素、蛋白质等)，进而降低残留凋落物的碳氮比；这使得土壤中菌根真菌和其他微生物分解者直接竞争有机氮，从而加剧了微生物分解者的氮限制，抑制了凋落物的降解^{[14, 55]}。但是在ECM森林中，“切换效应”的大小也不是固定的，还受土壤肥力、气候等因素影响^[56]。对于土壤肥力相对高的区域，由于氮相对丰富，缓解了微生物氮限制，减轻了“切换效应”^[57]。气候的影响体现在温度和水分的变化，氧化酶(主要由ECM真菌分泌)比水解酶(主要由自由分解者分泌)需要相对更多的能量，因此氧化酶对温度的变化可能更加敏感，从而影响“切换效应”的大小^[58]。

不同菌根真菌类型及其与土壤微生物之间的相互作用对土壤养分循环的影响具有差异，从而影响土壤有机碳的矿化^{[15, 59]}。相比于ECM真菌，AM真菌优势系统凋落物中含有相对丰富的氮源，受到氮限制的影响较小。因而AM优势系统具有更快的碳循环速率，从而具有相对较薄的枯枝落叶层(O层)和较厚的富含腐殖质的腐殖质层(A层)。另外，目前大部分研究都认为，AM真菌会促进凋落物分解^[15]。虽然有研究证明：AM真菌无法产生降解大分子所需要的酶^[60]，但是AM真菌可能会将不稳定碳释放到它们的菌丝际土壤中^[61]，从而刺激土壤微生物分解者的活性^[62-63]，间接促进有机质的分解^[64]。因此学者对于菌根真菌和微生物的相互关系，提出了“次共生微生物假说”。AM真菌刺激微生物活性，可能针对的是一类具有特异性的微生物类群，两者之间形成一种次生共生关系^[16]。有研究表明：特异性微生物联合AM真菌，负责分解菌丝际有机质，以获取能量和养分，与此同时AM真菌的菌丝可以吸收释放到土壤溶液中的矿质养分^[61]，两者形成一种类似互惠共生的关系。如DRIGO等^[17]利用稳定同位素的方法，发现AM从植物获得碳源后，优先分配给放线菌和芽孢杆菌，因此AM在植物向微生物群落释放碳的过程中处于关键地位。

在某些特定的环境中，AM真菌也可能存在抑制凋落物分解的情况。一般来说，AM优势系统土壤中，无机氮的占比较高^[55]，无机氮虽然是植物和AM真菌获得氮源的主要形式^[65-66]，但是同时也是氮淋失的主要途径。如BRZOSTEK等^[15]发现环割后AM优势系统凋落物分解加速，认为尽管AM优势系统土壤氮丰富，但并不是所有的氮都可以被菌根或土壤微生物所利用，也可能通过淋溶损失，而AM真菌菌丝对土壤速效养分的“搜刮”造成了AM真菌和土壤微生物的养分竞争，从而抑制了分解过程。此外，AM真菌与土壤微生物也会在凋落物降解过程中竞争磷。有研究表明：AM真菌侵染率与磷尤其是速效磷含量呈负相关^[67]，并且在养分充足时会转向寄生生长^[68]，因此在贫瘠的土壤中可能会存在AM真菌与其他微生物竞争磷。综上所述，土壤中氮、磷等养分成分的比例对AM真菌介导的有机质分解过程有显著影响。

3.2. 不同类型菌根对土壤激发效应的影响

植物根系以及共生真菌向周围土壤中分泌活性有机碳会引起根际激发效应，这是植物适应土壤养分状况的重要机制^{[11, 69-70]}。SULMAN等^[71]发现：ECM真菌能提升根系分泌物的分泌速率，使得其对有机质分解的激发效应大于AM真菌。研究发现：ECM真菌可以通过给菌根际微生物供应有机碳从而激发有机质的微生物分解^{[15, 70, 72]}。ECM宿主凋落物分解速率较低^{[14, 55]}，导致土壤有效氮含量降低，为了适应这种低有效氮环境，ECM可能通过加大其根系分泌物量以激发有机质的矿化过程。因此，相比于AM，ECM宿主在微生物生物量、无机氮含量和氮循环速率上具有更强烈的根际效应^[73]。ECM真菌死亡后的残体可能也是激发效应的一个重要来源，它与菌丝分泌的活性有机质有类似的效果，可以刺激土壤中的微生物分解者^[74]。因为生物量的差异，ECM菌丝周转对激发效应的贡献可能也大于AM菌丝。目前多数研究采用挖壕、环割等方法研究ECM真菌对土壤微生物及有机质降解的影响，切断了根系对水分的吸收，这可能会增加土壤水分并加速土壤有机质分解，并且新产生的根系和ECM菌丝凋落物可能会促进有机碳的分解。尽管这些研究结果还存在一定争议，但是目前大部分的研究都认为ECM真菌对激发效应的贡献大于AM真菌。关于AM真菌对土壤有机质分解是否具有激发效应目前仍有争议。有研究表明：AM真菌能促进土壤自持有机质的矿化^{[11, 62, 75]}，但SHAHZAD等^[76]发现：根系分泌物、地下凋落物是植物诱导的激发效应的主要贡献者，而AM真菌没有任何直接影响。有研究发现：AM优势系统土壤中通常含有更多与矿物结合态有机质^{[54, 77]}，这对微生物主导的激发效应有缓冲作用^{[29, 55, 78-79]}。今后，关于AM真菌是否存在激发效应及其正负方向还需进一步研究。

3.3. 不同类型菌根对土壤呼吸的影响

除光合作用外，土壤呼吸是生态系统中第二大碳通量^[80]。早先的研究将菌根呼吸和宿主根系呼吸作为同一个呼吸来源，在很大程度上忽略了菌根呼吸对土壤呼吸的贡献^[81]。有研究表明：有4%~6%的光合产物在21 h内通过菌根呼吸的形式释放^[82]。AM和ECM在同一条件下对土壤呼吸贡献的研究并不多。在AM优势生态系统中，利用根际微宇宙同位素标记等方法观察到AM真菌呼吸占土壤呼吸的8%~14%^[83-85]。在ECM优势系统中，ECM呼吸为1.3 mg·hm⁻²·a⁻¹，此时的根系呼吸为2.8 mg·hm⁻²·a⁻¹^[86]，这可能超过了宿主对于构建ECM生物量的碳分配^[87]。也有研究表明：ECM对于土壤呼吸的贡献可能较小^{[86, 88]}。但是目前菌根呼吸的研究对象多是单一类型的菌根，关于不同菌根对于土壤呼吸的影响的比较研究还较少。

Reference (94)

[1]	BRUNDRETT M C. Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis [J]. Plant Soil, 2009, 320(1/2): 37 − 77.
[2]	SMITH S E, READ D J. Mycorrhizal symbiosis [J]. Quart Rev Biol, 2008, 3(3): 273 − 281.
[3]	LIANG C, AMELUNG W, LEHMANN J, et al. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter [J]. Glob Change Biol, 2019, 25(11): 3578 − 3590.
[4]	SOUDZILOVSKAIA N A, HEIJDEN M G A, CORNELISSEN J H C, et al. Quantitative assessment of the differential impacts of arbuscular and ectomycorrhiza on soil carbon cycling [J]. New Phytol, 2015, 208(1): 280 − 293.
[5]	SOUDZILOVSKAIA N A, van BODEGOM P M, TERRER C, et al. Global mycorrhizal plant distribution linked to terrestrial carbon stocks[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13019-2.
[6]	郭良栋, 田春杰. 菌根真菌的碳氮循环功能研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2013, 40(1): 158 − 171.	GUO Liangdong, TIAN Chunjie. Progress of the function of mycorrhizal fungi in the cycle of carbon and nitrogen [J]. Microbiol China, 2013, 40(1): 158 − 171.
[7]	FERNANDEZ C W, LANGLEY J A, CHAPMAN S, et al. The decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal necromass [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 93: 38 − 49.
[8]	NOTTINGHAM A T, TURNER B L, WINTER K, et al. Root and arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelial interactions with soil microorganisms in lowland tropical forest [J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2013, 85(1): 37 − 50.
[9]	RILLIG M C. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes [J]. Ecol Lett, 2004, 7(8): 740 − 754.
[10]	TRESEDER K K, TURNER K M. Glomalin in ecosystems [J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2007, 71(4): 1257 − 1266.
[11]	CHENG L, BOOKER F L, TU C, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase organic carbon decomposition under elevated CO₂ [J]. Science, 2012, 337(6098): 1084 − 1087.
[12]	GADGIL R L, GADGIL P D. Mycorrhiza and litter decomposition [J]. Nature, 1971, 233(5315): 133.
[13]	LINDAHL B D, TUNLID A. Ectomycorrhizal fungi-potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs [J]. New Phytol, 2015, 205(4): 1443 − 1447.
[14]	AVERILL C, TURNER B L, FINZI A C. Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage [J]. Nature, 2014, 505(7484): 543 − 545.
[15]	BRZOSTEK E R, DRAGONI D, BROWN Z A, et al. Mycorrhizal type determines the magnitude and direction of root-induced changes in decomposition in a temperate forest [J]. New Phytol, 2015, 206(4): 1274 − 1282.
[16]	JANSA J, BUKOVSKÁ P, GRYNDLER M. Mycorrhizal hyphae as ecological niche for highly specialized hypersymbionts-or just soil free-riders?[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2013, 4. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00134.
[17]	DRIGO B, PIJL A S, DUYTS H, et al. Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO₂[J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107(24). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912421107.
[18]	ORWIN K H, KIRSCHBAUM M U F, ST JOHN M G, et al. Organic nutrient uptake by mycorrhizal fungi enhances ecosystem carbon storage: a model-based assessment [J]. Ecol Lett, 2011, 14(5): 493 − 502.
[19]	YIN H, WHEELER E, PHILLIPS R P. Root-induced changes in nutrient cycling in forests depend on exudation rates [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2014, 78: 213 − 221.
[20]	PARIHAR M, RAKSHIT A, MEENA V S, et al. The potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in C cycling: a review [J]. Arch Microbiol, 2020, 202(7): 1581 − 1596.
[21]	JIANG Yina, WANG Wanxiao, XIE Qiujing, et al. Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi [J]. Science, 2017, 356(6343): 1172 − 1175.
[22]	WIPF D, KRAJINSKI F, van TUINEN D, et al. Trading on the arbuscular mycorrhiza market: from arbuscules to common mycorrhizal networks [J]. New Phytol, 2019, 223(3): 1127 − 1142.
[23]	BAGO B, ZIPFEL W, WILLIAMS R M, et al. Translocation and utilization of fungal storage lipid in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis [J]. Plant Physiol, 2002, 128(1): 108 − 124.
[24]	LUGINBUEHL L H, MENARD G N, KURUP S, et al. Fatty acids in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are synthesized by the host plant [J]. Science, 2017, 356(6343): 1175 − 1178.
[25]	READ D J. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems [J]. Experientia, 1991, 47(4): 376 − 391.
[26]	READ D J, PEREZ-MORENO J. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystemsa journey towards relevance? [J]. New Phytol, 2003, 157: 475 − 492.
[27]	VARGAS R, BALDOCCHI D D, QUEREJETA J I, et al. Ecosystem CO₂ fluxes of arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal dominated vegetation types are differentially influenced by precipitation and temperature [J]. New Phytol, 2010, 185(1): 226 − 236.
[28]	石兆勇, 刘德鸿, 王发园, 等. 菌根类型对森林树木净初级生产力的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(3): 404 − 408.	SHI Zhaoyong, LIU Dehong, WANG Fayuan, et al. Effect of mycorrhizal strategy on net primary productivity of trees in global forest ecosystem [J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2012, 21(3): 404 − 408.
[29]	LIN Guigang, MCCORMACK M L, MA Chengen, et al. Similar below-ground carbon cycling dynamics but contrasting modes of nitrogen cycling between arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal forests [J]. New Phytol, 2017, 213(3): 1440 − 1451.
[30]	VESTERDAL L, ELBERLING B, CHRISTIANSEN J R, et al. Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species [J]. For Ecol Manage, 2012, 264: 185 − 196.
[31]	刘润进. 菌根学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007.
[32]	WITHINGTON J M, REICH P B, OLEKSYN J, et al. Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees [J]. Ecol Monogr, 2006, 3(76): 381 − 397.
[33]	HOBBIE S E, OGDAHL M, CHOROVER J, et al. Tree species effects on soil organic matter dynamics: the role of soil cation composition [J]. Ecosystems, 2007, 10(6): 999 − 1018.
[34]	MUELLER K E, EISSENSTAT D M, HOBBIE S E, et al. Tree species effects on coupled cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and acidity in mineral soils at a common garden experiment [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 111(1/3): 601 − 614.
[35]	TAYLOR M K, LANKAU R A, WURZBURGER N, et al. Mycorrhizal associations of trees have different indirect effects on organic matter decomposition [J]. J Ecol, 2016, 104(6): 1576 − 1584.
[36]	OOSTRA S, MAJDI H, OLSSON M. Impact of tree species on soil carbon stocks and soil acidity in southern Sweden [J]. Scand J For Res, 2007, 21(5): 364 − 371.
[37]	CLEMMENSEN K E, BAHR A, OVASKAINEN O, et al. Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest [J]. Science, 2013, 339: 1615 − 1618.
[38]	GODBOLD D L, HOOSBEEK M R, LUKAC M, et al. Mycorrhizal hyphal turnover as a dominant process for carbon input into soil organic matter [J]. Plant Soil, 2006, 281(1/2): 15 − 24.
[39]	ZHANG Jing, EKBLAD A, SIGURDSSON B D, et al. The influence of soil warming on organic carbon sequestration of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a sub-arctic grassland[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2020, 147: 107826. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107826.
[40]	ÖPIK M, DAVISON J, MOORA M, et al. DNA-based detection and identification of Glomeromycota: the virtual taxonomy of environmental sequences [J]. Botany, 2014, 92(2): 135 − 147.
[41]	MILLER R M, KLING M. The importance of integration and scale in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis [J]. Plant Soil, 2000, 226(2): 295 − 309.
[42]	MILLER R M, JASTROW J D, REINHARDT D R. External hyphal production of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in pasture and tallgrass prairie communities [J]. Oecologia, 1995, 103(1): 17 − 23.
[43]	RILLIG M C. Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation [J]. Can J Soil Sci, 2004, 84(4): 355 − 363.
[44]	RILLIG M C, WRIGHT S F, NICHOLS K A, et al. Large contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools in tropical forest soils [J]. Plant Soil, 2001, 233(2): 167 − 177.
[45]	刘满强, 胡锋, 陈小云. 土壤有机碳稳定机制研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(6): 2642 − 2650.	LIU Manqiang, HU Feng, CHEN Xiaoyun. A review on mechanisms of soil organic carbon stabilization [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(6): 2642 − 2650.
[46]	SIX J, BOSSUYT H, DEGRYZE S, et al. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics [J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2004, 79(1): 7 − 31.
[47]	RILLIG M C, MUMMEY D L. Mycorrhizas and soil structure [J]. New Phytolt, 2006, 171(1): 41 − 53.
[48]	LEIFHEIT E F, VERESOGLOU S D, LEHMANN A, et al. Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation: a meta-analysis [J]. Plant Soil, 2013, 374(1/2): 523 − 537.
[49]	WILSON G W T, RICE C W, RILLIG M C, et al. Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: results from long-term field experiments [J]. Ecol Lett, 2009, 12(5): 452 − 461.
[50]	GILLESPIE A W, FARRELL R E, WALLEY F L, et al. Glomalin-related soil protein contains non-mycorrhizal-related heat-stable proteins, lipids and humic materials [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43(4): 766 − 777.
[51]	SEYFRIED G S, DALLING J W, YANG W H. Mycorrhizal type effects on leaf litter decomposition depend on litter quality and environmental context [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2021, 155: 1 − 18.
[52]	DICKIE I A, KOELE N, BLUM J D, et al. Mycorrhizas in changing ecosystems [J]. Botany, 2014, 92(2): 149 − 160.
[53]	MCGUIRE K L, TRESEDER K K. Microbial communities and their relevance for ecosystem models: decomposition as a case study [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42(4): 529 − 535.
[54]	CRAIG M E, TURNER B L, LIANG C, et al. Tree mycorrhizal type predicts within-site variability in the storage and distribution of soil organic matter [J]. Global Change Biol, 2018, 24(8): 3317 − 3330.
[55]	PHILLIPS R P, BRZOSTEK E, MIDGLEY M G. The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon-nutrient couplings in temperate forests [J]. New Phytol, 2013, 199(1): 41 − 51.
[56]	FERNANDEZ C W, KENNEDY P G. Revisiting the “Gadgil effect”: do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils? [J]. New Phytol, 2016, 209(4): 1382 − 1394.
[57]	STERKENBURG E, BAHR A, BRANDSTROM DURLING M, et al. Changes in fungal communities along a boreal forest soil fertility gradient [J]. New Phytol, 2015, 207(4): 1145 − 1158.
[58]	FIERER N, CRAINE J M, SCHIMEL M. Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition [J]. Ecology, 2005, 86(2): 320 − 326.
[59]	CHEEKE T E, PHILLIPS R P, BRZOSTEK E R, et al. Dominant mycorrhizal association of trees alters carbon and nutrient cycling by selecting for microbial groups with distinct enzyme function [J]. New Phytol, 2017, 214(1): 432 − 442.
[60]	TISSERANT E, KOHLER A, DOZOLME-SEDDAS P, et al. The transcriptome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices (DAOM 197198) reveals functional tradeoffs in an obligate symbiont [J]. New Phytol, 2012, 193(3): 755 − 769.
[61]	HERMAN D J, FIRESTONE M K, NUCCIO E, et al. Interactions between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a soil microbial community mediating litter decomposition [J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2012, 80(1): 236 − 247.
[62]	PATERSON E, SIM A, DAVIDSON J, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae promote priming of native soil organic matter mineralisation [J]. Plant Soil, 2016, 408(1/2): 243 − 254.
[63]	TALBOT J M, ALLISON S D, TRESEDER K K. Decomposers in disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in ecosystems under global change [J]. Funct Ecol, 2008, 22(6): 955 − 963.
[64]	KUZYAKOV Y. Sources of CO₂ efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2006, 38(3): 425 − 448.
[65]	AVERILL C, DIETZE M C, BHATNAGAR J M. Continental-scale nitrogen pollution is shifting forest mycorrhizal associations and soil carbon stocks [J]. Global Change Biol, 2018, 24(10): 4544 − 4553.
[66]	SMITH G, PEAY K. Stepping forward from relevance in mycorrhizal ecology [J]. New Phytol, 2020, 226(2): 292 − 294.
[67]	JIANG Shaotao, HU Xiaoxuan, KANG Yalong, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in the rhizospheric soil of litchi and mango orchards as affected by geographic distance, soil properties and manure input[J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2020, 152: 103593. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103593.
[68]	JIANG Shaotao, LIU Yongjun, LUO Jiajia, et al. Dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure and functioning along a nitrogen enrichment gradient in an alpine meadow ecosystem [J]. New Phytol, 2018, 220(4): 1222 − 1235.
[69]	CHENG Weixin, PARTON W, GONZALEZ-MELER M A, et al. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming [J]. New Phytol, 2014, 201(1): 31 − 44.
[70]	ZHU Weixing, EHRENFELD J G. The effects of mycorrhizal roots on litter decomposition, soil biota, and nutrients in a spodosolic soil [J]. Plant Soil, 1996, 179(1): 109 − 118.
[71]	SULMAN B N, BRZOSTEK E R, MEDICI C, et al. Feedbacks between plant N demand and rhizosphere priming depend on type of mycorrhizal association [J]. Ecol Lett, 2017, 20(8): 1043 − 1053.
[72]	SUBKE J A, VOKE N R, LERONNI V, et al. Dynamics and pathways of autotrophic and heterotrophic soil CO₂ efflux revealed by forest girdling [J]. J Ecol, 2011, 99(1): 186 − 193.
[73]	PHILLIPS R P, FAHEY T J. Tree species and mycorrhizal associations influence the magnitude of rhizosphere effects [J]. Ecology, 2006, 87(5): 1302 − 1313.
[74]	PHILLIPS C L, KLUBER L A, MARTIN J P, et al. Contributions of ectomycorrhizal fungal mats to forest soil respiration [J]. Biogeosciences, 2012, 9(6): 2099 − 2110.
[75]	HODGE A, CAMPBELL C D, FITTER A H. An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material [J]. Nature, 2001, 413(6853): 297 − 299.
[76]	SHAHZAD T, CHENU C, GENET P, et al. Contribution of exudates, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and litter depositions to the rhizosphere priming effect induced by grassland species [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2015, 80: 146 − 155.
[77]	COTRUFO M F, RANALLI M G, HADDIX M L, et al. Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter [J]. Nat Geosci, 2019, 12(12): 989 − 994.
[78]	FONTAINE S, HENAULT C, AAMOR A, et al. Fungi mediate long term sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43(1): 86 − 96.
[79]	YIN Liming, DIJKSTRA F A, PHILLIPS R P, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees cause a higher carbon to nitrogen ratio of soil organic matter decomposition via rhizosphere priming than ectomycorrhizal trees[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2021, 157: 108246. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108246.
[80]	NEUMANN J, MATZNER E. Contribution of newly grown extramatrical ectomycorrhizal mycelium and fine roots to soil respiration in a young Norway spruce site [J]. Plant Soil, 2014, 378(1/2): 73 − 82.
[81]	HODGE A, FITTER A H. Substantial nitrogen acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic material has implications for N cycling [J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci, 2010, 107(31): 13754 − 13759.
[82]	VERESOGLOU S D, SEN R, MAMOLOS A P, et al. Plant species identity and arbuscular mycorrhizal status modulate potential nitrification rates in nitrogen-limited grassland soils [J]. J Ecol, 2011, 99(6): 1339 − 1349.
[83]	NOTTINGHAM A T, TURNER B L, WINTER K, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelial respiration in a moist tropical forest [J]. New Phytolt, 2010, 186(4): 957 − 967.
[84]	METCALFE D B, ROCHA W, BALCH J K, et al. Impacts of fire on sources of soil CO₂ efflux in a dry Amazon rain forest [J]. Global Change Biol, 2018, 24(8): 3629 − 3641.
[85]	GUI Weiyang, REN Haiyan, LIU Nan, et al. Plant functional group influences arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal abundance and hyphal contribution to soil CO₂ efflux in temperate grasslands [J]. Plant Soil, 2018, 432(1/2): 1 − 14.
[86]	FENN K M, MALHI Y, MORECROFT M D. Soil CO₂ efflux in a temperate deciduous forest: environmental drivers and component contributions [J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42(10): 1685 − 1693.
[87]	HEINEMEYER A, WILKINSON M, VARGAS R, et al. Exploring the overflow tap theory: linking forest soil CO₂ fluxes and individual mycorrhizosphere components to photosynthesis [J]. Biogeosciences, 2012, 9(1): 79 − 95.
[88]	MOYANO F E, KUTSCH W L, REBMANN C. Soil respiration fluxes in relation to photosynthetic activity in broad-leaf and needle-leaf forest stands [J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2008, 148(1): 135 − 143.
[89]	BRADFORD M A, KEISER A D, DAVIES C A, et al. Empirical evidence that soil carbon formation from plant inputs is positively related to microbial growth [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2013, 113(1/3): 271 − 281.
[90]	NORTHUP R, DAHLGREN R, VOGT K, et al. Polyphenol control of nitrogen release from pine litter [J]. Nature, 1995, 377(6546): 227 − 229.
[91]	王薪琪, 王传宽, 张泰东. 森林土壤碳氮循环过程的新视角: 丛枝与外生菌根树种的作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(10): 1113 − 1125.	WANG Xinqi, WANG Chuankuan, ZHANG Taidong. New perspectives on forest soil carbon and nitrogen cycling processes: roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal versus ectomycorrhizal tree species [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(10): 1113 − 1125.
[92]	OUIMETTE A P, OLLINGER S V, LEPINE L C, et al. Accounting for carbon flux to mycorrhizal fungi may resolve discrepancies in forest carbon budgets [J]. Ecosystems, 2019, 23(4): 715 − 729.
[93]	FERNANDEZ C W, SEE C R, KENNEDY P G. Decelerated carbon cycling by ectomycorrhizal fungi is controlled by substrate quality and community composition [J]. New Phytol, 2020, 226(2): 569 − 582.
[94]	VEN A, VERLINDEN M S, VERBRUGGEN E, et al. Experimental evidence that phosphorus fertilization and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis can reduce the carbon cost of phosphorus uptake [J]. Funct Ecol, 2019, 33(11): 2215 − 2225.