Green-belt soil testing methods for porosity and the importance of porosity on soil fertility evaluation

WU Haibing; LI Aiping; FANG Hailan; HAO Guanjun

doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.014

Volume 32 Issue 1

Jan. 2015

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Zhejiang A&F University > 2015 > 32(1): 98-103

WU Haibing, LI Aiping, FANG Hailan, HAO Guanjun. Green-belt soil testing methods for porosity and the importance of porosity on soil fertility evaluation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 98-103. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.014

Citation:

WU Haibing, LI Aiping, FANG Hailan, HAO Guanjun. Green-belt soil testing methods for porosity and the importance of porosity on soil fertility evaluation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(1): 98-103. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.014

Green-belt soil testing methods for porosity and the importance of porosity on soil fertility evaluation

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.014

1.
Shanghai Institute of Landscape Gardening, Shanghai 200232, China;
2.
College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2014-04-14
Rev Recd Date: 2014-05-27
Publish Date: 2015-02-20

Abstract

In order to discuss the influence of different testing methods for soil porosity and the importance of porosity on soil fertility. First, using typical green-belt soils and natural soils from Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, two soil porosity testing methods, the agriculture method （NY） and the forestry method （LY） were compared. Then, the former Shanghai World Exposition Site was used to evaluate the influence on the fertility of green-belt soils by the main physical properties. Results for green-belt soils showed that except for capillary porosity, total porosity and non-capillary porosity with the NY method was much higher than the LY method（P＜0.05）. For natural soils, no porosity differences were found when comparing the two methods（P＞0.05）. Thus, in green-belt soils, the LY method was more suitable for testing porosities. Results of the green-belt soil fertility evaluation showed that non-capillary porosity influenced soil fertility evaluation more than soil bulk density（P＜0.01）. To evaluate the fertility of green-belt soils, non-capillary porosity should be applied as an important index.［Ch，1 fig. 2 tab. 22 ref.］
- soil science,
- green-belt soil,
- agriculture method,
- forestry method,
- non-capillary porosity,
- soil fertility

Relative Article

[1]	SUN Jingyu, SUN Xiangyang, LI Suyan, WANG Chenchen, YUE Zongwei. Sources and contamination assessment of heavy metals in the green land soils in Tongzhou District, Beijing . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2024, 41(3): 517-525. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230435
[2]	BAO Jie, JIANG Feng, MA Jiawei, XU Yan, MA Yuanrui, CHEN Chuwen, YE Zhengqian, LIU Dan. CiteSpace visualization analysis of urban green space soil research literature . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(3): 685-694. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210624
[3]	LIU Zongyue, LÜ Shixin, XU Junjie, CHEN Xu, LOU Yikai, QI Xiangbin, YU Shuquan. Effects of clear-cutting and harvest residue of Phyllostachys edulis forests on soil quality . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(6): 1289-1295. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20220122
[4]	XIE Linfeng, LING Xiaoxiao, HUANG Shengyan, GAO Haozhan, WU Jiasen, CHEN Junhui, HUANG Jianqin, QIN Hua. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil hydrolase activities and soil fertility evaluation of Carya cathayensis forests in Lin’an District . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2022, 39(3): 625-634. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210417
[5]	HU Yingbing, JIN Jin, TONG Zhipeng, WU Jiasen. Soil fertility in Carya cathayensis plantation: a review . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(5): 1066-1075. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210501
[6]	WU Haibing, HE Xiaoli, LIANG Jing. Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility in relocated land for landscaping . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2021, 38(5): 1076-1081. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20200753
[7]	YAN Liangliang, YUE Kun, SONG Lihua. Correlation between fruit quality and soil fertility and leaf nutrients of Zizyphus jujuba ‘Lingwuchangzao’ . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(4): 631-638. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190462
[8]	JIANG Shikun, ZHOU Yunchao, TAN Wei, CHEN Zhu, HUANG Jianfeng. Soil fertility of Pinus massoniana forests under different near-natural management measures . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2020, 37(5): 876-882. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20190549
[9]	CAI Yu, WANG Jingyan, GONG Wei, LÜ Xiangnan, SHU Zhengyue, YAN Siyu, ZHAO Changping. Raising chickens in citrus orchards on fractal features of soil aggregates . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2017, 34(2): 225-232. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.02.004
[10]	MA Shanshan, ZHAO Keli, DING Lizhong, HUANG Sha, CAI Ling, ZHAO Weiming, YE Zhengqian. Soil fertility in Carya cathayensis orchards for major towns of Lin'an City, China . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2016, 33(6): 953-960. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.06.005
[11]	XU Li, ZHOU Wei, YU Yuanchun, WANG Mei, HOU Wenjun, XU Changbai, DAI Cheng. Soil properties and poplar growth with pig manure biogas slurry . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2015, 32(2): 204-207. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.02.006
[12]	LIANG Jing, FANG Hailan, HAO Guanjun, SUN Qian. Soil respiration for different plant communities in an urban green-belt of Shanghai . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2013, 30(1): 22-31. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2013.01.004
[13]	JIANG Jun-ming, ZHU Wei-shuang, LIU Guo-hua, FEI Shi-ming, CHEN Xiu-ming. Soil fertility in a Phyllostachys pubescens forest of southern Sichuan . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2008, 25(4): 486-490.
[14]	ZHOU Guo-mo, LIU En-bin, SHE Guang-hui. Summary of estimated methods on forest soil's carbon pool . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(2): 207-216.
[15]	HUANG Yong-lai. Soil fertility improvement in mixed forests of Liquidambar formosana with other tree species . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2006, 23(5): 497-500.
[16]	CAI Li-ping, XIE Jing-sheng, LIN Jing-yi, CHEN Guang-shui. Effect on different harness measures on lateritic red soil fertility in south subtropical zone . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2001, 18(2): 131-135.
[17]	Qiu Renhui, Zhou Xinnian, Yang Yusheng. Effect of Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil on High- lead Cableway Logging. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1998, 15(1): 37-41.
[18]	Liu Aiqin, Ma Xiangqing, Yu Lixuan, Luo Xuemei. Effects of different mixed model son soil fertility in plantations of Pinus massoniana . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1998, 15(3): 250-255.
[19]	Lin Kaimin, Lin Guoqing, Zhang Shenlong, Yu Lixuan.. Differences of soil Fertility between Nautral Broadleaved Forest and Replanted Chinese Fir Forest. . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1995, 12(2): 221-225.
[20]	Lin Ping, Ye Zhenghuan, Zhu Changle, Hou Jianyu.. Soil Fertility in Repeated Planting Cryptomeria fortunei Land . Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 1994, 11(2): 138-142.

References
Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(2726) PDF downloads(868) Cited by()

Proportional views

Green-belt soil testing methods for porosity and the importance of porosity on soil fertility evaluation

1. Shanghai Institute of Landscape Gardening, Shanghai 200232, China;

2. College of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2014-04-14

Rev Recd Date: 2014-05-27

Publish Date: 2015-02-20

Key words:

Abstract: In order to discuss the influence of different testing methods for soil porosity and the importance of porosity on soil fertility. First, using typical green-belt soils and natural soils from Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, two soil porosity testing methods, the agriculture method （NY） and the forestry method （LY） were compared. Then, the former Shanghai World Exposition Site was used to evaluate the influence on the fertility of green-belt soils by the main physical properties. Results for green-belt soils showed that except for capillary porosity, total porosity and non-capillary porosity with the NY method was much higher than the LY method（P＜0.05）. For natural soils, no porosity differences were found when comparing the two methods（P＞0.05）. Thus, in green-belt soils, the LY method was more suitable for testing porosities. Results of the green-belt soil fertility evaluation showed that non-capillary porosity influenced soil fertility evaluation more than soil bulk density（P＜0.01）. To evaluate the fertility of green-belt soils, non-capillary porosity should be applied as an important index.［Ch，1 fig. 2 tab. 22 ref.］

Green-belt soil testing methods for porosity and the importance of porosity on soil fertility evaluation

doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.01.014

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Related

Proportional views