Volume 18 Issue 2
Jul.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Zhejiang A&F University  > 2001  >  18(2): 188-192

YUN Huiya, BI Huaxing, JIAO Zhenhuan, et al. Composition and diversity of understory plants under different stand types and densities in loess region of western Shanxi Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(3): 569-578. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220433
Citation: WU Yue-yan, TAO Wei-fang. Tissue culture and propagation in grape[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2001, 18(2): 188-192.
shu

Tissue culture and propagation in grape

  • 1.

    Department of Life Science , Zhejiang Wanli University , Ningbo 315101, Zhejiang , China

Funds:

浙江省宁波市重点实验室基金资助项目(9941004)

  • Received Date: 2000-08-28
  • Rev Recd Date: 2001-02-05
  • Publish Date: 2001-06-20
  • Taking the stems of 0.5 cm with single bud as the explants to the different culturemediums , the results showed that the rates of differentiation of buds that were the highest in all treatments were 100 % for cv . Wuhebaijixin , and cv .Meirenzhi and 86 % for cv .Yongyou F1 on the GS medium containing 6-BA 1.0 mgL-1 or 6-BA 2.0 mgL-1 .When the buds grew 1.0 ～ 1.5cm , they were transferred to the MS medium supplemented with IAA 0.05 mgL-1 or 6-BA 1.0mgL-1 orGA 2.0 mgL-1 with the differentiation rate of 80 % ～ 86 % and the proliferation multiple of 4 for this three varieties and the shoots grew vigor , which were the most favourite medium for the induction and differention of buds in this test .If the grape of Wuhebaijixin was changed into the 1/2 MS medium containing IBA 1.0 mgL-1 and Meirenzhi and Yongyou F1 were changed into 1/2 MS medium containing IBA 2.0 mgL-1 , the shoots developed nice roots with rooting rate of 84 %～ 96 % and rooting number of 5 ～ 7 .These media were the most significant for roting in all treatments .
  • [1] YE Wen, YUAN Chaoqun, QIN Wei, WANG Zhentao, ZHU Yuqiu.  Optimization of regeneration system of stem segments of Nandina domestica 'Firepower' in vitro culture . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(2): 391-396. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2020.02.026
    [2] HU Jiahui, WANG Xiaode.  Induction, proliferation, and differentiation of Acer yangjuechi callus . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2018, 35(5): 975-980. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.05.024
    [3] RUAN Huize, LI Zhen, REN Yanyan, WU Xiaonan, SHAO Yuhao, PAN Feixiang, XIA Guohua.  Plantlet regeneration of Hemiboea subcapitata with subculturing . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2014, 31(1): 162-166. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2014.01.025
    [4] ZHOU Yanqing, DING Lan, XU Buqing, XIA Guohua, CUI Yongyi.  Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Ficus pandurata var.angustifolia with different plant growth regulators . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(3): 453-458. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.03.024
    [5] CHEN Jialong, ZHU Jianjun, WU Xiushui, YU Hong′ao.  Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Caragana sinica . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(4): 611-614. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.04.022
    [6] HANG Lu-lu, ZHANG Nan, JI Meng-cheng.  Haplocladium microphyllum spore germination with different culture mediums and sucrose concentrations . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2012, 29(3): 383-387. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.03.009
    [7] XU Yong, SUN Jun-wei, CHEN Zhen.  Plant growth regulator treatments for a tissue culture of Euodia rutaecarpa . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(3): 500-504. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.03.024
    [8] CHENG Ying, LI Gen-you, XIA Guo-hua, HUANG Shang-jue, HUANG Yu-feng.  Review on tissue culture of Aralia plants . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(6): 968-972. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.06.022
    [9] ZHANG Nan, DU Bao-ming, JI Meng-cheng.  Research progress on the bryophytes tissue culture . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(2): 305-313. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.02.022
    [10] LEI Zu-pei, YU Hong-ao, ZHANG Shu-run, LIN Rui-feng, KANG Hua-jing.  Hemsleya zhejiangensis seedling culture with two hormones and four types of medium . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(4): 662-666. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2011.04.022
    [11] YANG Hai-yun, GUI Ren-yi, TANG Ding-qin, FANG Wei.  Micropropagation of Sasa fortunei . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(2): 255-258.
    [12] SHAO Guo-yuan, QIN Guo-xin, WU Yu-kun, JI Kun.  Effects of leaf number on fruit quality of Vitis vinifera in greenhouse . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(6): 656-659.
    [13] LIU Zhi-gao, CHU Jia-miao, GAO Yan-hui, ZHANG Lu, .  Tissue culture in vitro of Lycoris albiflora . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(3): 347-350.
    [14] GAO Yan-hui, TONG Zai-kang, HUANG Hua-hong, GUO Fu-qi, YU Chong-yan.  Tissue culture on Trachelospermum jasminoides `Variegatum' . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(6): 701-704.
    [15] YU Xiao-li, WANG Zheng-de, LIU Hui-juan, YANG Ke-jin.  Plant regeneration in vitro from shoots explants of Rosa banksiae var .normalis . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2005, 22(4): 410-413.
    [16] HUANG Jian-qin.  Difference and de-difference of vegetable cell . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2001, 18(1): 89-92.
    [17] ZHU Yu-qiu, WANG Xue-gen.  Fast propagation techniques of Beltilla ochracea by means of tissue cultures . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1999, 16(2): 164-169.
    [18] Zhang Liqin, Zheng Yong ping, Luo Shiyuan, Hu Jiagong..  Salt Tolerance of Calli of Populus Clones and Pinus elliottii in Tissue Cultures . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1997, 14(1): 16-21.
    [19] Hu Chaozong, Jin Aiwu, Zhang Zhuowen.  Change of Endohormone In Mixed Bud on Lei Bamboo Rhizome during Differentiation . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1996, 13(1): 1-4.
    [20] Zhang Liqin, Zheng YongPing, Jin Peiying.  selection of Salt Tolerance poplar Regenerated plant-lets in Tissues Culture. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1996, 13(4): 397-404.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0400.250.50.7511.25Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 22.1 %FULLTEXT: 22.1 %META: 77.3 %META: 77.3 %PDF: 0.6 %PDF: 0.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.0 %其他: 7.0 %其他: 1.0 %其他: 1.0 %Austin: 0.2 %Austin: 0.2 %Baden: 0.1 %Baden: 0.1 %Ballwin: 0.0 %Ballwin: 0.0 %Beauharnois: 0.0 %Beauharnois: 0.0 %Canton: 0.0 %Canton: 0.0 %Cedar Rapids: 0.0 %Cedar Rapids: 0.0 %China: 1.0 %China: 1.0 %Dallas: 0.0 %Dallas: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Egypt: 0.0 %Egypt: 0.0 %Gwynn Oak: 0.1 %Gwynn Oak: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.1 %Hollywood: 0.1 %Hollywood: 0.1 %Hungary: 0.0 %Hungary: 0.0 %Jonquiere: 0.0 %Jonquiere: 0.0 %Lewisburg: 0.0 %Lewisburg: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.2 %Malvern: 0.2 %Nahant: 0.0 %Nahant: 0.0 %Norman: 0.1 %Norman: 0.1 %Pompano Beach: 0.1 %Pompano Beach: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Saudi Arabia: 0.0 %Saudi Arabia: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %Slovakia (SLOVAK Republic): 0.0 %Slovakia (SLOVAK Republic): 0.0 %Sunset: 0.0 %Sunset: 0.0 %Sydney Mines: 0.0 %Sydney Mines: 0.0 %United Kingdom: 0.1 %United Kingdom: 0.1 %United States: 0.4 %United States: 0.4 %Valencia: 0.1 %Valencia: 0.1 %[]: 1.4 %[]: 1.4 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东莞: 0.0 %东莞: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %乌兰察布: 0.0 %乌兰察布: 0.0 %乌海: 0.0 %乌海: 0.0 %乔治敦: 0.0 %乔治敦: 0.0 %亳州: 0.1 %亳州: 0.1 %代顿: 0.0 %代顿: 0.0 %伊犁哈萨克自治州: 0.0 %伊犁哈萨克自治州: 0.0 %伊萨卡: 0.0 %伊萨卡: 0.0 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯敦: 0.2 %佛罗里达: 0.0 %佛罗里达: 0.0 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %兰辛: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %凤凰城: 0.1 %凤凰城: 0.1 %利雅德: 0.0 %利雅德: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.2 %加利福尼亚州: 0.2 %加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚: 0.0 %加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚: 0.0 %加拿大卡尔加里: 0.1 %加拿大卡尔加里: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 13.2 %北京: 13.2 %匹兹堡: 0.2 %匹兹堡: 0.2 %十堰: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %华盛顿: 0.0 %华盛顿: 0.0 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南平: 0.0 %南平: 0.0 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南阳: 0.1 %南阳: 0.1 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %博阿努瓦: 0.0 %卡斯托里亚: 0.0 %卡斯托里亚: 0.0 %卡罗尔顿: 0.0 %卡罗尔顿: 0.0 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %吉达: 0.0 %吉达: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %圣保罗: 0.0 %圣保罗: 0.0 %圣克劳德: 0.0 %圣克劳德: 0.0 %圣巴巴拉: 0.1 %圣巴巴拉: 0.1 %圣路易斯: 0.1 %圣路易斯: 0.1 %坦佩: 0.1 %坦佩: 0.1 %大连: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %天津: 0.1 %天津: 0.1 %奥兰多: 0.0 %奥兰多: 0.0 %奥马哈: 0.0 %奥马哈: 0.0 %安德森: 0.0 %安德森: 0.0 %密蘇里城: 0.9 %密蘇里城: 0.9 %巴吞鲁日: 0.0 %巴吞鲁日: 0.0 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %延安: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %弗林特: 0.1 %弗林特: 0.1 %张家口: 1.0 %张家口: 1.0 %恩施土家族苗族自治州: 0.1 %恩施土家族苗族自治州: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %成都: 0.1 %扬州: 0.0 %扬州: 0.0 %拉普拉斯: 0.1 %拉普拉斯: 0.1 %斯托姆莱克: 0.0 %斯托姆莱克: 0.0 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %新伦敦: 0.0 %新伦敦: 0.0 %昆明: 0.0 %昆明: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %杭州: 1.8 %杭州: 1.8 %松原: 0.0 %松原: 0.0 %林奇堡: 0.1 %林奇堡: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.0 %武汉: 0.2 %武汉: 0.2 %汉堡: 0.1 %汉堡: 0.1 %波兰华沙: 0.0 %波兰华沙: 0.0 %泸州: 0.0 %泸州: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.2 %洛杉矶: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %深圳: 0.1 %深圳: 0.1 %渥太华: 0.0 %渥太华: 0.0 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %爱迪生: 0.0 %爱迪生: 0.0 %特拉维夫: 0.1 %特拉维夫: 0.1 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.1 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.1 %纳什维尔: 0.1 %纳什维尔: 0.1 %纽卡斯尔: 0.1 %纽卡斯尔: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %罗利: 0.1 %罗利: 0.1 %美国佛罗里达奥卡拉: 0.0 %美国佛罗里达奥卡拉: 0.0 %美国佛罗里达迈阿密: 0.0 %美国佛罗里达迈阿密: 0.0 %美国俄亥俄: 0.0 %美国俄亥俄: 0.0 %美国阿拉巴马塔斯卡卢萨: 0.0 %美国阿拉巴马塔斯卡卢萨: 0.0 %舟山: 0.0 %舟山: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 6.5 %芒廷维尤: 6.5 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.2 %蒙哥马利: 0.0 %蒙哥马利: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %西宁: 54.1 %西宁: 54.1 %西安: 0.0 %西安: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %达州: 0.0 %达州: 0.0 %达拉斯: 0.0 %达拉斯: 0.0 %迈尔斯堡: 0.0 %迈尔斯堡: 0.0 %运城: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %鄂尔多斯: 0.1 %鄂尔多斯: 0.1 %里弗赛德: 0.0 %里弗赛德: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %铜仁: 0.0 %铜仁: 0.0 %长沙: 0.1 %长沙: 0.1 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %阿伦敦: 0.0 %阿伦敦: 0.0 %阿布奎基: 0.1 %阿布奎基: 0.1 %青岛: 0.0 %青岛: 0.0 %魁北克: 0.0 %魁北克: 0.0 %黔西南: 0.1 %黔西南: 0.1 %其他其他AustinBadenBallwinBeauharnoisCantonCedar RapidsChinaDallasDoylestownEgyptGwynn OakHamiltonHollywoodHungaryJonquiereLewisburgMalvernNahantNormanPompano BeachRochesterSaudi ArabiaSeattleSlovakia (SLOVAK Republic)SunsetSydney MinesUnited KingdomUnited StatesValencia[]上海东莞临汾乌兰察布乌海乔治敦亳州代顿伊犁哈萨克自治州伊萨卡休斯敦佛罗里达保定兰辛凤凰城利雅德加利福尼亚州加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚加拿大卡尔加里包头北京匹兹堡十堰华盛顿南京南平南昌南阳博阿努瓦卡斯托里亚卡罗尔顿厦门台州吉达呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴圣保罗圣克劳德圣巴巴拉圣路易斯坦佩大连天津奥兰多奥马哈安德森密蘇里城巴吞鲁日布雷登顿布鲁克林区常州广州延安弗林特张家口恩施土家族苗族自治州成都扬州拉普拉斯斯托姆莱克新乡新伦敦昆明晋城杭州松原林奇堡森尼韦尔武汉汉堡波兰华沙泸州洛杉矶洛阳深圳渥太华温州湖州漯河潍坊爱迪生特拉维夫瑟普赖斯石家庄福州科珀斯克里斯蒂纳什维尔纽卡斯尔纽瓦克纽约绍兴罗利美国佛罗里达奥卡拉美国佛罗里达迈阿密美国俄亥俄美国阿拉巴马塔斯卡卢萨舟山芒廷维尤苏州莫斯科蒙哥马利蚌埠衢州西宁西安贵阳达州达拉斯迈尔斯堡运城郑州鄂尔多斯里弗赛德重庆金华铜仁长沙长治阳泉阿伦敦阿布奎基青岛魁北克黔西南Highcharts.com

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 宫正. 黄土高原森林林下植被物种多样性及其影响因素. 东北林业大学学报. 2025(02): 66-74 .
    2. 郭艳杰，毕华兴，赵丹阳，刘泽晖，林丹丹，韩金丹，黄浩博. 不同密度油松林地土壤水碳分布特征及其耦合关系. 应用生态学报. 2025(01): 50-58 .
    3. 王宇，王冬梅，王彦辉，云慧雅，张梦棋，张莹莹. 黄土高原退耕刺槐中龄林密度和空间结构对灌草多样性的影响. 生态学报. 2025(02): 822-836 .
    4. 张犇，赵廷宁，张海强，杨建英，贾亚倢，赵炯昌，胡亚伟，李阳. 晋西黄土区不同坡向刺槐林下植物种间关联及群落稳定性. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(05): 19-27 .
    5. 李志鑫. 陇东黄土高原刺槐林分特征和林下灌草多样性对林分密度的响应. 甘肃林业科技. 2024(03): 45-50+83 .
    6. 杨扬，彭祚登，刘伟韬，王鑫喆，王书婷，王少明. 不同经营世代刺槐人工林多功能经营的密度管理图研建. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(10): 11-21 .
    7. 贾亚倢，杨建英，张建军，胡亚伟，张犇，赵炯昌，李阳，唐鹏. 晋西黄土区林分密度对油松人工林生物量及土壤理化性质的影响. 浙江农林大学学报. 2024(06): 1211-1221 . 本站查看
    8. 王思淇，张建军，张彦勤，赵炯昌，胡亚伟，李阳，唐鹏，卫朝阳. 晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林下植物群落物种多样性. 干旱区研究. 2023(07): 1141-1151 .
    9. 李转桃，徐先英，赵鹏，罗永忠. 海拔对祁连山东段青海云杉林林下灌草多样性的影响. 植物资源与环境学报. 2023(06): 59-66 .
    10. 刘春梅，韩东苗，陈水莲，谭瑞坤，赵苗菲，龚昕怡. 林下套种草珊瑚栽培技术. 安徽农学通报. 2023(21): 51-54 .

    Other cited types(3)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Get Citation
PDF
XML

Article views(1466) PDF downloads(175) Cited by(13)

Related
Proportional views

Tissue culture and propagation in grape

  • 1. Department of Life Science , Zhejiang Wanli University , Ningbo 315101, Zhejiang , China
Funds:

浙江省宁波市重点实验室基金资助项目(9941004)

  • Received Date: 2000-08-28
  • Rev Recd Date: 2001-02-05
  • Publish Date: 2001-06-20

Abstract: Taking the stems of 0.5 cm with single bud as the explants to the different culturemediums , the results showed that the rates of differentiation of buds that were the highest in all treatments were 100 % for cv . Wuhebaijixin , and cv .Meirenzhi and 86 % for cv .Yongyou F1 on the GS medium containing 6-BA 1.0 mgL-1 or 6-BA 2.0 mgL-1 .When the buds grew 1.0 ～ 1.5cm , they were transferred to the MS medium supplemented with IAA 0.05 mgL-1 or 6-BA 1.0mgL-1 orGA 2.0 mgL-1 with the differentiation rate of 80 % ～ 86 % and the proliferation multiple of 4 for this three varieties and the shoots grew vigor , which were the most favourite medium for the induction and differention of buds in this test .If the grape of Wuhebaijixin was changed into the 1/2 MS medium containing IBA 1.0 mgL-1 and Meirenzhi and Yongyou F1 were changed into 1/2 MS medium containing IBA 2.0 mgL-1 , the shoots developed nice roots with rooting rate of 84 %～ 96 % and rooting number of 5 ～ 7 .These media were the most significant for roting in all treatments .

YUN Huiya, BI Huaxing, JIAO Zhenhuan, et al. Composition and diversity of understory plants under different stand types and densities in loess region of western Shanxi Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(3): 569-578. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220433
Citation: WU Yue-yan, TAO Wei-fang. Tissue culture and propagation in grape[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2001, 18(2): 188-192.
shu

    HTML

Catalog

  • HTML

浙ICP备11046845号

Copyright by 2019 Editorial Department of Journal of Zhejiang A&F University

Address: No. 666, Wu Su street, Ling'an District, Hangzhou, ZhejiangPost Code: 311300Tel: 0571-63732749

E-Mail: :zlxb@zafu.edu.cn

Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return