Volume 42 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

JIANG Bo, LI Yilin, YU Zhirun, et al. Evaluation of wild medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2025, 42(4): 736−744 doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240594
Citation: JIANG Bo, LI Yilin, YU Zhirun, et al. Evaluation of wild medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2025, 42(4): 736−744 doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240594

Evaluation of wild medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands

DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240594
  • Received Date: 2024-11-01
  • Accepted Date: 2025-04-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-03-31
  • Available Online: 2025-08-01
  • Publish Date: 2025-08-01
  •   Objective  Based on a survey of traditional Chinese medicinal resources on Nanji Islands, this study aims to understand the overall situation of wild medicinal plant resources in this area and provide scientific basis for the development and utilization of wild medicinal plant resources.   Method  A transect survey approach was employed to investigate medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands. Based on the survey results, the Delphi method was applied to determine the indicator layer and scheme layer of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A medicinal value evaluation model was constructed for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Finally, a comprehensive ranking of the development potential of wild medicinal plants on Nanji Islands was conducted based on the evaluation results.   Result  The comprehensive evaluation model of wild medicinal plants analyzed and evaluated 9 indicators including medicinal efficacy (C1), medicinal parts (C2), medicinal categories (C3), utilization degree (C4), community status (C5), frequency (C6), life type (C7), water ecological type (C8), and ecological habits (C9) from 3 dimensions: resource value, resource development and utilization potential, and ecological characteristics. 382 wild medicinal plant species belonging to 275 genera in 89 families were classified into 3 levels, among which 137 species were classified as 1st level wild medicinal plants with a comprehensive medicinal value assessment metric (hA) greater than 4.04. There were 171 species of 2nd level wild medicinal plants (3.08‌<hA≤4.04). There were 74 species of 3rd level medicinal plants (hA≤3.08).   Conclusion  Medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands are abundant. Priority can be given to the development and utilization of medicinal herbs such as Aster turbinatus, Chrysanthemum indicum, and Ixeridium dentatum, while the germplasm resources of Aristolochia debilis, Herminium lanceum, and Platycarya strobilacea should be protected. [Ch, 1 fig. 3 tab. 32 ref.]
  • [1] YING Xuebing, CHEN Pingmei, LI Luyao, WANG Hong, WU Haotian, ZHANG Yijun, ZHANG Xuerong, ZANG Yunxiang.  Comprehensive evaluation of Solanum melongena cultivars . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2025, 42(2): 357-364. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240394
    [2] YUAN Zixin, GUO Qiuju, AI Xunru, YAO Lan, ZHU Jiang, WANG Lei, XIANG Qin.  Comprehensive evaluation of spatial structure of four typical forest stands in Jinzishan state-owned forest farm . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(5): 928-938. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240162
    [3] WANG Shuang, DONG Bin, WANG Yiguang, ZHAO Hongbo.  Analysis and evaluation of flower and fruit characteristics of different Prunus mume cultivars . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(1): 113-123. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230213
    [4] YANG Yan, TANG Jie, LI Yongjin, TANG Yuxi, LI Lei.  Analysis and evaluation of growth and wood fiber characters of seven poplar clones in southern China . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(4): 807-813. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210481
    [5] WU Haibing, HE Xiaoli, LIANG Jing.  Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility in relocated land for landscaping . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(5): 1076-1081. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200753
    [6] TENG Zhiyan, CUI Yutong, YING Xuebing, ZHENG Weiwei, ZANG Yunxiang, ZHU Zhujun.  Comprehensive evaluation of pumpkin cultivars based on a principal component analysis . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(1): 143-150. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.01.019
    [7] ZHAO Xungang, HU Yucun, WANG Wenhui, HU Yunqing.  Changes in the ecological environment of Wuhai City and driving factors . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2019, 36(5): 990-998. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.05.019
    [8] LI Gaozhi, ZHU Yajun, ZHOU Shengcai, LU Yunfeng, ZHANG Junhong, TONG Zaikang.  Physiological indices at low temperature stress for two types of Phoebe zhennan . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(2): 310-318. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.02.015
    [9] MAO Liang, WANG Jingru, SHAO Zhuofeng.  Evaluation of sustainable development status of tourism in the northeast forest areas, China . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(6): 1113-1119. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.020
    [10] DING Shaogang, ZHU Yanran.  Constructing a synthetic evaluation system of hospital out-door environment based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy synthetic evaluation . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(6): 1104-1112. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.019
    [11] ZHANG Yanru, LIANG Lizhuang, NIU Shukui, HAN Hairong.  Ecological landscape quality of Taiyue Mountain in Shanxi . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016, 33(4): 599-604. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.04.007
    [12] XU Xiuyu, XIAO Li, WANG Minghuai, ZHANG Huaxin.  A comprehensive evaluation system for anti-typhoon performance of trees in coastal areas . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(4): 516-522. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.04.004
    [13] YANG Ling, KANG Yongxiang, LI Xiaojun, WANG Fu, WANG Danyang, GUO Le.  Health of ancient Platycladus orientalis in the Mausoleum of the Yellow Emperor . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(5): 779-784. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.05.019
    [14] KONG Yangyang, HAN Hairong, KANG Fengfeng, WANG Qingchun.  Ecological assessment of Momoge National Nature Reserve . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(1): 55-62. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.01.008
    [15] DING Yan-fen, ZHANG Jia-ping.  Comprehensive evaluation of landscape exploitation and application of wild tree and shrub resources in Mount Yuntai of Jiangsu Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(4): 558-565. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.04.012
    [16] LI Yin-gang, YING Guang-ming, LIU Xin-hong, HE Xiao-yong, YING Shang-jiao, CHEN Jun-xiao.  Establishment and application of tree species assessment system on fast-growing handle making raw material forests . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2010, 27(5): 719-724. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.05.013
    [17] JIA Si-hen, FANG Wei-in, CHEN Fa-di, CHEN Su-mei, YANG Xue-meng.  Heat tolerance for summer blooming of Chrysanthemum . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(1): 52-57.
    [18] NING Hui-juan, SHAO Feng, DAI Si-lan, BAO Zhi-yi.  Application evaluation of cutting flowers of 40 chrysanthemum cultivars . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2009, 26(3): 389-394.
    [19] MA Jun, WEI Xin-liang, YOU Jian-lin, XU Xiao-jun.  Tree species selection for an ecological landscape forest at Qingshan Lake,Zhejiang Province . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(5): 578-583.
    [20] Wu Yanxiong, Chen Meilan, Zhou Guomo, Guo Renjian.  Probing into synthetic appraisal of regional forest resources . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1999, 16(1): 80-84.
  • [1]
    HOU Xiaoqi, JIANG Weike, SONG Peilang, et al. Analysis of medicinal resource diversity in 33 pilot (districts) in Guizhou Province [J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2019, 44(2): 265−269.
    [2]
    XUE Xiaojuan, LIU Cai, WANG Yimin, et al. Status quo and development strategy of traditional Chinese medicine in the new era [J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2023, 25(5): 11−20.
    [3]
    DUAN Jin’ao, GUO Sheng, SU Shulan, et al. Innovation and practice of resource chemistry of Chinese medicinal materials leading the recycling and green development of the whole industry chain of chinese medicinal resources [J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 2024, 40(10): 1114−1122.
    [4]
    YU Xiaofang, MING Xiaoyu, HU Jiani, et al. Investigation and diversity of medicinal plant resources in Wangcang County, Guangyuan City [J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2023, 46(6): 1366−1370.
    [5]
    PAN Hongli, LI Maihe, CAI Xiaohu, et al. Plant growth and physio-ecological characteristics along altitude gradients [J]. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 2009, 18(2): 722−730.
    [6]
    LI Gang, LI Yong. Optimization spatial pattern method for vegetation landscape in bay based on AHP[J/OL]. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 2021, 83: 104041[2024-10-01]. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104041.
    [7]
    LI Meng. Plant Landscape Evaluation of Medicinal Botanical Garden in Anguo City, Hebei Province Based on AHP Method[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2018.
    [8]
    WANG Dan, HOU Jianming, PAN Boya, et al. Evaluation of medicinal plant resources in Wanghua District, Fushun City, Liaoning Province Based on AHP method [J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2023, 54(2): 207−213.
    [9]
    WU Ying, ZHANG Jiankui, WANG Jianhua, et al. Investigation of medicinal plant resources and AHP evaluation in Xihu District of Benxi City, Liaoning Province [J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2021, 44(5): 1075−1080.
    [10]
    ZHOU Yafu, LI Sifeng, LI Bin, et al. Evaluation of important medicinal plant resources in Qinling Mountains based on analytic hierarchy process method [J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2013, 44(15): 2172−2182.
    [11]
    ZHU Hong, KU Weipeng, RONG Jiantao, et al. Species diversity and floristic characteristics of vascular plants in Nanji Island, Zhejiang Province[J]. Plant Diversity and Resources, 2015, 37(6): 713−720.
    [12]
    KONG Jing, JI Xinyue, WANG Pengcheng, et al. Spatial distribution and environmental interpretation of Casuarina equisetifolia communities on Nanji Island [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2022, 38(7): 882−889.
    [13]
    BAO Naoou, SHI Dinggang, GUAN Wanchun, et al. Effect of CO2 concentration and irradiance on the growth of Sargassum horneri (Phaeophyceae) in Nanji Archipelago [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2014, 26(3): 649−655.
    [14]
    LI Yilin, JIANG Bo, WANG Zhibei, et al. Diversity and floral characteristics of wild medicinal plant resources in Nanji Islands [J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2024, 43(5): 114−122.
    [15]
    RONG Jiantao, ZHU Hong, KU Weipeng, et al. Characteristics of vegetation communities of the main forest types in Nanji Island, Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2017, 32(2): 294−300.
    [16]
    ZHU Hong, CAI Houcai, YOU Luxiang, et al. Analyses on species diversity, environmental interpretation and spatial distribution pattern of natural population of Narcissus tazetta var. chinensis on Daleishan Island of Nanji Islands in Zhejiang Province [J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2017, 26(3): 100−108.
    [17]
    LI Hong. Concise Records of Islands in Wenzhou City[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2015: 35−38.
    [18]
    WU Zhengyi. Vegetation of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1980: 15−28.
    [19]
    WU Yigu. Chinese Herbal Medicine[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1998: 115−208.
    [20]
    XIAO Peigen. New Compilation of Traditional Chinese Medicine: Vol 1 [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002: 89−108.
    [21]
    Committee on Biodiversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Catalogue of Life China 2024 Annual Checklist[EB/OL]. 2024-01-01 [2024-10-28]. https://escience.org.cn/news/activity-detail?id=850b551ba538ec76f1c2b2dae876eafa&code=work.
    [22]
    XU Guojun. Chinese Medicinal Materials Science (Part 2)[M]. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press, 1996: 40−65.
    [23]
    CHEN Renshou. Practical Handbook of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the National Pharmacopoeia[M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2007: 139−158.
    [24]
    Pharmacopoeia Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China[M]. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press, 2020: 1088.
    [25]
    FATTAHI M M, MAHDAVI R, REZAEI M, et al. Determination of optimal cultivation pattern of medicinal plants using AHP-TOPSIS hybrid model (case study: Qom Province) [J]. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 2021, 36(6): 885−897.
    [26]
    BRADY R S. Utilizing and adapting the delphi method for use in qualitative research [J]. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2015, 14(5): 597−228.
    [27]
    PIRI I, MOOSAVI M, TAHERI A Z, et al. The spatial assessment of suitable areas for medicinal species of Astragalus (Astragalus hypsogeton Bunge) using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and geographic information system (GIS) [J]. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2019, 22(2): 193−201.
    [28]
    REBUCAS M, RADAM L J, MOLERO N, et al. An integrated fuzzy evaluation of photovoltaic systems adoption barriers in rural island communities of developing economies [J/OL]. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2024, 80: 101424[2024-10-01]. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2024.101424.
    [29]
    JAYAWICKRAMA H, KULATUNGA A K, MATHAVAN S. Fuzzy AHP based plant sustainability evaluation method [J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, 8: 571−578.
    [30]
    WEI Jun, ZHENG Weichao, YANG Chen, et al. Analysis of medicinal plant resources and diversity characteristics in Tangjiahe National Nature Reserve [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2019, 39(7): 1307−1315.
    [31]
    LIU Yu, XU Chengyang. Research progress in ancient trees health assessment [J]. World Forestry Research, 2013, 26(1): 37−42.
    [32]
    CHEN Junqi. Health Assessment of Ancient Trees in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2014.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

Article views(525) PDF downloads(44) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Evaluation of wild medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240594

Abstract:   Objective  Based on a survey of traditional Chinese medicinal resources on Nanji Islands, this study aims to understand the overall situation of wild medicinal plant resources in this area and provide scientific basis for the development and utilization of wild medicinal plant resources.   Method  A transect survey approach was employed to investigate medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands. Based on the survey results, the Delphi method was applied to determine the indicator layer and scheme layer of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A medicinal value evaluation model was constructed for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Finally, a comprehensive ranking of the development potential of wild medicinal plants on Nanji Islands was conducted based on the evaluation results.   Result  The comprehensive evaluation model of wild medicinal plants analyzed and evaluated 9 indicators including medicinal efficacy (C1), medicinal parts (C2), medicinal categories (C3), utilization degree (C4), community status (C5), frequency (C6), life type (C7), water ecological type (C8), and ecological habits (C9) from 3 dimensions: resource value, resource development and utilization potential, and ecological characteristics. 382 wild medicinal plant species belonging to 275 genera in 89 families were classified into 3 levels, among which 137 species were classified as 1st level wild medicinal plants with a comprehensive medicinal value assessment metric (hA) greater than 4.04. There were 171 species of 2nd level wild medicinal plants (3.08‌<hA≤4.04). There were 74 species of 3rd level medicinal plants (hA≤3.08).   Conclusion  Medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands are abundant. Priority can be given to the development and utilization of medicinal herbs such as Aster turbinatus, Chrysanthemum indicum, and Ixeridium dentatum, while the germplasm resources of Aristolochia debilis, Herminium lanceum, and Platycarya strobilacea should be protected. [Ch, 1 fig. 3 tab. 32 ref.]

JIANG Bo, LI Yilin, YU Zhirun, et al. Evaluation of wild medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2025, 42(4): 736−744 doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240594
Citation: JIANG Bo, LI Yilin, YU Zhirun, et al. Evaluation of wild medicinal plant resources on Nanji Islands[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2025, 42(4): 736−744 doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240594
  • 中药资源是中医药事业赖以生存发展的重要物质基础和可持续发展的重要保障,是国家重要的战略性资源,其分布具有明显的地域性和关联性[1]。中药资源不仅在传统中医药领域发挥着不可替代的作用,还在现代医疗体系中为疾病的预防、治疗和康复提供了重要的天然药物来源,尤其是在抗炎、抗肿瘤和免疫调节等领域表现出显著的疗效[2]。随着全球对天然药物需求的不断增长,中药资源在国际健康领域中的地位日益提升,不仅对全球医疗体系产生了深远影响,还为许多国家和地区的经济发展提供了重要支持[3]。虽然进行了第4次全国性资源普查[4],但中国国土广袤、地势众多、气候复杂,即使是生长在同一山脉的植物,因其生长位置的不同,也会产生很大的差异,因此对于特定区域的资源状况需要具体情况具体分析。在海岛特殊的地貌以及气候条件下,野生药用植物具有明显的特殊性,具有相当的可开发潜力[5]。随着经济的发展,野生药用植物受人类活动的影响越来越大,生长空间被压缩,大多数野生珍稀药用植物已处在濒危的边缘。因此,制定野生药用植物受威胁程度的评价方法以及优先保护策略迫在眉睫。

    层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process, AHP)[6]可将因素按不同层次聚集组合,通过两两比较标度值的方法将定性问题进行量化,最终构成一个多层次的分析结构模型,是对定性问题进行定量分析的一种简便、灵活而又实用的多准则决策方法。根据已有的研究,该方法可以帮助评估野生药用植物的价值潜力,均得到了满意的结果[710]

    南麂列岛位于浙江省平阳县以东海域,地处海洋与大陆的过渡地带[11],生态系统独立且多样,形成了与内陆截然不同的生态环境。这里不仅分布有许多珍稀濒危植物,还可能存在尚未被发现或被充分研究的野生药用植物物种[12]。岛上高盐、高温环境,可能使当地野生药用植物富含有抗炎、抗氧化或抗肿瘤活性的次生代谢产物[13]。南麂列岛共有野生药用植物89科275属382种,以被子植物最多,是该区主要的野生药用植物来源;其次为蕨类植物;裸子植物最少,仅黑松Pinus thunbergii 1种[14]。目前,关于南麂列岛的研究多关注于其海洋生物和旅游资源的开发,虽然也有少量岛屿植被和植物多样性的研究,但关于南麂列岛野生药用植物开发潜力的研究缺失。本研究采用层次分析法对南麂列岛野生药用植物资源可持续开发潜力进行全面、客观的评价,进一步了解南麂列岛野生药用植物资源的现状,为南麂列岛资源可持续开发利用提供客观依据和评价方法。

    • 南麂列岛位于浙江东部海域, 27°25′~27°30′N,120°03′ ~121°10′E[15],由52个岛屿组成,陆地总面积约11.3 km2,是中国东南沿海的重要岛屿之一,最高海拔为299.1 m,海岸线总长为24.8 km。南麂列岛属于中亚热带海洋性季风气候,年平均降水量约为1 200.0 mm,年平均气温为16.5 ℃[16]。土壤类型以黄壤和海岸砂土为主,贫瘠,具有较高的盐碱性,部分区域因海鸟活动和植被覆盖,土壤有机质较高[17]。南麂列岛特殊的地理条件孕育了丰富的野生药用植物资源[14]

      前期调查发现:南麂列岛的89科275属382种野生药用植物中,以全株药用类(63.35%)、苦味类(59.95%)、解毒杀虫止痒类(21.32%)和消毒类(22.12%)植物为主,其他药用部位、药味和药用功能类型的种类较少[14]

    • 基于2017—2018年南麂列岛森林植被本底调查和2021—2022年南麂列岛野生药用植物资源调查结果,结合相关资料确定南麂列岛野生药用植物名录。参考文献[1824],分析统计南麂列岛野生药用植物的生活型、药用部位、药用类别、药用功效和群落地位等数据,用于建立综合评价指标体系。

    • 根据野生药用植物资源开发利用的特点,参考前人的经验[25]建立指标体系,应用德尔菲法[26]确定层次分析法的指标层与方案层。根据层次分析法的分析步骤,向专家发放调查问卷,对野生药用植物特征进行客观打分。进行综合评价首先需确定权重[27]。权重大小直接影响评估结果,体现了单项指标在评价指标体系中的重要性,反映了评价者对不同指标价值的态度[28]。确定相关指标的平均值,根据与之相关联的比例结果构建相应的判断矩阵,进行一致性比例(consistency ratio,CR)检验。当CR<0.1时,表示判断矩阵具有较高的一致性,各指标权重值分配适当;当CR≥0.1时,不具一致性,其结果不能接受,需要重新分配权重[6]。通过一致性检验后对单个南麂列岛野生药用植物按评分标准进行打分,并汇总,使用YAAHP软件[29]进行模糊综合评价,运用等距划分法将各个约束层的权重以及综合评价结果划分为3个等级,确定各权重以及综合评价结果的估量值分界,以便对结果进行分析和讨论。等距划分法的公式为:

      式(1)中:$ {h}_{r} $表示各约束层权重估量值的区间;R为约束层权重或综合评价得分最大值与最小值的差;k为区间数量,本研究中为3。用h1表示资源价值估量值;h2表示资源开发利用潜力估量值;h3表示生态学特性估量值;hA表示综合药用价值估量值。

      最后根据评价结果对南麂列岛野生药用植物开发潜力进行综合排序。

    • 利用层次分析法建立综合评价模型(表1)。模型分为目标层、约束层、标准层、最底层。

      目标层(A) 约束层(B) 标准层(C) 最底层(D)
      野生药用植物资源开发利用价值综合评价
      资源价值(B1) 药用功效(C1) 待评价的野生药用植物(D1, D2, D3,···)
      药用部位(C2)
      药用类别(C3)
      资源开发利用潜力(B2) 利用程度(C4)
      群落地位(C5)
      频度(C6)
      生态学特性(B3) 生活型(C7)
      水分生态型(C8)
      生态习性(C9)

      Table 1.  Appraisal model of medicinal plant resources in Nanji Islands

      目标层(A)在保证南麂列岛生态环境不被破坏且得到逐渐改善的前提下,遵循自然规律,科学有效地开发利用野生药用植物资源。

      约束层(B)包括制约和限制南麂列岛野生药用植物资源开发利用的各种因素。本研究仅列出对目标层制约作用较强的3个因素作为约束层:资源价值(B1),作为该项资源所具有的特定价值,其质量直接影响吸引公众的程度;资源开发利用潜力(B2),南麂列岛的野生药用植物资源的开发利用必须在保护的前提下,视实际情况进行,资源开发利用潜力决定野生药用植物利用的规模和前景;生态学特性(B3),主要反映资源自身的特征和空间分布规律,影响开发利用的难易程度。

      标准层(C)体现了约束层(B)的具体选择标准。资源价值包括药用功效(C1)、药用部位(C2)以及药用类别(C3)。开发与利用潜力包括了利用程度(C4)、群落地位(C5)和频度(C6);生态学特性包括了生活型(C7)、水分生态型(C8)以及生态习性(C9)。选择上述9个因素,运用定性与定量相结合的方法来确定分值作为评价指标(表2)。

      分值 药用功效(C1) 药用部位(C2) 药用类别(C3) 利用程度(C4) 群落
      地位(C5)
      5 5类及以上 全草入药或根、茎、叶、花、
       果分别入药
      中药、农药共用 大量药用 建群种
      4 4类功效 地上部分入药或5个类别
       中4项分别入药
      中药和农药2项中仅1项 较多药用 优势种
      3 3类功效 5个类别中3项入药 已药用 常见种
      2 2类功效 2项入药 较少药用 偶见种
      1 1类功效 1项入药 尚未药用 稀有种
      分值 频度(C6) 生活型(C7) 水分生态型(C8) 生态习性(C9)
      5 随遇种 多年生草本 中生植物 适应性很强、无生境要求
      4 较常见 1、2年生草本 旱生植物 适应性较强、对生境要求不严
      3 散生或常出现于定点区域 木本植物 湿生植物 适应性强、要求一定的生境
      2 疏生或偶尔出现在定点区域 水生植物 适应性不强、对生境要求严格
      1 定点区域稀有植物 适应性弱、对生境要求特别严格
        说明:-表示无此项。

      Table 2.  Appraisal standard for target hierarchy of wild medicinal plant resources in Nanji Islands

      最底层(D)为待评价的野生药用植物种类。

    • 各指标的权重及判断矩阵一致性比例见表3。约束层、标准层、综合评价指标权重(分别为$ {W}_{{B}_{i}} $、$ {W}_{{C}_{j}} $、$ {W}_{ij} $)之间的关系为:

      约束层(Bi) 约束层权重 标准层(Cj) 标准层权重 判断矩阵一致性比例(CR) 综合评价指标权重
      资源价值(B1) 0.320 药用功效(C1) 0.540 0.009<0.100 0.173
      药用部位(C2) 0.297 0.095
      药用类别(C3) 0.163 0.052
      资源开发利用潜力(B2) 0.559 利用程度(C4) 0.157 0.047<0.100 0.088
      群落地位(C5) 0.594 0.332
      频度(C6) 0.249 0.139
      生态学特性(B3) 0.122 生活型(C7) 0.625 0.016<0.100 0.076
      水分生态型(C8) 0.230 0.028
      生态习性(C9) 0.137 0.017

      Table 3.  Valuation index weights and consistency of judgment matrices for medicinal plant resources in Nanji Islands

      式(2)中:$ {W}_{{B}_{i}} $表示约束层权重;$ {W}_{{C}_{j}} $表示标准层权重;$ {W}_{ij} $则表示综合评价指标权重。综合评价指标的判断矩阵一致性比例(CR)检验结果中,CR=0.030<0.100,同时资源价值、资源开发利用潜力、生态学特性的CR分别为0.009、0.047和0.016,均小于0.100,表明通过了判断矩阵的一致性检验。

    • 综合评价得分需要专家按各个指标打分标准对野生药用植物进行逐一打分,每个标准层的得分($ C $)由权重和向量与评分向量的点积而得。用公式表示为:

      式(3)中:$ {W}_{{C}_{j}} $为标准层中第j项指标的权重值;$ {P}_{{C}_{j}} $为对应的评分;$ n $为标准层数量。最后的综合评价得分A用公式表示为:

      式(4)中:$ {W}_{{B}_{i}} $为约束层第i项的权重值;m为约束层总数。

    • 南麂列岛382种野生药用植物资源价值划分为3个等级(图1):第1级,资源价值估量值(h1)>3.80的野生药用植物占总量的18%,包含海金沙Lygodium japonicum、阔叶乌蕨Odontosoria biflora、扇叶铁线蕨Adiantum flabellulatum、井栏边草Pteris multifida以及伏石蕨Lemmaphyllum microphyllum等67种;第2级,2.60<h1≤3.80的野生药用植物占总量的50%,包含芒萁Dicranopteris pedata、野雉尾金粉蕨Onychium japonicum、蜈蚣凤尾蕨Pteris vittata、渐尖毛蕨Cyclosorus acuminatus以及干旱毛蕨Cyclosorus aridus等193种;第3级,h1≤2.60的野生药用植物占总量的32%,包含傅氏凤尾蕨Pteris fauriei、珠芽狗脊Woodwardia prolifera、中华复叶耳蕨Arachniodes chinensis、全缘贯众Cyrtomium falcatum以及太平鳞毛蕨Dryopteris pacifica等122种。

      Figure 1.  Proportion of estimated values of wild medicinal plants in the Nanji Islands

    • 根据南麂列岛野生药用植物资源特点,选取利用程度、群落地位以及频度作为指标对南麂列岛野生药用植物的资源开发利用潜力进行评价,依其分值大小将野生药用植物资源开发利用潜力划分为3个等级(图1):第1级,资源开发利用潜力估量值(h2)>3.72的野生药用植物占全部野生药用植物的49%,包含半边旗Pteris semipinnata、青绿薹草Carex breviculmis、扁穗莎草Cyperus compressus、砖子苗Cyperus cyperoides以及异型莎草Cyperus difformis等186种;第2级,2.44<h2≤3.72,占全部野生药用植物的41%,包含天南星Arisaema heterophyllum、风藤Piper kadsura、红楠Machilus thunbergii、艳山姜Alpinia zerumbet以及天门冬Asparagus cochinchinensis等157种;第3级,h2≤2.44,占全部野生药用植物的10%,包含杯盖阴石蕨Davallia griffithiana、江南星蕨Microsorum fortunei、马兜铃Aristolochia debilis、叉唇角盘兰Herminium lanceum以及萱草Hemerocallis fulva等39种。

    • 南麂列岛野生药用植物生态学特性划分为3个等级(图1):第1级,生态学特性估量值(h3)>4.28的野生药用植物占南麂列岛野生药用植物总量的49%,有换锦花Lycoris sprengeri、水仙Narcissus tazetta var. chinensis、天门冬、阔叶山麦冬Liriope muscari以及山麦冬Liriope spicata等188种,表明这类植物未受威胁,可开发利用;第2级,3.56<h3≤4.28,占南麂列岛野生药用植物总量的43%,有半夏Pinellia ternata、石蒜Lycoris radiata、饭包草Commelina benghalensis、裸花水竹叶Murdannia nudiflora以及野燕麦Avena fatua等165种,为渐稀种类,应注意保护与合理开发利用;第3级,h3≤3.56,占南麂列岛野生药用植物总量的8%,有菝葜Smilax china、小果菝葜Smilax davidiana、凤尾丝兰Yucca gloriosa、看麦娘Alopecurus aequalis以及囊颖草Sacciolepis indica等29种,为珍稀濒危种类或渐危种类,亟待加以保护。

    • 利用资源价值、资源开发利用潜力以及生态学特性3个子系统的评分对南麂列岛野生药用植物综合药用价值进行综合评价。依其最终分值的大小将南麂列岛野生药用植物综合药用价值划分为3个等级(图1):第1级,综合药用价值估量值(hA)>4.04的野生药用植物占南麂列岛野生药用植物总量的36%,有芦竹Arundo donax、雀麦Bromus japonicus、虎尾草Chloris virgata、狗牙根Cynodon dactylon以及龙爪茅Dactyloctenium aegyptium等137种,其综合药用价值高,可大规模开发利用;第2级,3.08<hA≤4.04,占南麂列岛野生药用植物总量的45%,有鸭跖草Commelina communis、野黍Eriochloa villosa、显子草Phaenosperma globosa、筒轴茅Rottboellia cochinchinensis以及木防己Cocculus orbiculatus等171种,有综合药用价值,可适度开发或小规模开发利用;第3级,hA≤3.08,占南麂列岛野生药用植物总量的19%,有黑松Pinus thunbergii、檵木Loropetalum chinense、山木通Clematis finetiana、小二仙草Gonocarpus micranthus以及朴树Celtis sinensis等74种,其综合药用价值低,应严加保护,保存种质资源。

      综合南麂列岛382种野生药用资源的排序结果见附表(http://pdfedit.xml-journal.cn/pdfview/zjnldxxb_2024-0594-tab.pdf?_t=48462),可优先选择陀螺紫菀Aster turbinatus、野菊Chrysanthemum indicum、小苦荬Ixeridium dentatum等综合药用价值较大的植物进行开发利用,而对马兜铃、叉唇角盘兰、化香树Platycarya strobilacea等综合药用价值低的种质资源进行保护,以待后续利用。

    • 在评价系统中,评价指标权重的分配至关重要。为使评价体系中的指标权重符合实际情况,本研究采用层次分析法对南麂列岛野生药用植物综合药用价值进行评价。该方法具有定性、定量相结合的特性,可以处理以往无法解决的实际问题。

      资源开发利用潜力权重最大,资源价值权重次之,生态学特性权重最小。表明野生药用植物资源的可持续开发利用,与该植物的资源开发利用潜力关系最为密切,说明群落地位、药用功效以及频度等指标是影响药用植物综合评价的重要指标,也是主导药用植物综合排名的最主要因素之一。这与前人研究结果基本一致[810, 30]

      相对于目标层,标准层指标权重从大到小依次为群落地位、药用功效、频度、药用部位、利用程度、生活型、药用类别、水分生态型、生态习性。表明在野生药用植物的可持续开发利用过程中,应该把群落地位、生活型、频度以及水分生态型等作为首要考虑因素,同时也要兼顾野生药用植物的利用程度以及药用功效等因素。这符合野生药用植物资源可持续开发利用的特点。

    • 层次分析法的评价结果表明:南麂列岛野生药用植物的资源开发利用潜力在整体评价中起到了主导作用。通过对综合评价指标权重分析,发现群落地位、生活型、频度以及水分生态型等因素是关键影响因素。因而,虽然海金沙和马兜铃等珍稀野生药用植物的资源价值得分较高,但因其资源开发利用潜力得分较低,导致综合得分较低,在本研究中排在靠后的位置。相对而言,单叶蔓荆Vitex rotundifolia等常见种类的资源价值较低,但资源开发利用潜力以及生态学特性得分相对较高,所以其综合得分比某些珍稀野生药用植物高。因此,在综合评价中,一些珍稀植物因其显著的市场价值和发展潜力被归入第1级,但因资源量较少,分布范围狭窄而被划分至第3级。这也符合南麂列岛的地方特点,体现了地域生态环境对药用植物分布及价值评估的影响。综合药用价值的评估结果还显示:常见且适应性强的野生药用植物,如茵陈蒿Artemisia capillaris,在本研究中获得了较高的排名。这一结果与对辽宁抚顺的药用植物研究结论相吻合。另如牛膝Achyranthes bidentata、枸杞Lycium chinense、山葛Pueraria montana等药用植物在秦岭[10]和唐家河[30]药用植物研究中排名前列,而在本研究中仅位于中上部分。主要是使用的标准层因素不同而产生的差异,其较为单一的药用功效和较为单一的药用部位,导致排名较低。由于药用植物的人工种植问题,以及中国国土广袤、立地条件多样造成的区域性影响,本研究的部分结论与现有文献中的研究结果略有不同。

    • 目前,野生药用植物资源的评价方法较多,如基于BP人工神经网络的评价法、逐步法(STEM)、主成分分析法等。不同的评价方法优缺点不一,因此在评价过程中,常将多种评价方法综合使用,以增加结果的可靠性[31]。层次分析法作为一种多准则评价的方法,被广泛应用于决策分析,具有结构清晰、操作简单等优点,但也存在主观性较强等局限性[32]。本研究邀请多位不同领域的专家,进行线上调查问卷,引入德尔菲法以及模糊综合评价法,降低个人偏见的影响,对分级结果进行模糊综合评价,提高了研究结果的准确性和客观性。

      南麂列岛地区,叉唇角盘兰、野菰Aeginetia indica以及阴行草Siphonostegia chinensis等面临重度威胁的野生药用植物亟需加强保护。这些野生药用植物在当地生态系统中起着关键作用,对它们进行保护有利于维持生态平衡和生物多样性;这些野生药用植物又具有独特的药用价值,其资源的持续利用对于中医药的传承和现代医药的发展至关重要。具体的保护措施包括建立保护区和种质资源库,开展生态监测和评估,实施严格的法律保护。通过科学的保护措施和可持续开发的策略可以实现这些珍稀植物资源的长期利用,为中医药的发展和现代医药创新提供坚实的基础。同时在开发利用方面可以加强科学研究与技术创新,提高繁育效率和植物的药用成分含量;还可以大力推进叉唇角盘兰、野菰和阴行草的人工种植与生态农业建设,开发先进的栽培技术,优化种植条件,增加产量,提高品质。除此之外,还可以探索这些野生药用植物在保健品、功能性食品和化妆品开发中的应用,增加其市场价值,进行多元化开发利用。最后可以建立社区参与和合作机制,鼓励当地社区参与濒危野生药用植物的保护与种植,建立利益共享机制提高社区保护意识和积极性。与科研机构、高校和企业合作,建立产学研结合的模式,共同推动濒危野生药用植物的保护和开发,实现生态保护与经济发展的双赢,推动当地生态文明建设和经济社会可持续发展。

Reference (32)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return